refactor(mode): drop the per-mode tool allowlist — enforce where an enforcer exists

A ModeDefinition is now exactly { section, access? }; unknown keys (a
tools list included) fail loud at load. What plan mode still does: the
guidance section, the exit_plan_mode visibility rule (plan only, both
soft surfaces), the access cap's bash/resolve-mode clamp, and the two
cap-derived pre-execute guards (the bash trio is withheld when no
confining executor can honor the cap; sandbox escalation is denied
while it holds). The general deny-by-default gate and the assemble
allowlist filter are gone: which tools a mode admits is an effects
question, and a hand-maintained name list mislabels it — it must track
every composed tool and rots silently as tools arrive. The dimension
returns as a consumer of effects self-declaration on tool definitions
(MCP ToolAnnotations as the template) — rationale and restart trigger
archived in the RFC's Alternatives/Deferred; the interim guidance-only
non-shell restraint is priced in Consequences.

Exiting plan is now a pure removal (the exit tool + section), which the
delta encoding CAN express: the re-recorded plan-mode fixture pins one
plan-shaped initial header snapshot plus one header-delta instead of
two snapshots.
This commit is contained in:
kingwl
2026-07-12 23:20:36 +08:00
parent 99650a201b
commit 1fe2f99580
20 changed files with 1995 additions and 1529 deletions

View File

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Registered by the tool registry itself under `mode: code` / `mode: both` (see th
### `exit_plan_mode`
Present your plan for the user's review and, on approval, leave plan mode. Send the COMPLETE plan as markdown, starting with a # heading that names it. The user may approve (the full toolset returns on your next step) or keep planning — their feedback comes back in the tool result; revise and present again.
Present your plan for the user's review and, on approval, leave plan mode. Send the COMPLETE plan as markdown, starting with a # heading that names it. The user may approve (carry out the plan from your next step) or keep planning — their feedback comes back in the tool result; revise and present again.
```json
{