fix(web): address session fork review findings

This commit is contained in:
imccyu
2026-07-30 12:55:10 +08:00
parent 57fb5b488e
commit 36f1489398
31 changed files with 346 additions and 80 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md
2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md: 5342deba8ca879026d32ee1420cb3c0fdf67c500
2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.zh.md: 51a3e0ce50aff10a9812c91d24dc6e78a56c43ba
2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md: 69ff85e1f137f4f263bf951af0a3f655411c606a
2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.zh.md: 3304a6f384c9004b3572c95881f832a4aa21b77c

View File

@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ class SessionStore extends Service {
An empty prefix is forkable; any non-empty boundary must be a safe existing sequence outside an open turn. Typed errors distinguish missing sources, stale objects, duplicate child ids, invalid boundaries, and prefixes ending during execution. Broader log validation and crash repair remain with their existing owners.
### Host and browser adaptation
The Host `session.fork` RPC accepts `atSeq` as an anchor within the desired turn rather than as the store's inclusive safe boundary. It selects the first `turn/end` at or after that anchor; an omitted or past-end anchor selects the last completed turn. An anchor already in the log but not followed by a matching `turn/end` returns `fork-unavailable` and never falls back to an earlier turn, so a message action cannot silently omit the clicked message.
The Host creates the child through the agent registry with the selected seed and lineage, and pre-publication setup installs the latest logged provider, model, and reasoning target before the child can run. It then attaches the child to the source Workspace. An attachment failure returns `workspace-attach-failed` with the already-published child id; the client reconciles that child into its summary list before surfacing the error. The Session-row action uses the last completed turn, while a message action supplies its event seq; both open the child after success, and lineage expansion makes it visible beneath the source.
## Alternatives considered
**Separate `ctx.sessionFork` service.** This was the first implementation, but review showed it overfit the capability-seam pattern. The code had no swappable backend, no extra event surface, no independent ownership lifecycle, and no durable behavior beyond `ctx.sessions.create({ seed, meta })`. Keeping a separate package would make callers discover and install a second service just to perform policy around a session-store primitive.
@@ -40,4 +46,4 @@ An empty prefix is forkable; any non-empty boundary must be a safe existing sequ
The public surface stays small and discoverable: live session branching is part of `ctx.sessions`, next to `create({ seed })`, rather than a standalone service or a two-step helper pair. Persistence continues to work through existing `session/created` and `session/flush` behavior: a forked child starts life with seeded events, so existing backends persist that seed once and preserve `parentSession` / `seedLength` in the header.
The v1 scope still excludes ACP `session/fork`, unloaded persisted-session forking, model-facing tools, and subagent refactors. If a future ACP method is added, it should advertise the capability only after it has protocol and snapshot coverage; this Agent Note adds no ACP wire behavior, so no ACP snapshot is required. Fork-child replay remains covered by the existing [seed-boundary testing Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md), while this API gets focused `dsh-session` unit tests plus JSONL persistence coverage.
The v1 scope still excludes ACP `session/fork`, unloaded persisted-session forking, model-facing tools, and subagent refactors. If a future ACP method is added, it should advertise the capability only after it has protocol and snapshot coverage; this Agent Note adds no ACP wire behavior, so no ACP snapshot is required. Fork-child replay remains covered by the existing [seed-boundary testing Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md); focused store, Host, carrier, and client tests pin the boundary and reconciliation contracts, while the real Chromium scenario pins the assembled message action and lineage tree.

View File

@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ class SessionStore extends Service {
空前缀可以被 fork任何非空边界都必须是位于开放轮次之外且安全、已存在的序号。类型化的错误区分源缺失、对象陈旧、子 id 重复、边界无效和前缀结束于执行过程中等情况。更广泛的日志校验与崩溃恢复仍由其现有的负责方处理。
### Host 与浏览器适配
Host 的 `session.fork` RPC 接受 `atSeq`,并将其视为所需轮次内的锚点,而非 store 中包含该序号的安全边界。它选择该锚点处或其后的首个 `turn/end`;锚点省略或超过末尾时,选择最后一个已完成轮次。若锚点已在日志中,但从该锚点起找不到匹配的 `turn/end`,则返回 `fork-unavailable`,绝不回退到更早的轮次,因此消息操作不会静默遗漏所点击的消息。
Host 通过 agent智能体注册表以选定的种子和谱系创建子会话发布前 setup 会先安装日志中最新的提供方、模型和推理reasoning目标子会话才能运行。随后Host 将子会话附加到源 Workspace。若附加失败则返回 `workspace-attach-failed` 及已发布的子会话 id客户端先将该子会话对账到摘要列表再向调用方报告错误。Session 行操作使用最后一个已完成轮次,消息操作则提供其事件 seq两者都会在成功后打开子会话展开谱系后可在源会话下看到它。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**独立的 `ctx.sessionFork` 服务。** 这是最初的实现,但评审表明它过度套用了 capability-seam 模式。代码没有可替换的后端、没有额外的事件面、没有独立的所有权生命周期,也没有超出 `ctx.sessions.create({ seed, meta })` 的持久化行为。保留独立包会迫使调用方为了在会话存储原语之上执行一层策略而去发现并安装第二个服务。
@@ -40,4 +46,4 @@ class SessionStore extends Service {
公开接口保持精简且易于发现:活跃会话分支是 `ctx.sessions` 的一部分,紧邻 `create({ seed })`,而非一个独立服务或一对两步辅助函数。持久化继续通过现有的 `session/created` 和 `session/flush` 行为运作fork 出的子会话以种子事件开始生命,因此现有后端只需持久化该种子一次,并在 header 中保存 `parentSession``seedLength`。
v1 范围仍然排除 ACPAgent Client Protocol `session/fork`、对未加载的已持久化会话的 fork、面向模型的工具以及 subagent 重构。如果未来添加 ACP 方法,应在具备协议与快照覆盖后才广播该能力;本 Agent Note 不添加任何 ACP 协议行为,因此不需要 ACP 快照。fork 子会话的回放仍由现有的[种子边界测试 Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md) 覆盖,而本 API 则获得专门的 `dsh-session` 单元测试加 JSONL 持久化覆盖
v1 范围仍然排除 ACPAgent Client Protocol `session/fork`、对未加载的已持久化会话的 fork、面向模型的工具以及 subagent 重构。如果未来添加 ACP 方法,应在具备协议与快照覆盖后才广播该能力;本 Agent Note 不添加任何 ACP 协议行为,因此不需要 ACP 快照。fork 子会话的回放仍由现有的[种子边界测试 Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md) 覆盖store、Host、载体与客户端的专项测试固定边界和对账契约真实 Chromium 场景则固定组装后的消息操作与谱系树