docs(todo): state the catalog's policy branch and drop the sidecar census

The tool catalog boots every tool with its default config, but
allowParallelInProgress has no default, so the generator has to choose;
the page now says which branch it shows. The Agent Note's sidecar count
went stale twice inside this PR, so it records the refresh rule instead
of a point-in-time census. The SDK builtin entry pins its config literal
with satisfies like every sibling.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
-2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: b9782d2946086feac3bac4f4361de543b5e93e69
-2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: e2311d40c8b246add39657162d2fcf3206da24b1
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 338534d2d2eeb4b1d6df79b32f0d4ec5b6695d39
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: d6e3c2f56ac0251e59a434cd76c198b0434991be

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md

@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel shares the same turn-scoped lifetime (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log standing plan (latest `todo/write` with no later `turn/start`), computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan when it still stands and the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, clears on a later `turn/start`, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.
+Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 71) plus `packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/todo-panel.spec.tsx` pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip). `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel shares the same turn-scoped lifetime (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log standing plan (latest `todo/write` with no later `turn/start`), computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan when it still stands and the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, clears on a later `turn/start`, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md

@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 后果
 
-回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管：未来对窗口重建的任何改动都会自然保持 todos 一致；fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture（测试前置数据）加上组装后的无密钥快照（`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`）在构建后的完整客户端依赖图中固定整条链（行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返）。`todos` 是 `ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段，所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板共用同一按轮次界定的生命周期（自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现）；Web 各面渲染同一个事件，只新增一个协议字段，不新增事件类型。这个由 host 提供的字段正是冷加载重建的依据：history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上当前有效的计划（其后没有更晚 `turn/start` 的最近一次 `todo/write`），独立于分页窗口计算（与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势）——因此重开会话时若计划仍然有效且最后一次写入落在窗口之前，计划也照常恢复；该值跨往前翻页保留，之后的任何写入照常覆盖，更晚的 `turn/start` 会清空，而尾页响应不带投影时复位为空。
+回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管：未来对窗口重建的任何改动都会自然保持 todos 一致；fx-alpha 第 71 轮的 fixture（测试前置数据）加上 `packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/todo-panel.spec.tsx` 固定整条链（行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返）。`todos` 是 `ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段，所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板共用同一按轮次界定的生命周期（自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现）；Web 各面渲染同一个事件，只新增一个协议字段，不新增事件类型。这个由 host 提供的字段正是冷加载重建的依据：history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上当前有效的计划（其后没有更晚 `turn/start` 的最近一次 `todo/write`），独立于分页窗口计算（与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势）——因此重开会话时若计划仍然有效且最后一次写入落在窗口之前，计划也照常恢复；该值跨往前翻页保留，之后的任何写入照常覆盖，更晚的 `turn/start` 会清空，而尾页响应不带投影时复位为空。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md
-2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 170c0d205a95b0668e8da0997a04849aae2bd59e
-2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 2ff13750bb2f19acccd09ffdd6d4937729e63803
+2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 310763977862cf7b170a8901d636ce824fca304d
+2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: e00c8357cac1dbc9bb82388b3e25304f96e80b3b

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md

@@ -47,4 +47,4 @@ The row takes `planSummary` in `toolviews/plan-summary.ts`. It names the first a
 
 ## Consequences
 
-A todo list can now faithfully mirror parallel execution, and every UI renders several active markers at once: the TUI's per-status prefix needed no change, the plan strip's header counts the active items, and the row needed the derivation above. A composition that sets `allowParallelInProgress: true` no longer rejects a formerly-invalid snapshot shape; one that sets `false` keeps the old rejection, and the durable-log invariant accepts both. The model-facing description changed, which re-recorded the tool-catalog page and every `tool-schemas.expected.json` sidecar carrying the todo schema (seven of the eight in the tree). Scenarios composing an identical header share one sidecar through `toolSchemasSource` rather than each keeping a copy, so the count tracks distinct header compositions, not scenarios; a branch changing the tool description still has to refresh whichever sidecars landed after it branched — `pnpm run test:snapshot:refresh` does it keylessly. The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items `in_progress`, so both fixture-driven surfaces render a parallel plan — `packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/todo-panel.spec.tsx` pins the row summary and the plan strip, and the ACP `todo-write` scenario records a three-todo plan with two active — and each would fail again if its derivation returned to single-active.
+A todo list can now faithfully mirror parallel execution, and every UI renders several active markers at once: the TUI's per-status prefix needed no change, the plan strip's header counts the active items, and the row needed the derivation above. A composition that sets `allowParallelInProgress: true` no longer rejects a formerly-invalid snapshot shape; one that sets `false` keeps the old rejection, and the durable-log invariant accepts both. The model-facing description changed, which re-recorded the tool-catalog page and every snapshot sidecar carrying the todo schema. No count is recorded here: the set grows with every pinning scenario that lands, and the two point-in-time censuses this note previously carried were both stale within days. The operative rule is that a branch changing the tool description must refresh whichever sidecars landed after it branched — including the numbered `tool-schemas.<n>.expected.json` files pinning a subagent class, whose schemas the parent scenario does not cover — and `pnpm run test:snapshot:refresh` does it keylessly over the whole corpus. The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items `in_progress`, so both fixture-driven surfaces render a parallel plan — `packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/todo-panel.spec.tsx` pins the row summary and the plan strip, and the ACP `todo-write` scenario records a three-todo plan with two active — and each would fail again if its derivation returned to single-active.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md

@@ -47,4 +47,4 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 后果
 
-现在 todo 列表可以忠实反映并行执行，并且每个 UI 都能一次渲染多个活跃标记：TUI 按状态区分的前缀无需改动，计划横条的表头会计数活跃条目，工具行则需要上述推导。设置 `allowParallelInProgress: true` 的组合不再拒绝一种此前无效的快照形状；设置为 `false` 的组合仍保留旧的拒绝行为，而持久日志不变式两者都接受。面向模型的描述发生了变化，这重新记录了 tool-catalog 页面以及每个带有 todo schema 的 `tool-schemas.expected.json` sidecar（树中八个里有七个）。组合出相同 header 的场景通过 `toolSchemasSource` 共用同一份 sidecar，而非各自保留副本，因此这个数量对应的是不同的 header 组合，而不是场景数；改动工具描述的分支仍须刷新它分叉之后落地的那些 sidecar —— `pnpm run test:snapshot:refresh` 可以无 key 完成。web fixture 的 todo 样本现在有两个条目处于 `in_progress`，因此两个由 fixture 驱动的展示面渲染的都是并行计划——`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/todo-panel.spec.tsx` 固定工具行摘要与计划横条，ACP `todo-write` 场景录制的是三条目、两个活跃的计划——任一推导退回单活跃项，对应的测试都会失败。
+现在 todo 列表可以忠实反映并行执行，并且每个 UI 都能一次渲染多个活跃标记：TUI 按状态区分的前缀无需改动，计划横条的表头会计数活跃条目，工具行则需要上述推导。设置 `allowParallelInProgress: true` 的组合不再拒绝一种此前无效的快照形状；设置为 `false` 的组合仍保留旧的拒绝行为，而持久日志不变式两者都接受。面向模型的描述发生了变化，这重新记录了 tool-catalog 页面以及每个带有 todo schema 的快照 sidecar。此处不记录数量：该集合会随每个新落地的 pin 场景增长，而本 Note 先前记过的两次点时刻计数都在几天内失实。有效规则是：改动工具描述的分支必须刷新它分叉之后落地的那些 sidecar —— 包括固定 subagent 类工具的编号文件 `tool-schemas.<n>.expected.json`，其 schema 不被父场景覆盖 —— `pnpm run test:snapshot:refresh` 可以无 key 地对整个语料完成刷新。web fixture 的 todo 样本现在有两个条目处于 `in_progress`，因此两个由 fixture 驱动的展示面渲染的都是并行计划——`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/todo-panel.spec.tsx` 固定工具行摘要与计划横条，ACP `todo-write` 场景录制的是三条目、两个活跃的计划——任一推导退回单活跃项，对应的测试都会失败。