fix: client module loader report package resolve info

This commit is contained in:
imccyu
2026-07-30 16:52:54 +08:00
committed by imccyu
parent 1351565681
commit 4517aa349c
8 changed files with 144 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md: b0873b7aa7bccd3d613f3113fa18207770952e5d
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md: f3472dbfc5a78924e77337bf92ce5983c8492c4c
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md: 02347f2964942b89ec1f0a6ec483f4c2b2f9e68c
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md: ea927d35860fbbba567c47cea0ee3a45133ce0f4

View File

@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ What happens between `dsh web` starting and the UI appearing? Three stages: the
**Host side — compose the graph.**
1. The composing app (`apps/cli`) ships the roster as ordinary rows in its `cordis.yml` config tree — client plugin packages are entry rows like every host plugin, and `--dev` appends the `client-hmr` row in code (`AppCLIEntry`) before the settle/sweep so the fail-loud triple covers it. A roster row that fails to import is caught by the boot's `assertEntriesLoaded`.
2. The `dsh-client-modules` node half (the package is dual-face: its browser half is the module table) scans loader entries' package.json `dshClient` declarations and composes `window.__DSH_BOOT__`: `{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }`. The `inject` edges and the `immediately` mark come from manifests, never hand-copied. It refuses a declared plugin without a built `./client` bundle, and any malformed declaration field — activation-time fail loud (a FAILED fiber the sweep reports).
1. The composing app (`apps/cli`) ships the roster as ordinary rows in its `cordis.yml` config tree — client plugin packages are entry rows like every host plugin, and `--dev` appends the `client-hmr` row in code (`AppCLIEntry`) before the host activation audit so the same check covers it. A roster row that fails to import is caught by `assertEntriesLoaded`; a row whose fiber rejects is reported with its original stack by `assertEntriesActivated` ([host boot decision](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md)).
2. The `dsh-client-modules` node half (the package is dual-face: its browser half is the module table) scans loader entries' package.json `dshClient` declarations and composes `window.__DSH_BOOT__`: `{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }`. The `inject` edges and the `immediately` mark come from manifests, never hand-copied. It refuses declared plugins without built `./client` bundles and groups their package/path rows under one required source-build instruction; malformed declaration fields also fail activation, and the host audit reports either error from the FAILED fiber.
3. Scanning is incremental per package — there is no full-rescan code path. Each cordis `internal/plugin` emission marks the fiber's entry name dirty (entry-less fibers drop O(1)); a microtask flush reconciles each dirty name against live loader entries, with package metadata (including the negative "not a client package" verdict) cached per name forever and bundle re-hashing reachable only through `rebuilt(id)`. The activation pass seeds the same dirty set from current entries and flushes synchronously, so first scan and steady state share one implementation. Each bundle's content hash is its `rev` (cache busting + HMR diff anchor), the row set hashes into `graph.rev`, and every row is fetch-served: `/plugins/<id>/client.js?rev=…`. The graph types are single-sourced in the modules package's `./impl` export — the webserver knows nothing about the graph (it is a plain route-registration plugin; modules registers the bundle route and taps the index render itself).
Why is the roster yml rows and not a scan? Because which plugins compose into a deployment is a composition decision, not a package property — a dshClient package existing in the repo does not mean this deployment mounts it, so discovery-by-scan cannot make that call; the node half scans only what the tree actually mounted.

View File

@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ vendored Loader 经其 `internal` seam 消费模块系统——唯一调用点
**host 侧——组合这张图。**
1. 负责组合的 app`apps/cli`)把名册作为普通行放进它的 `cordis.yml` 配置树——client 插件包与每个 host 插件一样是 entry 行,`--dev` 由代码(`AppCLIEntry`)在 settle/sweep 之前追加 `client-hmr` 行,使 fail-loud 三件套一并覆盖它。名册行 import 失败由 boot 的 `assertEntriesLoaded` 捕获。
2. `dsh-client-modules` 的 node 半(该包是双面的:浏览器半就是模块表)扫描 loader entry 的 package.json `dshClient` 声明,组合出 `window.__DSH_BOOT__``{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }``inject` 边与 `immediately` 标记都来自 manifest永不人肉抄写。它拒绝声明了插件却没有已构建 `./client` bundle 的包,也拒绝任何畸形声明字段——激活期大声失败FAILED fiber由 sweep 上报)
1. 负责组合的 app`apps/cli`)把名册作为普通行放进它的 `cordis.yml` 配置树——client 插件包与每个 host 插件一样是 entry 行,`--dev` 由代码(`AppCLIEntry`)在 host 激活检查之前追加 `client-hmr` 行,使同一项检查覆盖它。名册行 import 失败由 `assertEntriesLoaded` 捕获fiber reject 的行则由 `assertEntriesActivated` 报告原始 stack[host boot 决策](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md)
2. `dsh-client-modules` 的 node 半(该包是双面的:浏览器半就是模块表)扫描 loader entry 的 package.json `dshClient` 声明,组合出 `window.__DSH_BOOT__``{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }``inject` 边与 `immediately` 标记都来自 manifest永不人肉抄写。它拒绝没有已构建 `./client` bundle 的已声明插件,并把它们的 package/path 行归到一条源码构建要求下;畸形声明字段同样会让激活失败host 检查会从 FAILED fiber 报告这两类错误
3. 扫描是单包增量——不存在全量重扫代码路径。每次 cordis `internal/plugin` 发射把该 fiber 的 entry 名标脏(无 entry 的 fiber O(1) 丢弃);微任务 flush 把每个脏名对账 live loader entries包元数据含「非 client 包」的否定结论按名永久缓存bundle 重哈希只经 `rebuilt(id)` 可达。激活趟从当前 entries 灌同一脏集合并同步 flush初扫与稳态共享一条实现。每个 bundle 的内容哈希是其 `rev`(缓存失效 + HMR diff 锚点),行集合哈希进 `graph.rev`,每一行都经 fetch 供给:`/plugins/<id>/client.js?rev=…`。图类型单源在 modules 包的 `./client` 出口——webserver 对图一无所知它是朴素路由注册插件bundle 路由和 index 渲染 tap 都由 modules 自己注册)。
为什么名册是 yml 行而不是扫描?因为哪些插件组合进一次部署是组合决策,不是包属性——一个 dshClient 包存在于仓库里不代表这次部署要挂载它扫描发现无从替人做这个决定node 半只扫描配置树实际挂载了的东西。