docs: purge chain-of-thought leakage from prose

Delete design-session citations (decision/audit/plan ordinals, stack
positions), change narration, review choreography, and reviewer-addressed
justification from comments, JSDoc, docs, READMEs, Agent Notes, tests, and
generator templates; restate every affected fact as current-state contract
prose. Fix generated docs at their sources and regenerate the catalogs and
cordis-surface regions; re-paste type-equiv blocks; update every bilingual
counterpart and re-record the pairs. Record the citation rule in the
committed-artifact-citations Agent Note.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-08-09 15:09:19 +08:00
parent 793f6f55df
commit 25dcd7293c
763 changed files with 2705 additions and 1710 deletions

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ English | [中文](README.zh.md)
The **shared core** of the Claude Code / Codex hook wire protocol. NOT a cordis plugin — it registers nothing and injects nothing. It is a **library** of dialect-neutral primitives the two bridge plugins (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-hooks-claude`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-hooks-codex`) import so neither re-implements the identical halves of the protocol.
Why a shared lib at all: Codex deliberately reimplements a *subset* of the Claude Code hook protocol — the same `hooks.json` matcher-group shape, the same exit-code/stdout output contract, the same command-hook execution model. The genuinely-shared parts live here; each bridge owns only what differs.
Codex deliberately reimplements a *subset* of the Claude Code hook protocol — the same `hooks.json` matcher-group shape, the same exit-code/stdout output contract, the same command-hook execution model. The genuinely-shared parts live here; each bridge owns only what differs.
## What's shared (here) vs. per-dialect (the bridges)