Merge commit 'ecbf75a5e70f662b6420375140cf12eb6bac7860' into worktree/retarget-pr885-20260729

# Conflicts:
#	docs/development.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/MessageItem.tsx
#	packages/client/ui-primitives/src/markdown/CodeBlock.tsx
#	scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-29 21:37:43 +08:00
496 changed files with 6843 additions and 2738 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md
2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md: 63f25d5c36caecba435e9192534e0b494e1e0105
2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.zh.md: 17cf2f895b187fb794e691c2b14d6e0bff78363d
2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md: a47251376771165d0eb229aaa0fb7f63589d7d77
2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.zh.md: 5a6787b9bdb3286b71842abec075c5a0ebfc7991

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Pair updates run on a generated briefing instead of the guidance corpus; only ne
- **`pnpm run gen-translation-brief [--apply] [pair...]`** ([scripts/gen-translation-brief.ts](../../../../scripts/gen-translation-brief.ts), assembly in [scripts/translation-brief.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-brief.ts)) prints, per out-of-sync pair, the authored side's diff from its recorded last-confirmed blob to the working tree plus the change mapped at the narrowest safely aligned granularity, deterministically widening on mapping failure: a change confined to the pair's byte-identical code fences is computed outright (`--apply` splices it into the counterpart and validates the result against the pairing gate's structural signature before writing); otherwise changed Markdown units (headings, paragraphs, table rows, list items, code fences, block quotes, HTML blocks, thematic breaks, link definitions — matched by container-scoped kind sequences) each carry their last-confirmed source, current source, and current counterpart text with line numbers; units that do not align fall back to depth-matched heading sections; and when sections do not align either, or both sides drifted, the briefing says so and withholds the mapping instead of guessing. Terminology rows are matched against the changed spans only (word-boundary English matching with plural inflections), and for Chinese targets the briefing tracks each relevant term's document-wide first occurrence — when an edit moves it, the vacated and receiving spans join the briefing with an explanatory note, since the 首次出现 annotation must move with it. The unit mapping, code splice, and first-occurrence mechanics adopt the planner design from the [incremental prompt-pipeline work](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/684), whose provider-backed bake-off independently validated the same scope ladder for the automated pipeline. The briefing is the translator's whole working set; the full sources of truth remain the escalation path for decisions the briefing cannot answer.
- **The update path in [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)** consumes the briefing: mechanical (code-fence-only) changes are applied with `--apply`, no subagent; prose diffs go to a subagent whose prompt is the briefing, not the corpus; verification is clause-by-clause on the changed spans, not the whole document.
- **The pairing gate takes pair arguments.** `verify-translation-pairing [pair...]` checks just the named pairs (any of a pair's three files, or the bare stem, names it); the corpus-wide sweep remains the no-argument form that `doc-sync` and CI run. `--write` now requires naming the confirmed pairs — bare `--write` refuses, and re-recording everything is an explicit `--write --all` — because the old bare form silently blessed every drifted pair in the tree, including ones the caller never looked at, and a prose-only drift would then stay green forever. Each record's comment names its own scoped command.
- **The pairing gate takes pair arguments.** `verify-translation-pairing [pair...]` checks just the named pairs (any of a pair's three files, or the bare stem, names it); the corpus-wide sweep remains the no-argument form that `doc-sync` and CI run. `--write` now requires naming the confirmed pairs — bare `--write` refuses, and re-recording everything is an explicit `--write --all` — because the old bare form silently blessed every drifted pair in the tree, including ones the caller never looked at, and a prose-only drift would then stay green forever. Each record's comment names its own scoped command. Before recording, `--write` stores each side's exact bytes with `git hash-object -w --stdin` and pins the blob under a content-addressed local `refs/dsh/translation-pairing/snapshots/` ref; an uncommitted last-confirmed snapshot is therefore available to the briefing generator's later `git cat-file`, not merely named by a hash that Git cannot resolve or left vulnerable to garbage collection.
## Benchmark
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ A second head-to-head replay on the same ten examples compared this note's shipp
- A small prose edit's counterpart update now costs a briefing generation plus one small focused task — no corpus reads, no archaeology, no corpus-wide scans inside the loop — and the same PR obligation holds; the cheap path and the correct path point the same way.
- The briefing generator is a second consumer of the consistency records: recorded blob hashes now also drive diff recovery and section mapping, strengthening the incentive to keep records honest.
- Each distinct confirmed snapshot retains a content-addressed local ref and object. An abandoned re-record may therefore leave an extra durable pin, but it changes no branch or commit history; this local retention is the tradeoff that prevents garbage collection from invalidating an accepted pairing record.
- `--write` without arguments no longer works; muscle-memory callers must name pairs or pass `--all`. That is the point — the bulk bless is now a visible, deliberate act.
- Scoped checks mean an update loop can be green while an unrelated pair elsewhere is red; the corpus-wide check in `doc-sync`/CI still owns the tree-level invariant.
- Span mapping trusts an alignment only when the kind sequences match across the last-confirmed source, current source, and current counterpart; a mapping failure widens deterministically (units → sections → whole document) rather than guessing, so a restructured document gets an explicit "locate the regions yourself" briefing, never a wrong map.
@@ -47,4 +48,4 @@ A second head-to-head replay on the same ten examples compared this note's shipp
## Testing
[scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts) pins unit and section span extraction (container-scoped kinds, depth-only section alignment so translated heading text still maps, preamble), alignment and changed-index detection, the mechanical code splice and each of its refusal conditions, terminology row matching in both directions with word-boundary and plural-inflection discipline, first-occurrence movement tracking, fence escalation, and the rendered briefing's contract (unit bundles with three-way context, mechanical/sections/document scopes, per-direction digests, scoped finish commands). [scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts) pins argument normalization (any pair file or bare stem to the anchor) and the CLI matrix: scoped check, bare `--write` refusal, `--write <pair>`, `--write --all`, `--list` exclusivity, unknown flags.
[scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts) pins unit and section span extraction (container-scoped kinds, depth-only section alignment so translated heading text still maps, preamble), alignment and changed-index detection, the mechanical code splice and each of its refusal conditions, terminology row matching in both directions with word-boundary and plural-inflection discipline, first-occurrence movement tracking, fence escalation, and the rendered briefing's contract (unit bundles with three-way context, mechanical/sections/document scopes, per-direction digests, scoped finish commands). [scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts) pins exact-byte persistence and recovery for uncommitted snapshots, failure before an unavailable object can enter a sidecar, argument normalization (any pair file or bare stem to the anchor), and the CLI matrix: scoped check, bare `--write` refusal, `--write <pair>`, `--write --all`, `--list` exclusivity, unknown flags.

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
- **`pnpm run gen-translation-brief [--apply] [pair...]`**([scripts/gen-translation-brief.ts](../../../../scripts/gen-translation-brief.ts),组装逻辑在 [scripts/translation-brief.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-brief.ts))针对每个失去同步的配对,打印被改一侧从其记录在案的上次确认 blob 到当前工作区的 diff,并附上以能安全对齐的最窄粒度映射的这次改动,映射失败时粒度确定性地逐级放宽:仅落在配对中逐字节一致的围栏代码块内的改动会直接算出(`--apply` 会把它拼接进对侧文件,并在写入前用配对门禁的结构签名校验所得结果);否则,每个有改动的 Markdown 单元(标题、段落、表格行、列表项、围栏代码块、块引用、HTML 块、分隔线、链接定义;匹配依据是以容器为作用域的种类序列)都带上各自的上次确认源文、当前源文与当前对侧文本及行号;无法对齐的单元回退到按深度匹配的标题章节;当章节也无法对齐或两侧同时漂移时,简报会明说这一点并省略映射,而不是靠猜。术语表行只与改动块匹配(英文术语按词边界匹配,含复数变形);当目标侧是中文时,简报还会跟踪每个相关术语在整篇文档中的首次出现:一旦某次编辑使其移位,腾出的与接收的两处区间就会附一条解释性说明加入简报,因为「首次出现」括注必须随之移动。单元映射、代码拼接与首次出现机制采纳了[增量提示词流水线工作](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/684)中的规划器设计;该项工作中接入提供方的对比评测,已为自动流水线独立验证了同一套范围阶梯。简报就是译者的全部工作集;简报回答不了的决策,仍以完整的真源文档作为升级求证路径。
- **[dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 中的更新路径**消费这份简报:机械类改动(只涉及围栏代码块)用 `--apply` 应用,不动用 subagent;行文类 diff 交给 subagent,其提示词就是简报本身,而非指导语料;核验只对改动块逐句进行,不覆盖整篇文档。
- **配对门禁接受配对参数。**`verify-translation-pairing [pair...]` 只检查被点名的配对(配对三个文件中的任意一个,或其裸词干,都能指代该配对);全语料扫描仍是 `doc-sync`(文档同步门禁)与 CI 运行的无参数形式。`--write` 现在要求点名已确认的配对:裸 `--write` 会拒绝执行,重新记录全部配对必须显式写 `--write --all`;原因是旧的裸形式会默默为树中每一个漂移的配对背书,包括调用者从未看过的那些,纯行文层面的漂移于是可以永远保持绿灯。每份记录的注释都写明针对该配对自身的按对命令。
- **配对门禁接受配对参数。**`verify-translation-pairing [pair...]` 只检查被点名的配对(配对三个文件中的任意一个,或其裸词干,都能指代该配对);全语料扫描仍是 `doc-sync`(文档同步门禁)与 CI 运行的无参数形式。`--write` 现在要求点名已确认的配对:裸 `--write` 会拒绝执行,重新记录全部配对必须显式写 `--write --all`;原因是旧的裸形式会默默为树中每一个漂移的配对背书,包括调用者从未看过的那些,纯行文层面的漂移于是可以永远保持绿灯。每份记录的注释都写明针对该配对自身的按对命令。写下记录之前,`--write` 用 `git hash-object -w --stdin` 存入每一侧的精确字节,并在内容寻址的本地 `refs/dsh/translation-pairing/snapshots/` ref 下固定该 blob;未提交的上次确认快照因此能被简报生成器之后的 `git cat-file` 取回,而不只是留下一个 Git 无法解析的 hash 名称或暴露于垃圾回收。
## 基准测试
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 一次小的行文修改,其对侧更新如今只需生成一份简报,外加一个小而聚焦的任务(不读指导语料、不翻查历史、循环内不做全语料扫描),同一 PR 内完成更新的义务保持不变;低成本的路径与正确的路径指向同一个方向。
- 简报生成器成为一致性记录的第二个消费方:记录的 blob hash 如今还驱动 diff 还原与章节映射,这进一步强化了如实维护记录的动机。
- 每个不同的已确认快照都会保留一个内容寻址的本地 ref 和对象。因此,中途放弃的重新记录可能留下额外的持久固定项,但它不会改变任何分支或提交历史;这种本地保留正是防止垃圾回收让已接受配对记录失效所付出的代价。
- 不带参数的 `--write` 不再可用;靠肌肉记忆的调用者必须点名配对或传 `--all`。这正是目的所在:批量背书如今是一个可见的、有意为之的动作。
- 按对检查意味着一个更新循环可以在别处某个无关配对处于红灯时自己保持绿灯;`doc-sync`/CI 中的全语料检查仍然承载树级不变式。
- 区间映射只在上次确认源文、当前源文与当前对侧文本三方的种类序列一致时才信任一处对齐;映射失败时粒度确定性地逐级放宽(单元 → 章节 → 整篇文档)而不是靠猜,因此被重构过的文档拿到的是一份明确写着「请自行定位相关区域」的简报,绝不会是一张错误的地图。
@@ -47,4 +48,4 @@ Status: implemented
## 测试
[scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts) 固定单元与章节的区间提取(以容器为作用域的种类、只按深度对齐章节从而让已翻译的标题文字仍能映射、首个标题前的序言)、对齐与改动索引检测、机械代码拼接及其每一个拒绝条件、带词边界与复数变形约束的双向术语行匹配、首次出现移位跟踪、围栏升级,以及渲染后简报的契约(带三方上下文的单元条目、机械/章节/整篇文档三种范围、分方向的规则摘要、按对的收尾命令)。[scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts) 固定参数归一化(配对的任一文件或裸词干都归一到锚点)与 CLI(命令行界面)用例矩阵:按对检查、裸 `--write` 拒绝执行、`--write <pair>`、`--write --all`、`--list` 的互斥性、未知标志。
[scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-brief.spec.ts) 固定单元与章节的区间提取(以容器为作用域的种类、只按深度对齐章节从而让已翻译的标题文字仍能映射、首个标题前的序言)、对齐与改动索引检测、机械代码拼接及其每一个拒绝条件、带词边界与复数变形约束的双向术语行匹配、首次出现移位跟踪、围栏升级,以及渲染后简报的契约(带三方上下文的单元条目、机械/章节/整篇文档三种范围、分方向的规则摘要、按对的收尾命令)。[scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.spec.ts) 固定未提交快照的精确字节持久化与取回、在不可用对象进入伴随记录前失败、参数归一化(配对的任一文件或裸词干都归一到锚点),以及 CLI(命令行界面)用例矩阵:按对检查、裸 `--write` 拒绝执行、`--write <pair>`、`--write --all`、`--list` 的互斥性、未知标志。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-26-web-syntax-highlighting-shiki.md: b329e35f1d0ce7b3de454758403a09f67056b5af
2026-07-26-web-syntax-highlighting-shiki.zh.md: 8e9d1f0d0c38ce64bcb5da1262538da762f70b12
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-26-web-syntax-highlighting-shiki.md
2026-07-26-web-syntax-highlighting-shiki.md: 48a1e4c43f19693f90906f210f0ed85db3f31687
2026-07-26-web-syntax-highlighting-shiki.zh.md: 780b66a309c841c542f873f376226b8da454e050

View File

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ The client rendered every code surface — markdown fences in assistant prose, t
- **Dependency**: `shiki/core` + `@shikijs/langs`, composed via `createHighlighterCoreSync` with `createJavaScriptRegexEngine({ forgiving: true })` — no oniguruma WASM, no async init, bundle-friendly. Grammar allowlist: `typescript` (embeds JS), `shellscript`, `json` — the languages the harness actually renders; everything else falls back to a geometry-identical plain block, never an error. Prior art: the VitePress site already renders all documentation code through shiki, and TextMate grammars materially beat regex highlighters on TypeScript — the payload that matters here.
- **Singleton**: `ui-primitives/src/markdown/highlight.ts` creates one `HighlighterCore` per document and exposes `highlightToHtml(code, lang)` (undefined = render plain). Engine + grammar construction is a ~120-175ms long task, so the module pre-warms the singleton in a deferred task at plugin boot (the lazy path stays as the correctness fallback), keeping the cost off the render path where a stream's finalize swap would jank. The alias table is a `Map`, not an object: fence info strings are assistant-authored, so a label like `constructor` must miss instead of resolving an inherited property and crashing shiki. The shared `CodeBlock` component owns both arms; its shiki arm injects the generated span tree via `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` — sanctioned because shiki emits a static span tree computed from the code text (no user HTML passes through, no scripts/handlers), shiki's own documented consumption path.
- **Theming**: shiki's `createCssVariablesTheme` routes every token color through `--shiki-*` custom properties; the VALUES live in a new `ui-theme/styles/shiki.css` token sheet (light on `:root`, dark on `body[data-ds-dark-theme]` — the same cascade as every other sheet), imported by the shell's `base.css` chain. Component CSS stays tokens-only; no literal color ever enters JS or component sheets. Background/foreground alias the existing markdown code-block tokens so highlighted and plain blocks agree.
- **Surfaces**: markdown fences (`MarkdownText`'s `pre` component routes single-string fences through `CodeBlock`), the `run_code` expanded program body (ToolRow's code variant, `lang="typescript"`), and the details panel's Input args (`lang="json"`). Output stays plain deliberately — tool output is arbitrary text, and guessing a grammar would mis-highlight more than it helps.
- **Surfaces**: markdown fences (`MarkdownText`'s `pre` component routes single-string fences through `CodeBlock`), the `run_code` expanded program body (ToolRow's code variant, `lang="typescript"`), and the details panel's Input args (`lang="json"`). Tool output is never syntax-highlighted — it is arbitrary text, and guessing a grammar would mis-highlight more than it helps; a bash card's output carries only the color its own ANSI sequences declare, through [the terminal card](../feature/2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md).
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ client 过去把每一处代码表面——assistant 正文里的 markdown 围
- **依赖**:`shiki/core` + `@shikijs/langs`,经 `createHighlighterCoreSync` 搭配 `createJavaScriptRegexEngine({ forgiving: true })` 组装——不带 oniguruma WASM、没有异步初始化、对 bundle 友好。语法(grammar)白名单:`typescript`(内嵌 JS)、`shellscript`、`json`——即 harness 实际会渲染的那几种语言;其余一律回退到几何完全一致的纯文本块,绝不报错。先例:VitePress 站点已经通过 shiki 渲染全部文档代码;而在 TypeScript(正是此处要紧的载荷)上,TextMate 语法实质性优于正则高亮器。
- **单例**:`ui-primitives/src/markdown/highlight.ts` 为每个 document 创建一个 `HighlighterCore`,并公开 `highlightToHtml(code, lang)`(undefined 即渲染为纯文本)。引擎加语法的构建是一次约 120-175ms 的长任务,因此模块在插件启动时用延迟任务预热单例(惰性路径保留为正确性兜底),把这笔开销挪出渲染路径——否则流式 finalize 交换的那一刻会卡顿。别名表用 `Map` 而非对象:fence 信息串由 assistant 撰写,诸如 `constructor` 这样的标签必须落空,而不是解析到继承属性并让 shiki 崩溃。共享的 `CodeBlock` 组件同时拥有两条分支;其 shiki 分支经 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` 注入生成的 span 树——此用法获准,因为 shiki 输出的是从代码文本计算出的静态 span 树(不流经任何用户 HTML,没有脚本或事件处理器),这正是 shiki 自身文档载明的消费路径。
- **主题化**:shiki 的 `createCssVariablesTheme` 让每一种 token 颜色都经由 `--shiki-*` 自定义属性路由;取值本身住在新增的 `ui-theme/styles/shiki.css` token 表里(亮色在 `:root`、暗色在 `body[data-ds-dark-theme]`——层叠方式与其余每张样式表相同),由壳的 `base.css` 导入链引入。组件 CSS 保持只用 token;任何字面颜色都不进入 JS 或组件样式表。背景/前景以别名指向既有的 markdown 代码块 token,使高亮块与纯文本块彼此一致。
- **表面**:markdown 围栏代码块(`MarkdownText` 的 `pre` 组件把单字符串围栏路由到 `CodeBlock`)、`run_code` 展开后的程序正文(ToolRow 的 code 变体,`lang="typescript"`),以及 details 面板的 Input 参数(`lang="json"`)。输出有意保持纯文本——工具输出是任意文本,硬猜一种语法,带来的误高亮会多于帮助。
- **表面**:markdown 围栏代码块(`MarkdownText` 的 `pre` 组件把单字符串围栏路由到 `CodeBlock`)、`run_code` 展开后的程序正文(ToolRow 的 code 变体,`lang="typescript"`),以及 details 面板的 Input 参数(`lang="json"`)。工具输出从不做语法高亮——它是任意文本,硬猜一种语法,带来的误高亮会多于帮助;bash 卡片的输出只承载其自身 ANSI 序列声明的颜色,经由[终端卡片](../feature/2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md)渲染。
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.md
2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.md: d18f6c1bf8fe240759ad48f67ca6b231000eaf2c
2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.zh.md: 42a1625a3b2ec7b00942dc46b0c9c64058ecd2fc
2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.md: 75dfd47087356c34005ec4673e174e451a72c660
2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.zh.md: bc4902769561c3d33d2101de55e28e70d114f39b

View File

@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ Hook installation is worktree-scoped. With `CI=true` or `GITHUB_ACTIONS=true`, t
Before upgrading format 0, the installer refuses direct common-config `extensions.*`; it also refuses direct `core.worktree` or `core.bare=true` and non-empty dormant worktree configs that enabling the extension would activate. The migration removes direct `core.bare=false` because false is Git's default. The common repository config and every existing `config.worktree` must be regular files. These checks disable include expansion because Git's repository-format parser also ignores included targets. A repository-scoped lock serializes migration and hook writes; its process ID, random token, file identity, and exact contents must still match at release. Dead or invalid locks require manual recovery rather than automatic breaking.
Each hook directory carries a JSON ownership marker containing the absolute path last published to worktree config. After a checkout moves, that marker permits replacement of only the exact stale owned value. Before Lefthook runs, the marker and every existing generated hook must be unaliased regular files. The installer resolves the effective scope, origin, and value of `core.hooksPath`, including active `config.worktree` includes; it refuses command-scoped paths, unowned worktree-scoped paths, and unowned reserved directories. An inherited system, global, or common-repository path requires `DSH_LEFTHOOK_ALLOW_HOOKS_PATH_OVERRIDE=1`, which opts only the current worktree into Lefthook. Inactive `includeIf` targets are not recursively inspected because they do not affect the current configuration. Command-scoped Git configuration is removed from the Lefthook subprocess environment after validation.
Each hook directory carries a JSON ownership marker containing the absolute path last published to worktree config. After a checkout moves, that marker permits replacement of only the exact stale owned value. Git seeds a new linked worktree's `config.worktree` from the main worktree; when that seed contains the marker-backed reserved hook path of a registered worktree, the installer replaces only the new worktree's config with its own path. Before Lefthook runs, the marker and every existing generated hook must be unaliased regular files. The installer resolves the effective scope, origin, and value of `core.hooksPath`, including active `config.worktree` includes; it refuses command-scoped paths, unowned worktree-scoped paths, and unowned reserved directories. An inherited system, global, or common-repository path requires `DSH_LEFTHOOK_ALLOW_HOOKS_PATH_OVERRIDE=1`, which opts only the current worktree into Lefthook. Inactive `includeIf` targets are not recursively inspected because they do not affect the current configuration. Command-scoped Git configuration is removed from the Lefthook subprocess environment after validation.
If Lefthook fails after changing `core.hooksPath`, the installer restores the previous worktree value; a rollback failure is reported alongside the installation failure. Existing files in `$GIT_COMMON_DIR/hooks` are never removed or rewritten. Focused installer tests pin isolation, migration refusal, ownership and relocation, concurrent installation, custom paths, and rollback.
If Lefthook fails after changing `core.hooksPath`, the installer restores the previous worktree value; a rollback failure is reported alongside the installation failure. Existing files in `$GIT_COMMON_DIR/hooks` are never removed or rewritten. Focused installer tests pin isolation, copied new-worktree configuration, migration refusal, ownership and relocation, concurrent installation, custom paths, and rollback.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ Lefthook 生成的钩子会优先使用安装时从对应 worktree 记录的绝
升级格式 0 之前,安装程序会拒绝共用配置中直接设置的 `extensions.*`;它还会拒绝直接设置的 `core.worktree` 或 `core.bare=true`,以及启用扩展后将被激活的非空且尚未生效的 worktree 配置。迁移会移除直接设置的 `core.bare=false`,因为 false 是 Git 的默认值。共用仓库配置和每个已有的 `config.worktree` 都必须是常规文件。这些检查会禁用 include 展开,因为 Git 的仓库格式解析器也会忽略 include 目标。仓库级锁会串行化迁移和钩子写入;释放时,锁的进程 ID、随机令牌、文件身份和完整内容必须仍然匹配。所属进程已结束或内容无效的锁必须手动恢复,不会被自动破坏。
每个钩子目录都有一个 JSON 所有权标记,其中包含上次写入 worktree 配置的绝对路径。检出目录移动后,该标记只允许替换确切的陈旧自有值。Lefthook 运行前,所有权标记和每个已有的生成钩子都必须是不带别名的常规文件。安装程序会解析 `core.hooksPath` 的生效作用域、来源和值,包括通过当前生效的 `config.worktree` include 加载的值;它会拒绝命令作用域路径、非自有的 worktree 作用域路径以及非自有的保留目录。继承自系统、全局或共用仓库配置的路径必须设置 `DSH_LEFTHOOK_ALLOW_HOOKS_PATH_OVERRIDE=1`,从而只让当前 worktree 显式启用 Lefthook。未生效的 `includeIf` 目标不会被递归检查,因为它们不影响当前配置。完成验证后,Lefthook 子进程的环境会移除命令作用域的 Git 配置。
每个钩子目录都有一个 JSON 所有权标记,其中包含上次写入 worktree 配置的绝对路径。检出目录移动后,该标记只允许替换确切的陈旧自有值。Git 会以主 worktree 的配置为新链接 worktree 初始化 `config.worktree`;当该初始配置包含某个已注册 worktree 中由所有权标记佐证的保留钩子路径时,安装程序只会在新 worktree 的配置中将其替换为新 worktree 自有的路径。Lefthook 运行前,所有权标记和每个已有的生成钩子都必须是不带别名的常规文件。安装程序会解析 `core.hooksPath` 的生效作用域、来源和值,包括通过当前生效的 `config.worktree` include 加载的值;它会拒绝命令作用域路径、非自有的 worktree 作用域路径以及非自有的保留目录。继承自系统、全局或共用仓库配置的路径必须设置 `DSH_LEFTHOOK_ALLOW_HOOKS_PATH_OVERRIDE=1`,从而只让当前 worktree 显式启用 Lefthook。未生效的 `includeIf` 目标不会被递归检查,因为它们不影响当前配置。完成验证后,Lefthook 子进程的环境会移除命令作用域的 Git 配置。
若 Lefthook 在更改 `core.hooksPath` 后失败,安装程序会恢复先前的 worktree 值;若回滚失败,会与安装失败一并报告。`$GIT_COMMON_DIR/hooks` 中的现有文件绝不会被移除或改写。聚焦的安装程序测试固定了隔离、迁移拒绝、所有权和检出目录移动、并发安装、自定义路径及回滚行为。
若 Lefthook 在更改 `core.hooksPath` 后失败,安装程序会恢复先前的 worktree 值;若回滚失败,会与安装失败一并报告。`$GIT_COMMON_DIR/hooks` 中的现有文件绝不会被移除或改写。聚焦的安装程序测试固定了隔离、复制的新 worktree 配置、迁移拒绝、所有权和检出目录移动、并发安装、自定义路径及回滚行为。
## 考虑过的替代方案