Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/persist-web-theme-settings
# Conflicts: # .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.i18n.yaml # packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml # packages/host/apiproxy/README.i18n.yaml
This commit is contained in:
Yichen Jiang
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: b6a24ecd9700e32912b8112b59cbd8b6ab131eb5
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: a00a43ece1e581190de6096be8138df25a23f07f
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 99bbed3edab32512f88ece9694d6519a1f89c2dd
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: ca1bbe9ed3e412186763d1ed4fca9ed06669d4c3
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
In the registry's native presentation, the agent loop advertises every visible capability as a JSON-schema function definition. `ToolRegistry` contributes its schemas to the system-prompt assembly, the assembly's `tools` land on the wire (and in the logged request header), the model invokes one `tool-call` block per step, and the loop dispatches each call through `ctx.tools.execute()` **sequentially** (parallel tool execution is an explicit open TODO in `dsh-tools` and [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)), with **every** intermediate `tool-result` re-entering the model's context on the next request.
|
||||
In the registry's native presentation, the agent loop advertises every visible capability as a JSON-schema function definition. `ToolRegistry` contributes its schemas to the system-prompt assembly, the assembly's `tools` land on the wire (and in the logged request header), the model invokes one `tool-call` block per step, and at the time of this note the loop dispatched each call through `ctx.tools.execute()` **sequentially** (parallel tool execution was an open TODO then; bounded parallel dispatch has since shipped — the [parallel tool-call note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md), the rolling pool in [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)) — with **every** intermediate `tool-result` re-entering the model's context on the next request.
|
||||
|
||||
For multi-step tool work this is token-heavy and serial. The model cannot compose tools — loop over a result set, branch on an intermediate value, fan out, post-process — without a full model round-trip per call, and each round-trip drags the entire intermediate result back into context whether the model needs it or not.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ This note owns Code Mode's presentation, composition, isolation, and settlement
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction with `toolOrder`, stated up front:** a configured `systemPrompt.toolOrder` naming native capabilities rejects every assembly under `mode: 'code'`, because those names are outside that mode's wire-validation universe. This is correct behavior, not a bug: a deployment using Code Mode updates its order config or drops it.
|
||||
|
||||
**SDK prompt section.** In `'code'` and `'both'`, the lazy `tools:sdk` section in the tool-guidance order band renders TypeScript declarations plus fixed usage instructions for the scope's visible capabilities. It shares lookup and execution visibility, excludes `run_code`, and sorts tools lexicographically for byte-stable output.
|
||||
**SDK prompt section.** In `'code'` and `'both'`, the lazy `tools:sdk` section in the tool-guidance order band renders the loaded runtime's language declarations plus fixed usage instructions for the scope's visible capabilities (TypeScript by default; the [language-dispatch note](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md) added Python and the `ctx.codeRuntime.language` renderer table). It shares lookup and execution visibility, excludes `run_code`, and sorts tools lexicographically for byte-stable output.
|
||||
|
||||
**Assembly ownership.** `run_code` and `tools:sdk` enter the trusted `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall as normal assembly inputs. A scoped `tools:sdk` section may shadow the global default before dispatch, and a listener may remove or replace either contribution. The waterfall's returned assembly is final, so whoever changes these inputs owns preserving a viable Code Mode protocol when the deployment expects Code Mode to remain usable; no restoration pass overrides deliberate composition.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentat
|
||||
|
||||
**Sub-call contexts are deferred through the parent.** Injecting inside `run_code` would break parent call/result adjacency, so `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` collects every sub-result `additionalContexts` entry in dispatch order. The registry carries that array even when the program later throws, and the loop appends each entry only after the outer result and every sibling result in the step. An outer post-execute block discards tool-deferred entries and exposes only contexts explicitly attached by the blocking decision.
|
||||
|
||||
**Concurrency is serialized.** Each run owns a dispatch queue, so even `Promise.all` executes tool calls in submission order. Settlement abandons queued calls that have not started. Parallelism requires per-tool concurrency-safety metadata.
|
||||
**Concurrency is bounded, not serialized.** Each run owns a dispatch queue that starts calls strictly in submission order and classifies each one through `registry.executionMode`, the same fail-closed `isConcurrencySafe` contract the native loop uses. Consecutive parallel-classified calls overlap up to `maxParallelSubCalls` (default 10; `1` restores serial dispatch); an exclusive call drains the pool and runs alone. Settlement abandons queued calls that have not started. This note shipped the serialized placeholder; the [live-parallel Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) owns the scheduler that replaced it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Each sub-dispatch appends a log-only `tool/code-dispatch-start` event at pool en
|
||||
- `CodeBindingNamespace = { global: string; functions: Record<string, (args: unknown) => Promise<CodeJsonValue>>; errorClass?: { name: string; memberNameProperty: string } }` — the runtime exposes each namespace as a global object of async functions inside the program; the optional descriptor asks the runtime to inject a real program-visible rejection class without teaching the seam consumer-specific names. `CodeJsonValue` is this dependency-light seam's structural lossless-JSON type, so binding arguments and resolutions cross the implementation's serialization boundary whole.
|
||||
- `CodeRunResult = { value?: CodeJsonValue; logs: string[]; error?: CodeRunFailure }` — program execution outcomes resolve as the `error` field. `run()` may reject only for caller/seam misuse (for example a duplicate binding namespace); consumers still contain a non-conforming backend rejection at their own error boundary.
|
||||
- `CodeRunFailure = { kind: 'exception' | 'timeout' | 'abort' | 'worker-exit' | 'invalid-output' | 'output-limit'; message: string }` — orthogonal outcomes reported independently per [defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md); a timed-out run is not an exception, an abort is not a timeout, a lossy completion is not an overflow, and a substrate exit is none of them.
|
||||
- Two readonly backend descriptors, informational not gating: `language` (what the program must be written in — `'typescript'` for the shipped backend; a Python backend would say so, and pair with its own SDK generator on the presentation side) and `isolation` (`'worker-thread'` for the shipped backend; `'process'`, `'container'`, … for future ones). `dsh-tools` requires `language === 'typescript'` in the MVP — its codegen emits TS — and fails the assembly loudly otherwise, the same misconfiguration idiom as `toolOrder` violations (as when `mode` is non-native with no `ctx.codeRuntime` loaded at all).
|
||||
- Two readonly backend descriptors, informational not gating: `language` (what the program must be written in — `'typescript'` for the first backend; a Python backend says `'python'` and pairs with its own SDK generator on the presentation side) and `isolation` (`'worker-thread'` for the shipped backend; `'process'`, `'container'`, … for future ones). `dsh-tools` accepts any `language` with a registered SDK renderer and `run_code` flavor (TypeScript and Python ship; see the [language-dispatch note](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md)) and fails the assembly loudly otherwise, the same misconfiguration idiom as `toolOrder` violations (as when `mode` is non-native with no `ctx.codeRuntime` loaded at all).
|
||||
|
||||
Requests contain every runtime input; implementations own validated timeout and cap defaults. The registry looks up the optional runtime only when Code Mode is assembled, so native mode does not depend on one. Missing or language-incompatible runtimes fail loudly. Alternate substrates or languages can replace the implementation behind the same seam, paired with the appropriate SDK generator.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ The worker runtime provides containment, not a security boundary: model code can
|
||||
|
||||
### What the model sees
|
||||
|
||||
The SDK instructs the model to write an async erasable-TypeScript body, call tools through `await tools.name(args)`, catch rejected tool calls when needed, and return or log only the output that should re-enter context. Calls remain sequential even under `Promise.all`. The declaration prefix can be as large as native schemas, especially in `'both'`, but remains stable for provider caching.
|
||||
The SDK instructs the model to write an async body in the loaded runtime's language (an erasable-TypeScript body by default; a Python `async` body under a Python runtime — see the [language-dispatch note](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md)), call tools through `await tools.name(args)`, catch rejected tool calls when needed, and return or log only the output that should re-enter context. Both flavors state the same contract in their own primitive: independent read-only calls MAY overlap under `Promise.all` (TypeScript) or `asyncio.gather` (Python), mutating calls run alone in submission order, and dependent work sequences with `await`. The declaration prefix can be as large as native schemas, especially in `'both'`, but remains stable for provider caching.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assembly listeners own the integrity of any rewritten protocol surface. Sub-dispatch remains serialized, while per-call contexts retain their source, envelope, and metadata through the outer result.
|
||||
Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assembly listeners own the integrity of any rewritten protocol surface. Sub-dispatch starts in submission order under a bounded overlap pool, while per-call contexts retain their source, envelope, and metadata through the outer result.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assem
|
||||
|
||||
**Result elision / summarization over native tool-calling.** Addresses only the context-bloat half of the problem: trimming old `tool-result`s is cheap to add as a logged surface replacement under reconstructable requests, but still pays one model round-trip per call and cannot express loops, branches, or joins. Complementary, not competing; it can layer under Code Mode for residual native calls.
|
||||
|
||||
**Parallel native dispatch in the loop.** The other answer to round-trip cost; still valid future work (the open TODO), still blocked on concurrency-safety metadata, and still no composition — it parallelizes calls the model already decided on in one step. Code Mode's serialized-queue decision keeps the two compatible: when the metadata lands, both native parallel dispatch and per-tool binding parallelism unlock together.
|
||||
**Parallel native dispatch in the loop.** The other answer to round-trip cost at decision time; it was blocked on concurrency-safety metadata and offers no composition either way — it parallelizes calls the model already decided on in one step. Code Mode's queue decision kept the two compatible, and that is how it played out: the metadata landed as `isConcurrencySafe` (the [parallel tool-call note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md)), and native rolling-pool dispatch and per-tool binding parallelism unlocked on the same classifier.
|
||||
|
||||
**Always-exclusive (Cloudflare-faithful, no mode).** Rejected for this SDK's primary consumer: a coding agent's bread-and-butter single calls (`bash`, `read`, `edit`) are already ideal as native calls, and forcing every edit through a program taxes the common case. The mode config keeps the faithful form (`'code'`) one line away without imposing it.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,6 +128,6 @@ Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assem
|
||||
|
||||
**Large lossless JSON values can exhaust memory.** Tool bindings snapshot lossless JSON before dispatch and return canonical JSON resolutions whole. The runtime validates both sides of the worker port and applies no per-binding byte cap; structured-clone cost and process or worker memory are the practical bounds. The combined outer-output ledger for logs, the completion value, and a failure diagnostic is the only byte-capped boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Serialized-only sub-dispatch.** `Promise.all` gains no wall-clock parallelism yet, only fewer round-trips; models may over-expect. The instructions state it; lifting it is tied to the same concurrency-safety metadata the native parallel-dispatch TODO needs.
|
||||
**Sub-dispatch overlap is bounded by tool safety claims, not by the caller.** A program's `Promise.all` or `asyncio.gather` buys wall-clock parallelism only across calls the tool itself classifies concurrency-safe; a run of exclusive calls still costs its round-trips in sequence, and models may over-expect. Both flavors' SDK instructions state the real contract. This note shipped the serialized placeholder that made the risk absolute; the [live-parallel Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) owns the scheduler and its overlap cap.
|
||||
|
||||
**Budget metering reads the event loop, not a flag.** Busy-time polling (`eventLoopUtilization()`) is coarser than an exact CPU meter — a budget expires up to one poll interval late — and its correctness claim ("a pending dispatch cannot pause it") is load-bearing against a hostile program. Both sides are unit-tested (hot loop with a pending decoy dispatch dies at `computeMs`; idle-on-slow-binding survives to `maxWallMs`), and the poll interval is an internal constant, not config — nothing a deployment could mis-tune into a bypass. `maxWallMs` is config, and it reaches `setTimeout`, which clamps a delay above `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS` (2^31-1 ms) to 1 ms; a positivity check alone therefore accepts a 25-day ceiling that expires on the first tick and times out every run. The worker runtime range-checks the field at load for that reason. `computeMs` needs no upper bound because it is compared against measured utilization instead of being handed to a timer.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
在注册表的原生呈现方式下，agent loop（智能体循环）将每个可见能力以 JSON Schema 函数定义的形式通告给模型。`ToolRegistry` 将其 schema 贡献给系统提示词组装，组装结果中的 `tools` 落到协议格式（wire format）上（也记录在请求头日志中），模型每步调用一个 `tool-call` 块，循环通过 `ctx.tools.execute()` **逐个**分发每次调用（并行工具执行是 `dsh-tools` 和 [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) 中明确标注的 open TODO），且**每一个**中间 `tool-result` 都会在下一次请求时重新进入模型上下文。
|
||||
在注册表的原生呈现方式下，agent loop（智能体循环）将每个可见能力以 JSON Schema 函数定义的形式通告给模型。`ToolRegistry` 将其 schema 贡献给系统提示词组装，组装结果中的 `tools` 落到协议格式（wire format）上（也记录在请求头日志中），模型每步调用一个 `tool-call` 块，而在本 note 写作时，循环通过 `ctx.tools.execute()` **逐个**分发每次调用（并行工具执行当时还是 open TODO；此后有界的并行分发已经交付——见[并行工具调用 note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md)，以及 [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) 中的 rolling pool）——且**每一个**中间 `tool-result` 都会在下一次请求时重新进入模型上下文。
|
||||
|
||||
对于多步工具操作，这种方式 token 开销大且串行。模型无法组合工具——遍历结果集、根据中间值分支、扇出、后处理——每次调用都需要一次完整的模型往返，而每次往返都会把完整的中间结果拖回上下文，不管模型是否需要。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
|
||||
|
||||
**与 `toolOrder` 的交互，预先说明：** 如果配置的 `systemPrompt.toolOrder` 引用了原生能力名称，在 `mode: 'code'` 下会拒绝所有组装，因为那些名称不在该模式的协议校验范围内。这是正确行为而非 bug：使用 Code Mode 的部署需要更新其 order 配置或移除它。
|
||||
|
||||
**SDK 提示词段。** 在 `'code'` 和 `'both'` 下，tool-guidance order band 中的惰性 `tools:sdk` 段为当前 scope 的可见能力渲染 TypeScript 声明加固定的使用说明。它共享查找和执行可见性，排除 `run_code`，并按字典序排列工具以获得字节稳定的输出。
|
||||
**SDK 提示词段。** 在 `'code'` 和 `'both'` 下，tool-guidance order band 中的惰性 `tools:sdk` 段为当前 scope 的可见能力渲染所加载运行时语言的声明加固定的使用说明（默认 TypeScript；[语言分发 note](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md) 加入了 Python 与按 `ctx.codeRuntime.language` 选择的渲染器表）。它共享查找和执行可见性，排除 `run_code`，并按字典序排列工具以获得字节稳定的输出。
|
||||
|
||||
**组装所有权。** `run_code` 和 `tools:sdk` 作为正常的组装输入进入受信任的 `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall。一个 scoped 的 `tools:sdk` 段可以在分发前遮蔽全局默认值，监听器也可以移除或替换任一贡献。waterfall 返回的组装结果是最终的，因此修改这些输入的人有责任在部署期望 Code Mode 可用时保持协议面的完整性；没有恢复 pass 会覆盖有意的组合。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
|
||||
|
||||
**子调用上下文通过父调用延后。** 在 `run_code` 内部注入会破坏父调用/结果的相邻性，因此 `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` 按分发顺序收集每个子结果的 `additionalContexts` 条目。即使程序后来抛出异常，注册表仍携带该数组；循环只在外层结果与步骤中所有兄弟结果之后追加每个条目。外层 post-execute 阻止会丢弃工具延后的条目，只暴露阻止 decision 显式附加的上下文。
|
||||
|
||||
**并发被序列化。** 每次 run 拥有一个分发队列，因此即使 `Promise.all` 也按提交顺序执行工具调用。结算时放弃尚未开始的排队调用。并行化需要每个工具的并发安全元数据。
|
||||
**并发是有界的，而非被序列化。** 每次 run 拥有一个分发队列，严格按提交顺序启动调用，并通过 `registry.executionMode` 对每个调用分类——与原生循环所用的 fail-closed `isConcurrencySafe` 契约相同。连续的 parallel 类调用最多重叠 `maxParallelSubCalls` 个（默认 10；设为 `1` 恢复串行分发）；exclusive 类调用会排空池并单独运行。结算时放弃尚未开始的排队调用。本 note 交付的是被序列化的占位实现；取代它的调度器由[实时并行 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) 负责。
|
||||
|
||||
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定：`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片，`kind: 'execute'`，以程序文本作为标题，并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput`；`run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`，因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时（Web）会通过通用原始内容回退机制，使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片，其中包括捕获的日志，以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片：该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」，程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
|
||||
- `CodeBindingNamespace = { global: string; functions: Record<string, (args: unknown) => Promise<CodeJsonValue>>; errorClass?: { name: string; memberNameProperty: string } }`——运行时将每个命名空间作为程序内部的全局异步函数对象暴露；可选描述符要求运行时注入真正的、程序可见的 reject 类，而无需让 seam 获知消费方专用名称。`CodeJsonValue` 是这个低依赖 seam 的结构化无损 JSON 类型，因此绑定参数与返回值可以完整跨越实现的序列化边界。
|
||||
- `CodeRunResult = { value?: CodeJsonValue; logs: string[]; error?: CodeRunFailure }`——程序执行失败时，执行 promise 仍会 fulfill，并通过 `error` 字段返回失败结果。只有调用方/seam 误用（例如重复的绑定命名空间）时，`run()` 才会 reject；消费方仍在自己的错误边界处理不合规后端的拒绝。
|
||||
- `CodeRunFailure = { kind: 'exception' | 'timeout' | 'abort' | 'worker-exit' | 'invalid-output' | 'output-limit'; message: string }`——按[防御性模式](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)独立报告的正交结果；超时的 run 不是异常，abort 不是超时，有损完成值不是溢出，基底退出也与上述情况相互独立。
|
||||
- 两个只读的后端描述符，仅供信息参考而非门禁判定：`language`（程序必须使用的语言——交付的后端为 `'typescript'`；Python 后端会声明自己，并在呈现侧配对自己的 SDK 生成器）和 `isolation`（交付的后端为 `'worker-thread'`；未来可为 `'process'`、`'container'` 等）。`dsh-tools` 在 MVP 中要求 `language === 'typescript'`——其代码生成输出 TS——否则组装会大声失败，与 `toolOrder` 违规时的配置错误惯用法相同（如 `mode` 为非 native 但根本没有加载 `ctx.codeRuntime`）。
|
||||
- 两个只读的后端描述符，仅供信息参考而非门禁判定：`language`（程序必须使用的语言——首个后端为 `'typescript'`；Python 后端声明 `'python'`，并在呈现侧配对自己的 SDK 生成器）和 `isolation`（交付的后端为 `'worker-thread'`；未来可为 `'process'`、`'container'` 等）。`dsh-tools` 接受任何注册了 SDK 渲染器与 `run_code` flavor 的 `language`（TypeScript 与 Python 已交付；见[语言分发 note](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md)），否则组装会大声失败，与 `toolOrder` 违规时的配置错误惯用法相同（如 `mode` 为非 native 但根本没有加载 `ctx.codeRuntime`）。
|
||||
|
||||
请求包含所有运行时输入；实现方拥有经校验的超时和上限默认值。注册表仅在组装 Code Mode 时查找可选的运行时，因此 native 模式不依赖它。缺失或语言不兼容的运行时会大声失败。替代基底或语言可以在同一 seam 背后替换实现，配对相应的 SDK 生成器。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ worker 运行时只能约束程序的运行，而不构成安全边界：模型
|
||||
|
||||
### 模型看到的内容
|
||||
|
||||
SDK 指示模型编写一个异步的可擦除 TypeScript 函数体，通过 `await tools.name(args)` 调用工具，在需要时捕获被拒绝的工具调用，并仅 return 或 log 应重新进入上下文的输出。即使在 `Promise.all` 下调用仍保持顺序。声明前缀可能与原生 schema 一样大，尤其在 `'both'` 下，但对提供方缓存保持稳定。
|
||||
SDK 指示模型编写一个所加载运行时语言的异步函数体（默认可擦除 TypeScript；Python 运行时下为 Python `async` 函数体——见[语言分发 note](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md)），通过 `await tools.name(args)` 调用工具，在需要时捕获被拒绝的工具调用，并仅 return 或 log 应重新进入上下文的输出。两种 flavor 用各自的原语陈述同一契约：相互独立的只读调用可以在 `Promise.all`（TypeScript）或 `asyncio.gather`（Python）下重叠，有副作用的调用按提交顺序单独运行，有依赖的工作用 `await` 排序。声明前缀可能与原生 schema 一样大，尤其在 `'both'` 下，但对提供方缓存保持稳定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
切换到 `'code'` 的部署必须更新任何仅限 native 的 `toolOrder`。组装监听器有责任维护任何被重写的协议面的完整性。子分发保持序列化，而每次调用的上下文会通过外层结果保留其 source、信封与元数据。
|
||||
切换到 `'code'` 的部署必须更新任何仅限 native 的 `toolOrder`。组装监听器有责任维护任何被重写的协议面的完整性。子分发在有界的重叠池下按提交顺序启动，而每次调用的上下文会通过外层结果保留其 source、信封与元数据。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ SDK 指示模型编写一个异步的可擦除 TypeScript 函数体，通过 `aw
|
||||
|
||||
**在原生工具调用上做结果省略/摘要。** 仅解决问题中上下文膨胀这一半：裁剪旧 `tool-result` 作为可重建请求下的日志化表面替换成本低，但仍需每次调用一次模型往返，且无法表达循环、分支或汇合。互补而非竞争；它可以在 Code Mode 下为残余的原生调用分层。
|
||||
|
||||
**循环中的并行原生分发。** 往返成本的另一个答案；仍是有效的未来工作（open TODO），仍被并发安全元数据阻塞，且仍无组合能力——它并行化的是模型在一步中已经决定的调用。Code Mode 的序列化队列决策保持两者兼容：当元数据就绪时，原生并行分发和每工具绑定并行化一起解锁。
|
||||
**循环中的并行原生分发。** 决策当时对往返成本的另一个答案；它被并发安全元数据阻塞，且无论如何都不提供组合能力——它并行化的是模型在一步中已经决定的调用。Code Mode 的队列决策保持了两者兼容，后续也正是这样落地的：元数据以 `isConcurrencySafe` 的形式就绪（见[并行工具调用 note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md)），原生 rolling-pool 分发与每工具绑定并行化基于同一个分类器一起解锁。
|
||||
|
||||
**始终排他（忠于 Cloudflare，无模式）。** 否决，因为本 SDK 的主要消费方是编码 agent：其日常的单次调用（`bash`、`read`、`edit`）作为原生调用已经是最优的，强制每次编辑都通过程序会给常见场景增加负担。mode 配置让忠实形式（`'code'`）只需一行配置即可启用，而不强加于人。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,6 +128,6 @@ SDK 指示模型编写一个异步的可擦除 TypeScript 函数体，通过 `aw
|
||||
|
||||
**大型无损 JSON 值可能耗尽内存。** 工具绑定会在分发前对无损 JSON 创建快照，并完整返回规范 JSON 返回值。运行时会校验 worker 端口两侧，但不对单次绑定设置字节数上限；结构化克隆成本以及进程或 worker 内存构成实际边界。只有包含日志、完成值和失败诊断的组合外层输出账本受字节数上限约束。
|
||||
|
||||
**仅序列化的子分发。** `Promise.all` 尚未获得挂钟并行性，仅减少往返次数；模型可能过度期望。说明中已声明；解除此限制与原生并行分发 TODO 所需的并发安全元数据绑定。
|
||||
**子分发的重叠由工具自身的安全声明限定，而非由调用方决定。** 程序里的 `Promise.all` 或 `asyncio.gather` 只在工具自己分类为并发安全的调用之间换来挂钟并行性；一串 exclusive 调用仍要按顺序付出各自的往返开销，模型可能过度期望。两种 flavor 的 SDK 说明都陈述了真实契约。本 note 交付的是使该风险绝对化的序列化占位实现；调度器及其重叠上限由[实时并行 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) 负责。
|
||||
|
||||
**预算计量读取事件循环，而非 flag。** 忙碌时间轮询（`eventLoopUtilization()`）比精确 CPU 计量更粗糙——预算到期最多延迟一个轮询间隔——且其正确性声明（「pending 的分发不能暂停它」）是抵御恶意程序的关键。两种情况均有单元测试（带 pending 诱饵分发的热循环会在耗尽 `computeMs` 预算时终止；等待慢速绑定的空闲程序则会持续运行至 `maxWallMs`），轮询间隔是内部常量而非配置——部署无法将其误调为绕过手段。`maxWallMs` 是配置项，且会传入 `setTimeout`，后者会把超过 `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS`（2^31-1 ms）的延迟夹到 1 ms；因此仅有正数校验会放行一个 25 天的上限，它在第一个 tick 就到期，使每次运行都超时。worker 运行时正因如此在加载时对该字段做范围校验。`computeMs` 不需要上界，因为它对照的是实测占用率，而不是交给定时器。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md
|
||||
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md: a58598d8a956d47cb0cf6aa3e659f38314bc4b17
|
||||
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.zh.md: 0deb0b81ce262db4fa4ae26076cd59756d628d20
|
||||
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md: f83128e8bf62e0718e59912c16c4e449855aaa1a
|
||||
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.zh.md: bef3bd9cbc22f363b92880864651dcaa782fc1de
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ Every deployment that wants harness sessions in an observability stack must hand
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/telemetry/` revives the two reviewed packages under the SDK stance — the harness provides the capability, the deployment configures where records go and owns what leaves in them:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** — the seam. `TelemetryBackend` (`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`), the service-registered `Telemetry` form, and `TelemetryCoordinator` owning capture: adoption with cursor read-back, the per-append firehose (project → `structuredClone` → redact → `emit`, zero I/O), the fixed first-chunk-per-(turn, step) projection, the `agent/error` relay, and dispose-time `shutdown` records.
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** — the seam. `TelemetryBackend` (`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`), the service-registered `Telemetry` form, and `TelemetryCoordinator` owning capture: live adoption with cursor read-back and the per-append firehose (project → `structuredClone` → redact → `emit`, zero I/O), buffer-free on-demand replay from the canonical log, the fixed first-chunk-per-(turn, step) projection, the live `agent/error` relay, and live dispose-time `shutdown` records.
|
||||
- **The `telemetry/record` waterfall** — the delta over the branch version and the seam's redaction extension point. Every record passes it before reaching any backend; the seam ships NO rules of its own — the innermost `next()` is a pass-through, deployments mount their rules as listeners (stacking by transforming `next()`'s return value), and a throwing rule withholds the record fail-closed. Redaction applies to the exported copy only; the canonical log is never rewritten.
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** — the reference backend: OTel JS SDK log pipeline (`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter), configured verbatim through `exporter`/`processor` passthroughs. `exporter.url` is required and validated at load; unmounted or unconfigured, nothing leaves the process.
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** — the reference backend: OTel JS SDK log pipeline (`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter), configured verbatim through `exporter`/`processor` passthroughs. Its default `FULL` mode requires `exporter.url`; the later [feedback-gated telemetry decision](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md) adds `FEEDBACK_ONLY` and `DISABLED` delivery modes without moving the redaction or backend boundary, while [buffer-free feedback replay](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md) avoids a second in-memory copy of the session prefix.
|
||||
|
||||
The boundary axiom holds: the harness's aspect ends at `emit()`. Batching, retry, queueing, and loss policy are the reporting SDK's, configured through passthroughs — delivery is best-effort (at-most-once across a crash), which the READMEs state plainly.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ The boundary axiom holds: the harness's aspect ends at `emit()`. Batching, retry
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
A deployment adds one `cordis.yml` entry with an OTLP endpoint and gets its session stream in any OTel-compatible stack; removing the entry is the opt-out, with no residual state. A rule-free deployment exports records exactly as captured — including any credentials embedded in file contents or command output — so a deployment crossing a trust boundary must mount `telemetry/record` listeners, and both READMEs state this plainly. Where rules are mounted, exported bodies can differ from canonical log bytes, so receivers must not treat telemetry as a byte-exact replica; the log remains the source of truth. Crash durability is explicitly out of scope until the outbox decision above is revisited.
|
||||
A deployment adds one `cordis.yml` entry with an OTLP endpoint and gets its session stream in any OTel-compatible stack. `FULL` preserves that behavior by default, `FEEDBACK_ONLY` replays a canonical-log prefix when feedback is recorded, and `DISABLED` constructs no reporting pipeline; removing the entry remains a silent opt-out, while the disabled mode keeps the local feedback warning. A rule-free deployment exports records exactly as captured — including any credentials embedded in file contents or command output — so a deployment crossing a trust boundary must mount `telemetry/record` listeners, and both READMEs state this plainly. Where rules are mounted, exported bodies can differ from canonical log bytes, so receivers must not treat telemetry as a byte-exact replica; the log remains the source of truth. Crash durability is explicitly out of scope until the outbox decision above is revisited.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/telemetry/` 以 SDK 立场复活这两个经过评审的包——harness 提供能力，部署方配置上报去向并对导出内容负责：
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** —— seam 本体。`TelemetryBackend`（`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`）、服务注册形态的 `Telemetry`、以及拥有捕获侧的 `TelemetryCoordinator`：带游标回读的接管、逐 append 的 firehose（投影 → `structuredClone` → 脱敏 → `emit`，零 I/O）、固定的每个（轮次、步骤）组合的首分片投影、`agent/error` 转发、以及 dispose（资源释放）时的 `shutdown` 记录。
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** —— seam 本体。`TelemetryBackend`（`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`）、服务注册形态的 `Telemetry`、以及拥有捕获侧的 `TelemetryCoordinator`：带游标回读的实时收养与逐 append 的 firehose（投影 → `structuredClone` → 脱敏 → `emit`，零 I/O）、从权威日志进行的无缓冲按需回放、固定的每个（轮次、步骤）组合首分片投影、实时 `agent/error` 转发，以及实时 dispose（资源释放）时的 `shutdown` 记录。
|
||||
- **`telemetry/record` waterfall（瀑布式事件）** —— 相对分支版本的增量，也是该 seam 的脱敏扩展点。每条记录抵达任何后端前必经此处；seam 自身不带任何规则——最内层 `next()` 原样透传，部署方以监听器挂载自己的规则（通过变换 `next()` 的返回值堆叠），抛异常的规则将该记录 fail-closed 扣下。脱敏只作用于导出副本；canonical log 永不改写。
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** —— 参考后端：OTel JS SDK 日志流水线（`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter），经 `exporter`/`processor` passthrough 原样配置。`exporter.url` 必填且加载时校验；未挂载或未配置时，任何数据都不会离开进程。
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** —— 参考后端：OTel JS SDK 日志流水线（`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter），经 `exporter`/`processor` passthrough 原样配置。其默认 `FULL` 模式要求 `exporter.url`；后续的[反馈门控遥测决策](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md)增加了 `FEEDBACK_ONLY` 与 `DISABLED` 投递模式，但未移动脱敏或后端边界，而[无缓冲反馈回放](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md)避免在内存中创建会话前缀的第二份副本。
|
||||
|
||||
边界公理保持不变：harness 的职责止于 `emit()`。批处理、重试、排队与丢失策略属于 reporting SDK，经 passthrough 配置——投递是尽力而为（崩溃时至多一次），两份 README 对此如实陈述。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
部署方在 `cordis.yml` 加一个带 OTLP endpoint 的 Cordis 配置项即可把会话流接入任何 OTel 兼容体系；删除该配置项即退出，无残留状态。未挂载规则的部署导出的记录与捕获时完全一致——包括文件内容与命令输出中内嵌的任何凭据——因此跨信任边界的部署必须挂载 `telemetry/record` 监听器，两个 README 对此如实陈述。挂载规则后，导出的 body 可能与 canonical log 字节不同，接收端不得把遥测当作字节精确副本；日志仍是真源。崩溃持久性在上述 outbox 决定重新审议前明确不在范围内。
|
||||
部署方在 `cordis.yml` 加一个带 OTLP endpoint 的 Cordis 配置项即可把会话流接入任何 OTel 兼容体系。`FULL` 默认保留该行为，`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 在记录反馈时回放权威日志前缀，`DISABLED` 则不构造上报流水线；删除该配置项仍是静默退出方式，而禁用模式会保留本地反馈警告。未挂载规则的部署导出的记录与捕获时完全一致，包括文件内容与命令输出中内嵌的任何凭据。因此，跨信任边界的部署必须挂载 `telemetry/record` 监听器，两个 README 对此如实陈述。挂载规则后，导出的 body 可能与 canonical log 字节不同，接收端不得把遥测当作字节精确副本；日志仍是真源。崩溃持久性在上述 outbox 决定重新审议前明确不在范围内。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-feedback-command.md
|
||||
2026-07-28-feedback-command.md: 770c72954d66c9e26e03c47f99c261626e6ed09b
|
||||
2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md: c8bd57ddb5e94bfb826ec40b771547ca9625c8e3
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: `/feedback` command
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
A user who notices something wrong mid-session has nowhere to put that observation. Telling the model wastes a turn, changes the conversation the user was having, and buries the remark in derived history where no later reader can find it. Writing it outside the session loses the context that makes it meaningful — which session, at which point, against which work.
|
||||
|
||||
The capture surface has to be usable at the moment of annoyance, which rules out anything requiring the user to leave the interactive client, and it must not perturb the run in progress: no model tokens, no turn of work, no change to the request the user is waiting on.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` in `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` registers one global `feedback` command over `ctx.commands`. `/feedback <text>` acknowledges; bare or whitespace-only input returns a direct usage error. The handler is synchronous, injects only `commands`, and has no configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
The package declares the log-only `feedback/record { text }` session event and exports `recordFeedback(session, text)` as its command-independent producer. The producer discards surrounding whitespace, rejects an empty result, and appends exactly one event. `/feedback` delegates to it, so another UI, hook, or host integration can record the same domain fact without constructing a slash command.
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-commands` still writes its `command/run` / `command/done` lifecycle pair around `/feedback`, but this command sets `recordInput: false`. Its `command/run` therefore carries the command identity and source without `args`; the feedback text exists only in `feedback/record`, while `command/done` carries the acknowledgement outcome. All three records are log-only and non-surface. Their appends start persistence's ordinary eager drain; nothing forces a flush, so acknowledgement reports that the feedback is in the log rather than already on disk.
|
||||
|
||||
Capture remains inert for the running agent and model. The optional OTel telemetry package later adds one infrastructure consumer: it observes `feedback/record` as a release trigger in `FEEDBACK_ONLY` mode and as the local-only warning trigger in `DISABLED` mode, without changing the feedback event or command path. See [Feedback-gated session telemetry](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md).
|
||||
|
||||
### Why feedback owns an event
|
||||
|
||||
Feedback is a domain fact, while `/feedback` is one trigger. Keeping the only payload in `feedback/record` lets later triggers use the same event and lets consumers select feedback without depending on command names or parsing command lifecycle records. Omitting `command/run.args` for this definition avoids two authoritative-looking copies of one human remark.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why the model never sees it
|
||||
|
||||
Feedback is about the session, not input to it. Injecting it as a user message would change the next model request, contradicting the requirement that recording not perturb the run, and would make the remark part of the conversation it comments on. `command/run` and `command/done` are absent from `SurfaceEventType`, so they cannot acquire a `surfaceOp` or enter derived history even by mistake.
|
||||
|
||||
### Verbatim text
|
||||
|
||||
Surrounding whitespace is discarded, but nothing else is parsed. `/feedback /plan felt slow` records `/plan felt slow`; the leading `/plan` is content, not a nested command. Control-word grammar of the kind `/goal` uses would make the corresponding literal feedback impossible to express, which is the opposite of what a capture surface is for.
|
||||
|
||||
### A new group
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/feedback/` is a new group because no existing one owns this. `goal/` is objective state, `session-title/` is titles, `core/` is the product spine. The group holds one producer package; cross-cutting consumers stay in their owning groups rather than forcing this one to grow.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Use `command/run` as the feedback record.** Rejected because feedback would then be coupled to one trigger and consumers would have to identify a domain fact by command name. A non-command producer could not create the same record without pretending to execute a command.
|
||||
|
||||
**Store the text in both `feedback/record` and `command/run.args`.** Rejected because one act would have two payload copies with no useful distinction. `recordInput: false` preserves the generic lifecycle while leaving the domain event authoritative.
|
||||
|
||||
**Inject feedback as a user message via `agent.inject()`.** Needs no new event type and reuses the path `/goal` mutations take. Rejected: it makes the feedback model-visible, so it enters the next request, changes the run being commented on, and consumes tokens — contradicting all three parts of the no-perturbation requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
**Make `/feedback` a true no-op that records nothing.** The most literal reading of "does not do anything". Rejected because it makes the command pointless: the stated requirement was that the remark reach the session log.
|
||||
|
||||
**Register the command inside an existing package** such as `packages/ui/commands`. Avoids a new group and its README pair. Rejected: `ctx.commands` is the registry, not a home for arbitrary command implementations, and the requester asked for a standalone package.
|
||||
|
||||
**Parse structure out of the text** (category prefixes, severity markers). Rejected as speculative: no consumer needs that structure, and any control-word grammar makes the corresponding literal feedback unrecordable. Verbatim text is the widest surface a future consumer can narrow; a parsed one cannot be widened after the fact.
|
||||
|
||||
**Add a model-facing tool instead of a slash command.** Rejected: feedback is a direct human observation. Routing it through the model spends a turn, lets the model paraphrase the user's words, and makes the record contingent on the model choosing to call the tool.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The shipped `dsh` base mounts the command unconditionally — no configuration, no dependency on the goal stack. The Web client exposes it through its command adapter. Headless mode, ACP, and JSON-RPC do not provide a command adapter, so `/feedback` is unavailable there.
|
||||
|
||||
The package owns one independent append-only event with no cross-event or mutable-data relation for an invariant companion to check. The event follows the session log's existing replay, fork, persistence, and crash-tail behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
Deferred: no product or model consumer; no structured fields; no amend or withdraw, since the log is append-only and this package adds no tombstone; and no explicit durability barrier, so an entry recorded immediately before a crash can be lost with any other unflushed tail. The optional telemetry consumer treats the event only as an export-policy trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
No keyless transcript snapshot accompanies this change, at the requester's explicit direction. Package tests, a real Loader composition test over a `cordis.yml`, and the shipped Web composition test cover registration, capture, model exclusion, and product assembly.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: `/feedback` 命令
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-28-feedback-command.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
用户在会话中途发现问题时，没有地方记下这个观察。告诉模型会浪费一个轮次、改变用户原本进行的对话，并把这条评论埋进派生历史，使后续读者无法找到它。写到会话之外则会丢失让它有意义的上下文：属于哪个会话、处于哪个时点、针对哪项工作。
|
||||
|
||||
采集接口必须能在用户产生不满的那一刻使用，因此任何需要用户离开交互式客户端的方案都不可行；它还不能扰动正在进行的运行：不消耗模型 token、不产生工作轮次、不改变用户正在等待的请求。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
位于 `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` 的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` 通过 `ctx.commands` 注册一个全局 `feedback` 命令。`/feedback <text>` 给出确认；空输入或仅含空白的输入返回直接用法错误。处理器是同步的，只注入 `commands`，且没有任何配置。
|
||||
|
||||
本包（package）声明仅写入日志的 `feedback/record { text }` 会话事件，并导出 `recordFeedback(session, text)`，作为不依赖命令的生产方。该生产方丢弃前后空白，拒绝空结果，并且恰好追加一个事件。`/feedback` 委托给它，因此其他 UI、钩子或 host 集成无需构造斜杠命令也能记录同一个领域事实。
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-commands` 仍会围绕 `/feedback` 写入 `command/run` / `command/done` 生命周期配对，但该命令设置了 `recordInput: false`。因此，它的 `command/run` 携带命令标识与来源，但不携带 `args`；反馈文本只存在于 `feedback/record` 中，而 `command/done` 携带确认结果。三个记录都仅写入日志且非 surface。它们的追加会启动持久化的常规即时排空；没有任何环节强制 flush，因此确认文本报告的是反馈已进入日志，而非已经落盘。
|
||||
|
||||
采集对正在运行的 agent 与模型仍不产生后续动作。可选的 OTel 遥测包后续增加了一个基础设施消费方：它在 `FEEDBACK_ONLY` 模式下将 `feedback/record` 作为释放触发器，在 `DISABLED` 模式下将其作为本地警告触发器，且不改变反馈事件或命令路径。见[反馈门控的会话遥测](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
### 为何反馈拥有自己的事件
|
||||
|
||||
反馈是领域事实，而 `/feedback` 是一种触发方式。只把载荷保存在 `feedback/record` 中，既让后续触发方式可以使用同一个事件，也让消费方无需依赖命令名或解析命令生命周期记录即可筛选反馈。在该定义中省略 `command/run.args`，可避免同一条人类评价出现两个看起来都具有权威性的副本。
|
||||
|
||||
### 为何模型永不看到它
|
||||
|
||||
反馈是关于会话的，而不是会话的输入。将其作为 user 消息注入会改变下一次模型请求，与「记录不得扰动运行」的要求相冲突，也会让该评论成为它所评论的那段对话的一部分。`command/run` 与 `command/done` 不属于 `SurfaceEventType`，因此即便出错也无法获得 `surfaceOp` 或进入派生历史。
|
||||
|
||||
### 原样文本
|
||||
|
||||
前后空白会被丢弃，但除此之外不做解析。`/feedback /plan felt slow` 记录 `/plan felt slow`；开头的 `/plan` 是内容，而非嵌套命令。若采用 `/goal` 那样的控制词语法，对应的字面反馈将无法表达，这与采集接口的目的正好相反。
|
||||
|
||||
### 一个新的分组
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/feedback/` 是新分组，因为现有分组都不拥有此职责：`goal/` 负责目标状态，`session-title/` 负责标题，`core/` 是产品主干。该分组只包含一个生产方包；跨领域的消费方留在各自所属的分组，而不是迫使这个包不断膨胀。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**使用 `command/run` 作为反馈记录。** 已否决，因为这会将反馈与一种触发方式耦合，消费方还必须通过命令名识别领域事实。非命令生产方若不伪装成执行命令，就无法创建相同记录。
|
||||
|
||||
**同时在 `feedback/record` 与 `command/run.args` 中存储文本。** 已否决，因为同一行为会产生两个没有实质区别的载荷副本。`recordInput: false` 保留通用生命周期，同时让领域事件保持权威性。
|
||||
|
||||
**通过 `agent.inject()` 将反馈作为 user 消息注入。** 无需新增事件类型，并复用 `/goal` 变更所走的路径。已否决：它会让反馈对模型可见，从而进入下一次请求、改变正被评论的那次运行并消耗 token——与「不得扰动」要求的三个方面全部冲突。
|
||||
|
||||
**让 `/feedback` 成为真正的空操作，什么都不记录。** 这是对「什么都不做」最字面的理解。已否决：这会使命令失去意义——明确的要求是让这条评论进入会话日志。
|
||||
|
||||
**在现有包中注册该命令**，例如 `packages/ui/commands`。可省去新分组及其双语 README。已否决：`ctx.commands` 是注册表，而不是任意命令实现的归属地；且请求者明确要求独立的包。
|
||||
|
||||
**从文本中解析结构**（类别前缀、严重程度标记）。已否决，属于投机设计：没有消费方需要该结构，而任何控制词语法都会让对应的字面反馈无法记录。原样文本是未来消费方可以收窄的最宽接口；而已被解析的接口无法事后放宽。
|
||||
|
||||
**改为提供面向模型的工具。** 已否决：反馈是人类的直接观察。经由模型会消耗一个轮次、让模型改写用户的原话，并使记录取决于模型是否选择调用该工具。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
随附的 `dsh` 基础组合无条件挂载该命令：没有配置，也不依赖 goal 栈。Web 客户端通过命令适配器暴露该命令。无头模式、ACP 和 JSON-RPC 不提供命令适配器，因此 `/feedback` 在那里不可用。
|
||||
|
||||
本包拥有一个独立的仅追加事件，不存在跨事件关系或可变数据关系可供不变式伴生插件检查。该事件遵循会话日志现有的回放、fork、持久化和崩溃尾部行为。
|
||||
|
||||
延期事项：没有产品或模型消费方；没有结构化字段；不支持修改或撤回，因为日志仅追加且本包不新增 tombstone；且没有显式持久化屏障，因此紧临崩溃前记录的条目可能与其他未 flush 的尾部一同丢失。可选的遥测消费方只将该事件作为导出策略触发器。
|
||||
|
||||
本次变更按请求者的明确指示不附带无密钥 transcript（文本记录）快照。包测试、基于真实 `cordis.yml` 的 Loader 组合测试，以及随附的 Web 组合测试覆盖注册、采集、模型排除和产品组装。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.md
|
||||
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.md: a2c9b52507d32c2d851f811f0ecdd878a60b1e1c
|
||||
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.zh.md: 725db61869383711042d85cc1508b00eb1b196b6
|
||||
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.md: 73f5091888ab2506eab50b827e74c5120394b127
|
||||
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.zh.md: c1bc93c472aae8be8cee3bab6cd02f556abca494
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ Chat tool rows treated the whole summary line as a click target that opened the
|
||||
|
||||
File-tool path summaries (`read` / `write` / `edit` args carrying `path` or `file_path`) render as hover-underline links with a pointer cursor. Clicking the path calls `host.openPath` through `WorkspacesService.openPath`, resolving relative paths against the session cwd. File-link rows disable args expand (leading icon is inert); whole-row click, row hover fill, and the click-to-open-details gesture are removed from tool rows (including bash and todo registrations). The details panel and its inject surface remain for programmatic selection; rows no longer drive them.
|
||||
|
||||
`host.openPath` is a privileged unary RPC accepted only from loopback, same-origin browser requests (same carrier guard as `host.pickDirectory`). Platform adapters open without a shell: `open` on macOS, PowerShell `Invoke-Item` on Windows, `xdg-open` on Linux. The opener is injectable for tests. URL-only read args (`web_fetch`) are not file links.
|
||||
`host.openPath` is a privileged unary RPC accepted only from loopback, same-origin browser requests (same carrier guard as `host.pickDirectory`). Platform adapters open without a shell: `open` on macOS, PowerShell `Invoke-Item` on Windows, and `xdg-open` on desktop Linux. WSL is a separate host shape despite Node reporting `linux`: the adapter recognizes its environment or Microsoft kernel release, translates the Linux path with `wslpath -w`, and passes the resulting Windows/UNC path to the same PowerShell handoff. The opener's platform facts and command runner are injectable for tests. URL-only read args (`web_fetch`) are not file links.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep row-click details and add a separate file affordance — rejected; the product ask replaces the row gesture with the file link.
|
||||
- Open files inside an in-app preview — rejected; the ask is the OS default application.
|
||||
- Treat WSL as desktop Linux — rejected; a WSL process reports `linux`, but a Linux desktop association is optional while its ordinary operator desktop and browser live on Windows.
|
||||
- Reuse `host.pickDirectory`'s timeout exemption — unnecessary; path open hand-off completes quickly under the normal unary deadline.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
@@ -26,5 +27,5 @@ Clicking a file path in a tool row opens that path on the host. Non-file tool ro
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
|
||||
- Linux hosts without `xdg-open` fail the RPC; the chat row stays silent while the host returns an internal error.
|
||||
- Desktop Linux hosts without `xdg-open`, and WSL hosts without working Windows interop (`wslpath` plus `powershell.exe`), fail the RPC; the chat row stays silent while the host returns an internal error.
|
||||
- Relative paths without a session cwd are forwarded verbatim and may fail on the host.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
文件工具的路径摘要（`read`／`write`／`edit` 参数中的 `path` 或 `file_path`）渲染为悬停下划线链接并使用 pointer 光标。点击路径会经 `WorkspacesService.openPath` 调用 `host.openPath`，相对路径以会话 cwd 为基准解析。带文件链接的行关闭参数展开（左侧图标不可点）；工具行（含 bash 与 todo 注册）去掉整行点击、整行悬停底色，以及点击打开 details 的手势。details 面板及其 inject 面仍保留供程序化选择；工具行不再驱动它们。
|
||||
|
||||
`host.openPath` 是特权一元 RPC，仅接受来自回环地址且同源的浏览器请求（与 `host.pickDirectory` 相同的载体守卫）。平台适配器不经 shell 打开：macOS 为 `open`，Windows 为 PowerShell `Invoke-Item`，Linux 为 `xdg-open`。打开器可在测试中注入。仅含 URL 的 read 参数（`web_fetch`）不是文件链接。
|
||||
`host.openPath` 是特权一元 RPC，仅接受来自回环地址且同源的浏览器请求（与 `host.pickDirectory` 相同的载体守卫）。平台适配器不经 shell 打开：macOS 为 `open`，Windows 为 PowerShell `Invoke-Item`，桌面 Linux 为 `xdg-open`。尽管 Node 将 WSL 报告为 `linux`，WSL 仍是一种独立的宿主形态：适配器根据其环境或 Microsoft 内核 release 识别它，用 `wslpath -w` 转换 Linux 路径，并将所得 Windows/UNC 路径交给同一 PowerShell 交接。打开器的平台信息和命令运行器可在测试中注入。仅含 URL 的 read 参数（`web_fetch`）不是文件链接。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- 保留整行点击打开 details，另加文件入口 — 否决；产品要求用文件链接替换整行手势。
|
||||
- 在应用内预览文件 — 否决；要求是操作系统默认应用。
|
||||
- 将 WSL 当作桌面 Linux — 否决；WSL 进程报告 `linux`，但 Linux 桌面文件关联并非必有，而其常规用户桌面和浏览器位于 Windows 上。
|
||||
- 复用 `host.pickDirectory` 的超时豁免 — 不必要；打开路径的交接在常规一元截止时间内即可完成。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
@@ -26,5 +27,5 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 风险
|
||||
|
||||
- 没有 `xdg-open` 的 Linux 宿主会使 RPC 失败；聊天行保持静默，宿主返回内部错误。
|
||||
- 没有 `xdg-open` 的桌面 Linux 宿主，以及 Windows 互操作（`wslpath` 加 `powershell.exe`）不可用的 WSL 宿主，会使 RPC 失败；聊天行保持静默，宿主返回内部错误。
|
||||
- 没有会话 cwd 时相对路径会原样转发，可能在宿主侧失败。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md
|
||||
2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md: f43f7f9c9687e4494993d7e225d11cf6446a9954
|
||||
2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md: a6261c65c1e9d77cea2de5624b2c9fde1278c612
|
||||
2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md: feced6aeb11d176d6c774242a4d1dae14f6730f8
|
||||
2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md: 5e33182421b423f45c84dbe1a979505f4c31b819
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ The web chat user bubble already had copy / branch / edit IconActions but no clo
|
||||
|
||||
**User bubbles prepend a date-aware local clock to the existing IconActions row; the last content-text assistant of each turn appends a copy / branch / clock row with `margin-top: 16px`; both seats stay visible whenever mounted and re-format at the next local midnight.**
|
||||
|
||||
The assistant seat is narrowed by the [completed-turn decision](../bug-fix/2026-08-05-turn-tail-actions-require-a-completed-turn.md): only a turn with a `turn/end` grants it, so a turn still producing steps hands the row to nothing. The user seat's branch control is removed outright by the [user-bubble branch removal](../simplification/2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.md); a user row's IconActions are clock and copy.
|
||||
|
||||
Both seats format `node.time` through `formatMessageClock`: same calendar day → `HH:mm`, earlier this year → `M月D日 HH:mm`, other years → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`. `useCalendarDay` is a component-local day tick (timeout to the next local midnight) so memoized rows re-render when the calendar day changes without a new framework hook. `MessageItem` places the label before copy (figma `388:20051`). `ChatView` derives turn-tail seqs via `assistantActionsSeqs` and withholds `time` for mid-turn content; `AssistantMarkdown` places the row after branch (figma `43:32997`) only when `streaming` is false, the event time is known, and the node has non-empty text content. Think-only nodes, mid-turn narration, and the streaming tail omit the row. Copy writes joined text blocks. Both message rows pass their event's `seq` to the same fork callback; [Web session fork actions](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md) define the real mutation contract. Clipboard write and the clock helpers live in `message-chrome.ts`. The assembled surface is pinned by `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts` (cold-seeded history + aria golden); aria normalization collapses every clock shape to `{{clock}}`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ Web 聊天的用户气泡已有复制、分支、编辑 IconActions，但没有
|
||||
|
||||
**用户气泡在既有 IconActions 行的开头添加感知日期的本地时钟；每个轮次中最后一条带 text 内容的 assistant 在正文下追加带 `margin-top: 16px` 的复制、分支、时钟；两边只要挂载就保持可见，并在下一个本地午夜重新格式化。**
|
||||
|
||||
assistant 一侧的座位由[已完成轮次决策](../bug-fix/2026-08-05-turn-tail-actions-require-a-completed-turn.md)收紧：只有存在 `turn/end` 的轮次才授予该行，仍在产出步骤的轮次不把该行交给任何节点。user 一侧的分支控件被 [user 气泡分支移除决策](../simplification/2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.md)直接移除；user 行的 IconActions 只有时钟与复制。
|
||||
|
||||
两边都通过 `formatMessageClock` 格式化 `node.time`：同一日历日 → `HH:mm`，同年更早 → `M月D日 HH:mm`，跨年 → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`。`useCalendarDay` 是组件本地的日刻度（定时到下一个本地午夜），因此 memo 行在日历日变化时会重渲染，且不新增框架钩子。`MessageItem` 把标签放在复制之前（figma `388:20051`）。`ChatView` 通过 `assistantActionsSeqs` 推导轮次尾部的 seq，并不为轮次中间的内容传入 `time`；`AssistantMarkdown` 把该行放在分支之后（figma `43:32997`），且仅在 `streaming` 为 false、已知事件时间、且节点含非空 text 内容时渲染。纯 Think 节点、轮次中间的叙述与流式尾部省略该行。复制写入拼接后的 text 块。两种消息行都把自己的事件 `seq` 交给同一个 fork 回调；真实 mutation 契约由 [Web session fork 操作](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md)定义。剪贴板写入与时钟辅助函数放在 `message-chrome.ts`。组装后的界面由 `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts`（冷 seed 历史 + aria golden）钉住；aria 归一化把每种时钟形态折叠为 `{{clock}}`。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的方案
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md: 96001252d6494d058a8df9974fb5a0d59e7d7112
|
||||
2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md: aa7eb2a6b4b9117f1d707b37afcdbe12b814bad2
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Code Mode language dispatch and the Python SDK renderer
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Code Mode generated one SDK flavor: TypeScript. `ToolRegistry` hard-coded `renderToolsSdk` for the `tools:sdk` section and `requireCodeRuntime` rejected any `ctx.codeRuntime.language !== 'typescript'`. Adding a CPython backend means a program's source language is no longer fixed: the same visible tool registry must project a Python SDK when a Python runtime is loaded, and the model-facing `run_code` schema strings ("Execute a Python program …") must match the SDK section's language so the model never sees a TypeScript instruction over a Python runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the tool-facing half of the multi-language Code Mode split; the [code-runtime seam](../../../../packages/code-runtime/code-runtime/README.md) already carries `CodeRuntime.language`. This note owns only how `dsh-tools` dispatches on that field. The backend that implements `language: 'python'` is owned by its own note, delivered separately.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Language selection is a lookup on `ctx.codeRuntime.language`, resolved lazily at prompt assembly, against two parallel tables in `dsh-tools`:
|
||||
|
||||
- `SDK_RENDERERS` (index.ts) maps a language to its `tools:sdk` renderer — `typescript → renderToolsSdk`, `python → renderToolsSdkPy`. The `tools:sdk` section reads the loaded runtime's language and picks the renderer; `requireCodeRuntime` rejects a `mode: code`/`both` runtime whose language is absent from the table, naming the known languages.
|
||||
- `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` (code-mode.ts) maps a language to its two model-facing `run_code` strings (tool `description` and the `code` parameter description), so a language's SDK section and its transport schema always agree.
|
||||
|
||||
Both tables are read with `Object.hasOwn` before use so a language named `toString`/`constructor` cannot resolve an inherited `Object.prototype` member as a renderer. The two guards differ in reachability: `SDK_RENDERERS`' in-callback guard is unreachable because `requireCodeRuntime` validated the same `const` table earlier in the same callback (it carries a `/* v8 ignore */`), while `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`' guard is the primary, publicly reachable rejection — any language absent from the flavor table hits it through `run_code`'s language-aware getters, which the public `schemas()` reaches without passing `requireCodeRuntime` first; the test reads one of those getters off the definition directly, under a language absent from both tables. A language present in `SDK_RENDERERS` but not `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` is drift the shared `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` pins reject at `typecheck`, so it is not an input either guard can see; what the guards still own is a mounted runtime reporting a language absent from both tables. Schema emission reads the runtime through `peekRuntime()` rather than `requireRuntime()`: `undefined` (no runtime mounted, reached by definition readers and `schemas()`, of which the doc-catalog harvest is the only shipped one and none of which feeds a model because assembly passes `requireCodeRuntime` first) degrades to the TypeScript flavor, whereas a mounted unknown language fails loud — this is NOT the silent fallback rejected below, which concerns emitting a wrong-language SDK for a real runtime. Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member and the two table entries — plus its renderer and the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them (the seam's `dsh-code-runtime` README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` pair; this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc — no gate checks any of it), with no `agent-loop` or registry-structure change.
|
||||
|
||||
`code-mode.ts` depends only on the runtime seam (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`), never on a concrete backend; dispatch is by `runtime.language` at run time. The tool layer therefore lands independently of the protocol and backend PRs — it needs only the seam's `language` field, which is already on master.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Python SDK renderer
|
||||
|
||||
`py-types.ts` renders the same unified tool-schema vocabulary `jsonSchemaToTs` covers, targeting Python: `jsonSchemaToPy` emits a type expression per JSON-schema node, and `renderToolsSdkPy` assembles named `TypedDict`s for each visible tool's arguments and canonical output plus a `tools` object with usage instructions equivalent to the TypeScript flavor. Unsupported raw constructs degrade rather than throwing during assembly, matching the TypeScript renderer's contract. The output is deterministic — lexicographic tool order, byte-identical text for an unchanged tool set — so the prompt stays prefix-cache-friendly. Lexicographic means one ordered member stream: a tool whose name is not a legal attribute is listed as a `tools[name]` comment in its sorted position rather than partitioned to the end, matching how the TypeScript flavor quotes an exotic key in place. That stream forces one thing directly — comment lines are not statements, so a tool set that emits no method at all still needs an explicit `pass`. Three further rules are Python-specific rather than consequences of the ordering. The usage contract states that the declarations are static stubs and arguments are plain `dict`/`list` values: a `TypedDict` reads as a constructible class, so a model that writes `FooArgs(field=1)` gets a `NameError` — TypeScript's `interface` is visibly a type, and the TS flavor's "runs type-stripped" clause already covers it. A description becomes the method's docstring emitted as the FIRST statement of its body: above the `async def` the first one would document the `Tools` class and the rest would be dead expressions, leaving every method undocumented. And a `list[…]` chain degrades to `Any` past `MAX_LIST_NESTING`, because CPython's tokenizer rejects a line with more than 200 open brackets and the block must stay parseable Python — the same reason `docLines` escapes quotes and backslashes. `ts-types` needs neither: TypeScript attaches a leading `/** … */` to the member that follows it and bounds nesting nowhere in its grammar.
|
||||
|
||||
The standard that cap serves is grammatical validity, and the boundary is deliberate: a long `A | B | …` union is valid Python at any length and is left uncapped, even though CPython's `compile()` exhausts its C recursion walking the left-nested `BinOp` spine (measured on 3.9: 1,000 branches compile, 5,000 raise `RecursionError`). Nothing compiles this block — it is prompt text — so that limit costs nothing, whereas capping union length would retire the deep-chain tests that pin the walk's linear time and the class-name propagation cap. A future renderer that does need compilable output should flatten unions rather than truncate them.
|
||||
|
||||
`renderType` validates the whole schema once (`assertSupportedJsonSchema`) and then trusts it, wrapping the walk in one `try/catch` that degrades to `Any` — the same trusted-after-validation stance the sibling `ts-types` renderer takes at this typed same-process seam ([Trust TypeScript at typed same-process seams](../../../../AGENTS.md)). It deliberately carries NO defenses against a schema whose accessors mutate between reads (post-validation cycles, TOCTOU on `const`/`enum`, self-referential functions): the input is a first-party registration (a `defineTool` literal or a raw registration) or a wire-derived plain JSON schema — the former is trusted per AGENTS.md, the latter is a `JSON.parse` product that physically cannot carry accessors, and `renderType` re-validates the whole tree on every call regardless — so such inputs are unreachable, and adding per-shape guards here would break symmetry with `ts-types` (which has none) for values the static interface forbids. `jsonSchemaToPy(schema: unknown)` accepts `unknown` and returns `Any` on a malformed schema — the Python counterpart of the TS flavor's `unknown` — but its contract is "degrade an unsupported schema", not "survive an adversarial mutating one".
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **A `language` config field on `ToolRegistry`.** Deployment would then have two places to name the language (the loaded runtime and the tools config) that can disagree; the loaded runtime is the single source of truth, so the registry reads it rather than duplicating it.
|
||||
- **Importing the Python backend into `code-mode.ts` to detect it.** That would couple the tool layer to a concrete backend and force the protocol/backend PRs to land first. Runtime dispatch on `language` keeps the layer backend-agnostic and independently shippable.
|
||||
- **A default renderer for an unknown language.** A silent fallback would emit a TypeScript SDK over, e.g., a Ruby runtime — the model would see instructions in the wrong language. Failing loud at assembly is the repository's misconfiguration stance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member, an `SDK_RENDERERS` entry, and a `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` entry — plus the renderer function the second points at, with no change to `agent-loop` or the registry structure. The two tables (`SDK_RENDERERS`, `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`) must stay in step, and that invariant is checked statically rather than left to review: both are `satisfies`-checked against that one union, so a language added to one and not the other fails `typecheck`. This is the mechanical form the drift risk deserves — the runtime `Object.hasOwn` guards would catch it too, but only once a backend reporting that language ships: one PR after the drift, at the consumer's integration point rather than where it was introduced, and on this base never, since no second backend exists. The tables keep their `Record<string, …>` declared type because `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`; the union pins what the harness ships, the guards reject what a runtime reports. What stays outside that check is the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them: `dsh-code-runtime`'s README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` pair at the seam, plus this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc. Earlier notes name the values as the state at their own PR and are not on that list. Two separate reasons keep it ungated. Prose is not type-checked at all, wherever the union lives. And no type-level pin can stand in for it here: the interface package must not import its consumer's table, and `CodeRuntime.language` stays an unconstrained `string` by design, so moving the union into the seam would not apply it either. A unit test pinning the two key sets equal was rejected in favor of this: it would buy the same check at the cost of a test-only export of two private tables, and would run later than the compiler does. Which of the two runtime failures surfaces depends on the entry point, for a language absent from both tables: assembly reports the missing renderer, because `wireSchemas` calls `requireCodeRuntime` before projecting, while the public `schemas()` reaches `run_code`'s language-aware getters first and reports the missing flavor. The tool layer stays free of any concrete backend dependency, so it lands and is testable on master ahead of the Python protocol and backend.
|
||||
|
||||
The cost is that the Python branch of both tables is unreachable on this base: `CodeRuntime.language` is set by the loaded backend, the only published backend is `dsh-code-runtime-worker` (`'typescript'`), and the registry reads the loaded runtime rather than a config field, so no assembled application can select `renderToolsSdkPy` or `PYTHON_FLAVOR`. The model-visible surface is therefore unchanged by this note's work until a backend reporting `'python'` is published, and this PR's coverage is unit-level — the renderer output plus the dispatch and rejection paths. The keyless snapshot for the Python model interface belongs to the PR that publishes that backend, because only there does a real `cordis.yml` over published plugins produce a Python assembly; a snapshot example that mounted a fixture runtime here would assert against a test double, which [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) rejects as a substitute for the assembled application transcript.
|
||||
|
||||
Two runtime contracts the Python SDK text asserts are owed by that same backend PR. First, the instructions tell the model that exactly `tools` and `ToolCallError` are bound and that the declared `TypedDict` classes are not, so the backend must inject those two names — with `ToolCallError.toolName` populated per the seam's `errorClass` contract — and must NOT bind the declared class names into the program's globals; injecting them "helpfully" would make the SDK text false. Second, the language has to be bound to the request: `requireCodeRuntime` resolves `ctx.codeRuntime` separately at assembly and at `run_code` execution, so a reload that swapped the runtime between those two points would hand a program written against one flavor to the other. The split is finer than those two points — `run_code`'s `description` and `parameters` getters each call `resolveFlavor(peekRuntime())`, and `schemaOf` destructures both, so one projection reads the runtime twice; both reads are for `run_code`'s own schema, since the getters are installed on that one definition and every other definition carries plain data properties. A reload between those two reads yields a single schema whose two halves name different languages. Neither is reachable here — one published backend means both reads return the same flavor and no program ever runs against this renderer's output — and the cross-language rejection is not testable until a second language exists.
|
||||
|
||||
Third, that PR owns the CPython floor, and with it the renderer's Unicode-table skew. Four expressions read the running engine's tables (Node 22.23.1: Unicode 17.0) while the interpreter uses its own (CPython 3.9.6: 13.0.0): `isBareIdentifier`'s `IDENTIFIER`, and `camelCase`'s split set, head test, and `toUpperCase()`. An interpreter older than the engine is the failing direction — the engine emits a character its tokenizer refuses, taking the whole block down — and it arrives by three independent paths. Through the predicate, a bare method or field name carrying a character added between the two versions — to `XID_Start` at its head, or to `XID_Continue` in any tail position, the middle of a name included. Through `camelCase`'s XID reads, a class name, which reaches emitted text whenever any object shape in the tool's schema declares a `TypedDict`, and which the predicate's verdict on the tool name does not gate: `zz-` plus U+1E4D0 never reaches the predicate's skew, since the `-` rejects it outright, yet it still declares `class Zz𞓐xArgs`. Through the case mapping, a class name derived from a tool the predicate accepted — a different table and a wider window than XID membership: U+019B is XID_Start and NFKC-stable, so `async def ƛ` compiles on 3.9.6, but Node uppercases it to U+A7DC (unassigned there; CPython's own `.upper()` is the identity) and `class Args` fails with `invalid non-printable character U+A7DC`. The exposure window is the characters and mappings that changed between the two versions, so the PR that names a supported CPython range must decide explicitly between accepting it and pinning all four read points to tables for that floor — pinning the predicate alone leaves both class-name paths open. Nothing here can decide it: the floor does not exist yet, and a table pinned to a guess would be a deployment-varying constant with no configurability behind it. A second axis rides along with the floor and is not one of the four: the names and syntax the block would evaluate at definition time. `TypedDict` needs 3.8, the PEP 585 builtin generics `dict[str, Any]` and `list[…]` need 3.9, an `A | B` annotation 3.10, and `NotRequired` 3.11. These are not parse failures — the block parses on any version, which is the standard the `MAX_LIST_NESTING` cap serves — but definition-time evaluation failures, and nothing in the product evaluates this text. Recording them with the read points keeps "parseable on the supported range" from being read as "executable on it".
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Code Mode 语言分发与 Python SDK 渲染器
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
Code Mode 只生成一种 SDK 形态：TypeScript。`ToolRegistry` 为 `tools:sdk` 段硬编码了 `renderToolsSdk`，且 `requireCodeRuntime` 会拒绝任何 `ctx.codeRuntime.language !== 'typescript'`。引入 CPython 后端后，程序的源语言不再固定：同一个可见工具注册表在加载 Python 运行时时必须投射出 Python SDK，而面向模型的 `run_code` schema 字符串（"Execute a Python program …"）也必须与 SDK 段的语言一致，模型才不会在 Python 运行时下看到 TypeScript 指令。
|
||||
|
||||
这是多语言 Code Mode 拆分中面向工具的那一半；[代码运行时 seam](../../../../packages/code-runtime/code-runtime/README.md) 已经携带 `CodeRuntime.language`。本 Note 只负责 `dsh-tools` 如何在该字段上分发。实现 `language: 'python'` 的后端由它自己的 Note 负责，单独交付。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
语言选择就是对 `ctx.codeRuntime.language` 的查表，在 prompt 装配时惰性解析，查 `dsh-tools` 里两张平行的表：
|
||||
|
||||
- `SDK_RENDERERS`（index.ts）把语言映射到它的 `tools:sdk` 渲染器——`typescript → renderToolsSdk`、`python → renderToolsSdkPy`。`tools:sdk` 段读取所加载运行时的语言并选出渲染器；`requireCodeRuntime` 拒绝其语言不在表中的 `mode: code`/`both` 运行时，并列出已知语言。
|
||||
- `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`（code-mode.ts）把语言映射到它那两条面向模型的 `run_code` 字符串（工具 `description` 与 `code` 参数描述），使一种语言的 SDK 段与它的传输 schema 始终一致。
|
||||
|
||||
两张表在使用前都以 `Object.hasOwn` 读取，这样名为 `toString`/`constructor` 的语言不会把继承自 `Object.prototype` 的成员解析成渲染器。两个守卫的可达性不同：`SDK_RENDERERS` 的段内守卫不可达，因为 `requireCodeRuntime` 已在同一回调更早处校验过同一张 `const` 表（它带 `/* v8 ignore */`）；而 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 的守卫是主要的、可公开到达的拒绝路径——任何缺席 flavor 表的语言都经 `run_code` 的语言感知 getter 到达它，而公共 `schemas()` 抵达那些 getter 时并未先过 `requireCodeRuntime`；测试直读 definition 上的其中一个 getter，用的是对两张表都缺席的语言。「在 `SDK_RENDERERS` 里却不在 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 里」这种漂移已由共享的 `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` 在 `typecheck` 处拒绝，两个守卫都看不到这种输入；它们如今负责的是所挂载运行时报告了一门两张表都缺席的语言。schema 发射通过 `peekRuntime()` 而非 `requireRuntime()` 读取运行时：`undefined`（无运行时，由直读 definition 的读者与 `schemas()` 到达，其中 doc-catalog 采集是唯一已交付的一个，而它们都不会喂给模型，因为组装路径先过 `requireCodeRuntime`）降级到 TypeScript flavor，而挂载了未知语言则 fail loud——这不是下方被否决的静默回退，那指的是为真实运行时发出错误语言的 SDK。新增一门后端语言是三处并列编辑——一个 `CodeSdkLanguage` 成员加两条表项——再加它的渲染器，以及点名已知值而非从中派生的散文（seam 侧的 `dsh-code-runtime` README 双语对、它的 `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc 与 `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` 双语对；本包自己的 README 双语对与它的 `Config.mode` JSDoc，无任何 gate 检查其中任何一处），不动 `agent-loop`，也不动注册表结构。
|
||||
|
||||
`code-mode.ts` 只依赖运行时 seam（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`），绝不依赖具体后端；分发在运行时按 `runtime.language` 进行。因此工具层独立于协议和后端 PR 落地——它只需要 seam 的 `language` 字段，而该字段已在 master 上。
|
||||
|
||||
### Python SDK 渲染器
|
||||
|
||||
`py-types.ts` 渲染 `jsonSchemaToTs` 所覆盖的同一套统一工具 schema 词汇，目标为 Python：`jsonSchemaToPy` 为每个 JSON-schema 节点发出一个类型表达式，`renderToolsSdkPy` 为每个可见工具的参数与规范输出装配具名 `TypedDict`，再加一个带用法说明的 `tools` 对象，与 TypeScript 形态等价。不支持的原始构造在装配时降级而非抛错，与 TypeScript 渲染器的契约一致。输出是确定性的——工具按字典序排列，工具集不变时文本逐字节相同——因此 prompt 保持 prefix-cache 友好。字典序意味着单一有序的成员流：名字不是合法属性的工具以 `tools[name]` 注释出现在它排序后的位置上，而不是被分拣到末尾，与 TypeScript 形态就地为异常键加引号的做法一致。这个成员流直接决定了一件事：注释行不是语句，所以一个不发出任何方法的工具集仍需显式 `pass`。另有三条规则并非源自排序，而是 Python 特有。其一，用法约定声明这些声明只是静态存根、参数为普通 `dict`/`list` 值：`TypedDict` 读起来像一个可构造的类，模型若写 `FooArgs(field=1)` 会得到 `NameError`——TypeScript 的 `interface` 一眼就是类型，且 TS 形态的「runs type-stripped」一句已经覆盖了它。其二，描述会成为方法的 docstring，且必须作为方法体的**第一条语句**发出：放在 `async def` 之上，第一条会变成 `Tools` 的类文档、其余都是无效果表达式，导致每个方法都没有文档。其三，`list[…]` 链超过 `MAX_LIST_NESTING` 后降级为 `Any`，因为 CPython 的 tokenizer 拒绝一行中超过 200 个同时未闭合的括号，而这个块必须是可解析的 Python——与 `docLines` 转义引号和反斜杠是同一个理由。`ts-types` 两者都不需要：TypeScript 会把前置的 `/** … */` 附着到其后的成员上，其语法也不对嵌套设限。
|
||||
|
||||
该上限服务的标准是**语法合法性**，这条边界是有意划定的：长的 `A | B | …` union 在任何长度下都是合法 Python，故不设上限——尽管 CPython 的 `compile()` 在沿左嵌套 `BinOp` 脊柱下降时会耗尽 C 递归（在 3.9 上实测：1,000 个分支可编译，5,000 个抛 `RecursionError`）。没有任何东西会编译这个块——它是提示词文本——所以那条限制在这里没有代价；而给 union 长度封顶会作废那几个钉住 walk 线性时间与类名传播上限的深链测试。将来若有渲染器确实需要可编译的输出，应当把 union 拍平，而不是截断。
|
||||
|
||||
`renderType` 先用 `assertSupportedJsonSchema` 整树校验一次、随后信任它，用单个 `try/catch` 把整个遍历兜住并降级为 `Any`——与姊妹渲染器 `ts-types` 在这个 typed 同进程 seam 上采取的「校验后信任」姿态一致（[Trust TypeScript at typed same-process seams](../../../../AGENTS.md)）。它有意不设任何针对「访问器在多次读取间变值」的防御（校验后成环、`const`/`enum` 的 TOCTOU、自引用函数）：输入是第一方注册（`defineTool` 字面量或 raw 注册）或从 wire 桥接而来的纯 JSON——前者按 AGENTS.md 受信任，后者是 `JSON.parse` 产物、物理上不可能携带访问器，且每次调用 `renderType` 都会整树重新校验——这类输入不可达，而在此加逐形态守卫会为静态接口所禁止的值破坏与 `ts-types`（没有这类守卫）的对称。`jsonSchemaToPy(schema: unknown)` 接受 `unknown` 并对畸形 schema 返回 `Any`——TypeScript 形态 `unknown` 的对应物——但它的契约是「降级不支持的 schema」，而非「扛住对抗性的可变 schema」。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **在 `ToolRegistry` 上加一个 `language` 配置字段。** 那样部署方就会有两处命名语言（所加载的运行时与 tools 配置）且可能相互矛盾；所加载的运行时是唯一真相来源，故注册表读取它而不复制它。
|
||||
- **把 Python 后端 import 进 `code-mode.ts` 来检测它。** 那会把工具层耦合到具体后端，并迫使协议/后端 PR 先落地。按 `language` 运行时分发使该层保持后端无关、可独立发布。
|
||||
- **为未知语言提供默认渲染器。** 静默回退会在比如 Ruby 运行时上发出 TypeScript SDK——模型会看到错误语言的指令。在装配处 fail loud 是本仓库对错误配置的立场。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
新增一门后端语言是三处并列编辑——一个 `CodeSdkLanguage` 成员、一个 `SDK_RENDERERS` 表项、一个 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 表项——再加第二处所指向的渲染器函数，不动 `agent-loop`，也不动注册表结构。两张表（`SDK_RENDERERS`、`RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`）必须同步，且这条不变式由静态检查把关，而非交给 review：两张表都以 `satisfies` 对上述同一个 union 校验，因此只加其一而漏掉另一会在 `typecheck` 处失败。这正是该漂移风险应有的机械形式——运行期的 `Object.hasOwn` 守卫同样能捕获，但要等到有后端报告该语言之后：晚于漂移引入一个 PR，且触发点在消费方的集成处而非漂移引入处；在当前 base 上则永远不会触发，因为不存在第二个后端。两张表的声明类型仍是 `Record<string, …>`，因为 `CodeRuntime.language` 是不受约束的 `string`：union 钉住本仓库交付了什么，守卫拒绝运行时报告了什么。落在这条检查之外的是点名已知值而非从中派生的散文：seam 侧的 `dsh-code-runtime` README 双语对、它的 `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc 与 `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` 双语对，再加本包自己的 README 双语对与它的 `Config.mode` JSDoc。更早的 note 点名这些值时记的是其自身 PR 当时的状态，不在此列。让它无 gate 的是两条独立理由。其一，散文根本不受类型检查，union 放在哪里都一样。其二，类型级替代在这里也不可用：接口包不得 import 其消费方的表，而 `CodeRuntime.language` 按设计保持不受约束的 `string`，即便把 union 迁进 seam 也不会作用到它。用一个断言两张表键集相等的 unit test 的方案被否决：它买到的是同一条检查，代价却是把两张私有表做测试专用导出，且运行时机晚于编译器。对两张表都缺席的语言，两种运行期失败中报出哪一条随入口而异：组装路径报缺渲染器，因为 `wireSchemas` 在投影前先调 `requireCodeRuntime`；而公共 `schemas()` 先经过 `run_code` 的语言感知 getter，报的是缺 flavor 表项。工具层不依赖任何具体后端，因此它能先于 Python 协议和后端在 master 上落地并可测。
|
||||
|
||||
代价是两张表的 Python 分支在当前 base 上不可达：`CodeRuntime.language` 由所加载的后端设定，已发布的后端只有 `dsh-code-runtime-worker`（`'typescript'`），而注册表读取的是所加载的运行时而非某个配置字段，因此没有任何一份组装好的应用能选中 `renderToolsSdkPy` 或 `PYTHON_FLAVOR`。也就是说，在报告 `'python'` 的后端发布之前，本 note 的工作不改变模型可见表面，本 PR 的覆盖因此是 unit 级——渲染器输出加分发与拒绝路径。Python 模型界面的 keyless snapshot 归属于发布该后端的那个 PR，因为只有在那里，一份基于已发布插件的真实 `cordis.yml` 才会产出 Python 组装；在此处挂载 fixture 运行时的快照示例断言的是测试替身，而 [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) 明确拒绝以此替代组装好的应用 transcript。
|
||||
|
||||
Python SDK 文本断言的两条运行时契约同样归属那个 backend PR。其一，说明文字告诉模型运行时恰好绑定 `tools` 与 `ToolCallError` 两个名字、所声明的 `TypedDict` 类不绑定，因此后端必须注入这两个名字（并按 seam 的 `errorClass` 契约填充 `ToolCallError.toolName`），且**不得**把所声明的类名绑进程序全局——「好心」注入会使这段 SDK 文本变成假话。其二，语言必须绑定到请求上：`requireCodeRuntime` 在组装时与 `run_code` 执行时分别解析 `ctx.codeRuntime`，若在这两点之间发生重载并换掉运行时，就会把针对一种形态写成的程序交给另一种形态执行。分裂比这两点更细——`run_code` 的 `description` 与 `parameters` 两个 getter 各自调用 `resolveFlavor(peekRuntime())`，而 `schemaOf` 会解构这两个字段，因此一次投影读两次运行时；两次都属于 `run_code` 自己的 schema，因为这两个 getter 只装在那一个 definition 上，其余 definition 携带的都是普通数据属性。在这两次读取之间重载会产出单个 schema 的两半分属不同语言。两者在此处都不可达——只有一个已发布后端意味着两次读取返回同一形态，且没有任何程序会针对本渲染器的输出运行——而跨语言拒绝在第二门语言存在之前也无法测试。
|
||||
|
||||
其三，那个 PR 拥有 CPython 版本下限，连带拥有本渲染器的 Unicode 表偏斜。有四处表达式读所运行引擎的表（Node 22.23.1：Unicode 17.0），而解释器用它自己的表（CPython 3.9.6：13.0.0）：`isBareIdentifier` 的 `IDENTIFIER`，以及 `camelCase` 的切分集、头部测试与 `toUpperCase()`。解释器旧于引擎是会失败的那个方向——引擎发出的字符被其 tokenizer 拒收，整个块随之不可解析——而它经三条独立路径抵达。经判据抵达的是裸发的方法名或字段名，其中带有一个在两个版本之间新增的字符——首位加进 `XID_Start`，或尾部任意位置（含名字中部）加进 `XID_Continue`。经 `camelCase` 的 XID 读取抵达的是类名：只要工具 schema 中有任一对象形态声明 `TypedDict`，该类名就进入发出的文本，且判据对工具名的裁决并不对它设闸——工具名 `zz-` 加 U+1E4D0 因 `-` 被判据直接拒绝、从不触及那里的偏斜，却照样声明 `class Zz𞓐xArgs`。经大写映射抵达的是由判据已接受的工具派生出的类名——这是另一张表，窗口也比 XID 归属更宽：U+019B 既是 XID_Start 又 NFKC 稳定，故 `async def ƛ` 在 3.9.6 上可编译，但 Node 将其大写为 U+A7DC（在那里未分配；CPython 自己的 `.upper()` 在此是恒等），于是 `class Args` 以 `invalid non-printable character U+A7DC` 失败。暴露窗口是两个版本之间发生变化的那些字符与映射，所以宣布支持某个 CPython 范围的那个 PR 必须在「接受该暴露」与「按该下限的表钉住全部四个读取点」之间显式作出决定——只钉判据会同时留下两条类名路径。此处无法决定：下限尚不存在，而按猜测钉死一张表会成为一个随部署而变、却没有可配置性支撑的常量。还有第二条轴随该下限一同确定，且不属于那四个读取点：本块在定义期会被求值的那些名字与语法。`TypedDict` 需要 3.8，PEP 585 的内建泛型 `dict[str, Any]` 与 `list[…]` 需要 3.9，`A | B` 形式的注解需要 3.10，`NotRequired` 需要 3.11。这些不是解析失败——本块在任何版本上都能解析，这正是 `MAX_LIST_NESTING` 上限所服务的标准——而是定义期求值失败，且产品中没有任何东西会求值这段文本。把它们与那四个读取点记在一起，可避免把「在所支持范围上可解析」读成「在其上可执行」。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-03-fs-tool-error-remedy.md
|
||||
2026-08-03-fs-tool-error-remedy.md: f227c31365725652b130e097d70c79d3daab3684
|
||||
2026-08-03-fs-tool-error-remedy.zh.md: 11acd0cf48924833ced91591d5ea1424735969cd
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Guarded-mutation errors append the recovery instruction at the model boundary
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-03-fs-tool-error-remedy.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Guarded `write` and `edit` failures reach the model with messages that state the condition but not the only correct recovery: `FS_STALE_VERSION` ("file changed since it was read") and `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` ("edit requires reading … first"). The model must guess that the recovery is a re-read (or a first read) followed by a retry, and the retry/permission/UI layers that route on the structured code see the same message text. The provider-owned messages are part of the storage seam's machine-oriented vocabulary ([filesystem capability seam](../architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md)), so the remedy cannot live there without leaking model-facing wording into every consumer of `FsError`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-fs` owns a model-facing error wrapper, `remediateFsError` in `src/error.ts`, applied in `write.ts` and `edit.ts` after the sandbox denial mapping. It appends the recovery instruction to the two guarded-mutation codes and passes everything else through untouched:
|
||||
|
||||
- `FS_STALE_VERSION` (including a missing edit target, which shares the stale code) gains `— re-read the file, then retry`.
|
||||
- `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` gains `— read the file, then retry`.
|
||||
|
||||
The structured `FsError` code is preserved so retry/permission/UI layers keep routing on it, and the original error chains as `cause`. Provider messages stay machine-oriented and unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
In `edit.ts` the `fs/edit-intent` waterfall now sits inside the same `try` as the provider mutation, so the policy plugin's `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` refusal thrown from the intent slot also receives the remedy — both refusal paths reach the model with the same recovery wording.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Append the remedy to the provider messages in `dsh-fs` / `dsh-fs-local`.** Rejected because those messages are machine-oriented seam vocabulary consumed by retry, permission, and UI layers as well as the model surface; model-facing wording belongs at the model boundary, where `dsh-tool-fs` already owns result formatting ([filesystem capability seam](../architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md)).
|
||||
- **Add the recovery to prompt guidance instead.** Rejected because the failure arrives mid-task; a static instruction does not reliably reach the retry decision, while the error message is present exactly when the model must act.
|
||||
- **Signal the remedy with a new `FsError` code.** Rejected because the two failures are the same conditions retry layers already handle; splitting the code would fork routing on identical semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Model-visible text for the two codes changes; the `fs-policy-reject` keyless snapshot is re-recorded, and the READMEs of `dsh-tool-fs` and `dsh-fs-policy` pin the exact appended text. Unit tests cover the wrapper directly (remedy text, code preservation, cause chaining, passthrough of other codes and non-`FsError` values) and the assembled tool paths assert the remedy reaches the model for both codes.
|
||||
|
||||
The remedy is not a promise: a deleted observed target cannot be unblocked, because re-reading a missing file fails with `FS_NOT_FOUND` and records no observation. That dead end is pinned fail-closed in the integration tests — the retried mutation fails identically until the target exists again and is freshly observed.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Guarded-mutation errors append the recovery instruction at the model boundary
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-03-fs-tool-error-remedy.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
受防护的 `write` 与 `edit` 失败以只陈述条件、不给出唯一正确恢复方式的消息到达模型：`FS_STALE_VERSION`（"file changed since it was read"）与 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`（"edit requires reading … first"）。模型必须自行猜测恢复方式是重新读取（或首次读取）后重试，而基于结构化错误码路由的重试/权限/UI 层看到的也是同一段消息文本。提供方拥有的消息属于存储接缝的面向机器词汇（[filesystem capability seam](../architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md)），因此恢复指令不能放在那里，否则会把面向模型的措辞泄漏给 `FsError` 的每个消费者。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-fs` 拥有一个面向模型的错误包装 `remediateFsError`（位于 `src/error.ts`），在 `write.ts` 与 `edit.ts` 中于沙箱拒绝映射之后应用。它为两个受防护变更错误码追加恢复指令，其余错误原样透传：
|
||||
|
||||
- `FS_STALE_VERSION`（包括缺失的编辑目标——它与陈旧错误共用同一错误码）追加 `— re-read the file, then retry`。
|
||||
- `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 追加 `— read the file, then retry`。
|
||||
|
||||
结构化 `FsError` 错误码保持不变，使重试/权限/UI 层继续基于它路由；原始错误作为 `cause` 链入。提供方消息保持面向机器且不变。
|
||||
|
||||
在 `edit.ts` 中，`fs/edit-intent` waterfall 现在与提供方变更位于同一个 `try` 内，因此策略插件从 intent 槽抛出的 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 拒绝也会获得恢复指令——两条拒绝路径都以相同的恢复措辞到达模型。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **在 `dsh-fs` / `dsh-fs-local` 的提供方消息中追加恢复指令。** 被拒绝：这些消息是面向机器的接缝词汇，除模型表面外还被重试、权限与 UI 层消费；面向模型的措辞应位于模型边界，即 `dsh-tool-fs` 已经拥有结果格式化之处（[filesystem capability seam](../architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md)）。
|
||||
- **改为在提示词引导中加入恢复方式。** 被拒绝：失败发生在任务中途；静态指令无法可靠地影响重试决策，而错误消息恰好在模型必须行动时出现。
|
||||
- **用新的 `FsError` 错误码表达恢复指令。** 被拒绝：这两种失败本就是重试层已处理的相同条件；拆分错误码会让语义相同的路由分叉。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
两个错误码的模型可见文本发生变化；`fs-policy-reject` 无密钥快照被重新录制，`dsh-tool-fs` 与 `dsh-fs-policy` 的 README 逐字固定追加后的文本。单元测试直接覆盖包装器（恢复指令文本、错误码保留、cause 链、其他错误码与非 `FsError` 值的透传），组装后的工具路径断言两个错误码的恢复指令都到达模型。
|
||||
|
||||
恢复指令不是承诺：已删除的观察目标无法被解除阻塞，因为重新读取缺失文件会以 `FS_NOT_FOUND` 失败且不记录观察。这一死胡同在集成测试中以 fail-closed 方式固定——在目标重新存在并被新鲜观察之前，重试的变更以相同方式失败。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md
|
||||
2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md: 7d923a7e4cf61e8d1119187564b87e4cbb2065b7
|
||||
2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.zh.md: 2862162c0c36e5194846c7e1c7bbc24230ce90aa
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Feedback-gated session telemetry
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Session telemetry originally has one mounted behavior: every accepted record enters the reporting backend immediately. Deployments need two stricter policies without replacing the plugin: hold a session's telemetry unless its user records feedback, or disable reporting while still explaining what happens to feedback. The policy must preserve the existing full-export default and the telemetry seam's redaction-before-backend boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel` exposes the string-valued `TelemetryMode` enum to TypeScript callers and accepts the same three uppercase `mode` values in serialized configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
- `FULL` is the default and preserves immediate delivery to the configured OTel pipeline.
|
||||
- `FEEDBACK_ONLY` reads the canonical session log when `feedback/record` is appended and hands over the unreleased prefix through that exact event. Records appended after that boundary remain local until another feedback event.
|
||||
- `DISABLED` constructs no exporter, processor, or logger provider. A `feedback/record` listener prints that nothing is shared and the feedback remains local.
|
||||
|
||||
The generic telemetry coordinator owns `live` and `on-demand` capture. Live capture projects, clones, redacts, and hands each event to the backend on the session firehose. On-demand capture registers no continuous capture listeners; `captureSession(session, throughSeq)` reads the canonical log from the handoff cursor through an inclusive boundary, then projects, clones, redacts, and hands over that prefix. The cursor advances only for handed-over records. The [buffer-free replay decision](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md) owns why the on-demand path uses the canonical log instead of copied records.
|
||||
|
||||
Mode resolution is a closed, fail-before-setup check: an unknown direct-construction value fails before transport configuration is read. Only `FULL` exposes the public service's `emit()` path to the SDK pipeline. `FEEDBACK_ONLY` gives its on-demand coordinator a private backend capability; its listener passes an event to `captureSession()` only when the exact `feedback/record` object is already stored at `session.events[event.seq]`. `Session.append` commits that object before publishing `session/event`, so replay includes the feedback but cannot extend past its boundary. `DISABLED` creates neither the capability nor the SDK pipeline and does not inspect exporter configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Open a session permanently after its first feedback.** Rejected because later work would be shared without another feedback act and the plugin would need additional open-session state. Releasing one pending prefix per feedback has the smaller state machine and the narrower sharing boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Retain capture-time redacted records until feedback.** Rejected because it duplicates an unbounded session prefix even though the canonical log already owns the events. It preserves capture-time redaction policy and operational records, but those properties do not justify the memory cost for a mode defined as uploading the session log after feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
**Temporarily allow public `emit()` calls during feedback replay.** Rejected because a redaction listener or another reentrant caller could enqueue an unrelated record while the flag was open. A private backend capability makes authorization structural and keeps the public service closed throughout replay.
|
||||
|
||||
**Use an unmounted plugin as the disabled state.** That remains the silent opt-out, but it cannot warn when feedback is recorded. The explicit disabled mode lets a deployment keep one configuration shape and communicate that the local feedback did not leave the process.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
`FULL` remains source- and wire-compatible with the original default. `FEEDBACK_ONLY` adds no telemetry-owned per-event buffer before feedback; direct service calls and non-canonical feedback events upload nothing, and a crash before feedback uploads nothing from that prefix. Replay applies the redaction policy mounted when feedback is recorded and excludes operational records that do not exist in the canonical log. Feedback-only streams therefore carry neither `agent-error` nor `shutdown` records, and shutdown absence is not a crash signal. Each later feedback captures the suffix accumulated since the previous boundary. `DISABLED` can omit `exporter.url`, does no reporting work, and keeps feedback only in the canonical session log.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note：反馈门控的会话遥测
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
会话遥测原本只有一种已挂载行为：每条已接受记录都立即进入上报后端。部署方需要两种更严格的策略，且不替换插件：只有用户记录反馈时才释放该会话的遥测，或禁用上报并仍向用户说明反馈的去向。该策略必须保留现有的全量导出默认值，以及遥测 seam 在记录抵达后端之前脱敏的边界。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel` 向 TypeScript 调用方公开以字符串为值的 `TelemetryMode` 枚举，并在序列化配置中接受相同的三个大写 `mode` 值：
|
||||
|
||||
- `FULL` 是默认值，保留向已配置 OTel 流水线的即时投递。
|
||||
- `FEEDBACK_ONLY` 在追加 `feedback/record` 时读取权威会话日志，并交接截至该事件的未释放前缀。该边界后追加的记录会留在本地，直到另一个反馈事件。
|
||||
- `DISABLED` 不构造导出器、处理器或日志提供方。`feedback/record` 监听器会输出警告，说明什么都不会共享，且反馈仍留在本地。
|
||||
|
||||
通用遥测协调器拥有 `live` 与 `on-demand` 捕获。实时捕获在会话 firehose 上投影、深拷贝、脱敏每个事件，并将其交给后端。按需捕获不注册持续捕获监听器；`captureSession(session, throughSeq)` 从 handoff 游标起读取权威日志，直至含边界的指定序列号，然后投影、深拷贝、脱敏并交接该前缀。游标只为已交接记录推进。[无缓冲回放决策](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md)说明了按需路径为何使用权威日志而非记录副本。
|
||||
|
||||
模式解析采用封闭式检查，并在设置前失败：通过直接构造传入未知值时，会在读取传输配置前失败。只有 `FULL` 向 SDK 流水线开放公共服务的 `emit()` 路径。`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 向其按需协调器提供私有后端能力；其监听器向 `captureSession()` 传递事件的唯一条件，是该事件与那个 `feedback/record` 对象身份完全相同，且该对象已存储于 `session.events[event.seq]`。`Session.append` 在发布 `session/event` 前已提交该对象，因此回放包含该反馈，但不会越过其边界。`DISABLED` 既不创建该能力，也不创建 SDK 流水线，并且不检查导出器配置。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**会话在首次反馈后永久开放。** 已否决，因为后续工作会在用户未再次提交反馈的情况下被共享，而且插件需要额外的会话开放状态。每次反馈只释放一个待处理前缀，状态机更小，共享边界也更窄。
|
||||
|
||||
**反馈前保留捕获时已脱敏记录。** 已否决，因为权威日志已拥有这些事件，该方案仍会复制无上限的会话前缀。它能保留捕获时的脱敏策略与运维记录，但对于一个定义为「反馈后上传会话日志」的模式，这些性质不足以证明该内存成本合理。
|
||||
|
||||
**在反馈回放期间临时允许公开 `emit()` 调用。** 已否决，因为在标志开启期间，脱敏监听器或另一个可重入调用方可能将无关记录入队。私有后端能力使授权成为结构性保证，并确保公共服务在整个回放过程中保持关闭。
|
||||
|
||||
**以不挂载插件表示禁用状态。** 这仍然是静默退出方式，但无法在记录反馈时输出警告。显式禁用模式让部署方可以保持同一种配置形态，并说明本地反馈未离开进程。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
`FULL` 与原有默认值保持源码及协议兼容。`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 在反馈前不增加遥测自有的逐事件缓冲；直接服务调用与非权威反馈事件均不上传任何内容，且反馈前发生崩溃时，该前缀也不上传任何内容。回放使用记录反馈时挂载的脱敏策略，并排除权威日志中不存在的运维记录。因此，仅反馈的流既不携带 `agent-error` 记录，也不携带 `shutdown` 记录，而缺少 shutdown 不是崩溃信号。每个后续反馈都会捕获从上一个边界起累积的后缀。`DISABLED` 可省略 `exporter.url`，不执行任何上报工作，并仅在权威会话日志中保留反馈。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.md
|
||||
2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.md: fcf5c3b5b61c94b0823fe54624c3dc906c520348
|
||||
2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.zh.md: bef36df44d97af3993c9760a6b6d3add7b7c932c
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web skill tool row
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The Web transcript renders `skill` calls through the generic fallback row, so a loaded instruction set looks like an unknown tool call even though Skill is a first-class product concept. The generic row also exposes the JSON argument envelope beside the result, adding noise around the one identity users need: the loaded skill name.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`ui-skill` registers a component under the existing `conversation.chat.toolview` keyed slot with key `skill`. The component owns its row chrome from the public `ToolRowProps` contract, matching the independent registrant posture used by the Bash sample instead of importing conversation-private components.
|
||||
|
||||
The collapsed row uses a 14-pixel document-and-sparkle glyph and the Bash row's neutral hierarchy: tertiary glyph, secondary `Skill` title, caption separator, and tertiary skill name. Running, failed, and interrupted calls retain the transcript's shimmer, error dot and first-line summary, and warning dot semantics. A settled call expands through the whole summary row into a 260-pixel bounded `Instructions` card containing the exact durable result text; the existing trajectory `Inspect` handoff remains available below the card.
|
||||
|
||||
The row derives every visible value from a paired call/result slice in the current runtime window. It reads the skill name from the recorded `name` argument and the instructions from durable result content, and never joins the current skill catalog for descriptions or provider metadata. If pagination leaves the call outside the window, the result has no tool identity and remains on the generic fallback rather than extending the history wire contract. The existing ACP `skill-load` recording is seeded through the real Web persistence and composition path for a keyless interaction and accessibility snapshot.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep the generic tool row and add only a `skill` color selector in `ui-conversation`. This leaves the redundant input envelope and generic expanded body in place, and makes the conversation package own a domain-specific visual rule.
|
||||
- Add a new `skill` value to the host tool render-intent union. The keyed client slot already identifies this tool when its call is in the runtime window, so a new cross-boundary presentation value adds protocol and snapshot surface without enabling another consumer.
|
||||
- Export the conversation package's private `ToolRow` component for reuse. Client packages intentionally expose contracts rather than cross-package components; exporting it would couple independent feature packages to conversation implementation details.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
`ui-skill` now depends on the public conversation toolview contract, locale and primitive packages, and React in addition to its reference-source dependencies. It owns a small copy of the disclosure-row chrome, so future global interaction changes must update this registrant alongside the Bash sample and conversation rows.
|
||||
|
||||
Cold replay stays deterministic when the installed skill catalog changes, and the transcript remains compact until instructions are explicitly expanded. A result-only history page intentionally uses the generic fallback; keeping this edge case generic preserves the existing history protocol and confines the feature to client presentation. The dedicated card intentionally shows the tool's complete framed output rather than extracting only `<skill_instructions>`, preserving exactly what reached the model and avoiding a second parser for the skill result format.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web skill 工具行
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
Web transcript（文本记录）通过通用后备行渲染 `skill` 调用，使已加载的指令集看起来像一次未知工具调用，尽管 Skill（技能）已是产品中的一等概念。通用行还会在结果旁暴露 JSON 参数的外层结构，围绕用户真正需要的唯一标识增加了噪声：已加载的 skill 名称。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`ui-skill` 在现有的 `conversation.chat.toolview` 键控 slot 下注册 key 为 `skill` 的组件。该组件基于公开的 `ToolRowProps` 契约自行实现行 chrome，沿用 Bash 示例的独立注册方姿态，而不导入 conversation 私有组件。
|
||||
|
||||
收起的行使用 14 像素的文档与闪光组合图标，并沿用 Bash 行的中性色层级：图标采用三级色，`Skill` 标题采用二级色，分隔符采用 caption 色，skill 名称采用三级色。运行、失败和中断调用分别沿用 transcript 的扫光、错误状态点加首行摘要，以及警告状态点语义。已结算调用可以通过整个摘要行展开一个高度上限为 260 像素的 `Instructions` 卡片，其中原样呈现持久化结果文本；用于跳转至 trajectory 的现有 `Inspect` 入口仍保留在卡片下方。
|
||||
|
||||
该行的所有可见值均派生自当前 runtime 窗口中已配对的调用／结果片段。skill 名称来自已记录的 `name` 参数，指令来自持久化的结果内容；该行绝不关联当前 skill 目录来读取描述或提供方元数据。如果分页将调用留在窗口外，结果便没有工具身份，并继续使用通用后备路径，而不是扩展 history 协议契约。现有的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）`skill-load` 记录经由真实的 Web 持久化与组合路径写入，用于无需密钥的交互和无障碍快照。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- 保留通用工具行，只添加一个 `skill` 颜色选择器，并将其放在 `ui-conversation` 中。该方案仍会保留多余的输入外层结构和通用展开体，也会让 conversation 包拥有特定领域的视觉规则。
|
||||
- 在宿主工具渲染意图联合类型中添加新的 `skill` 值。键控客户端 slot 在调用位于 runtime 窗口内时已经能够识别该工具，因此新的跨边界呈现值只会增加协议和快照表层，却不会支持其他消费方。
|
||||
- 导出 conversation 包的私有 `ToolRow` 组件供复用。客户端包刻意对外暴露契约而非跨包组件；导出该组件会使独立功能包耦合到 conversation 的实现细节。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
除了引用 source 的依赖外，`ui-skill` 现在还依赖公开的 conversation toolview 契约、locale 包、原语包和 React。它自行保留了一小份折叠展开行 chrome，因此未来的全局交互变更必须与 Bash 示例和 conversation 行同步更新这个注册方。
|
||||
|
||||
即使已安装的 skill 目录发生变化，冷回放仍保持确定性；在用户显式展开指令前，transcript 保持紧凑。仅含结果的 history 页有意使用通用后备路径；让这个边缘情况保持通用呈现，可以保留现有 history 协议，并将该功能限定在客户端呈现层。专用卡片有意显示工具完整封装的输出，而不是只提取 `<skill_instructions>`，从而原样保留模型实际收到的内容，也避免为 skill 结果格式再引入一个解析器。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user