Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into xtr/react-loop-simplification

# Conflicts:
#	.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.i18n.yaml
#	docs/architecture.i18n.yaml
#	docs/architecture.md
#	docs/architecture.zh.md
#	docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml
#	docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.md
#	docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md
#	docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.i18n.yaml
#	docs/core-data-structures/session.i18n.yaml
#	docs/defensive-patterns.i18n.yaml
#	packages/acp/acp/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/runtime/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-goal/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/compact/compact-basic/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/context/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/context/README.md
#	packages/context/README.zh.md
#	packages/context/session-reference/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/context/session-reference/README.md
#	packages/context/session-reference/README.zh.md
#	packages/context/tmux-context/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/core/session/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/core/session/README.md
#	packages/core/session/README.zh.md
#	packages/goal/command-goal/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/goal/goal-session/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/goal/goal-session/README.zh.md
#	packages/guard/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/guard/README.md
#	packages/guard/README.zh.md
#	packages/guard/repeat-tool-guard/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/host/apiproxy/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/host/apiproxy/README.md
#	packages/host/apiproxy/README.zh.md
#	packages/plan/plan-mode/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/sdk/sdk-client/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/sdk/sdk-client/README.md
#	packages/sdk/sdk-client/README.zh.md
#	packages/session-persistence/session-persistence/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/README.i18n.yaml
#	python/sdk/README.i18n.yaml
This commit is contained in:
_Kerman
2026-08-05 20:43:30 +08:00
486 changed files with 2538 additions and 3002 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write packages/plan/plan-mode/README.md
README.md: cbd0f5a042a4ce67e10eb990189ad87329aaf9fb
README.zh.md: e876f547305ade0b4c2b8c69a302e0e0837094c3
README.md: 7273fa1a9be063e208596788eb4ca4f2bd3409a4
README.zh.md: 0878319545593948fcf04fbc3de518641e1ecfbe

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The review question declares the `plan-review` presentation intent, naming `Appr
When `ctx.commands` is composed, the package registers `/plan [message]` and reserves the exact argument `off` for direct exit. Bare `/plan` selects plan mode; any other non-empty argument selects it first and is then submitted through `agent.steer()`, so it becomes the next step's ordinary logged user message under plan guidance. `/plan off` selects inactive without sending model input; it also cancels a pending entry before plan mode reaches a request.
The TUI consumes the plugin-owned `/plan` command; other front doors may drive the same service directly without defining a second mode vocabulary.
The Web client consumes the plugin-owned `/plan` command; other front doors may drive the same service directly without defining a second mode vocabulary.
## Session projection
@@ -94,5 +94,4 @@ Mode transitions do not change the tool catalog; plan arguments and review resul
- Plan mode guides rather than enforces; deployments needing a hard boundary must combine independent sandbox and approval controls.
- A pending selection made while idle is lost if the process exits before the next boundary, so the UI must reapply it.
- Forked agents inherit logged plan state, while newly spawned agents begin inactive; there is no creation-time plan option.
- The `exit_plan_mode` review arc has one assembled-application snapshot, the Web `plan-review` e2e lane (submit → decision card → approved flip). The rejected-feedback and dismissed branches are covered by package tests only, and the TUI keyless scenarios exercise only `/plan` entry and `/plan off` exit.
- Only the Web UI renders the `plan-review` intent; the TUI presents the review through its generic question flow, which is answerable but does not read as a plan gate.
- Only the Web UI has a specialized `plan-review` renderer; another interaction provider may present the same request through its generic option flow.

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
组合 `ctx.commands` 时,该包会注册 `/plan [message]`,并将参数恰好为 `off` 的情况保留给直接退出。不带参数的 `/plan` 会启用 plan mode;任何其他非空参数都会先启用 plan mode,再通过 `agent.steer()` 提交,因此它会在 plan 引导下成为下一步骤的常规已记录用户消息。`/plan off` 会选择停用状态,不发送模型输入;它还可以在启用 plan mode 的待处理选择到达请求边界之前将其取消。
TUI 使用该插件提供的 `/plan` 命令;其他入口可以直接驱动同一服务,无需定义第二套 mode 词汇。
Web 客户端使用该插件提供的 `/plan` 命令;其他入口可以直接驱动同一服务,无需定义第二套 mode 词汇。
## 会话投影
@@ -94,5 +94,4 @@ mode 转换不改变工具目录;plan 参数与评审结果按常规方式扩
- Plan mode 只进行引导,而不强制执行;需要硬边界的部署必须组合独立的沙箱与批准控制。
- 如果进程在下一个边界之前退出,空闲时作出的待生效选择会丢失,因此 UI 必须重新应用它。
- Fork 的 agent 会继承已记录的 plan 状态,新 spawn 的 agent 则从未激活状态开始;不存在创建时 plan 选项。
- `exit_plan_mode` 评审弧有一个组装应用快照,即 Web `plan-review` e2e 通道(提交 → 决定卡片 → 已批准切换)。已拒绝反馈与放弃审阅两个分支仅由包测试覆盖,TUI 无密钥场景只演练 `/plan` 进入和 `/plan off` 退出。
- 只有 Web UI 渲染 `plan-review` 意图;TUI 通过其通用问题流程呈现该评审,可以回答,但读起来不像一个计划关口。
- 只有 Web UI 具备专用的 `plan-review` 渲染器;其他交互提供方可以通过通用选项流程呈现同一请求。