Coder/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cleanup(config): remove literal credential compatibility residue

Browse Source 
Adapter schemas now carry only credential references, but the Models join, onboarding readiness, shipped overlays, SDK scaffolding, fixtures, and active decision prose still treated a redacted literal apiKey as a supported compatibility state. That residue made an unsupported field look contractual and pinned Schemastery silent-dropping as behavior.

Delete those branches and examples, and let compositions and scaffolds use adapter-owned reference and environment resolution. Do not add a tombstone validator or change generic unknown-key behavior: literal adapter credentials have no migration contract to preserve.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-08-07 22:03:49 +08:00
parent ac154b2dfa
commit 356453d6cb
37 changed files with 78 additions and 189 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md
2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md: d1f6d31d362b76392514704be780f553b45d36ad
2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.zh.md: 75b3fa247bdf449964a874e909e6e3bc9e0694fa
2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md: e9ca76ede06080f2b868f6436998d163e642adbc
2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.zh.md: 5666a884d4c9478291072375681d8d3526b2632a

14
.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Pasting a key containing an emoji, CJK text, or a full-width punctuation mark in
`llm-pi-ai` was worse on the same input. Its discovery probe builds the same header with a bare `fetch` in [discovery.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/discovery.ts) and wrapped every failure as `could not reach <url>`, so a local key fault was reported as an unreachable network. The probe is reachable from the unsaved draft: `ProviderEditor` puts the typed `keyDraft` into its probe request, so the model-listing button sent an illegal key before anything was stored.
Whitespace passed every check. `ProviderEditor` tested `keyDraft.length` and `resolveAdapterOptions` tested `config.apiKey.length`, so a key of three spaces stored and then authenticated as `Bearer` plus blanks. `llm-pi-ai` rejected an empty literal `apiKey` in `resolveProfiles`, but applied no check whatsoever to a credential- or environment-sourced key — the path the Models page writes, and therefore the path users actually take.
Whitespace passed every check. `ProviderEditor` tested `keyDraft.length`, so a key of three spaces was stored and then authenticated as `Bearer` plus blanks. Neither adapter checked a credential- or environment-sourced key — the path the Models page writes, and therefore the path users actually take.
Sources: deepseek-harness#1594 and #1595; dsh-external#247, #249, #266, and #210.
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ The shape rule is a guess about how people paste, so it runs **only in the brows
### Absence is a configuration state, not a missing key
"No API key" means three different things here, and only one of them is an error. The rule applies to a value that was *provided*; deciding whether one was provided at all stays with each caller.
The rule applies to a value that was *provided*; deciding whether one was provided at all stays with each caller.
**Omitted.** A profile naming neither `apiKey` nor `apiKeyEnv` is authenticated by something other than a harness-held key. `routeAuth` in [provider.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/provider.ts) keeps the installed catalog provider's own auth precisely so provider-native ambient discovery survives, and `openai-codex` — shipped in that catalog — authenticates through OAuth and refuses an explicit key outright. `namesCredential` carries this distinction. In `llm-deepseek`, an absent `apiKey` likewise falls through to `apiKeyEnv`. Omission is never validated.
**No named credential.** A pi-ai profile omitting `apiKeyEnv` may authenticate outside the harness-held credential path. `routeAuth` in [provider.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/provider.ts) keeps the installed catalog provider's own auth precisely so provider-native ambient discovery survives, and `openai-codex` — shipped in that catalog — authenticates through OAuth. `namesCredential` carries this distinction; omission is not a value to validate.
**A blank field in the web UI.** The key input opens empty even for a provider whose key is already stored — the `keyStored` copy reads "Configured — enter a new value to replace" — so blank means *keep what is stored*. `ProviderEditor` skips `credentials.set` entirely when the draft is empty, and that stays a no-op: a blank field never blocks submit, or editing a base URL would demand re-entering the key.
**Provided, but empty or whitespace-only.** What this means depends on what absence selects for that surface, and the two adapters differ for a reason. In `llm-pi-ai` it is an error, because absence there switches authentication mode — to the installed provider's ambient discovery or OAuth — so a blank key leaves genuine ambiguity about which was meant; its wording names the legitimate alternative rather than just refusing (*has an empty apiKey; omit it to use ambient authentication*). In `llm-deepseek` absence merely selects a different *source* for the same key, `apiKeyEnv`, so a blank literal resolves through that fallback exactly as an omitted one does. In the browser it is always a failure, on both cards: the field is where a person just typed, and silently discarding what they typed is never the right answer.
**A resolved value that is whitespace-only.** This is invalid at both adapters because it cannot authenticate a request. In the browser it is also a field-level failure: the field is where a person just typed, and silently discarding what they typed is never the right answer.
`normalizeApiKey` therefore takes `string`, never `string | undefined`.
@@ -55,9 +55,7 @@ The client cannot import any of this: client packages reference only client pack
| Surface | Behavior |
|---|---|
| `dsh-llm` | Owns `normalizeApiKey`, `assertUsableApiKey`, and `INVALID_CREDENTIAL_CODE`, which is deliberately outside `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES`. |
| `llm-deepseek` `resolveAdapterOptions` | Refuses a literal `apiKey` no header can carry, beside the other beyond-schema bounds; uses the trimmed value. An absent or blank one falls through to `apiKeyEnv`. |
| `llm-deepseek` `resolveApiKey` | Normalizes what the credentials seam or environment returns, rejecting with `INVALID_CREDENTIAL` naming the Models page and never echoing the key. |
| `llm-pi-ai` `resolveProfiles` | Applies the shared rule, keeping its "omit it to use ambient authentication" wording, and writes the trimmed value into the resolved profile. |
| `llm-pi-ai` `resolveApiKey` | Normalizes the credential and environment paths. A profile naming no credential still returns `undefined`, so ambient and OAuth routes are unaffected. |
| `llm-pi-ai` `discoverModels` | Normalizes before building the header, so an illegal key is a credential fault rather than an unreachable endpoint. A probe carrying no key stays unauthenticated. |
| `ui-models` | Mirrors the charset rule, adds the shape heuristic, trims `keyDraft` before probe and `credentials.set`, and fixes the `stringAt` emptiness test. A blank field remains a no-op that submits; a field holding only whitespace is a field-level failure. Submit **and the endpoint interrogation** are both gated, so a refused key never spends a round trip to be told what the field already says, and the failure renders on the field, matching the existing `modelFailure` pattern. |
@@ -68,8 +66,6 @@ The client cannot import any of this: client packages reference only client pack
## Alternatives considered
**A `.pattern()` on the `apiKey` schema field.** Vendored schemastery supports it, and the pattern would serialize to the browser with the rest of the namespace schema — one rule, delivered rather than mirrored. It lost because a pattern cannot trim first: `cordis.yml` would then reject a padded key while `.env` tolerated one, and the resolver would disagree with the schema about the same string. Validating in `resolveAdapterOptions` keeps every surface trim-then-validate, and that function is already where this package re-judges bounds the schema cannot express.
**A validation module shared by client and host.** Rejected by the source-plane layout: client packages reference only client packages plus `vendor/cordis` and `support/invariants`, and widening that to reach a host package would collide the two `Context` merges the split exists to keep apart. Mirroring a one-line predicate with a test on each side is the established shape here.
**A per-adapter thrower in each of `llm-deepseek` and `llm-pi-ai`.** The first plan gave each adapter its own, differing only by the package prefix in the message, with a duplication-gate exemption to excuse the pair. Rejected before implementation: `LlmError` is declared in the seam, so the seam can own the diagnosis outright, and an exemption there would have hidden exactly the duplication it was covering for.
@@ -100,7 +96,7 @@ The costliest way to get this wrong would have been to treat absence as invalidi
`packages/llm/llm/tests/api-key.spec.ts` drives `normalizeApiKey` and `assertUsableApiKey` over the whole input table — empty, whitespace-only, padded, interior-space, C0 control, emoji, CJK, full-width, latin-1, and the printable-ASCII boundary — and pins that a refusal carries `INVALID_CREDENTIAL` and no part of the key.
`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/tests/` covers the literal-config path in `adapter.spec.ts` and the stored-credential path end to end in `dynamic-config.spec.ts`, through the real credentials seam rather than a stub. `packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/tests/` covers `resolveProfiles` — including that the trimmed value reaches the resolved profile, which the `...rest` spread would otherwise discard — and the discovery probe, including that a probe with no key sends no `authorization` header.
`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/tests/` covers the stored-credential path end to end in `dynamic-config.spec.ts`, through the real credentials seam rather than a stub. `packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/tests/` covers the discovery probe, including that a probe with no key sends no `authorization` header.
`packages/client/ui-models/tests/` pins `apiKeyFailure` over the same table plus the paste-shape cases, and drives both cards: a blank field submits without writing a credential, a whitespace-only field fails on the field, an illegal or wrapped key blocks submit and the interrogation alike, a padded key is trimmed before `credentials.set` and before an interrogation, and a hand-declared route can be created with no key at all.

14
.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.zh.md
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
同样的输入在 `llm-pi-ai` 上更糟。它的探测路径在 [discovery.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/discovery.ts) 里用裸 `fetch` 构造同一个 header，并把一切失败包装成 `could not reach <url>`，于是一个本地的 Key 故障被报成网络不可达。这条探测在保存之前就够得着：`ProviderEditor` 把用户输入的 `keyDraft` 直接放进探测请求，所以「获取模型列表」按钮会在任何东西落盘之前就把非法 Key 发出去。
空白字符能通过每一道检查。`ProviderEditor` 判的是 `keyDraft.length`，`resolveAdapterOptions` 判的是 `config.apiKey.length`，于是三个空格构成的 Key 会被存下，随后以 `Bearer` 加若干空格去认证。`llm-pi-ai` 在 `resolveProfiles` 中拒绝空的字面量 `apiKey`，却对来自凭据或环境的 Key 完全不做检查——而那正是模型设置页写入的路径，也就是用户真正走的路径。
空白字符能通过每一道检查。`ProviderEditor` 判的是 `keyDraft.length`，于是三个空格构成的 Key 会被存下，随后以 `Bearer` 加若干空格去认证。两个适配器都不检查来自凭据或环境的 Key——而那正是 Models 页写入的路径，也就是用户真正走的路径。
来源：deepseek-harness#1594 与 #1595；dsh-external#247、#249、#266、#210。
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ Status: implemented
### 「没有 Key」是一种配置状态，不是缺失
在这里，「没有 API Key」意味着三件完全不同的事，其中只有一件是错误。规则作用于**已提供**的值；至于究竟有没有提供，由各个调用方自行判断。
规则作用于*已提供*的值；至于究竟有没有提供，由各个调用方自行判断。
**未指定。** 既不写 `apiKey` 也不写 `apiKeyEnv` 的 profile，是由 harness 所持有的 Key 之外的东西来鉴权的。[provider.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/provider.ts) 中的 `routeAuth` 保留内置 catalog provider 自身的鉴权，正是为了让 provider 原生的 ambient 发现得以存活；而该 catalog 附带的 `openai-codex` 通过 OAuth 鉴权，并会直接拒绝一个显式的 Key。`namesCredential` 承载着这一区分。在 `llm-deepseek` 中，缺省的 `apiKey` 同样会回落到 `apiKeyEnv`。未指定的情形永不参与校验。
**未点名凭据。** 省略 `apiKeyEnv` 的 pi-ai profile 可以在 harness 持有的凭据路径之外鉴权。[provider.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/provider.ts) 中的 `routeAuth` 保留内置 catalog provider 自身的鉴权，正是为了让 provider 原生的 ambient 发现继续工作；而该 catalog 附带的 `openai-codex` 通过 OAuth 鉴权。`namesCredential` 承载这一区分；省略不是需要校验的值。
**Web UI 中留空的输入框。** 即便某个 provider 的 Key 已经存好，该输入框也是空着打开的——`keyStored` 的文案写的是「已配置——输入新值以替换」——所以留空意味着*保持已存储的值*。`ProviderEditor` 在草稿为空时完全跳过 `credentials.set`，这一点保持不变：留空绝不拦截提交，否则改一个 base URL 都得重新输一遍 Key。
**已提供，但为空或纯空白。** 它意味着什么，取决于「缺失」在该界面上选中了什么，而两个适配器的差异是有依据的。在 `llm-pi-ai` 中它是错误，因为那里的缺失切换的是**鉴权方式**——转向内置 provider 的 ambient 发现或 OAuth——因此一个空 Key 究竟想选哪一种是真有歧义；它的措辞指明了合法替代路径而非单纯拒绝（*has an empty apiKey; omit it to use ambient authentication*）。在 `llm-deepseek` 中，缺失只是为同一把 Key 选择了另一个**来源** `apiKeyEnv`，因此空白字面量会像缺省一样经该回落解析。在浏览器中它始终是失败，两张卡片皆然：字段是人刚刚敲过字的地方，静默丢弃他敲进去的内容永远不是正确答案。
**解析得到的值只含空白。** 两个适配器都将其视为非法，因为它无法为请求鉴权。在浏览器中，这同样是字段级失败：字段是人刚刚敲过字的地方，静默丢弃他敲进去的内容永远不是正确答案。
因此 `normalizeApiKey` 接受 `string`，而绝非 `string | undefined`。
@@ -55,9 +55,7 @@ Status: implemented
| 界面 | 行为 |
|---|---|
| `dsh-llm` | 拥有 `normalizeApiKey`、`assertUsableApiKey` 与 `INVALID_CREDENTIAL_CODE`，后者刻意不进 `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES`。 |
| `llm-deepseek` `resolveAdapterOptions` | 拒绝标头无法承载的字面量 `apiKey`，与其他超出 schema 的边界检查并排；使用 trim 后的值。缺省或空白的 `apiKey` 回落到 `apiKeyEnv`。 |
| `llm-deepseek` `resolveApiKey` | 归一化凭据 seam 或环境返回的值，以 `INVALID_CREDENTIAL` 拒绝，消息指明模型设置页，绝不回显 Key。 |
| `llm-pi-ai` `resolveProfiles` | 施加这条共享规则，保留其「omit it to use ambient authentication」的措辞，并把 trim 后的值写进解析后的 profile。 |
| `llm-pi-ai` `resolveApiKey` | 归一化凭据与环境路径。不指定任何凭据的 profile 仍返回 `undefined`，ambient 与 OAuth 路由不受影响。 |
| `llm-pi-ai` `discoverModels` | 在构造 header 之前归一化，使非法 Key 成为凭据故障而非端点不可达。不带 Key 的探测保持未鉴权。 |
| `ui-models` | 镜像字符集规则，加入形状启发式，在探测与 `credentials.set` 之前 trim `keyDraft`，并修正 `stringAt` 的空值判断。留空的输入框仍是可以提交的空操作；只含空白的输入框则是字段级失败。提交**与端点探测**同时受拦截，因此被拒绝的密钥不会白花一次往返去换取字段上已经写明的答案；失败呈现在字段上，与既有的 `modelFailure` 模式一致。 |
@@ -68,8 +66,6 @@ Status: implemented
## Alternatives considered
**在 `apiKey` schema 字段上加 `.pattern()`。** vendor 中的 schemastery 支持它，且该 pattern 会随命名空间 schema 一同序列化到浏览器——一条规则，投递而非镜像。它落败于 pattern 无法先行 trim：那样 `cordis.yml` 会拒绝带首尾空白的 Key 而 `.env` 却容忍，resolver 与 schema 会对同一个字符串给出分歧。在 `resolveAdapterOptions` 中校验可以让每一层都是 trim-then-validate，而该函数本就是本包重新裁定 schema 无法表达的边界之处。
**由 client 与 host 共享一个校验模块。** 被 source plane 布局否决：client 包只 reference client 包外加 `vendor/cordis` 与 `support/invariants`，把它放宽到够得着 host 包会撞上这一分割本就要隔开的两份 `Context` 合并。在两侧各镜像一行断言并各配一份测试，是此处的既定形态。
**在 `llm-deepseek` 与 `llm-pi-ai` 中各留一个抛错 helper。** 最初的计划正是各留一份，差别仅在消息中的包名前缀，并配一个重复检测豁免来放行这一对。在实现之前即被否决：`LlmError` 声明在 seam 中，因此 seam 完全可以自己拥有这句诊断，而那里的一个豁免恰恰会掩盖它本要遮掩的重复。
@@ -100,7 +96,7 @@ Status: implemented
`packages/llm/llm/tests/api-key.spec.ts` 以整张输入表驱动 `normalizeApiKey` 与 `assertUsableApiKey`——空值、纯空白、带首尾空白、含中间空格、C0 控制字符、emoji、中文、全角、latin-1，以及可打印 ASCII 的边界字符——并钉住一次拒绝携带 `INVALID_CREDENTIAL` 且不含 Key 的任何部分。
`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/tests/` 在 `adapter.spec.ts` 中覆盖字面量配置路径，在 `dynamic-config.spec.ts` 中经真实凭据 seam（而非 stub）端到端覆盖已存储凭据路径。`packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/tests/` 覆盖 `resolveProfiles`——包括 trim 后的值确实到达解析后的 profile，否则会被 `...rest` 展开丢弃——以及探测路径，包括不带 Key 的探测不会发出 `authorization` 标头。
`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/tests/` 在 `dynamic-config.spec.ts` 中经真实凭据 seam（而非 stub）端到端覆盖已存储凭据路径。`packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/tests/` 覆盖探测路径，包括不带 Key 的探测不会发出 `authorization` 标头。
`packages/client/ui-models/tests/` 以同一张表加上形状用例钉住 `apiKeyFailure`，并驱动两张卡片：留空的输入框可提交且不写入凭据、只含空白的输入框在字段上失败、非法或被包裹的 Key 同时拦截提交与探测、带首尾空白的 Key 在 `credentials.set` 与探测之前被 trim，以及手工声明的路由可以完全不带 Key 创建。

4
.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.md
2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.md: ce45207e7ac7224f44e34945e36ba85db0971f09
2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.zh.md: c476417517b8ed72036344a13720a8ba378775e6
2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.md: c28788921e8f1b233b44e19b29ad4d4acaa25022
2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.zh.md: 2ea3b21fb6ceb4fa38a0cad0daf47c3b6a98a664

6
.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.md
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The Models editor spans independent settings and credential RPC domains. It prev
Provider save remains a two-stage settings-then-credentials operation over the existing wire domains, but the card treats the successful settings response as a commit checkpoint. It replaces its comparison subtree and expected revision with the returned redacted descriptor before attempting `credentials.set`; if that second stage fails, the draft key and card stay visible, and retry produces no settings ops and repeats only the credential write. Genuine concurrent changes before the first settings commit still fail with `settings-conflict`. Typed keys are trimmed at the UI and direct DeepSeek resolver boundaries, and pi-ai records a derived reference only when the normalized key is non-empty; saving a blank key materializes an empty, reference-free profile for provider-native discovery.
Deletion removes a credential only when the joined row identifies the exact `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` reference derived by this page and reports it configured and writable. It unsets that credential before the user-layer profile so a settings-stage failure leaves the row and its frozen target visible for retry; both unsets are idempotent. Custom references, environment credentials, missing credentials, and targets the join cannot identify are retained. The row's accessible Edit/Delete names and the destructive dialog title, description, and final action all use the same stable `Display Name (route-id)` identity, collapsing to the route id when both strings match. The dialog states whether the stored key will be removed and owns operation failures instead of replacing the whole page with a load-error banner. Rows expose API-key state only from the value-free join: a confirmed literal or referenced credential is a green solid dot, a confirmed missing named reference is a red solid dot, and reference-free provider-native authentication or unavailable credential enrichment has no dot. Each dot has accessible copy and a tooltip, while successful Apply uses the same provider identity in a local status message and never echoes secret material.
Deletion removes a credential only when the joined row identifies the exact `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` reference derived by this page and reports it configured and writable. It unsets that credential before the user-layer profile so a settings-stage failure leaves the row and its frozen target visible for retry; both unsets are idempotent. Custom references, environment credentials, missing credentials, and targets the join cannot identify are retained. The row's accessible Edit/Delete names and the destructive dialog title, description, and final action all use the same stable `Display Name (route-id)` identity, collapsing to the route id when both strings match. The dialog states whether the stored key will be removed and owns operation failures instead of replacing the whole page with a load-error banner. Rows expose API-key state only from the value-free join: a confirmed referenced credential is a green solid dot, a confirmed missing named reference is a red solid dot, and reference-free provider-native authentication or unavailable credential enrichment has no dot. Each dot has accessible copy and a tooltip, while successful Apply uses the same provider identity in a local status message and never echoes secret material.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ Deletion removes a credential only when the joined row identifies the exact `<RO
**Delete every credential reference named by a removed profile.** A custom reference can be shared, externally managed, or intentionally survive profile churn. Exact equality with this page's derived target plus configured+writable state is the narrow evidence available to the page; anything weaker risks deleting a credential it does not own.
**Remove settings first and compensate by recreating the profile.** The browser holds only a redacted subtree and cannot faithfully reconstruct stored literal secrets or concurrent edits. Credential-first deletion leaves the authoritative profile visible on partial failure and makes retry safe without synthesizing configuration.
**Remove settings first and compensate by recreating the profile.** The browser holds only a redacted subtree and cannot faithfully reconstruct concurrent edits. Credential-first deletion leaves the authoritative profile visible on partial failure and makes retry safe without synthesizing configuration.
## Consequences
The Models page can recover from either second-stage failure without reload, secret disclosure, or a false concurrency conflict, and blank-key pi-ai profiles preserve Bedrock, Vertex, and other provider-native authentication. Confirmed status is visible without turning route liveness, native authentication, or a failed credential lookup into a false error, and a successful replacement remains observable even when the row stays green. Deleting a page-managed provider no longer leaves a reusable local key, while ambiguous credentials deliberately remain for manual management. Save and delete are still not atomic across durable stores: a process crash can stop between stages, but their order and idempotence leave an observable, retryable state. Component tests pin partial-success retries, empty-key native auth, normalized literals, status visibility, target identity, cleanup ownership, and credential/settings rejection ordering; the keyless browser scenario pins bilingual accessible copy and verifies that confirmed deletion removes both `settings.yaml` profile and `.env` credential. This decision refines the Models apply semantics recorded in the [web configuration plane note](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md).
The Models page can recover from either second-stage failure without reload, secret disclosure, or a false concurrency conflict, and blank-key pi-ai profiles preserve Bedrock, Vertex, and other provider-native authentication. Confirmed status is visible without turning route liveness, native authentication, or a failed credential lookup into a false error, and a successful replacement remains observable even when the row stays green. Deleting a page-managed provider no longer leaves a reusable local key, while ambiguous credentials deliberately remain for manual management. Save and delete are still not atomic across durable stores: a process crash can stop between stages, but their order and idempotence leave an observable, retryable state. Component tests pin partial-success retries, empty-key native auth, trimmed key handling, status visibility, target identity, cleanup ownership, and credential/settings rejection ordering; the keyless browser scenario pins bilingual accessible copy and verifies that confirmed deletion removes both the `settings.yaml` profile and `.credentials.yaml` entry. This decision refines the Models apply semantics recorded in the [web configuration plane note](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md).

6
.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-provider-credential-lifecycle.zh.md
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Models 编辑器横跨互相独立的 settings 与凭据 RPC 领域。之前它
提供方保存仍在现有 wire 领域上按先 settings、后凭据的两阶段顺序执行，但卡片会把成功的 settings 响应视为提交检查点。它会在尝试 `credentials.set` 之前，用返回的脱敏 descriptor 替换比较基准子树与预期 revision；如果第二阶段失败，草稿密钥与卡片会继续显示，重试不会产生 settings op，只会再次写入凭据。首次 settings 提交之前发生的真实并发变更仍会以 `settings-conflict` 失败。UI 与 DeepSeek 直连 resolver 边界均会去除所输密钥的首尾空白，且只有标准化密钥非空时，pi-ai 才会记录派生引用；留空密钥会具化一个空的、不带引用的 profile，以便使用提供方原生凭据发现。
只有当联接所得的行识别出该页面派生的精确 `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` 引用，并将其报告为已配置且可写时，删除操作才会清除该凭据。它会先取消设置该凭据，再取消设置用户层 profile；如果 settings 阶段失败，该行及其已冻结的目标仍可见，便于重试。两项 unset 都具备幂等性。自定义引用、环境凭据、缺失的凭据，以及联接无法识别目标的凭据均会保留。行的无障碍 Edit/Delete 名称以及破坏性对话框的标题、说明和最终操作都使用同一个稳定的 `Display Name (route-id)` 标识；当两个字符串相同时，标识会简化为路由 id。对话框会说明是否一并删除已存密钥，并在自身内显示操作失败，而不是用加载错误横幅替换整个页面。行只根据不含值的联接结果展示 API 密钥状态：确认已配置的字面密钥或引用凭据显示为绿色实心点，确认缺失的具名引用显示为红色实心点，无引用的提供方原生认证或无法取得凭据补充信息时则不显示状态点。每个状态点都有无障碍文案和工具提示；「应用」成功后的本地状态消息会使用同一个提供方标识，且绝不回显任何机密内容。
只有当联接所得的行识别出该页面派生的精确 `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` 引用，并将其报告为已配置且可写时，删除操作才会清除该凭据。它会先取消设置该凭据，再取消设置用户层 profile；如果 settings 阶段失败，该行及其已冻结的目标仍可见，便于重试。两项 unset 都具备幂等性。自定义引用、环境凭据、缺失的凭据，以及联接无法识别目标的凭据均会保留。行的无障碍 Edit/Delete 名称以及破坏性对话框的标题、说明和最终操作都使用同一个稳定的 `Display Name (route-id)` 标识；当两个字符串相同时，标识会简化为路由 id。对话框会说明是否一并删除已存密钥，并在自身内显示操作失败，而不是用加载错误横幅替换整个页面。行只根据不含值的联接结果展示 API 密钥状态：确认已配置的引用凭据显示为绿色实心点，确认缺失的具名引用显示为红色实心点，无引用的提供方原生认证或无法取得凭据补充信息时则不显示状态点。每个状态点都有无障碍文案和工具提示；「应用」成功后的本地状态消息会使用同一个提供方标识，且绝不回显任何机密内容。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ Models 编辑器横跨互相独立的 settings 与凭据 RPC 领域。之前它
**删除被移除 profile 所指定的每一个凭据引用。**自定义引用可能被共享、由外部管理，或有意在 profile 反复增删时存留。与该页面派生目标精确相等，再加上已配置且可写的状态，是页面所能获得的最小范围证据；比这更弱的判定都有可能删除不属于它的凭据。
**先删除 settings，再重建 profile 以作补偿。**浏览器只持有脱敏后的子树，无法忠实重建已存的字面机密或并发编辑。先删除凭据可以让权威 profile 在部分失败时仍然可见，并且无需合成配置就能安全重试。
**先删除 settings，再重建 profile 以作补偿。**浏览器只持有脱敏后的子树，无法忠实重建并发编辑。先删除凭据可以让权威 profile 在部分失败时仍然可见，并且无需合成配置就能安全重试。
## 后果
Models 页可以从任一第二阶段失败中恢复，无需重新加载，也不会泄露机密或产生虚假的并发冲突；空密钥的 pi-ai profile 会保留 Bedrock、Vertex 与其他提供方原生认证。已确认的状态清晰可见，同时不会把路由存活状态、原生认证或凭据查询失败误报为错误；即使该行继续显示绿色，密钥替换成功也仍然可观察。删除由页面管理的提供方不再遗留可重用的本地密钥，而存在歧义的凭据会有意保留，交由手动管理。保存与删除在跨持久存储时仍非原子操作：进程可能在两个阶段之间崩溃，但它们的顺序与幂等性会留下可观察、可重试的状态。组件测试固定了部分成功后的重试、空密钥原生认证、标准化字面值、状态可见性、目标标识、清理所有权，以及凭据／settings 拒绝顺序；无密钥的浏览器场景固定了双语无障碍文案，并验证确认删除会同时清除 `settings.yaml` profile 与 `.env` 凭据。此决策细化了 [web 配置平面 note](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) 中记录的 Models 应用语义。
Models 页可以从任一第二阶段失败中恢复，无需重新加载，也不会泄露机密或产生虚假的并发冲突；空密钥的 pi-ai profile 会保留 Bedrock、Vertex 与其他提供方原生认证。已确认的状态清晰可见，同时不会把路由存活状态、原生认证或凭据查询失败误报为错误；即使该行继续显示绿色，密钥替换成功也仍然可观察。删除由页面管理的提供方不再遗留可重用的本地密钥，而存在歧义的凭据会有意保留，交由手动管理。保存与删除在跨持久存储时仍非原子操作：进程可能在两个阶段之间崩溃，但它们的顺序与幂等性会留下可观察、可重试的状态。组件测试固定了部分成功后的重试、空密钥原生认证、密钥首尾空白处理、状态可见性、目标标识、清理所有权，以及凭据／settings 拒绝顺序；无密钥的浏览器场景固定了双语无障碍文案，并验证确认删除会同时清除 `settings.yaml` profile 与 `.credentials.yaml` 条目。此决策细化了 [web 配置平面 note](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) 中记录的 Models 应用语义。