docs: audit package limitations on current stack
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The [documentation standard](../../../AGENTS.md) assigns limitations to the pack
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Every `packages/<group>/<pkg>/README.md` carries a canonical `## Known Limitations and Deferred Work` section: a condensed bullet list of consumer-visible gaps (unimplemented features, platform caveats, deliberate MVP cuts) and consciously postponed work (TODO markers, RFC deferrals still open). A `doc-sync` gate, `verify-readme-limitations` ([scripts/verify-readme-limitations.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-readme-limitations.ts)), enforces the shape per README: exactly one limitations-like heading, byte-equal to the canonical h2, with at least one top-level bullet. Near-miss headings at any level ("Limitations", "Deferred", "What is NOT here", …) fail the gate, so variant sections cannot creep back beside — or instead of — the canonical one.
|
||||
Every package manifest under `packages/<group>/<pkg>/package.json` has a sibling README carrying a canonical `## Known Limitations and Deferred Work` section: a condensed bullet list of consumer-visible gaps (unimplemented features, platform caveats, deliberate MVP cuts) and consciously postponed work (TODO markers, RFC deferrals still open). A `doc-sync` gate, `verify-readme-limitations` ([scripts/verify-readme-limitations.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-readme-limitations.ts)), derives the package set from those manifests, rejects a missing README, and enforces the shape per README: exactly one limitations-like heading, byte-equal to the canonical h2, with at least one top-level bullet. Near-miss headings at any level ("Limitations", "Deferred", "What is NOT here", "Non-goals", …) fail the gate, so variant sections cannot creep back beside — or instead of — the canonical one.
|
||||
|
||||
A package with genuinely nothing to declare is whitelisted (`NO_LIMITATIONS` in the script) and must NOT carry the section. The inverted check keeps the whitelist honest in both directions: an empty or boilerplate section cannot satisfy the gate, and giving a whitelisted package real limitations forces the whitelist edit in the same change. Whitelist entries are validated against the scanned package set, so a package rename or removal fails loud instead of silently un-gating a README.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user