Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/event-driven-issue-review-status-20260810

2026-08-10 23:56:42 +08:00
parent e9a3a38873 396925ad4c
commit 23b1cf47d2
48 changed files with 1804 additions and 48 deletions
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.i18n.yaml
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.i18n.yaml
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md
-2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md: c39117ab0de001650a95f98ccf3e42f3a5034c92
-2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.zh.md: 5e98a2865013a355c134317ded8a4f2ddaccf42c
+2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md: 5a82f0220058c10892b819a83499c817aa9be6ad
+2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.zh.md: 0fb3330014eb703c854f70c9e5ed552256651c31
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Composition splits into two planes, decided by what must be shared rather than b

 | Plane | Instances | Contents |
 |---|---|---|
-| Host | one | The registries themselves (`tools`, `systemPrompt`, `agents`, `agent-loop`, `sessions`), cross-session facilities (persistence, query, projections, storage, settings, credentials, telemetry), and the web host |
+| Host | one | The registries themselves (`tools`, `systemPrompt`, `agents`, `agent-loop`, `sessions`), cross-session facilities (persistence, query, projections, storage, settings, credentials, telemetry), the subagent providers those facilities resolve, and the web host |
 | Agent | one per session | What a single agent contributes to those registries: tool plugins, persona and prompt sections, compaction policy |

 Model routing stays out of presets. `installAgentLlmTarget` is already the per-agent seam for provider, model, and reasoning effort, and an LLM adapter mounted inside a preset would never be resolved by `agent-loop`, which lives in the host plane.
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Which preset an unnamed session gets is a user setting (`agent-presets.default`)

 **Authoring a preset is an RPC, and a privileged one.** A composition is a file, but "edit it on the filesystem" is not a browser affordance, so the roster gained `read`/`write`/`remove` beside `select`. Those three are loopback-pinned: a composition names the plugins a session runs, so reading one is reconnaissance and writing one is arbitrary capability. `list` and `select` deliberately stay ordinary. The roster carries ids and trust only, and a LAN client's picker needs it; and choosing a preset looked like escalation — one of them mounts the toolset that edits the live runtime — but `session.create` already takes an `agentPreset`, so pinning only the switch would have left the same capability one method over. The capability is not the preset's to grant either: the deployment's own default already carries `bash` and the filesystem tools, so any caller that may start a session at all can already run commands as this process. Containment is a property of the id (`[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*`), checked before it becomes a directory name rather than by inspecting the joined path afterwards; the text is parsed with the loader's own schema and dialect, so a save cannot leave a file no session could load. Shipped presets are refused for writes and deletes, because the deployment's copy is what a broken local preset is compared against — which also makes "duplicate, then edit" the authoring path rather than an afterthought.

-**A service with a consumer outside the agent plane cannot move into a preset.** The aggressive split moved the `subagents` registry and its spawn/fork backends into the delegation group's entry-local realm, and `dsh web` then failed to boot: `dsh-host-apiproxy` is a HOST row that injects `subagents` to answer the browser's cross-session queries (`listChildren`, `followup`), so it waited forever for a service only sessions now provided. A per-session copy is wrong twice over — a provider name registers once, so the second session would have collided anyway. The registry and its backends are host-plane; the preset contributes the delegation TOOLS, which resolve the host registry. `workflows` stays entry-local because nothing outside an agent reads it. Grepping injectors is what should have caught this and did not: the search has to include the host packages, not just the agent-plane ones.
+**A service with a consumer outside the agent plane cannot move into a preset.** The aggressive split moved the `subagents` registry and its spawn/fork backends into the delegation group's entry-local realm, and `dsh web` then failed to boot: `dsh-host-apiproxy` is a HOST row that injects `subagents` to answer the browser's cross-session queries (`listChildren`, `followup`), so it waited forever for a service only sessions now provided. A per-session copy is wrong twice over — a provider name registers once, so the second session would have collided anyway. The registry and every shared backend, including the [fixed Codex and Claude Code product providers](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md), are host-plane; a preset contributes whichever delegation TOOLS its agent should see, and those tools resolve the host registry. `workflows` stays entry-local because nothing outside an agent reads it. Grepping injectors is what should have caught this and did not: the search has to include the host packages, not just the agent-plane ones.

 **A real-composition test that disables a host row cannot audit that row.** The web composition test disabled `api-gateway` — the api-proxy itself — as a row with side effects, which is exactly the row whose pending injection would have named the break. It now boots with the api-proxy enabled and the browse directory picker substituted, so the boot audit covers the whole host-plane injection graph; only the port, the asset tree, and the telemetry exporter stay off.

@@ -78,3 +78,7 @@ Which preset an unnamed session gets is a user setting (`agent-presets.default`)
 **Make the agent's scope key the preset.** Sessions on one preset would share a layer for free, but per-agent registrations — `installAgentLlmTarget`, per-agent tool restrictions — would then collide across sessions.

 **Run each preset as a child process.** [`subagent-dsh-sdk`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/README.md) already proves a full child harness works, and isolation would be absolute. It also means proxying streaming, approvals, and projections per session, which is a transport project rather than a composition one.
+
+**Give product subagents global enable settings and a separate settings page.** The process-wide value would compete with the preset as owner of model-visible tools and could not express two sessions using different compositions. Product providers stay host-side, while ordinary preset rows independently expose Codex and Claude Code tools.
+
+**Ship one preset for every Codex and Claude Code combination.** Four identities duplicate the full preset composition to represent two independent rows. A copied preset can enable either row directly, so combination presets add roster and maintenance cost without adding a user result.
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.zh.md
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.zh.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented

 | 平面 | 实例数 | 内容 |
 |---|---|---|
-| 宿主 | 一份 | 注册表本身（`tools`、`systemPrompt`、`agents`、`agent-loop`、`sessions`）、跨会话设施（持久化、查询、投影、存储、设置、凭据、遥测），以及 web 宿主 |
+| 宿主 | 一份 | 注册表本身（`tools`、`systemPrompt`、`agents`、`agent-loop`、`sessions`）、跨会话设施（持久化、查询、投影、存储、设置、凭据、遥测）、这些设施所解析的 subagent provider，以及 web 宿主 |
 | agent | 每会话一份 | 单个 agent 对这些注册表的贡献：工具插件、人设与提示词段落、压缩策略 |

 模型路由不进 preset。`installAgentLlmTarget` 已经是 provider、model 与 reasoning effort 的按 agent 可替换点；而挂在 preset 内部的 LLM 适配器永远不会被 `agent-loop` 解析到，因为后者位于宿主平面。
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Status: implemented

 **创作 preset 是一次 RPC，而且是特权 RPC。** 组装是一个文件，但“去文件系统里改它”并不是浏览器能提供的操作，因此名单在 `select` 之外新增了 `read`/`write`/`remove`。这三者被固定在环回地址：组装指明了一个会话所运行的插件，因此读取它是侦察，写入它是任意能力。`list` 与 `select` 刻意保持为普通方法。名单只携带 id 与信任级别，而局域网客户端的选择器需要它；至于选择本身，它看起来像提权——其中一个 preset 会挂载可编辑活动运行时的工具集——但 `session.create` 本就接受 `agentPreset`，只固定切换会把同一能力留在隔壁一个方法上。这份能力也不由 preset 授予：部署自带的默认 preset 本就带着 `bash` 与文件系统工具，因此任何被允许开启会话的调用方，早已能以本进程的身份执行命令。约束是 id 自身的性质（`[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*`），在它成为目录名之前就检查，而不是事后再去审视拼接出的路径；文本使用 loader 自身的 schema 与方言解析，因此保存不会留下任何会话都无法加载的文件。随部署提供的 preset 拒绝写入与删除，因为部署自带的那一份正是用来对照有问题的本地 preset 的——这也让“先复制、再编辑”成为创作路径本身，而非事后补充。

-**在 agent 平面之外还有消费方的服务，不能搬进 preset。** 激进拆分把 `subagents` 注册表连同 spawn/fork 后端一起搬进了 delegation 组的 entry-local realm，于是 `dsh web` 直接起不来：`dsh-host-apiproxy` 是宿主行，它注入 `subagents` 来回答浏览器的跨会话查询（`listChildren`、`followup`），因而永远等待一个此刻只有会话才提供的服务。按会话各一份在两个层面上都是错的——provider 名只能注册一次，第二个会话本来也会相撞。注册表与后端属于宿主平面；preset 贡献的是委派**工具**，它们解析宿主注册表。`workflows` 保持 entry-local，因为 agent 之外没有任何东西读它。本该拦下它的是「检索注入方」这一步，而它没拦住：检索必须覆盖宿主包，而不只是 agent 平面的包。
+**在 agent 平面之外还有消费方的服务，不能搬进 preset。** 激进拆分把 `subagents` 注册表连同 spawn/fork 后端一起搬进了 delegation 组的 entry-local realm，于是 `dsh web` 直接起不来：`dsh-host-apiproxy` 是宿主行，它注入 `subagents` 来回答浏览器的跨会话查询（`listChildren`、`followup`），因而永远等待一个此刻只有会话才提供的服务。按会话各一份在两个层面上都是错的——provider 名只能注册一次，第二个会话本来也会相撞。注册表与所有共享后端，包括[固定的 Codex 与 Claude Code 产品 provider](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md)，都属于宿主平面；preset 只贡献自己的 agent 应看见的委派**工具**，这些工具解析宿主注册表。`workflows` 保持 entry-local，因为 agent 之外没有任何东西读它。本该拦下它的是「检索注入方」这一步，而它没拦住：检索必须覆盖宿主包，而不只是 agent 平面的包。

 **真实组装测试若禁用了某个宿主行，就无法审计该行。** web 组装测试把 `api-gateway`——也就是 api-proxy 本身——当作「有外部副作用的行」禁用了，而它恰恰是那个会以 pending 注入点名此次断裂的行。现在它在启用 api-proxy、并替换为 browse 目录选择器的前提下引导，启动审计因此覆盖整个宿主平面的注入图；只有端口、资源目录与遥测导出器仍然关闭。

@@ -79,3 +79,7 @@ Status: implemented
 **把 agent 的 scope 键设为 preset。** 同一 preset 上的会话就能免费共享一层，但按 agent 的注册——`installAgentLlmTarget`、按 agent 的工具限制——会跨会话相撞。

 **把每个 preset 作为子进程运行。** [`subagent-dsh-sdk`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/README.md) 已经证明完整的子 harness 可行，隔离性也会是绝对的。但这同时意味着要按会话代理流式输出、审批与投影，那是一个传输层项目，而非组装问题。
+
+**给产品 subagent 增加全局启用设置与独立设置页。** 进程级值会与 preset 争夺模型可见工具的所有权，也无法表达两个会话使用不同组装。产品 provider 留在宿主，普通 preset 行分别暴露 Codex 与 Claude Code 工具。
+
+**为 Codex 与 Claude Code 的每种组合交付一份 preset。** 四个身份会复制完整 preset 组装，只为表示两条独立行。复制后的 preset 已能直接启用任一行，因此组合 preset 只增加名单与维护成本，不增加用户结果。
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.i18n.yaml
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.i18n.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md
+2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md: 33b6eb6cf7a6c19e9ea71cdb7dc8881e8052ef24
+2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.zh.md: fd78c7a3fee4e4ee30d27d87c752e1a23576fd85
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Agent Note: Product subagent providers live in the shared profile host
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The [Codex and Claude Code provider contracts](../feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md) were first shipped as independently installable packages that a deployment loaded beside the common subagent tool. Agent Presets later became the ordinary owner of one agent's model-visible tools, but a preset cannot safely own these product providers: `ctx.subagents` is a process registry, provider names are unique, and host consumers resolve the same registry across sessions. Requiring a person to edit both a Profile and a Preset would also make a generic preset row incomplete by itself.
+
+The placement decision must preserve two independent facts. Loading a provider must not start or authenticate a product, while enabling a tool must remain per preset so two sessions can expose different products. A global product switch, a provider instance per agent, or pre-enumerated combination presets would each create a second owner for one of those facts.
+
+## Decision
+
+Every shipped Profile loads the fixed `codex` and `claude-code` providers once through the base bundle's host plane. Loading either plugin only registers a dormant backend; the corresponding Codex or Claude process starts on the first actual delegation call. Agent Presets independently contribute ordinary `dsh-tool-subagent` rows for `subagent_codex` and `subagent_claude_code`, so a preset can expose neither tool, either one, or both without changing the provider registry.
+
+This decision supersedes only the opt-in composition placement recorded by the provider-contract note. That note continues to own each product protocol, result mapping, cancellation, process-tree lifecycle, and evidence tiers. The [Agent Preset architecture](2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md) continues to own the Host/Agent split, preset authoring, and the rule that edits affect only newly composed sessions.
+
+The providers use products already selected by the host environment. Codex starts `codex` from `PATH`; Claude Code resolves `claude` through the shared subprocess execution world and passes the exact path to the official SDK. Profile loading does not install a product, create product state, probe a version, test authentication, or add product-specific settings. Missing commands and product failures remain local to the attempted delegation.
+
+The current base dependency closure still includes the Claude Agent SDK's optional platform CLI payload even though production resolves the host `claude`. Removing that unused payload belongs to the separate product installation-closure follow-up; this placement decision neither installs it dynamically nor treats it as the production executable.
+
+## Verification
+
+The base Loader test proves both provider names register exactly once and no product process starts during Profile boot. Real Agent Preset composition covers none, Codex-only, Claude-only, and both tool sets, including generation isolation after an authored preset changes. Keyless ACP snapshots pin the model-visible tool schemas for one and both products, while provider tests separately prove native executable resolution, failure, cancellation, and process-tree quiescence.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Keep product providers opt-in at the Profile layer.** This preserves a smaller default dependency closure, but a copied or agent-authored Preset row is not usable unless the person also discovers and edits a second composition layer. It leaves the general Preset entry incomplete for these otherwise ordinary tools.
+
+**Store global or per-Profile product enable switches.** A process switch competes with the Preset as owner of model-visible tools and cannot express two sessions using different combinations. Availability and authentication are deployment facts, not another persisted product state.
+
+**Mount a provider inside every Agent Preset.** Provider names belong to a process registry, so the second session would collide with the first. Host consumers also need the registry independently of any one agent's lifetime.
+
+**Ship four product-combination presets.** Four identities duplicate complete compositions to represent two independent tool rows. Ordinary rows already express the full matrix without adding roster or maintenance state.
+
+## Consequences
+
+A user manages both products through the same Agent Preset authoring path as other plugins, and each new session receives exactly the tools its chosen preset contributes. Every Profile carries two dormant provider registrations, so unused products consume package and module-loading footprint but no product process, login, model call, or product home.
+
+The Host registry remains the single provider authority and each Preset remains the single model-tool authority. The trade-off is the current Claude SDK optional-payload installation cost, which stays explicitly deferred rather than being hidden behind another enable state or installer lifecycle.
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.zh.md
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.zh.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Agent Note: 产品 subagent 提供方位于共享 profile 宿主
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+[Codex 与 Claude Code 提供方约定](../feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md)最初以可独立安装的包交付，由部署环境在通用 subagent 工具旁加载。Agent Preset 后来成为单个 agent（智能体）的模型可见工具的常规责任方，但 preset 不能安全地拥有这些产品提供方：`ctx.subagents` 是进程级注册表，提供方名称唯一，而宿主消费方会跨会话解析同一个注册表。如果要求用户同时编辑 Profile 和 Preset，也会使通用 preset 行本身不完整。
+
+归属决策必须同时保留两个彼此独立的事实：加载提供方不得启动产品，也不得对产品执行身份验证；而工具是否启用仍须按 preset 决定，这样两个会话才能暴露不同的产品。全局产品开关、按 agent 创建提供方实例或预先枚举的组合 preset，都会为其中一个事实另设第二责任方。
+
+## 决策
+
+每个随发行版交付的 Profile 都会通过 base 组合包的宿主平面，把固定的 `codex` 与 `claude-code` 提供方各加载一次。加载任一插件只会注册一个休眠后端；对应的 Codex 或 Claude 进程直到第一次实际委派调用时才启动。Agent Preset 分别通过普通的 `dsh-tool-subagent` 行贡献 `subagent_codex` 与 `subagent_claude_code`，因此一个 preset 可以不暴露任何工具、只暴露其中一个或同时暴露两者，而无需更改提供方注册表。
+
+本决策仅取代提供方约定说明所记录的、原先由用户选择启用的组装位置。该说明仍负责每个产品的协议、结果映射、取消、进程树生命周期与证据层级。[Agent Preset 架构](2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md)仍负责宿主与 agent 的划分、preset 创作，以及改动只影响新组装会话的规则。
+
+这些提供方使用宿主环境已经选定的产品。Codex 启动 `codex`，该命令从 `PATH` 解析；Claude Code 通过共享的子进程执行世界解析 `claude`，并把确切路径交给官方 SDK。加载 Profile 不会安装产品、创建产品状态、探测版本、测试身份验证，也不会新增产品专属设置。命令缺失和产品故障仍局限于发生问题的那次委派。
+
+当前 base 依赖闭包仍包含 Claude Agent SDK 的可选平台 CLI（命令行界面）载荷，尽管生产环境解析的是宿主提供的 `claude`。移除这份未使用载荷属于独立的产品安装闭包后续项；本归属决策既不会动态安装它，也不会将它当作生产可执行文件。
+
+## 验证
+
+base Loader 测试证明两个提供方名称都恰好注册一次，而且 Profile 启动期间不会启动产品进程。真实 Agent Preset 组装覆盖不暴露任何工具、仅暴露 Codex、仅暴露 Claude 和同时暴露两者这四种工具集合，也覆盖自行创作的 preset 发生改动后的代际隔离。无密钥 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）快照固定单个产品与两个产品同时启用时的模型可见工具 schema，提供方测试则另行证明原生可执行文件解析、失败、取消和进程树完全停稳。
+
+## 考虑过的替代方案
+
+**将产品提供方保留为 Profile 层的按需启用项。** 这样可缩小默认依赖闭包，但复制或由 agent 创作的 Preset 行无法直接使用，除非用户还发现并编辑第二个组装层。对于这些本来与其他工具无异的工具，通用 Preset 入口仍不完整。
+
+**存储全局或按 Profile 配置的产品启用开关。** 进程级开关会与 Preset 争夺模型可见工具的责任归属，也无法表示两个会话使用不同组合。可用性与身份验证属于部署事实，并非另一份需要持久化的产品状态。
+
+**在每个 Agent Preset 内挂载一个提供方。** 提供方名称属于进程级注册表，因此第二个会话会与第一个冲突。宿主消费方也需要独立于任何单个 agent 的生命周期使用该注册表。
+
+**交付四个产品组合 preset。** 四个身份会复制完整组装，只为表示两条独立的工具行。普通行已经能表达完整矩阵，无需新增名单或维护状态。
+
+## 后果
+
+用户通过与其他插件相同的 Agent Preset 创作路径管理两个产品，每个新会话只会获得其所选 preset 所贡献的工具。每个 Profile 都携带两个休眠的提供方注册，因此未使用的产品会产生包和模块加载开销，但不会启动产品进程、登录、调用模型或创建产品主目录。
+
+宿主注册表仍是提供方的唯一权威，每个 Preset 仍是模型工具的唯一权威。代价是当前 Claude SDK 可选载荷的安装成本继续被明确延期处理，而不会隐藏在另一种启用状态或安装程序生命周期之后。
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.i18n.yaml
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.i18n.yaml
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md
-2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md: 2063b99a7b0ca34f434b3e56628f3ce765d90d81
-2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.zh.md: 71d4a8e9fc060f8c96483b22641fd67ee1f71c08
+2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md: ccc96d6c998c4ab958a7eea1e502d036d16ec90d
+2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.zh.md: 740eeb633e336d5b01cb0b84fb656612e690959d
--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The product integrations must not become second owners for task text, cwd, cance

 ## Decision

-The harness publishes two sibling one-shot providers as independently installable, opt-in packages. A user loads a provider and the existing common subagent tool in their own `cordis.yml`: `subagent_codex` binds `codex`, while `subagent_claude_code` binds `claude-code`. The shipped CLI dependency closure and base, Web, and headless configurations load neither provider. Each tool accepts only a standalone text task; product selection and background execution are not model arguments.
+The harness publishes two sibling one-shot provider packages: `codex` and `claude-code`. This note owns their product protocols, result mapping, and process lifecycle; the [shared-profile-host placement decision](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md) supersedes the original opt-in composition placement. Loading either provider starts no product process, and each tool accepts only a standalone text task; product selection and background execution are not model arguments.

 Both providers report `inheritsParentContext: false`, advertise no optional start capabilities, and pass the parent Session cwd without copying the parent conversation. Their documented tools disable background execution and use `maxDepth: 'provider-managed'`, leaving recursion policy with the out-of-process product instead of sending a limit the provider cannot enforce. Every call creates a fresh product process and a non-resumable product conversation. The shared subagent service continues to own request resolution, lifecycle events, result settlement, and foreground collection; the shared subprocess service owns credential scrubbing, process-tree termination, and whole-tree exit observation.

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Codex 0.147.0 speaks the Responses protocol, while DeepSeek's public OpenAI-comp

 ## Claude Code provider

-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` registers the fixed `claude-code` provider and invokes `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`. The SDK's platform `optionalDependency` supplies the real Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI. The provider uses the official `query()` entrypoint and passes the SDK's `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` command, arguments, cwd, environment, and forwarded signal unchanged to `dsh-subprocess`; its private `SpawnedProcess` adapter exposes only the stream, event, kill, and exit facts the SDK requires.
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` registers the fixed `claude-code` provider and invokes `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`. Before each run, the provider resolves the fixed `claude` name through the host subprocess execution world and passes that exact path as `pathToClaudeCodeExecutable`; the SDK therefore uses the native product that launched DSH rather than selecting its platform `optionalDependency`. A Windows `.cmd` or `.bat` path crosses `cmd.exe /v:off` as a quoted per-spawn environment expansion, so percent, ampersand, and exclamation path components remain data without changing the shared subprocess contract. The provider uses the official `query()` entrypoint and passes the SDK's `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` arguments, cwd, environment, and forwarded signal to `dsh-subprocess`; its private `SpawnedProcess` adapter exposes only the stream, event, kill, and exit facts the SDK requires.

 The public configuration contains the same two deployment-owned values as the Codex sibling: an explicit `env` overlay and a positive finite `disposeGraceMs` no greater than the repository's shared `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS`. Each run creates its own `AbortController`, sets `persistSession: false`, and disables `AskUserQuestion`. The provider deliberately omits `settingSources`, so the SDK reads the host's normal user, project, and local Claude settings relative to the parent Session cwd. It neither copies nor filters those settings and does not create or modify login state. It supplies no `canUseTool`, elicitation, or dialog callback, so unattended interactions fail through the SDK rather than waiting for a user interface the provider does not own.

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ The Codex evidence pins `@openai/codex@0.147.0` and `codex-cli 0.147.0`. Its rea

 The Codex credentialed e2e registers the production provider, starts the same real app-server, and requests one random nonce through the test-private bridge described above. It fixes the external endpoint and model, stores no credential or request payload, requires exactly one completed upstream response, compares the trimmed product answer byte-for-byte with the nonce, and waits for every managed handle to exit.

-The Claude Code evidence pins Agent SDK 0.3.220 and its platform-distributed Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI. Its real-product spec observes the exact `x-api-key`, original task, byte-exact final answer, inherited temporary host-setting marker, process failure, local cancellation, and whole-tree exit. The Loader e2e resolves both product packages by name while neither product command is available and records zero child starts.
+The Claude Code evidence pins Agent SDK 0.3.220 and uses its platform-distributed Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI as the deterministic compatibility fixture, routed through the same native executable-resolution path production uses. Its real-product spec observes the exact `x-api-key`, original task, byte-exact final answer, inherited temporary host-setting marker, process failure, local cancellation, whole-tree exit, and a real Windows batch shim under a path containing percent, ampersand, and exclamation metacharacters. This evidence proves the official SDK/CLI integration path, not compatibility with every independently installed product version. The Loader and shipped-profile evidence resolve both product packages by name while starting neither product, and the provider suite proves that the SDK receives the executable resolved from the host `PATH`.

 The Claude Code credentialed e2e maps the key and fixed official endpoint only in the provider's in-memory environment, uses the documented `deepseek-v4-pro[1m]` and `deepseek-v4-flash` model variables, and traverses the production provider, official SDK, and real CLI. It compares the trimmed result with a random nonce and proves whole-tree exit without calling the Messages API directly from the test.

@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ The project owner's distribution authorization is scoped to the official `@anthr

 ## Consequences

-Users can install either or both product providers, bind stable foreground tools in their own Cordis configuration, and delegate one self-contained task through the existing subagent contract. Official product integrations preserve native settings and behavior while shared services retain the sole ownership of task settlement and process-tree quiescence.
+Users delegate through two stable foreground tools backed by the official product integrations. Their Profile placement and per-Preset exposure are owned by the [shared-host placement decision](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md); this note's provider lifecycle keeps native settings and behavior while shared services retain the sole ownership of task settlement and process-tree quiescence.

 Every delegation pays for a fresh product process and independent model context, and only final text reaches the parent. Product-native configuration makes behavior depend on the deployment's installed product, account state, and workspace settings. Credentialed e2e runs also spend external API quota and depend on the official DeepSeek endpoint; deterministic protocol, failure, cancellation, and approval coverage remains in the keyless tier. The providers do not resume sessions, stream progress, accept new human interaction, roll back tool or file side effects, or impose a wall-clock timeout.

--- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.zh.md
+++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.zh.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 决策

-harness 将两个一次性兄弟提供方作为可独立安装、选择启用的包交付。用户在自己的 `cordis.yml` 中加载提供方与现有的通用 subagent 工具：`subagent_codex` 绑定 `codex`，`subagent_claude_code` 绑定 `claude-code`。随产品交付的 CLI（命令行界面）依赖闭包，以及基础、Web 与 headless 配置都不会加载任一提供方。每个工具只接受独立文本任务；产品选择与后台执行都不作为模型参数。
+harness 交付两个同级的一次性提供方包：`codex` 与 `claude-code`。本说明负责它们的产品协议、结果映射和进程生命周期；[共享 profile 宿主归属决策](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md)取代原先由用户选择启用的组装位置。加载任一提供方都不会启动产品进程，而且每个工具只接受独立文本任务；产品选择与后台执行都不作为模型参数。

 这两个提供方都报告 `inheritsParentContext: false`，不声明任何可选的启动能力，并传递父会话 cwd，但不会复制父级对话。文档所示的工具会禁用后台执行，并使用 `maxDepth: 'provider-managed'`，将递归策略留给进程外产品，而不是发送提供方无法强制执行的限制。每次调用都会创建一个全新的产品进程和一次不可续接的产品对话。共享 subagent 服务继续负责请求解析、生命周期事件、结果结算和前台收集；共享子进程服务负责凭证清洗、进程树终止以及整棵进程树的退出观测。

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Codex 0.147.0 使用 Responses 协议，而 DeepSeek 的公开 OpenAI 兼容端

 ## Claude Code 提供方

-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` 注册固定的 `claude-code` 提供方，并调用 `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`。SDK 的平台 `optionalDependency` 提供真实的 Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI。提供方使用官方 `query()` 入口点，并将 SDK 的 `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` 命令、参数、cwd、环境和转发的信号原样传入 `dsh-subprocess`；其私有 `SpawnedProcess` 适配器只公开 SDK 所需的流、事件、终止和退出事实。
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` 注册固定的 `claude-code` 提供方，并调用 `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`。每次运行前，提供方经宿主 subprocess 执行世界解析固定名称 `claude`，并把准确路径作为 `pathToClaudeCodeExecutable` 交给 SDK；SDK 因此使用启动 DSH 的原生产品，而不是选择自身的 platform `optionalDependency`。Windows `.cmd` 或 `.bat` 路径会作为带引号、仅供本次 spawn 使用的环境展开值穿过 `cmd.exe /v:off`，因此路径中的百分号、与号和感叹号仍只是数据，且无需改变共享子进程约定。提供方使用官方 `query()` 入口点，并将 SDK 的 `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` 参数、cwd、环境和转发的信号交给 `dsh-subprocess`；其私有 `SpawnedProcess` 适配器只公开 SDK 所需的流、事件、终止和退出事实。

 公开配置包含与 Codex 兄弟提供方相同、由部署方负责的两个值：显式的 `env` 覆盖项，以及须为正有限值且不得大于仓库共享 `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS` 的 `disposeGraceMs`。每次运行都会创建自己的 `AbortController`，设置 `persistSession: false` 并禁用 `AskUserQuestion`。提供方故意省略 `settingSources`，因此 SDK 会相对于父会话 cwd 读取宿主机常规的用户、项目和本地 Claude 设置。它既不复制也不过滤这些设置，也不会创建或修改登录状态。提供方不设置 `canUseTool`、elicitation 或对话回调，因此无人值守交互会经 SDK 失败，而不会等待本提供方不负责的用户界面。

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Codex 证据锁定 `@openai/codex@0.147.0` 与 `codex-cli 0.147.0`。其真实

 带密钥 Codex e2e 会注册生产提供方，启动同样的真实 app-server，并通过上述测试专用桥接层请求一个随机数。该测试固定外部端点与模型，不存储任何凭据或请求载荷，要求上游恰好完成一次响应，将去除首尾空白后的产品答案与该随机数逐字节比较，并等待所有受管句柄退出。

-Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220 及其平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI。其真实产品测试会观测确切的 `x-api-key`、原始任务、逐字节完全一致的最终回答、继承的临时宿主设置标记、进程失败、本地取消以及整棵进程树退出。Loader e2e 会在两个产品命令均不可用时按名称解析两个产品包，并记录零次子级启动。
+Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220，并使用 SDK 按平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI 作为确定性兼容性 fixture（测试前置数据），且该 fixture 经生产环境所用的同一原生可执行文件解析路径运行。其真实产品测试会观测确切的 `x-api-key`、原始任务、逐字节完全一致的最终回答、继承的临时宿主设置标记、进程失败、本地取消、整棵进程树退出，以及位于同时含百分号、与号和感叹号路径中的真实 Windows batch shim。这项证据证明官方 SDK/CLI 集成路径，而不证明它与每个独立安装的产品版本兼容。Loader 与随附 profile 证据会按名称解析两个产品包且不启动产品，provider 测试则证明 SDK 收到由宿主 `PATH` 解析出的可执行文件。

 带密钥 Claude Code e2e 仅在提供方的内存环境中映射密钥与固定的官方端点，把模型变量设为文档所示的 `deepseek-v4-pro[1m]` 与 `deepseek-v4-flash`，并实际经过生产提供方、官方 SDK 与真实 CLI。它将去除首尾空白后的结果与一个随机数比较，并证明整棵进程树退出，且测试不会直接调用 Messages API。

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220 及其平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1

 **面向模型的产品选择器。** 产品可用性和身份验证属于部署事实。两个固定工具使各自的 schema 与提供方绑定保持明确，也避免在通用服务中添加动态选择状态。

-**以产品替身作为强制证据。** 替身可以穷尽覆盖私有协议分支，但无法证明包导出、官方发行版、身份验证或真实进程行为。强制证据会驱动每个官方产品连接回环模型 fixture（测试前置数据）。
+**以产品替身作为强制证据。** 替身可以穷尽覆盖私有协议分支，但无法证明包导出、官方发行版、身份验证或真实进程行为。强制证据会驱动每个官方产品连接回环模型 fixture。

 **由插件管理登录、产品主目录、模型、设置或权限。** 这些选择会在每个产品的原生配置之外建立另一套权威来源，并将一次性提供方扩张为账户管理功能。提供方只公开显式环境覆盖项和清理宽限期；无人值守交互会以默认拒绝方式失败。

@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220 及其平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1

 ## 后果

-用户可以安装任一或两个产品提供方，在自己的 Cordis 配置中绑定稳定的前台工具，并通过现有 subagent 约定委派一项自包含任务。官方产品集成会保留原生设置与行为，而共享服务继续独占任务结算与进程树完全停稳的责任。
+用户通过官方产品集成支持的两个稳定前台工具进行委派。它们在 Profile 中的归属和按 Preset 暴露方式由[共享宿主归属决策](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md)负责；本说明规定的提供方生命周期会保留原生设置与行为，而共享服务继续独占任务结算与进程树完全停稳的责任。

 每次委派都要承担新建产品进程和独立模型上下文的开销，且只有最终文本会到达父级。产品原生配置使行为取决于部署环境中安装的产品、账户状态和工作区设置。带密钥 e2e 运行还会消耗外部 API 配额，并依赖 DeepSeek 官方端点；对协议、失败、取消与审批的确定性覆盖仍由无密钥层级承担。提供方不会恢复会话、以流式方式传送进度、接受新的人工交互、回滚工具或文件副作用，也不会施加按实际经过时间触发的超时。