Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into feat/search-presenter

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.md
+2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.md: d6f4785e83335ca2dd5295516baf47c845ebf5bd
+2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.zh.md: ed95cbe39f4f0bf77ba5da64d664705a0841863f

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Agent Note: Web result card frontend — rendering the web render intent in the browser
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The `web_search` and `web_fetch` tools declare a `card: 'web'` result view ([web result card](2026-07-30-web-result-card.md)): a `kind`-tagged union carrying either the structured cited sources plus an optional provider answer (`kind: 'search'`) or the fetched URL and its HTTP status (`kind: 'fetch'`). That view already reaches the browser — host, connection, and runtime deliver it onto `ConversationSnapshot` as `resultView` — but the Web client ignored it: a completed web call rendered only as its flattened model-facing text, the same lossy render the contract note explains the structured view exists to replace. A `web_search` reached the reader as one free-text markdown line per source rather than a citation list of clickable sources, and a `web_fetch` as its markdown body with no retrieval summary.
+
+## Decision
+
+`WebBlock` is a `ui-primitives` component that renders a completed web retrieval, and every Web render site for a web call consumes the `web` render intent through it: the keyed chat tool rows (`web_search`/`web_fetch`), the `GenericToolCard` render-site fallback, and the details panel's Output section. `ui-conversation/src/client/contract/web-card-model.ts` is the single place that turns the snapshot's `resultView` into the component's props, mirroring `terminal-card-model.ts`, so no two sites disagree about what a web call shows. It returns null — the generic path — for a running call (the web card is result-only, since the tools keep a generic pending view), for a settled call whose result view is not a web card including a `card` value this client version does not know (which arrives over the wire and so cannot be trusted to be a compiled variant), for a generic result view (a web tool's error path returns the generic card, whose text the generic path preserves), and for a web card whose `kind` this client version does not know (a newer host's value off the wire, which reading as a fetch would draw as an empty URL and `HTTP undefined`).
+
+One component draws both kinds, discriminated by `kind`. A `search` shows the answer as markdown above a citation list; each source is a safe external link labelled by its title, or its hostname when the provider gave none, with the snippet and publication date below it, and a `来源列表已截断` indicator when the tool capped the list. A `fetch` shows a compact summary: the linked final URL, its HTTP status, and a `内容已截断` indicator. One component rather than two because both are web retrieval rendered as one card family, which is exactly the reason the contract carries them under one `card` tag with a `kind` discriminant.
+
+**Links are safe by the http(s) subset of the allowlist MarkdownText applies to untrusted assistant-authored links** — MarkdownText also permits `mailto:`, deliberately excluded here since a retrieval URL is never a mail address. A source or fetch URL becomes a navigable anchor only when its protocol is `http:` or `https:`, with `target="_blank"` and `rel="noopener noreferrer"`; a `javascript:`/`data:`/`file:`/`mailto:` URL or an unparseable string renders as plain text with no href. The result content a web tool returns is model-authored and reaches this component unverified, so it is treated as untrusted exactly as assistant markdown is. The label falls back from title to hostname to the raw URL, so a source always reads as something even when both the title is absent and the URL does not parse.
+
+**Geometry mirrors CodeBlock/TerminalBlock** (12px radius, code-block surface, 16px vertical margin) so a web card reads as one family with them. A long source list caps at `maxSources` with a head/tail collapse using TerminalBlock's exact split arithmetic (`ceil(max/2)` head lines plus the remaining tail), so a long body's slices agree between the two cards. A source list is prose rather than column-aligned output, so it wraps normally instead of scrolling horizontally the way a terminal card's output does — that is the one deliberate divergence from TerminalBlock.
+
+The card is **resident** under the summary row in the chat rows, capped at `CHAT_WEB_MAX_SOURCES` (8) — half the primitive's own default of 16, which the details panel keeps — the same summary-surface-versus-reading-surface split `CHAT_TERMINAL_MAX_LINES` draws for the terminal card, and the same resident posture `BashRow` uses. The keyed rows register one `WebRow` component under both `web_search` and `web_fetch`; the row discriminates on the tool name only to pick its icon (search vs. browse) and its title (`Search`/`Fetch`). A web-declaring tool without its own keyed row lands on `GenericToolCard`, which grows the same resident card. The details panel renders the card at the primitive's full source allowance and, below it, the flattened model-visible result content: a `web_fetch` card carries only the URL and status, so its fetched body is readable only here.
+
+## Consequences
+
+`WebBlock` reads only the web view's fields, so it stays a pure function of what the render intent carries — no session lookups, replay-safe like the presenters that produce the view, and unlike the terminal card it needs no cwd resolution because a web view carries no path. A UI without the `web` capability (the TUI) still gets the contract's fallback `content`; nothing about the tools' result shape changed. `MarkdownText` is reused for the answer, so the answer's own untrusted-link handling and GFM rendering come for free.
+
+A separate later PR unifies the whole-row collapse/expand interaction and will flip every resident card (terminal, diff, web) to expand-gated at once; this card follows the current resident convention rather than pre-empting that change.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Two components, one per kind.** Rejected: the two shapes share their card chrome, their safe-link handling, and their truncation indicator, and the contract already expresses their difference as a `kind` discriminant under one `card` tag; two components would duplicate the shared surface and split the safe-link logic.
+
+**Reparse the model-facing render text instead of consuming the structured view.** Rejected for the same reason the contract note gives: `web_search`'s render collapses each source's fields into one free-text line labelled by title OR hostname, so reparsing cannot recover `{url, title?, snippet?, publishedAt?}`. The structured `resultView` is the only faithful source, which is why the backend PR added it.
+
+**Render plain anchors without the protocol allowlist.** Rejected: the URL is model-authored and unverified at this seam, so an unfiltered href would let a `javascript:` URL execute on click. The allowlist is the http(s) subset of MarkdownText's (which also permits `mailto:`), so untrusted retrieval links behave identically wherever they render.
+
+## Testing
+
+`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/web-block.spec.tsx` pins the component per-file to the 100% gate: both kinds; the title-or-hostname-or-raw-URL label fallback; the safe-link attributes on both kinds (an http(s) URL becoming an external anchor with `target`/`rel`, a `javascript:`/`file:`/unparseable URL rendering as a plain span with no href); the snippet and date shown or omitted on present/empty/absent; the truncation indicator gated on the flag; and the source-list height cap with its head/tail slice and expand/collapse control including the default cap.
+
+`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/web-card.spec.tsx` mirrors `terminal-card.spec.tsx` at every wiring seam: `webCardModel`'s derivation projecting every source field, its truncation and absent-answer arms, the fetch derivation, and each null arm (running, null result view, generic result view, unknown card tag, unknown web `kind`); the keyed `WebRow`'s resident card for both kinds capped tighter than the panel, its summary-row-alone running and failed arms; the `GenericToolCard` fallback growing the resident card for a web-declaring tool and keeping the plain row for a non-web call; the details panel's Output section for both kinds — including a `web_fetch`'s body flattened below its URL/status card — and its flattened fallback for a non-web result; and the keyed registration under both `web_search` and `web_fetch` with one component. That file sits on the coverage `exclude` list (`ui-conversation/src/*`), so a coverage run measures none of it.
+
+The fixture (`packages/client/connection/src/client/fixture.ts`) adds turns 66 (`web_search`) and 67 (`web_fetch`), authored inline because the client-side fixture cannot import the web tool: turn 66's result view carries an answer and three sources exercising the citation list (a titled source with a snippet and date, a source with no title so its hostname labels the link, and a source with a date but no snippet) with the capped indicator on; turn 67's carries the fetched URL and a 200 status. Both keep a generic pending call view and add the `web` card only at result time, matching the contract's result-only web shape, and are named after the real tools so they hit the keyed `WebRow`. They are ordered before the todo turn (renumbered to 68) for the same reason the terminal turn is: the standing plan retires at the next `turn/start`, so a turn appended after it would empty the dock's plan strip. This drives the built-boot snapshot and a live `?fixture` server.
+
+## Related
+
+- [Web result card](2026-07-30-web-result-card.md) — the backend PR that added the `card: 'web'` result arm and made the two tools emit it; this is its deferred frontend consumer.
+- [Web terminal card](2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md) — the precedent this mirrors: a `ui-primitives` block, a single card-model derivation, keyed and fallback chat rows, and a details-panel arm, for the `terminal` render intent.
+- [Tagged render-intent union for tool-call presentation](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) — the `card`-tagged vocabulary; the Web client is now a full consumer of the `web` arm.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Agent Note: Web result 卡片前端 —— 在浏览器渲染 web 渲染意图
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-web-result-card-frontend.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+`web_search` 和 `web_fetch` 工具声明了 `card: 'web'` result view（[web result card](2026-07-30-web-result-card.md)）：一个 `kind` 标签联合,携带结构化的被引用 sources 加可选的 provider answer（`kind: 'search'`),或抓取的 URL 及其 HTTP 状态（`kind: 'fetch'`）。该视图早已抵达浏览器 —— host、connection、runtime 将它作为 `resultView` 投递到 `ConversationSnapshot` —— 但 Web 客户端忽略了它:一次已完成的 web 调用只渲染为摊平的模型可见文本,正是契约笔记所解释的、结构化视图要替代的那种有损渲染。`web_search` 到达读者时是每个 source 一行自由文本 markdown,而非可点击 source 的引用列表;`web_fetch` 是它的 markdown 正文,没有检索摘要。
+
+## Decision
+
+`WebBlock` 是一个 `ui-primitives` 组件,渲染一次已完成的 web 检索,web 调用的每个 Web 渲染点都通过它消费 `web` 渲染意图:键控的 chat 工具行（`web_search`/`web_fetch`）、`GenericToolCard` 渲染点兜底,以及详情面板的 Output 区。`ui-conversation/src/client/contract/web-card-model.ts` 是唯一把快照的 `resultView` 转成组件 props 的地方,镜像 `terminal-card-model.ts`,因此没有两个渲染点会对一次 web 调用的显示产生分歧。它返回 null —— 走通用路径 —— 对运行中的调用（web 卡片是 result-only 的,因为工具保留 generic pending 视图）、对 result view 不是 web 卡片的已结算调用（包括本客户端版本不认识的 `card` 值,它经 wire 抵达因而不能被信任为已编译的变体）、对 generic result view（web 工具的错误路径返回 generic 卡片,其文本由通用路径保留）、以及对本客户端版本不认识 `kind` 的 web 卡片（更新的 host 经 wire 发来的值,读作 fetch 会画出空 URL 和 `HTTP undefined`）。
+
+一个组件绘制两种 kind,由 `kind` 判别。`search` 把 answer 作为 markdown 显示在引用列表上方;每个 source 是一个安全外链,以其标题为标签,provider 未给标题时以其主机名为标签,下方是 snippet 与发布日期,工具截断列表时显示 `来源列表已截断` 提示。`fetch` 显示一个紧凑摘要:带链接的最终 URL、其 HTTP 状态、以及 `内容已截断` 提示。用一个组件而非两个,因为两者都是渲染为同一卡片族的 web 检索 —— 这正是契约把它们放在一个 `card` 标签下、用 `kind` 判别的原因。
+
+**链接的安全性沿用 MarkdownText 对不受信任的 assistant 链接所用 allowlist 的 http(s) 子集。** MarkdownText 还允许 `mailto:`，此处刻意排除，因为检索 URL 绝不会是邮件地址。一个 source 或 fetch URL 仅当其协议为 `http:` 或 `https:` 时才成为可导航锚点，带 `target="_blank"` 和 `rel="noopener noreferrer"`；`javascript:`/`data:`/`file:`/`mailto:` URL 或无法解析的字符串渲染为纯文本、无 href。web 工具返回的 result content 是模型创作的,未经验证抵达本组件,因此像 assistant markdown 一样被当作不受信任处理。标签从标题回退到主机名再回退到原始 URL,因此即便标题缺失且 URL 无法解析,source 也总能读作某个东西。
+
+**几何镜像 CodeBlock/TerminalBlock**（12px 圆角、code-block 表面、16px 垂直外边距）,使 web 卡片与它们读作一家。长 source 列表在 `maxSources` 处折叠,用 TerminalBlock 完全相同的分割算术做头/尾折叠（`ceil(max/2)` 头部行加剩余尾部）,使长正文的切片在两张卡之间一致。source 列表是散文而非按列对齐的输出,所以它正常换行,而不像终端卡片的输出那样横向滚动 —— 这是与 TerminalBlock 唯一刻意的分歧。
+
+卡片在 chat 行中**常驻**于摘要行之下,上限 `CHAT_WEB_MAX_SOURCES`（8）—— 原语自身默认 16 的一半,面板保留 16 —— 与 `CHAT_TERMINAL_MAX_LINES` 为终端卡片所画的摘要面对阅读面的同一划分,以及 `BashRow` 所用的同一常驻姿态。键控行把一个 `WebRow` 组件注册在 `web_search` 与 `web_fetch` 两个键下;行仅根据工具名判别以选取其图标（search 对 browse）与标题（`Search`/`Fetch`）。没有自己键控行的 web 声明工具落到 `GenericToolCard`,它长出同一张常驻卡片。详情面板以原语的完整 source 额度渲染卡片,并在其下方渲染摊平的模型可见结果内容:`web_fetch` 卡片只携带 URL 与状态,因此其抓取正文只在此处可读。
+
+## Consequences
+
+`WebBlock` 只读 web view 的字段,因此它是渲染意图所携带内容的纯函数 —— 无会话查找,与产出该视图的 presenter 一样回放安全,且不同于终端卡片它不需要 cwd 解析,因为 web view 不携带路径。没有 `web` 能力的 UI（TUI）仍得到契约的回退 `content`;工具的 result 形状没有任何改变。answer 复用 `MarkdownText`,因此 answer 自身的不受信任链接处理与 GFM 渲染免费获得。
+
+一条独立的后续 PR 会统一整行折叠/展开交互,并把每张常驻卡片（terminal、diff、web）一次性翻成 expand-gated;本卡片遵循当前的常驻约定,而非抢先做那次改动。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**两个组件,每种 kind 一个。** 拒绝:两种形状共享卡片外框、安全链接处理、截断提示,而契约已经把它们的差异表达为一个 `card` 标签下的 `kind` 判别;两个组件会重复共享表面并拆分安全链接逻辑。
+
+**重解析模型可见的渲染文本,而非消费结构化视图。** 因契约笔记给出的同一理由拒绝:`web_search` 的渲染把每个 source 的字段压缩成一行自由文本、以标题或主机名为标签,所以重解析无法恢复 `{url, title?, snippet?, publishedAt?}`。结构化的 `resultView` 是唯一忠实来源,这正是后端 PR 添加它的原因。
+
+**不加协议 allowlist 直接渲染裸锚点。** 拒绝:URL 在此接缝处是模型创作、未经验证的,所以未过滤的 href 会让 `javascript:` URL 在点击时执行。该 allowlist 是 MarkdownText allowlist（它还允许 `mailto:`）的 http(s) 子集,因此不受信任的检索链接无论在何处渲染都行为相同。
+
+## Testing
+
+`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/web-block.spec.tsx` 把组件钉到 per-file 100% 门槛:两种 kind;标题-或-主机名-或-原始 URL 的标签回退;两种 kind 上的安全链接属性（http(s) URL 成为带 `target`/`rel` 的外链,`javascript:`/`file:`/无法解析的 URL 渲染为无 href 的纯 span）;snippet 与日期在存在/为空/缺失时的显示或省略;由标志位控制的截断提示;以及 source 列表高度上限及其头/尾切片与展开/收起控件,含默认上限。
+
+`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/web-card.spec.tsx` 在每个接线接缝镜像 `terminal-card.spec.tsx`:`webCardModel` 的派生投影每个 source 字段、其截断与缺失 answer 的支路、fetch 派生、以及每个 null 支路（运行中、null result view、generic result view、未知 card 标签、未知 web `kind`）;键控 `WebRow` 对两种 kind 的常驻卡片、比面板收得更紧、其仅摘要行的运行中与失败支路;`GenericToolCard` 兜底为 web 声明工具长出常驻卡片、并为非 web 调用保持纯行;详情面板 Output 区对两种 kind —— 含 `web_fetch` 正文摊平在其 URL/状态卡片下方 —— 及其对非 web 结果的摊平回退;以及在 `web_search` 与 `web_fetch` 两键下用一个组件的键控注册。该文件位于覆盖率 `exclude` 列表（`ui-conversation/src/*`）,因此覆盖率运行不度量它。
+
+fixture（`packages/client/connection/src/client/fixture.ts`）添加 turn 66（`web_search`）与 67（`web_fetch`）,内联撰写,因为客户端 fixture 无法 import web 工具:turn 66 的 result view 携带一个 answer 与三个 source,演练引用列表（一个带 snippet 与日期的有标题 source、一个无标题因而以主机名标注链接的 source、一个有日期无 snippet 的 source）并开启截断提示;turn 67 携带抓取的 URL 与一个 200 状态。两者都保留 generic pending call view,仅在 result 时添加 `web` 卡片,匹配契约的 result-only web 形状,且以真实工具命名,使其命中键控 `WebRow`。它们被排在 todo turn（重编号为 68）之前,理由与终端 turn 相同:待定计划在下一个 `turn/start` 退休,所以排在其后的 turn 会清空 dock 的 plan strip。这驱动 built-boot snapshot 与一个实时 `?fixture` 服务。
+
+## Related
+
+- [Web result card](2026-07-30-web-result-card.md) —— 添加 `card: 'web'` result 支路并让两个工具发出它的后端 PR;本条是它推迟的前端消费者。
+- [Web terminal card](2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md) —— 本条所镜像的先例:一个 `ui-primitives` block、一处 card-model 派生、键控与兜底 chat 行、以及一个详情面板支路,用于 `terminal` 渲染意图。
+- [工具调用呈现的标签化 render-intent union](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) —— `card` 标签词汇;Web 客户端现在是 `web` 支路的完整消费者。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.md
+2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.md: 8208a20bee9b9ab8f1e73720790e3e5be4c27306
+2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.zh.md: 8ac115034f562fe96d53bdba010b05648d4d5947

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Agent Note: GUI Full access risk confirmation
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+Switching the web client to `danger-full-access` was a single click on either permission surface (the composer's Access chip and the `/permission` popup picker), with the preset shown as the title-cased machine name `Danger Full Access`. Full access reduces confirmation steps and lets the agent run sensitive operations, modify files, or execute external commands, so an accidental pick armed the most dangerous preset with no deliberate acknowledgement step.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Both permission surfaces gate `danger-full-access` behind one shared in-page `RiskConfirmation` dialog whose enabling action stays disabled until an explicit acknowledgement checkbox is checked; the preset renders under the product label `Full access`; every dismissal path submits nothing.**
+
+- `RiskConfirmation` (ui-primitives) is a controlled Modal composition: title, description, acknowledgement checkbox, cancel, and a confirm button disabled until `acknowledged`. It stays an in-page dialog — the Modal portals to this document's body and never opens a native or separate browser window that could land on another display. `Modal` gains a `contentClassName` seat so the warning body scrolls inside constrained mobile/landscape viewports while the action row stays fixed.
+- The composer chip (`PermissionSelect`, ui-conversation) intercepts a Full-access pick before the `/permission` submit: `confirmation`/`acknowledged` component state opens the dialog, confirm submits `/permission danger-full-access` through the same injected `command` path as every other pick, and cancel/Escape/close/mask leave the current preset untouched with the checkbox reset. The confirmation revokes itself when the session locks (`locked`/value-absent effect) and resets across task switches (`key={sessionId}` remount). Copy rides the standard `conversation` locale seat as `access.confirm.*` keys.
+- The `/permission` popup (ui-permission over the ui-command shell) gates through data, not a second dialog implementation: `SelectOption` grows an optional `confirmation` payload, the popup controller owns the `confirming`/`acknowledged` state transitions, and `PopupSelectView` swaps the picker card for the same `RiskConfirmation` while a gated option is pending.
+- `Full access` intentionally overrides the kebab-to-title display transform on both surfaces (option rows, trigger label, settled command rows keep the machine name on the wire); the warning body remains locale-aware in Chinese and English.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**A native/OS or separate-window confirmation.** Rejected: the dialog must stay inside the current WebUI window; a second window can appear on another display and detaches the decision from the page state it guards.
+
+**One shared locale namespace for both surfaces' safety copy.** Rejected: the ui-permission bundle and ui-conversation load independently, so each registers the same copy under its own namespace (`permission.access` beside the conversation dictionary); the duplication is fenced with an explanatory `jscpd:ignore` block rather than a cross-bundle import.
+
+**Gating in the host/permission backend.** Out of scope by design: the change is browser-client confirmation flow only; backend permission semantics, defaults, and the safer presets' one-click behavior are unchanged.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Every visible GUI path into Full access now requires a deliberate, informed acknowledgement, at the cost of one extra dialog step for users who genuinely want the preset. New pickers reuse the gate by attaching a `confirmation` payload (popup path) or the chip's state machine (composer path) instead of inventing bespoke dialogs. Acceptance: the composer flow's four gated cases in `input-bar.spec.tsx`, the popup gate in `popup-view.spec.tsx` and `popup.spec.ts`, the Modal/RiskConfirmation contract in `atoms.spec.tsx`, and the assembled `access-confirmation` web e2e whose golden pins the product-default Chinese dictionary copy.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Agent Note: GUI Full access 风险确认
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-31-gui-full-access-confirmation.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+Web 客户端切换到 `danger-full-access` 在两个权限面（编辑器的 Access chip 与 `/permission` popup 选择器）上都只需一次点击，且预设以 Title Case 机器名 `Danger Full Access` 展示。Full access 会减少确认步骤，允许智能体执行敏感操作、修改文件或运行外部命令，误点即在毫无刻意确认环节的情况下启用了最危险的预设。
+
+## Decision
+
+**两个权限面都把 `danger-full-access` 关进同一个共享的页面内 `RiskConfirmation` 对话框：启用按钮在用户勾选明确的风险确认复选框前保持禁用；预设以产品标签 `Full access` 展示；所有取消路径都不提交任何命令。**
+
+- `RiskConfirmation`（ui-primitives）是受控的 Modal 组合：标题、说明、确认复选框、取消，以及 `acknowledged` 勾选前禁用的确认按钮。它始终是页面内对话框——Modal portal 到本文档 body，绝不打开可能落在另一块显示器上的原生或独立浏览器窗口。`Modal` 新增 `contentClassName` 座位，令警示正文在受限的移动端／横屏视口内滚动，动作行保持固定。
+- 编辑器 chip（ui-conversation 的 `PermissionSelect`）在 `/permission` 提交前拦截 Full-access 选择：`confirmation`/`acknowledged` 组件状态打开对话框，确认后经与其他选择完全相同的注入 `command` 通道提交 `/permission danger-full-access`；取消、Escape、关闭与遮罩点击均保持当前预设不变并重置复选框。会话锁定时确认自行撤销（`locked`／值缺席 effect），切换任务时随 `key={sessionId}` 重挂载而重置。文案经标准 `conversation` locale 座位以 `access.confirm.*` 键供给。
+- `/permission` popup（ui-permission 骑在 ui-command 外壳上）以数据而非第二套对话框实现完成把关：`SelectOption` 新增可选的 `confirmation` 载荷，popup 控制器拥有 `confirming`/`acknowledged` 状态迁移，`PopupSelectView` 在门控选项未决期间把选择卡换成同一个 `RiskConfirmation`。
+- `Full access` 在两个面上有意覆盖 kebab 转 Title Case 的显示变换（选项行、触发器标签；落定的命令行仍在 wire 上保留机器名）；警示正文保持中英文 locale 感知。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**原生／操作系统或独立窗口确认。** 已拒：对话框必须留在当前 WebUI 窗口内；第二个窗口可能出现在另一块显示器上，使决策脱离其守护的页面状态。
+
+**两个面共享一个安全文案 locale namespace。** 已拒：ui-permission bundle 与 ui-conversation 可独立加载，故各自在自己的 namespace 下注册同一份文案（`permission.access` 与 conversation 词典并立）；这处重复以带说明的 `jscpd:ignore` 块圈护，而非跨 bundle import。
+
+**在 host／权限后端把关。** 设计上即出界：本变更只涉浏览器客户端确认流；后端权限语义、默认值与更安全预设的一键行为均不变。
+
+## Consequences
+
+进入 Full access 的每条可见 GUI 路径现在都要求刻意且知情的确认，代价是真想启用该预设的用户多一步对话框。新的选择器复用此门：popup 路径挂 `confirmation` 载荷、编辑器路径走 chip 的状态机，而不是各造对话框。验收：`input-bar.spec.tsx` 中编辑器流的四个门控用例、`popup-view.spec.tsx` 与 `popup.spec.ts` 的 popup 门、`atoms.spec.tsx` 的 Modal/RiskConfirmation 契约，以及组装态 `access-confirmation` web e2e——其 golden 钉住产品默认中文词典文案。