fix(scope): close final ownership races

Drain idle injection flushes before agent teardown, snapshot approval and subagent provider inputs, and gate subagent lifecycle events on real child readiness. Align the RFCs and generated contracts with the hardened behavior.

docs/rfc/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Problem
 
-Today the agent loop advertises every registered tool to the model as a native JSON-schema function definition. `ToolRegistry` contributes its schemas to the system-prompt assembly, the assembly's `tools` land on the wire (and in the logged request header), the model invokes one `tool-call` block per step, and the loop dispatches each call through `ctx.tools.execute()` **sequentially** (parallel tool execution is an explicit open TODO in `dsh-tools` and [docs/architecture.md](../../../architecture.md)), with **every** intermediate `tool-result` re-entering the model's context on the next request.
+In the registry's native presentation, the agent loop advertises every visible capability as a JSON-schema function definition. `ToolRegistry` contributes its schemas to the system-prompt assembly, the assembly's `tools` land on the wire (and in the logged request header), the model invokes one `tool-call` block per step, and the loop dispatches each call through `ctx.tools.execute()` **sequentially** (parallel tool execution is an explicit open TODO in `dsh-tools` and [docs/architecture.md](../../../architecture.md)), with **every** intermediate `tool-result` re-entering the model's context on the next request.
 
 For multi-step tool work this is token-heavy and serial. The model cannot compose tools — loop over a result set, branch on an intermediate value, fan out, post-process — without a full model round-trip per call, and each round-trip drags the entire intermediate result back into context whether the model needs it or not.
 
@@ -37,14 +37,14 @@ Three decisions, each elaborated in its own section below:
 Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentation transport with one required parameter, `{ code: string }`. It is represented by a normal `ToolDefinition` for dispatch but stays outside the filterable capability layers, so restrictions cannot accidentally remove Code Mode's only entry point. Calls traverse the complete tool pipeline — `tools/pre-execute` → monotonic guards → `tools/execute` around dispatch → `tools/post-execute` → immutable `tools/result` notification — exactly like native calls; a permission plugin can inspect the program text before it runs, and final-result observers see the normalized outer outcome. Its `execute(args, exec)`:
 
 1. **Builds the bindings**: the bridge owns a **run-scoped `AbortController`** whose signal follows `exec.signal` (an outer cancel propagates in) and which the bridge itself fires the moment the run settles for any reason — completion, program exception, `computeMs`/`maxWallMs` expiry, worker exit. For every visible capability tool, the binding is an async function that (a) checks the run signal before and after, (b) **JSON-normalizes the argument** — a `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(args))` round-trip, rejecting that one call with a descriptive `Error` when the value does not survive (`BigInt`, circular structures) — because the seam's structured-clone boundary is wider than JSON while the session log accepts only JSON, (c) awaits its turn on the **per-run serialization queue** (below), (d) calls `this.execute({ callId, name, arguments, agent: exec.agent, parent: exec.token, signal: runSignal })` with a deterministic sub-id `` CallId(`${exec.callId}:code:${n}`) ``, (e) appends a `tool/code-dispatch` session event, and (f) maps the result: success → the text-block contents joined as a `string` (non-text blocks become placeholders), `isError` → **the binding rejects** with an `Error` carrying the result text. The child's readonly `parent` is only the outer execution's frozen, property-free token, so commit-style observers can correlate outcomes without receiving a mutation path into the live `run_code` wrapper. Every sub-call still traverses the full pipeline under its own immutable identity and registry-assigned token. The run signal, rather than the bare outer one, lets budget expiry abort an in-flight sub-tool instead of orphaning it. Rejection gives programs ordinary `try/catch` and `Promise.all` failure semantics rather than a bespoke result envelope.
-2. **Runs the program**: `ctx.codeRuntime.run({ program: args.code, bindings: [{ global: 'tools', functions }], signal: exec.signal })`.
-3. **Surfaces the outcome — after reaching quiescence.** When `ctx.codeRuntime.run()` resolves, the bridge fires the run-scoped abort (cancelling any in-flight sub-dispatch and abandoning queued-unstarted ones), then **awaits the dispatch queue's drain before returning**, per the dispose-to-quiescence rule in [defensive patterns](../../../defensive-patterns.md): an aborted in-flight sub-call still settles and logs its `isError` `tool/code-dispatch` event *inside* the open turn, and nothing can append after `run_code` returns. A successful run then returns one text block — the captured console/stdout output followed by the rendered return value (if any) — plus a `meta` payload (capped logs, dispatch count) for presentation. A run with `result.error` throws a `CodeRunFailedError extends HarnessError` (`code: 'CODE_RUN_FAILED'`, message = the error kind and text plus captured logs so the model can self-correct); the registry's existing catch turns it into a structured `isError` result.
+2. **Runs the program**: `ctx.codeRuntime.run({ program: args.code, bindings: [{ global: 'tools', functions }], signal: runController.signal })`. The runtime receives the run-scoped signal, not only the caller's outer signal, so any way the outer run settles also aborts work inside the runtime.
+3. **Surfaces the outcome — after reaching quiescence.** When `ctx.codeRuntime.run()` settles, whether by fulfillment or rejection, the bridge fires the run-scoped abort (cancelling any in-flight sub-dispatch and abandoning queued-unstarted ones), then **awaits the dispatch queue's drain before returning or propagating**, per the dispose-to-quiescence rule in [defensive patterns](../../../defensive-patterns.md): an aborted in-flight sub-call still settles and logs its `isError` `tool/code-dispatch` event *inside* the open turn, and nothing can append after `run_code` settles. A successful result then returns one text block — the captured console/stdout output followed by the rendered return value (if any) — plus a `meta` payload (capped logs, dispatch count) for presentation. A fulfilled run with `result.error` throws a `CodeRunFailedError extends HarnessError` (`code: 'CODE_RUN_FAILED'`, message = the error kind and text plus captured logs so the model can self-correct); a backend rejection propagates through the same registry error boundary. Both become structured `isError` tool results.
 
 **Sub-call `additionalContext` is suppressed, deliberately.** A `tools/post-execute` hook may attach `additionalContext` to a call; for loop-dispatched calls the loop buffers those and appends each as a `context/message` only after the step's `tool/result`s, preserving call/result adjacency. A sub-dispatch result's `additionalContext` has no such safe outlet from inside a running `run_code`: injecting immediately would land a `context/message` between the parent's `tool/call` and its `tool/result` (breaking the adjacency the buffering exists to protect), and `PostToolDecision.additionalContext` is singular where a program may produce many. The MVP therefore drops sub-call `additionalContext`, pinned by a test and stated in the hooks bridge's docs; the follow-up (a plural context channel or loop-level sub-dispatch buffering) is deferred until a real hook needs it through Code Mode.
 
 **Concurrency: serialized, enforced by the binding.** The bindings are async, so a model writing `Promise.all([tools.a(…), tools.b(…)])` starts both immediately — concurrent dispatch would be the default, while the tool contract carries no concurrency-safety metadata (the open parallel-execution TODO). Each `run_code` invocation therefore owns a dispatch queue and every binding call chains onto it, so even `Promise.all` executes the underlying `ctx.tools.execute()` calls one at a time in submission order; when the run settles, queued-but-unstarted dispatches are abandoned. Lifting this per tool remains tied to tools declaring themselves concurrency-safe.
 
-**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent RFC](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` → a `generic` card, `kind: 'execute'`, title `Run code`, `rawInput` = the program text; `presentResult` → a `generic` card whose content is the captured output (from `meta`). Not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not.
+**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent RFC](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` → a `generic` card, `kind: 'execute'`, title = the program text, `rawInput` = the same program text; `presentResult` → a `generic` card whose content is the captured output (from `meta`). The program is the title because ACP execute cards reliably render that field while some clients omit body and raw-input content. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not.
 
 ### Observability: `tool/code-dispatch`
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Each sub-dispatch appends one session event, declared by `dsh-tools` via `Sessio
 
 - `CodeRunRequest = { program: string; bindings: CodeBindingNamespace[]; signal?: AbortSignal }`
 - `CodeBindingNamespace = { global: string; functions: Record<string, (args: unknown) => Promise<unknown>> }` — the runtime exposes each namespace as a global object of async functions inside the program; binding arguments and resolutions must be structured-cloneable (a runtime may cross a serialization boundary; ours does).
-- `CodeRunResult = { value?: unknown; logs: CodeLogEntry[]; error?: CodeRunFailure }` — an error is a field on a resolved result, never a rejection of `run()`.
+- `CodeRunResult = { value?: unknown; logs: CodeLogEntry[]; error?: CodeRunFailure }` — program execution outcomes, including exception, timeout, abort, and worker exit, resolve as the `error` field. `run()` may reject only for caller/seam misuse (for example a duplicate binding namespace); consumers still contain a non-conforming backend rejection at their own error boundary.
 - `CodeLogEntry = { source: 'console' | 'stdout' | 'stderr'; level?: 'log' | 'info' | 'warn' | 'error' | 'debug'; text: string }`
 - `CodeRunFailure = { kind: 'exception' | 'timeout' | 'abort' | 'worker-exit'; message: string }` — orthogonal outcomes reported independently per [defensive patterns](../../../defensive-patterns.md); a timed-out run is not an exception, an abort is not a timeout.
 - Two readonly backend descriptors, informational not gating: `language` (what the program must be written in — `'typescript'` for the shipped backend; a Python backend would say so, and pair with its own SDK generator on the presentation side) and `isolation` (`'worker-thread'` for the shipped backend; `'process'`, `'container'`, … for future ones). `dsh-tools` requires `language === 'typescript'` in the MVP — its codegen emits TS — and fails the assembly loudly otherwise, the same misconfiguration idiom as `toolOrder` violations (as when `mode` is non-native with no `ctx.codeRuntime` loaded at all).