Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into feat/web-terminal-card

# Conflicts:
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml
This commit is contained in:
Chinesezjc
2026-07-28 21:03:26 +08:00
407 changed files with 6332 additions and 3102 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 6936fbfa04c0fdaf1a8786c0465c193e9c285243
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 3af14359fa01e92f63ae3b3e51dced9a97f6419f
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: ed171735cf483938c70291963a6e68dc02d7bde2
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 8b2a3ebabb493954e653255e876255b9c0810c19

View File

@@ -12,21 +12,21 @@ Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface proj
## Decision
**One primitive, three preset aliases.** The `Agent` interface's `send(input, { target, wakeup })` covers the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix. Its `UserMessageData` input owns the inseparable model-facing `content` and producer `source`; the complete `SendOptions` owns only routing policy. `followup` (`next-turn`/wakeup), `steer` (`next-step`/wakeup), and `inject` (`next-step`/no-wakeup) each accept that one input and fix the policy. `wakeup` means "make the model run": wake a parked driver for a `next-turn` item, or force a continuation for a running `next-step` item. `next-turn`/no-wakeup (queue without waking) is representable with no alias and no current caller.
**One primitive, three preset aliases.** The `Agent` interface's `send(message, { target, wakeup })` covers the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix. Its complete `UserMessage` owns identity, role, model-facing `content`, and producer `source`; the complete `SendOptions` owns only routing policy. `followup` (`next-turn`/wakeup), `steer` (`next-step`/wakeup), and `inject` (`next-step`/no-wakeup) each accept that one message and fix the policy. `wakeup` means "make the model run": wake a parked driver for a `next-turn` item, or force a continuation for a running `next-step` item. `next-turn`/no-wakeup (queue without waking) is representable with no alias and no current caller.
**inject keeps its mechanism.** The `next-step`/no-wakeup path is exactly the old `inject`: durable model-facing context appended at the current log position, deferred while prompt admission or a turn owns the next safe boundary, and appended directly outside that window. It bypasses the FIFOs entirely, while its required `UserMessageData.source` preserves the caller's explicit provenance.
**inject keeps its mechanism.** The `next-step`/no-wakeup path is exactly the old `inject`: durable model-facing context appended at the current log position, deferred while prompt admission or a turn owns the next safe boundary, and appended directly outside that window. It bypasses the FIFOs entirely, while its required `UserMessage.source` preserves the caller's explicit provenance.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context is now a `user/message`; context producers supply the appropriate non-user `source` explicitly, and typed source variants carry any domain-specific durable provenance. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change is a round-zero goal-sourced `user/message` whose source carries the complete change; a positive round is an admitted continuation prompt. `decodeGoalEvent` takes a `user/message` and fails loud when goal-state content and its typed source disagree.
**`send` returns an id.** `send` (and the aliases) return an opaque branded `AgentMessageId` for the accepted message; `send`'s previous return was `void`.
**`send` does not return identity.** Callers already own the complete message and its opaque `MessageId`; creation and freezing are owned by the [identified immutable message decision](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md), not by routing.
**Three inbox events replace agent/queued.** `agent/inbox/enqueue` (an item entered a FIFO), `agent/inbox/dequeue` (the driver claimed one), and `agent/inbox/discard` (`cancel()` dropped pending items) type their `AgentMessage` payload with only the accepted message's returned `id`, content, and source. Enqueue separately carries the resolved `queued | steering` placement captured by the producer at acceptance time, so observers and reconnect mirrors never reconstruct routing from later status or session history. Injection never touches a FIFO and emits none of these. Every FIFO entry publishes an enqueue, including steering submitted by an `agent/turn-stopping` listener, so the ledger stays balanced with its later dequeue or discard. The `dsh-agent` invariant companion asserts FIFO conservation: a per-agent outstanding count that dequeue and discard can never drive negative.
**Three inbox events replace agent/queued.** `agent/inbox/enqueue` (an item entered a FIFO), `agent/inbox/dequeue` (the driver claimed one), and `agent/inbox/discard` (`cancel()` dropped pending items) carry the accepted `UserMessage`. Enqueue and dequeue also carry the resolved `queued | steering` placement captured at acceptance, so observers and reconnect mirrors retire repeated message identities from the correct FIFO without reconstructing routing from later status or session history. Injection never touches a FIFO and emits none of these. Every FIFO entry publishes an enqueue, including steering submitted by an `agent/turn-stopping` listener, so the ledger stays balanced with its later dequeue or discard. The `dsh-agent` invariant companion asserts FIFO conservation: a per-agent outstanding count that dequeue and discard can never drive negative.
**Admission accepts next-step input without becoming a turn.** The loop opens a private next-step acceptance window before `agent/prompt-submit`, keeps it open through the turn, and closes it before `turn/end`. Steering and injection received during admission therefore remain together in the outbox and join an allowed turn. If admission blocks or fails, a context-only caller batch takes idle injection's immediate append, while steering and context staged beside it remain available to retry; neither path writes the rejected prompt. When a later prompt is admitted, retained outbox input enters its turn before that prompt, while input accepted during the current admission remains after the prompt. Closing the window before `turn/end` preserves the rule that reentrant late steering becomes an independent queued turn. `Agent.acceptsNextStep` exposes whether a `next-step` send would currently join this window; `status` remains the broader activity signal rather than a routing predicate.
**One accepted message keeps one representation.** Durable user-role input and additional model-facing context both use `UserMessageData { content, source }` directly; public `AgentMessage` extends it with the correlation `id`, and the loop-private `PendingMessage` extends that with `wakeup`. The loop clones and freezes `UserMessageData` before publication, queueing, or immediate append, so later caller or observer mutation cannot change the accepted value. A queued message that becomes steering enters the outbox as the same `PendingMessage` object, while injected and tool-produced context enters as plain `UserMessageData`. The outbox therefore stores their union directly instead of wrapping steering beside a duplicate copy of its content and source. Provider-native assistant messages remain adapter-owned output types and do not participate in this input hierarchy.
**One accepted message keeps one representation.** Durable user-role input and additional model-facing context both use the identified, frozen `UserMessage` directly. The loop stores that value beside private routing state rather than copying its identity, content, or source into another public shape. A queued message that becomes steering keeps the same message value in the outbox, while injected and tool-produced context each carry their own identified message. The [identified immutable message decision](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md) supersedes this note's former `UserMessageData`/`AgentMessage` hierarchy and extends the representation to assistant and tool-result messages.
**Idle wakeup follows acceptance.** Before publishing enqueue, a waking queued send installs quiescence ownership and schedules driver admission for a microtask that runs after the id returns. Every send in one synchronous caller stack therefore resolves placement against the same pre-admission state, while reentrant cancellation or teardown cannot retire before the scheduled admission settles. Two idle `steer()` calls remain two FIFO turns instead of the first opening an admission window that captures the second.
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface proj
## Alternatives considered
- **A dedicated `MessageSource` kind `context`** for injected content. Rejected because `plugin` already means "not a human," so a fourth kind would add a parallel axis the authority checks would have to learn. Plugin-produced injected context supplies its plugin source explicitly.
- **A typed discriminant field on `UserMessageData`** (e.g. `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`) to replace the event-type split. Rejected in favor of `source`, which every consumer already carries and which the goal system already keyed on; a second discriminant would duplicate that fact.
- **A typed discriminant field on `UserMessage`** (e.g. `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`) to replace the event-type split. Rejected in favor of `source`, which every consumer already carries and which the goal system already keyed on; a second discriminant would duplicate that fact.
- **Keeping `agent/queued` alongside the inbox events.** Rejected as a mirror: `agent/inbox/enqueue` is the same enqueue-time signal with the resolved placement, and the dequeue/discard events complete the FIFO lifecycle the single event could not describe.
- **Derive inbox placement from agent status or the session log.** Rejected because `running` includes admission and settlement, while reconnect baselines need the original acceptance result even when the earlier turn boundary is absent. The producer already owns the exact routing decision.
@@ -50,3 +50,4 @@ The delivery surface is now one primitive plus three self-documenting presets, a
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md) — the one-claimed-message-per-turn rule this builds on.
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md) — the cancel-cause signal `keepInbox` extends.
- [identified immutable message values](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md) — the message identity and representation contract that now underlies this routing decision.

View File

@@ -12,21 +12,21 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
## 决策
**一个原语,三个预设别名。** `Agent` 接口的 `send(input, { target, wakeup })` 覆盖 (`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵。 `UserMessageData` 输入持有不可分割的模型可见 `content` 与生产方 `source`;完整的 `SendOptions` 只持有路由策略。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup`steer``next-step`/wakeup`inject``next-step`/no-wakeup都接收这一项输入并固定策略。`wakeup` 意为“让模型运行”:为一个 `next-turn` 队列项唤醒处于停泊状态的驱动器,或为一个运行中的 `next-step` 队列项强制继续执行。`next-turn`/no-wakeup入队但不唤醒可以表达只是没有别名也没有当前调用方。
**一个原语,三个预设别名。** `Agent` 接口的 `send(message, { target, wakeup })` 覆盖 (`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵。完整的 `UserMessage` 持有标识、角色、模型可见 `content` 与生产方 `source`;完整的 `SendOptions` 只持有路由策略。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup`steer``next-step`/wakeup`inject``next-step`/no-wakeup都接收这一条消息并固定策略。`wakeup` 意为“让模型运行”:为一个 `next-turn` 队列项唤醒处于停泊状态的驱动器,或为一个运行中的 `next-step` 队列项强制继续执行。`next-turn`/no-wakeup入队但不唤醒可以表达只是没有别名也没有当前调用方。
**inject 保留其机制。** `next-step`/no-wakeup 路径正是旧的 `inject`:持久的面向模型上下文会追加到当前日志位置;提示词准入或一个轮次占有下一个安全边界时,它会延迟处理,而在该窗口之外则直接追加。它完全绕过 FIFO 队列,而必填的 `UserMessageData.source` 会保留调用方显式提供的来源信息。
**inject 保留其机制。** `next-step`/no-wakeup 路径正是旧的 `inject`:持久的面向模型上下文会追加到当前日志位置;提示词准入或一个轮次占有下一个安全边界时,它会延迟处理,而在该窗口之外则直接追加。它完全绕过 FIFO 队列,而必填的 `UserMessage.source` 会保留调用方显式提供的来源信息。
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文现在是一条 `user/message`;上下文生产方显式提供合适的非 `user` 类别 `source`,类型化 source 变体携带所有特定于领域的持久来源信息。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。
**goal 回放靠轮次而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更是一条第 0 轮、来源为 goal 的 `user/message`,其 source 携带完整变更;正数轮次则是一条已准入的继续执行提示词。`decodeGoalEvent` 接收一条 `user/message`,并在 goal 状态内容与其类型化 source 不一致时立即报错。
**`send` 返回一个 id。** `send`(以及其别名)为被接受的消息返回一个不透明的 branded `AgentMessageId``send` 此前的返回值是 `void`
**`send` 返回标识。** 调用方已经持有完整消息及其不透明的 `MessageId`;消息的创建与冻结由[带标识的不可变消息值决策](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md)负责,而不是由路由负责
**三个 inbox 事件取代 agent/queued。** `agent/inbox/enqueue`(一个队列项进入某个 FIFO`agent/inbox/dequeue`(驱动器认领了一个)和 `agent/inbox/discard``cancel()` 丢弃了待处理项)都将各自的 `AgentMessage` 载荷类型限定为仅包含被接受消息所返回的 `id`、内容和来源。enqueue 还会单独携带生产方在接受消息时捕获的已解析 `queued | steering` 放置方式,因此观察方和重连镜像永远不必根据后续状态或会话历史重建路由。注入从不触及 FIFO也不发出这些事件中的任何一个。每一次 FIFO 入队都会发布一个 enqueue 事件,包括 `agent/turn-stopping` 监听器提交的 steering因此账目会与其后的 dequeue 或 discard 保持平衡。`dsh-agent` 的不变量配套断言 FIFO 守恒:一个按 agent 计的未结算计数dequeue 和 discard 永远无法把它压到负数。
**三个 inbox 事件取代 agent/queued。** `agent/inbox/enqueue`(一个队列项进入某个 FIFO`agent/inbox/dequeue`(驱动器认领了一个)和 `agent/inbox/discard``cancel()` 丢弃了待处理项)都会携带已接受的 `UserMessage`。enqueue 和 dequeue 还会携带生产方在接受消息时捕获的已解析 `queued | steering` 放置方式,因此观察方和重连镜像可以从正确的 FIFO 中结算重复出现的消息标识,无需根据后续状态或会话历史重建路由。注入从不触及 FIFO也不发出这些事件中的任何一个。每一次 FIFO 入队都会发布一个 enqueue 事件,包括 `agent/turn-stopping` 监听器提交的 steering因此账目会与其后的 dequeue 或 discard 保持平衡。`dsh-agent` 的不变量配套断言 FIFO 守恒:一个按 agent 计的未结算计数dequeue 和 discard 永远无法把它压到负数。
**准入接受 next-step 输入,但不会因此成为一个轮次。** 循环会在 `agent/prompt-submit` 前打开一个私有的 next-step 接受窗口,使其贯穿整个轮次,并在 `turn/end` 前关闭。因此,在准入期间收到的 steering 和注入会一起留在 outbox 中并加入获准轮次。如果准入被阻止或失败,仅含调用方上下文的批次会采用空闲注入的立即追加行为,而 steering 及与其一同暂存的上下文仍可重试;两种路径都不会写入被拒绝的提示词。后续提示词获准时,保留在 outbox 中的输入会先于该提示词进入其轮次,而当前准入期间接受的输入则留在提示词之后。在 `turn/end` 前关闭窗口,可以保留这样的规则:可重入的晚到 steering 会成为一个独立的排队轮次。`Agent.acceptsNextStep` 会公开一次 `next-step` 发送当前是否会加入该窗口;`status` 仍是更宽泛的活动信号,而非路由判据。
**一条已接受消息只保留一种表示。** 持久的用户角色输入和附加的模型可见上下文都直接使用 `UserMessageData { content, source }`;公开的 `AgentMessage` 在此基础上增加用于关联的 `id`,循环私有的 `PendingMessage` 再增加 `wakeup`。循环会在发布、入队或立即追加前克隆并冻结 `UserMessageData`,因此调用方或观察方后续的修改无法改变已接受的值。一条成为 steering 的排队消息会以同一个 `PendingMessage` 对象进入 outbox而注入和工具产生的上下文则以普通 `UserMessageData` 进入。因此outbox 直接存储这两种类型的联合,而不再把 steering 与一份重复的内容和来源副本包装在一起。提供方原生的助手消息仍是适配器拥有的输出类型,不参与这套输入层级
**一条已接受消息只保留一种表示。** 持久的用户角色输入和附加的模型可见上下文都直接使用带标识且冻结的 `UserMessage`。循环把该值与私有路由状态存放在一起,不会将其标识、内容或来源复制到另一种公开形状中。一条成为 steering 的排队消息会在 outbox 中保留同一个消息值,而注入和工具产生的上下文则各自携带带标识的消息。[带标识的不可变消息值决策](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md)取代了本记录此前的 `UserMessageData`/`AgentMessage` 层级,并将这一表示扩展到 assistant 消息和工具结果消息
**空闲唤醒在接受之后发生。** 在发布 enqueue 前,一次会唤醒驱动器的排队发送会先取得完全停稳所有权,并把驱动器准入调度到一个会在该次发送返回 id 后运行的微任务中。因此,同一同步调用栈中的每次发送都会基于同一份准入前状态解析放置方式,而可重入的取消或拆除在已调度的准入结算前无法完成退役。空闲时的两次 `steer()` 调用会保留为两个 FIFO 轮次,而不会因第一次调用打开准入窗口而把第二次吸纳进去。
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **为注入内容设立专门的 `MessageSource` 类别 `context`。** 不予采纳,因为 `plugin` 已经表示“不是人类”,因此第四种类别会增加一条平行的轴,让授权检查不得不去学习它。由插件产生的注入上下文会显式提供其 plugin 来源。
- **在 `UserMessageData` 上设一个类型化的判别字段**(例如 `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`)来取代事件类型的区分。不予采纳,转而采用 `source`——每个消费方都已经携带它goal 系统也已经以它为键;第二个判别字段会重复这一事实。
- **在 `UserMessage` 上设一个类型化的判别字段**(例如 `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`)来取代事件类型的区分。不予采纳,转而采用 `source`——每个消费方都已经携带它goal 系统也已经以它为键;第二个判别字段会重复这一事实。
- **在 inbox 事件之外保留 `agent/queued`。** 作为镜像而被否决:`agent/inbox/enqueue` 是同一个入队时刻的信号,只是带有已解析的放置方式,而 dequeue/discard 事件补全了单个事件无法描述的 FIFO 生命周期。
- **根据 agent 状态或会话日志推导 inbox 放置方式。** 不予采纳,因为 `running` 同时涵盖准入与结算,而重连基线即使缺少此前的轮次边界,也需要最初的接受结果。生产方已经拥有精确的路由决策。
@@ -50,3 +50,4 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)——本决策所依托的“每轮次只认领一条消息”规则。
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)——`keepInbox` 所扩展的取消原因信号。
- [带标识的不可变消息值](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md)——本路由决策现在所依托的消息标识与表示契约。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: d44ef5afc8c376790192998bcf3069ceb651ae82
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: ba561b587effb278a67844ce4d876da9cd940e94
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: bf3ae2ecbd2205a4c49e8004ffc694f89a2460a3
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: a805eb651c5c77f3d37c92dacd116bb41f154ed7

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Idle `inject()` exposed a second mismatch. Injection did not request model execu
`inject()` is the only caller-facing operation for supplementary model-facing input, and a turn means one execution of the model loop.
`SendOptions` contains only `target` and `wakeup`. A caller that owns context delivers `UserMessageData` through `inject()` and submits the direct message independently with `send()` or `steer()`.
`SendOptions` contains only `target` and `wakeup`. A caller that owns context delivers an identified, frozen `UserMessage` through `inject()` and submits the direct message independently with `send()` or `steer()`.
Prompt and tool extension points still return `additionalContexts`. These values are outputs of the extension point, not attachments captured from a caller's inbox item. Prompt admission runs before `run()` opens a turn. An allowed prompt and its returned additional contexts enter the new turn as separate messages; a blocked prompt writes neither and opens no turn. Tool-produced additional contexts enter the outbox after the corresponding tool results.
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ This decision preserves the caller-owned framing decision from [unwrapped inject
## Verification
- `SendOptions` and steering inbox records contain no attached contexts; `agent/inbox/enqueue` reports only the message plus its resolved queued-or-steering placement.
- `UserMessageData` is the shared shape across prompt interception, tool execution, hook bridges, guards, and context producers.
- `UserMessage` is the shared identified, frozen shape across prompt interception, tool execution, hook bridges, guards, and context producers.
- Prompt-prefix placement, prompt envelopes, and `context/message` are absent from public types, durable events, projection, and UI replay.
- Idle `inject()` appends one sourced `user/message` without a turn or model call.
- Admission-time and active-turn injection drain at safe boundaries after complete tool-result batches and before the request that consumes them.

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ agent API 曾用三种相互重叠的方式表示面向模型的补充输入:
`inject()` 是调用方交付补充模型输入的唯一操作,而轮次表示一次模型循环执行。
`SendOptions` 只包含 `target``wakeup`。拥有上下文的调用方通过 `inject()` 交付 `UserMessageData`,再独立使用 `send()``steer()` 提交直接消息。
`SendOptions` 只包含 `target``wakeup`。拥有上下文的调用方通过 `inject()` 交付带标识且冻结的 `UserMessage`,再独立使用 `send()``steer()` 提交直接消息。
提示词和工具扩展点仍可返回 `additionalContexts`。这些值是扩展点的输出,而不是从调用方收件箱条目捕获的附件。提示词准入在 `run()` 打开轮次之前执行。获准的提示词及其返回的额外上下文会作为独立消息进入新轮次;提示词被阻止时,两者都不写入,也不打开轮次。工具产生的额外上下文则在对应工具结果之后进入 outbox。
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ agent API 曾用三种相互重叠的方式表示面向模型的补充输入:
## 验证
- `SendOptions` 与 steering 收件箱记录不包含附加上下文;`agent/inbox/enqueue` 只报告消息及其已解析的 queued 或 steering 放置方式。
- `UserMessageData` 是提示词拦截、工具执行、hook bridge、guard 和上下文生产方共享的形状。
- `UserMessage` 是提示词拦截、工具执行、hook bridge、guard 和上下文生产方共享的带标识且冻结的形状。
- 公共类型、持久事件、投影和 UI 回放中均不存在 prompt-prefix 放置方式、提示词封套与 `context/message`
- 空闲 `inject()` 在不产生轮次或模型调用的情况下,追加一条带来源的 `user/message`
- 准入期间和活跃轮次中的注入会在完整工具结果批次之后的安全边界排空,并在消费它们的请求之前进入日志。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md
2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md: cdb0f1aadc4796b5aa0642a3994d3e3e4ab67bd9
2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.zh.md: 3e1732cb5b7f49fb9349b2e1790cf5b3ec1474be

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Agent Note: Create every message as an identified immutable value
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.zh.md)
## Problem
The harness had several message-shaped representations with different identity rules. Agent input acquired an inbox correlation id only when the loop accepted it, while durable user messages, assistant messages, tool results, and model-request messages could have no identity. Prompt admission therefore sat between creation and identity, and equivalent content was copied across live events, durable events, and model requests without one value that named the message throughout its lifetime.
This made identity a routing side effect rather than a message invariant. Producers could not refer to a message before calling the agent, prompt hooks received content and source separately, and later projections had to reconstruct a message while deciding whether an id existed. Immutability also began at different boundaries: some inputs were frozen by the loop, some only by session append, and provider-produced assistant output used a separate provenance-bearing shape.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm` owns one `Message` value with required `id`, `role`, `content`, and `source`. `MessageId` is opaque and shared by user, assistant, and tool-result messages. A message receives its id at creation, before routing, prompt admission, durable append, or request projection. The same id survives every representation boundary.
`createMessage(input)` is the canonical role-generic creation boundary. It mints a `MessageId`, detaches the supplied role, content, and source, and deep-freezes the complete value before returning it. `createUserMessage({ content, source })` fixes the user role for prompt and context producers. `createAssistantMessage({ content, source })` fixes both the assistant role and the model source kind, so model-output producers supply only content and model provenance. All creation helpers exclude an input id so callers cannot accidentally present creation as import. `freezeMessage(message)` is the separate import or transformation boundary: it detaches and deep-freezes a message whose identity already exists, without minting a replacement.
The helpers live in `dsh-llm` beside the base message vocabulary because their complete contracts depend only on that vocabulary. `createToolResultMessage()` belongs with the other creation helpers: it couples a tool call id to the exact user-role tool-result block and source without depending on session state or events. `dsh-session` consumes complete messages rather than owning their construction.
The `Agent` interface accepts a complete `UserMessage`. `send`, `followup`, `steer`, and `inject` never allocate or return identity; they freeze an imported value whose id the caller already holds. Prompt admission receives that message directly. A content rewrite creates a frozen replacement with the same id, while an additional context is a separately created `UserMessage` with its own id.
Durable message-producing events store complete messages. `user/message` stores its `UserMessage` directly; `assistant/message`, `tool/result`, and `steering/message` wrap their role-specialized message beside event-local position, usage, failure, or presentation facts. Session derivation returns those frozen values instead of reconstructing anonymous messages. Assistant assembly creates a model-sourced message when a response completes, and tool execution creates a tool-sourced message when a result is committed.
Any operation that changes only the representation of an existing semantic message preserves its id and returns another frozen value. An operation that creates a new semantic message mints a new id. Compaction content rewrites therefore preserve the rewritten tool-result identity, while a summary checkpoint is a new message.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep ids optional on the base message.** This would minimize fixture migration and allow provider or persistence shapes to remain anonymous. It would also preserve the original ambiguity: every consumer would need to branch on whether identity exists, and no type would prove that admission, logging, or projection retained it.
**Let `Agent.send()` allocate the id.** This keeps identity scoped to inbox correlation but makes the agent call the earliest point at which a producer can name its own message. Prompt construction, UI attachments, and synchronous enqueue/discard coordination then need content matching or an out-of-band token before `send()` returns.
**Let each durable event allocate a new id.** This gives persisted messages identities but deliberately breaks correlation with the live input and makes replayed requests appear to contain different messages. Identity belongs to the semantic value, not to each envelope that carries it.
**Freeze only at agent or session admission.** This avoids a creation helper but leaves an identified mutable interval in which caller code can change the meaning associated with an id. The decision makes “has an id” and “is an immutable snapshot” coincide.
## Consequences
Every message producer must choose creation or import explicitly, and tests construct complete values rather than partial content/source records. UUID generation moves outward to the first semantic creation point, so deterministic fixtures that provide an existing id use `freezeMessage()` instead of `createMessage()`.
Live inbox events, durable events, derived history, and model requests can correlate one message without content equality or envelope-specific ids. Prompt admission and UI attachment cleanup can compare `MessageId` before a turn exists. Deep freezing prevents a producer, hook, or observer from changing the value after identity is established.
The shared representation removes the old `UserMessageData`/`AgentMessage` split and folds provider provenance into typed message sources. Event envelopes still own facts that are not message semantics, such as turn and step position, token usage, internal tool failure identity, and presentation metadata.
The message and helper unit tests pin immediate identity, detachment, deep immutability, and preservation of an imported id. Agent-loop tests pin identity across admission, inbox lifecycle, durable append, content rewriting, and cancellation; session tests pin frozen derivation and identity-preserving replacement.
## Related
- [Unify agent delivery on send(target × wakeup) and coalesce injected context into user/message](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md) — this note supersedes its input-representation and agent-assigned-id details while retaining its routing decision.
- [Reconstructable requests](2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md) — the session log remains the authority for every model-visible input.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Agent Note: 将每条消息创建为带标识的不可变值
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md) | 中文
## 问题
harness 曾存在多种形似消息的表示各自采用不同的标识规则。agent智能体输入只有在 loop 接受后才会取得 inbox 关联 id而持久用户消息、assistant 消息、工具结果和模型请求消息都可能没有标识。因此,提示词准入介于创建消息与建立标识之间;等价内容会在实时事件、持久事件和模型请求之间复制,却没有一个值能在消息的整个生命周期中标识它。
这使标识成为路由的副作用,而不是消息不变量。生产方无法在调用 agent 前引用一条消息,提示词钩子会分别接收内容和来源,后续投影则必须一边重建消息,一边决定 id 是否存在。不可变性也从不同边界开始:部分输入由 loop 冻结,部分直到会话追加时才冻结,提供方产生的 assistant 输出则使用另一种携带溯源信息的形状。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm` 持有唯一一种 `Message` 值,其 `id``role``content``source` 均为必填。`MessageId` 是不透明标识由用户消息、assistant 消息和工具结果消息共享。消息在创建时就会获得 id早于路由、提示词准入、持久追加或请求投影。同一个 id 会跨越每个表示边界。
`createMessage(input)` 是角色通用的规范创建边界。它会生成 `MessageId`,将输入的角色、内容和来源与输入分离,并在返回完整值前将其深度冻结。`createUserMessage({ content, source })` 为提示词和上下文生产方固定 user 角色。`createAssistantMessage({ content, source })` 同时固定 assistant 角色与模型来源类别,因此模型输出生产方只需提供内容和模型溯源信息。所有创建辅助函数的输入都不包含 id因此调用方不会意外地把创建表达为导入。`freezeMessage(message)` 是独立的导入或转换边界:它会将已有标识的消息与输入分离并深度冻结,不会生成替代标识。
这些辅助函数位于基础消息词汇旁的 `dsh-llm` 中,因为它们的完整契约只依赖该词汇。`createToolResultMessage()` 与其他创建辅助函数同属此处:它使用同一个工具调用 id将工具来源与确切的 user-role 工具结果块耦合起来,不依赖会话状态或事件。`dsh-session` 只消费完整消息,不负责构造它们。
`Agent` 接口接收完整的 `UserMessage``send``followup``steer``inject` 绝不会分配或返回标识;它们会冻结导入的值,而调用方已经持有该值的 id。提示词准入会直接接收该消息。改写内容时会创建具有相同 id 的冻结替代值,而每个附加上下文都是单独创建的 `UserMessage`,拥有自己的 id。
产生持久消息的事件会存储完整消息。`user/message` 直接存储其 `UserMessage``assistant/message``tool/result``steering/message` 则将各自角色专用的消息与事件本地的位置、用量、失败或呈现事实包装在一起。会话派生会返回这些冻结值而不是重建匿名消息。assistant 组装会在响应完成时创建模型来源的消息,工具执行会在提交结果时创建工具来源的消息。
仅改变已有语义消息表示的操作会保留其 id并返回另一个冻结值。创建新语义消息的操作则会生成新 id。因此压缩compaction内容改写会保留被改写工具结果的标识而摘要检查点是一条新消息。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**让基础消息的 id 保持可选。** 这能减少 fixture测试前置数据迁移并允许提供方或持久化形状继续保持匿名但也会保留原有歧义每个消费方都必须根据标识是否存在执行分支且没有任何类型能证明准入、记录或投影保留了标识。
**让 `Agent.send()` 分配 id。** 这会将标识限定在 inbox 关联范围内,却也会让 agent 调用成为生产方可以标识自身消息的最早时机。这样一来,在 `send()` 返回前提示词构造、UI 附件和同步入队/丢弃协调都需要进行内容匹配,或使用带外 token。
**让每个持久事件分配新 id。** 这能为持久消息提供标识,却会有意切断它与实时输入的关联,并让回放请求表现得像包含了不同消息。标识属于语义值,而不是承载它的每个封装。
**只在 agent 或会话准入时冻结。** 这能省去创建辅助函数,却会留下一个带标识但可变的时间区间,调用方代码可以在这段时间内改变该 id 所关联的含义。本决策让「拥有 id」与「是不可变快照」同时成立。
## 后果
每个消息生产方都必须显式选择创建或导入测试也会构造完整值而不是不完整的内容来源记录。UUID 的生成会前移至最初的语义创建点,因此提供已有 id 的确定性 fixture 会使用 `freezeMessage()`,而不是 `createMessage()`
实时 inbox 事件、持久事件、派生历史和模型请求可以关联同一条消息,无需比较内容或使用封装专用 id。提示词准入和 UI 附件清理可以在轮次存在之前比较 `MessageId`。深度冻结可以防止生产方、钩子或观察方在标识建立后更改消息值。
共享表示移除了旧的 `UserMessageData`/`AgentMessage` 划分并将提供方溯源信息纳入带类型的消息来源。事件封装仍持有不属于消息语义的事实例如轮次与步骤位置、token 用量、内部工具失败标识和呈现元数据。
消息和辅助函数的单元测试会固定即时标识、输入分离、深度不可变性,以及导入 id 的保留。agent loop 测试会固定标识跨越准入、inbox 生命周期、持久追加、内容改写和取消的行为;会话测试会固定冻结派生和保留标识的替换行为。
## 相关
- [统一通过 send(target × wakeup) 交付 agent 消息,并将注入上下文合并到 user/message](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md)——本记录取代其中的输入表示和由 agent 分配 id 的细节,同时保留其路由决策。
- [可重建的请求](2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)——会话日志仍是每项模型可见输入的权威来源。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: 760373d64f462e3717a174d5793e6d47ab76b0b4
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: fd29e6049e6a729c2c7e78860ad7c065422da60e
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: 288932f641a37c13ea6beeb069ac360c4a8447c1
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: 03dae6328e5c7f4379694ab01db3434b4469826c

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The model sends the entire list every call; the new list replaces the old (last-
### State on the session log, not a service
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the standing plan from the latest `todo/write` that is not followed by a later `turn/start` ([plan strip lifetime](2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md)), with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
### NOT a surface event

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具,却没有办法记录结
### 状态在会话日志上,而非服务
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志,携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM大语言模型历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建:重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表,无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。(全量 log 消费者直接获得这份重建web 客户端的分页窗口则从尾页 history 携带的 host 计算投影获得——见 [web todo 展示 Note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)。)
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志,携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM大语言模型历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建:重新打开的会话从「其后没有更晚 `turn/start`」的最近一次 `todo/write` 重新推导站立计划([计划条生命周期](2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md),无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。(全量 log 消费者直接获得这份重建web 客户端的分页窗口则从尾页 history 携带的 host 计算投影获得——见 [web todo 展示 Note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)。)
### 不是 surface 事件

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md: a6c7c3b3e89e032d6d807a25a7661a875f9f7bec
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.zh.md: ef78cd7ecee3e2625b446139d7f22e16d0bf1dfa
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md: 61ea30cabb2abf4d4a9b4391891b5987affb91d0
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.zh.md: 6fba44103942d29428fd820591815743dfb5d96d

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ TUI users need to bring relevant work from another conversation into one new mes
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-reference` is one context consumer service at `ctx.sessionReferences`. Hosts normalize their protocol into `SessionReferenceInput[]` and call `prepare()` before delivery. The service returns detached readable content plus an optional sourced `UserMessageData` snapshot; core agent packages do not parse session URIs or read another log.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-reference` is one context consumer service at `ctx.sessionReferences`. Hosts normalize their protocol into `SessionReferenceInput[]` and call `prepare()` before delivery. The service returns detached readable content plus an optional identified, frozen `UserMessage` snapshot; core agent packages do not parse session URIs or read another log.
`dsh-session:<base64url(JSON.stringify(sessionId))>` is the canonical host-independent identifier. JSON string encoding precedes base64url so quotes, slashes, backslashes, Unicode, newlines, and every other JavaScript string value round-trip without delimiter ambiguity. TUI renders that URI inside `@[label](uri)`; text-only clients may use the same inline mention. Explicit Markdown mentions reject malformed URIs. Bare text becomes a reference only for a non-empty base64url-shaped payload, whose decode must still be canonical; empty or punctuation-only uses remain ordinary discussion text.

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ TUI 用户需要把另一场对话中的相关工作带入一条新消息,但
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-reference` 是注册在 `ctx.sessionReferences` 上的单一上下文消费服务。宿主先把各自的协议规范化为 `SessionReferenceInput[]`,并在交付前调用 `prepare()`。该服务返回分离的可读内容和一份可选的、带来源信息`UserMessageData` 快照;核心 agent 包既不解析会话 URI也不读取其他日志。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-reference` 是注册在 `ctx.sessionReferences` 上的单一上下文消费服务。宿主先把各自的协议规范化为 `SessionReferenceInput[]`,并在交付前调用 `prepare()`。该服务返回分离的可读内容和一份可选的、带标识且冻结`UserMessage` 快照;核心 agent 包既不解析会话 URI也不读取其他日志。
`dsh-session:<base64url(JSON.stringify(sessionId))>` 是与宿主无关的规范标识符。系统先执行 JSON 字符串编码,再执行 base64url 编码因此引号、正斜杠、反斜杠、Unicode、换行符以及其他任意 JavaScript 字符串值都能无损往返不会因分隔符产生歧义。TUI 把该 URI 渲染到 `@[label](uri)` 中;纯文本客户端可以使用同一种行内提及标记。显式 Markdown 提及标记会拒绝格式错误的 URI。裸文本只有在负载非空且形状符合 base64url 时才会成为引用,而且解码过程仍须通过规范性校验;空负载或只含标点符号的用法仍按普通讨论文本处理。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 5fe08cc40c1d23ff3a9b8c6d766fea6d3694c30d
2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: c121ffc27e3d0a93707c2c22b2f180023ebae5be
2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 7223ff9adbf1fa6dca39c9eb4949b6d3861bdd6d
2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: ac773a3c587183aa9a152caff2812686bc79f3c7

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Consume `todo/write` as a Session side effect, not a surface node, and render it
### Side-effect channel, converging with window replay
`applyEventSideEffects` gains a `todo/write` case (whole list, last write wins). Unlike partial/openCalls, `rebuildDerivedFromWindow` deliberately does NOT reset it: the value is session-level — taken from the tail history page's full-log projection — and an arbitrary window may not contain the latest write, so an older-page prepend keeps it and only an in-window or live write overwrites it. Every `installWindow` caller is a tail request (`doOpen`, its gap re-pull, `repairGap`; `loadOlder` prepends without it), which the host answers with the projection or omits it only when the full log holds no `todo/write` — so an absent field is the authoritative empty list and is assigned as such. That distinction matters on rollback: a live write whose host crashed before persisting leaves the log empty, and preserving the prior value instead would strand the rolled-back plan on screen indefinitely. `ConversationSnapshot.todos` is the read surface. This follows the event's own contract ("log-only UI state; never derived history"): surfacing each write as a conversation node would render superseded lists as if they were still standing.
`applyEventSideEffects` gains a `todo/write` case (whole list, last write wins) and clears on `turn/start` ([turn-scoped plan lifetime](2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md)). `rebuildDerivedFromWindow` sweeps the window from an empty plan and restores the tail-page seed only when the window never determined the plan (no `todo/write` and no `turn/start`); otherwise the in-window write/`turn/start` fold wins. Every `installWindow` caller is a tail request (`doOpen`, its gap re-pull, `repairGap`; `loadOlder` prepends without reseeding), which the host answers with the projection or omits it when no plan stands — so an absent field is the authoritative empty list and is assigned as such. That distinction matters on rollback: a live write whose host crashed before persisting leaves the log empty, and preserving the prior value instead would strand the rolled-back plan on screen indefinitely. `ConversationSnapshot.todos` is the read surface. This follows the event's own contract ("log-only UI state; never derived history"): surfacing each write as a conversation node would render superseded lists as if they were still standing.
### TodoPanel: the durable list as a persistent strip
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`
## Consequences
Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel is untouched (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.
Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel shares the same turn-scoped lifetime (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log standing plan (latest `todo/write` with no later `turn/start`), computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan when it still stands and the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, clears on a later `turn/start`, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
### 副作用通道,与窗口回放收敛
`applyEventSideEffects` 新增一个 `todo/write` 分支(整份列表,后写覆盖先写)。与 partial/openCalls 不同,`rebuildDerivedFromWindow` 刻意不重置它:该值是会话级的——取自尾页 history 携带的全量 log 投影——而任意窗口未必包含最近一次写入,因此往前翻页保留它,只有窗口内或实时的写入才会覆盖`installWindow` 的每个调用方都是尾页请求(`doOpen`、其补洞重拉、`repairGap``loadOlder` 只往前拼接、不走它),而 host 对尾页请求要么带上投影、要么仅在全量 log 没有任何 `todo/write` 时省略——因此字段缺失就是权威的空列表,直接照此赋值。这个区分在回滚场景上要紧:实时写入若在 host 持久化前崩溃log 里就是空的,此时保留旧值会让已回滚的计划永远留在屏幕上。`ConversationSnapshot.todos` 是读取面。这遵循事件自身的契约(「仅日志 UI 状态,绝非派生历史」):把每次写入作为对话节点呈现,会让已被取代的列表看起来仍然有效。
`applyEventSideEffects` 新增一个 `todo/write` 分支(整份列表,后写覆盖先写),并在 `turn/start` 清空([按 turn 界定的计划生命周期](2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md))。`rebuildDerivedFromWindow` 从空计划扫过窗口,仅当窗口从未判定计划(无 `todo/write` 且无 `turn/start`)时恢复尾页种子;否则以窗口内写入/`turn/start` 折叠为准`installWindow` 的每个调用方都是尾页请求(`doOpen`、其补洞重拉、`repairGap``loadOlder` 只往前拼接、不再播种),而 host 对尾页请求要么带上投影、要么在无站立计划时省略——因此字段缺失就是权威的空列表,直接照此赋值。这个区分在回滚场景上要紧:实时写入若在 host 持久化前崩溃log 里就是空的,此时保留旧值会让已回滚的计划永远留在屏幕上。`ConversationSnapshot.todos` 是读取面。这遵循事件自身的契约(「仅日志 UI 状态,绝非派生历史」):把每次写入作为对话节点呈现,会让已被取代的列表看起来仍然有效。
### TodoPanel长驻列表作为一条常驻横条
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Status: implemented
## Consequences
回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管:未来对窗口重建的任何改动都免费保持 todos 一致fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture测试前置数据加 assembled keyless snapshot`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`在构建产物客户端全图上钉住整条链行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返)。`todos``ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段,所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板未受改动(自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现Web 各面渲染同一个事件,只新增一个协议字段,不新增事件类型。冷加载重建正是靠这个字段由 host 兜底history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上最新一次 `todo/write` 的投影,独立于分页窗口计算(与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势)——因此重开会话时即使最后一次写入落在窗口之前,计划也照常恢复;该值跨往前翻页保留,之后的任何写入照常覆盖,而尾页响应不带投影时复位为空。
回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管:未来对窗口重建的任何改动都免费保持 todos 一致fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture测试前置数据加 assembled keyless snapshot`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`在构建产物客户端全图上钉住整条链行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返)。`todos``ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段,所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板共用同一按 turn 界定的生命周期(自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现Web 各面渲染同一个事件,只新增一个协议字段,不新增事件类型。冷加载重建正是靠这个字段由 host 兜底history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上的站立计划(其后没有更晚 `turn/start` 的最近一次 `todo/write`,独立于分页窗口计算(与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势)——因此重开会话时若计划仍站立且最后一次写入落在窗口之前,计划也照常恢复;该值跨往前翻页保留,之后的任何写入照常覆盖,更晚的 `turn/start` 会清空,而尾页响应不带投影时复位为空。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md
2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md: 8a2808f5023a0800fbbeb65c5e28b3495e051dbc
2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.zh.md: 6ea6b2b4fafe4b2f695ad2d54561f164747e5694

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Agent Note: Todo plan strip clears on the next turn
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.zh.md)
## Problem
`todo_write` stores whole-list snapshots on the session log, and interactive hosts render the latest list as a plan strip (web TodoPanel via the `todos` projection, TUI Plan panel). After a turn finished, that strip stayed on screen into the next user turn — a completed or abandoned checklist from the previous task. Readers treat the strip as "what this turn is doing," so a stale list across the turn boundary is the wrong product lifetime. The [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) and [`todo_write` tool](2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md) notes still own event-sourcing and the two render surfaces; they described the standing plan as lasting for the whole session until the next write.
## Decision
The standing plan is the latest `todo/write` that is not followed by a later `turn/start`. `turn/end` keeps the list visible so the finished checklist remains while the user reads the answer; the next `turn/start` clears it until the model writes again.
### Host projection (web)
`dsh-tool-todo`'s `todos` projection unit folds the rule: `apply` takes the whole list from each `todo/write` and returns `null` on each `turn/start` (`stateVersion` 2). Carriers (`dsh-host-apiproxy`) serve that value on the history tail `projections` block and push `session/projection` frames; the web dock reads it through `useProjection('todos')`. The keyless fixture mirrors the same fold for assembled snapshots.
### TUI live path
The TUI `renderEvent` switch still clears its local plan panel on `turn/start` and replaces it on `todo/write` (TUI is not yet a projection carrier). The rebuild path resets the panel before replaying the log so cold resume converges on the same rule.
## Alternatives considered
- **Clear on `turn/end`** — hides the checklist while the user is still reading the just-finished answer; the strip's job at that moment is the completed plan, not an empty dock.
- **Clear only when every item is `completed`** — leaves abandoned or partial plans across turns; the strip would still show another task's work.
- **Append an empty `todo/write` on turn start** — mutates the log for a UI lifetime rule and invents a write the model never authored.
## Consequences
The host projection and the TUI panel share one lifetime rule; reopening a session restores a plan only when no later turn has started. Partial supersession of the session-long standing-plan wording in [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) and [`todo_write` tool](2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md): event-sourcing, last-write-wins replacement, and the two render surfaces stay there; this note owns turn-boundary clearance. Coverage: tool-todo projection specs for turn/start clear + turn/end keep, fixture push-frame clearance for the assembled web snapshot, plus the TUI snapshot that starts the next turn and pins the strip gone.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Agent Note: 下一轮开始时清空 todo 计划条
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-28-todo-plan-clears-on-next-turn.md) | 中文
## 问题
`todo_write` 在会话日志中存储整表快照交互式宿主把最新列表渲染为计划条web TodoPanel 经 `todos` 投影TUI Plan 面板)。一轮结束后,该条仍留在下一用户轮次的屏幕上——上一任务已完成或已放弃的清单。读者把计划条理解为「本轮正在做什么」,因此跨轮次的陈旧列表是错误的产品生命周期。[web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)与 [`todo_write` 工具](2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md)笔记仍拥有事件溯源与两个渲染面;它们把站立计划描述为持续整段会话直至下一次写入。
## 决策
站立计划是其后没有更晚 `turn/start` 的最近一次 `todo/write``turn/end` 保留列表可见,以便用户阅读回答时仍能看到刚完成的清单;下一次 `turn/start` 将其清空,直至模型再次写入。
### Host 投影web
`dsh-tool-todo``todos` 投影单元折叠该规则:`apply` 从每个 `todo/write` 取整表,并在每个 `turn/start` 返回 `null``stateVersion` 2。载体`dsh-host-apiproxy`)在历史尾页的 `projections` 块与 `session/projection` 推送帧上供给该值web dock 经 `useProjection('todos')` 读取。无密钥 fixture测试前置数据镜像同一折叠供组装后的 snapshot 使用。
### TUI 实时路径
TUI 的 `renderEvent` 分支仍在 `turn/start` 清空本地计划面板、在 `todo/write` 替换之TUI 尚非投影载体)。重建路径在回放日志前重置面板,使冷恢复收敛到同一规则。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **在 `turn/end` 清空**——用户仍在阅读刚完成的回答时就隐藏清单;此时计划条的职责是已完成计划,而非空 dock。
- **仅在全部项为 `completed` 时清空**——会让放弃或部分完成的计划跨轮残留;计划条仍会显示另一任务的工作。
- **在 turn start 追加空的 `todo/write`**——为 UI 生命周期规则改写日志,并捏造模型从未写出的写入。
## 后果
Host 投影与 TUI 面板共用同一生命周期规则;重新打开会话仅在其后没有更晚轮次开始时恢复计划。部分取代 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)与 [`todo_write` 工具](2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md)中「会话级站立计划」的表述事件溯源、last-write-wins 替换与两个渲染面仍归那些笔记本笔记拥有轮次边界清空。覆盖tool-todo 投影对 turn/start 清空与 turn/end 保留的规格测试、供组装 web snapshot 的 fixture 推送帧清空,以及启动下一轮并钉住计划条消失的 TUI snapshot。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md
2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md: 201c543fd119909b1fb4a29f37f4965bc86ef59c
2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.zh.md: 79120f157dd8f4057b5e9ebe5b5aec953ca0df32
2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md: 78da1e783189968b5b20c17d6a84764d5a5788cb
2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.zh.md: 462662fa555777ffdb71fcc24dd306935123faf3

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The Web client ignored it. `packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/contract/
## Decision
`TerminalBlock` is a `ui-primitives` component that renders a shell command as a terminal surface, and both Web render sites for a bash call consume the terminal render intent through it: the chat tool row's expanded body and the details panel's Output section. `ui-conversation/src/client/contract/terminal-card-model.ts` is the single place that turns the snapshot's `callView`/`resultView` pair into the component's props, so the two sites cannot disagree about a command, its cwd, or its exit status. It returns null — the generic path — whenever neither side declares `card: 'terminal'`, including a `card` value this client version does not know, and whenever a settled call's result view is generic, which is how the bash tool's execution errors and background starts keep their existing rendering.
`TerminalBlock` is a `ui-primitives` component that renders a shell command as a terminal surface, and both Web render sites for a bash call consume the terminal render intent through it: the chat tool row's expanded body and the details panel's Output section. `ui-conversation/src/client/contract/terminal-card-model.ts` is the single place that turns the snapshot's `callView`/`resultView` pair into the component's props, so the two sites cannot disagree about a command, its cwd, or its exit status. It returns null — the generic path — whenever neither side declares `card: 'terminal'`, including a `card` value this client version does not know, and whenever a settled call's result view is generic, which is how the bash tool's execution errors and background starts keep their existing rendering. Two duties the render-intent contract assigns to the UI bridge land here rather than in the tool: a settled result's `title` REPLACES the pending one, and the working directory resolves against the session workspace — an absolute view cwd is used as-is, a relative one joins under the workspace, and an omitted one IS the workspace, which is the common case for a bash call with no `workdir`. A pure presenter cannot see the session cwd, which is why the resolution belongs at this seam; each render site supplies the cwd off the session list row.
The component's contract:
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ The component's contract:
- **One run-state dot for the call, on the first row.** `StateDot` in three of its four states: the chase while running, red for the exit status that also renders the pill, green for a clean settle — the same indicator a tool row's leading icon uses, so a row and its own card cannot disagree about one command. The dot exists because the first question a reader has about a shell command is whether it is still running, and without it that had to be inferred from the absence of output — which a settled command producing no output also looks like. It sits out of flow in a gutter reserved to the left of the card surface, so it neither indents its command nor depends on the command's own text metrics to line up with it. Exactly one dot, whatever the line count: the exit status the view carries is the whole call's, and bash reports no per-command status, so a dot per line would assert of a line that succeeded inside a failing call that the line itself failed. The single visually hidden text label carries the same scope, since `StateDot` is `aria-hidden` and one label per row would read to assistive technology as several distinct outcomes.
- **No soft wrapping.** Output lines are `white-space: pre` inside a horizontally scrolling box. Column alignment survives; a long line scrolls instead of folding.
- **Height cap with an expand control.** Output longer than `DEFAULT_TERMINAL_MAX_LINES` (16) lines shows `ceil(max/2)` head lines plus the remaining tail lines, with a button in between that reports the hidden count and expands. The count is of parsed lines after the trailing output terminator is dropped, so an N-line output ending in a newline is N lines. The split arithmetic is the same as the TUI transcript's collapsed tool card (`packages/ui/tui/src/components/transcript.ts`), so one command's head and tail slices agree between the two front ends.
- **ANSI color.** `anser` splits the SGR runs; `ui-primitives/src/ansi.ts` resolves each run into an inline style rendered as React spans. A foreground-only run maps the basic 16 colors onto `--dsw-*` theme tokens so authored color stays legible under both themes; a run that paints its own background keeps anser's literal rgb for both so its intended contrast survives, as do 256-palette, truecolor, and the two basic colors this design system has no token for. Sequences that carry no color (OSC strings, non-CSI escapes, inert C0 controls) are stripped before parsing so they never reach the DOM as literal characters, and a carriage return reduces its line to the final redraw, which is what a terminal shows for progress output.
- **ANSI color.** `anser` splits the SGR runs; `ui-primitives/src/ansi.ts` resolves each run into an inline style rendered as React spans. A foreground-only run maps the basic 16 colors onto `--dsw-*` theme tokens so authored color stays legible under both themes; a run that paints its own background keeps anser's literal rgb for both so its intended contrast survives, as do 256-palette, truecolor, and the two basic colors this design system has no token for. Sequences that carry no color (OSC strings, non-CSI escapes, inert C0 controls) are stripped before parsing so they never reach the DOM as literal characters. Two cursor movements resolve before that strip, because their effect on the visible text has to land before the characters expressing them are dropped: a carriage return reduces its line to the final redraw, and a backspace overwrites the character before it, so `abc` followed by two backspaces and `XY` reads `aXY` as a terminal draws it. Both are per-line, so neither reaches across a newline.
- **Exit status and copy.** A non-zero exit code or a signal renders a status pill, matching the exit-status distinction the bash tool's own renderer draws; a clean exit renders none, and settled empty output renders a dimmed placeholder. The copy control copies the raw output text, not the rendered tree, so the prompt line and the pill stay out of the clipboard.
Geometry, radius, and fonts mirror `CodeBlock`, so a terminal card and a fenced code block match visually; `white-space: pre` plus horizontal scroll is the deliberate divergence. The clipboard write both components need moved out of `CodeBlock` into a package-internal `src/clipboard.ts`, unexported so it stays an implementation detail of the two blocks.
@@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ Inline rendering is licensed for the terminal intent alone. A future intent that
## Testing
`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/ansi.spec.ts` pins the parse layer: token mapping for the basic colors, literal rgb for the values with no token, the background-run pair, every decoration and the `textDecoration` collision between two of them, the sanitizing of OSC strings and non-CSI escapes and inert controls, per-line carriage-return redraws, and CRLF preservation. `packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/terminal-block.spec.tsx` pins the component: cwd shortening, the running/empty/settled arms, signal outranking exit code, the trailing-newline terminator rule, the head/tail cap with its `aria-expanded` toggle, the run-state dot across all three reachable states plus its position ahead of the prompt label, the one-row-per-command-line prompt and its single dot on the first row, and the copy control asserting raw output on both the accepted and refused clipboard paths, plus `writeClipboard` directly.
`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/ansi.spec.ts` pins the parse layer: token mapping for the basic colors, literal rgb for the values with no token, the background-run pair, every decoration and the `textDecoration` collision between two of them, the sanitizing of OSC strings and non-CSI escapes and inert controls, per-line carriage-return redraws and backspace overwrites (including a backspace stopping at a line start and resolving after a redraw), and CRLF preservation. `packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/terminal-block.spec.tsx` pins the component: cwd shortening, the running/empty/settled arms, signal outranking exit code, the trailing-newline terminator rule, the head/tail cap with its `aria-expanded` toggle, the run-state dot across all three reachable states plus its position ahead of the prompt label, the one-row-per-command-line prompt and its single dot on the first row, and the copy control asserting raw output on both the accepted and refused clipboard paths, plus `writeClipboard` directly.
`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/terminal-card.spec.tsx` pins the wiring at every render site: `terminalCardModel`'s derivation and each of its null arms, the chat row's expand-gated body against the panel's full-height one, `BashRow`'s resident card and its agreement with its own summary row's state dot, and the panel's Output section including the run_code sub-dispatch and the out-of-window head. That file is written against no gate pressure — `packages/client/ui-conversation/src/*` sits on the coverage `exclude` list in `vitest.config.ts`, so a coverage run over this package measures none of these files.
`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/terminal-card.spec.tsx` pins the wiring at every render site: `terminalCardModel`'s derivation and each of its null arms, the result title replacing the pending one, the cwd resolving against the session workspace across all four of its cases, the panel resetting the card's expand state when the selection changes, the chat row's expand-gated body against the panel's full-height one, `BashRow`'s resident card and its agreement with its own summary row's state dot, and the panel's Output section including the run_code sub-dispatch and the out-of-window head. That file is written against no gate pressure — `packages/client/ui-conversation/src/*` sits on the coverage `exclude` list in `vitest.config.ts`, so a coverage run over this package measures none of these files.
`apps/web/tests/terminal-card.snapshot.ts` pins the assembled application over the built client bundles: the same render intent at both conversation render sites and in both chat-row shapes, because a bash call reaches a resident card only through the keyed `BashRow` registration and every other terminal-declaring tool name lands on the render-site fallback row, whose body is expand-gated. Fixture turn 66 was named `bash` and turn 60 left as `fx-bash` so one fixture covers both shapes, and turn 60's command was made two lines so the built-bundle snapshot pins the per-line prompt and its single dot (`dotsPerPromptRow: [1, 0]`); that turn also carries what turn 60's three clean lines cannot — SGR runs resolved to `--dsw-*` tokens, output past the chat cap, a nested cwd, and a non-zero exit recovered from the trailing marker.
`apps/web/tests/navigation-panes.e2e.ts` adds the real-browser scenario over its existing `echo NAVIGATION_OK` bash call, asserting what jsdom cannot compute: squeezing the output pane below its content width leaves the line at one row and gives the pane horizontal overflow, the run-state dot resolves to the green success token rather than to a literal color (a `--dsw-*` var has no computed value at all without the real theme stylesheet) and starts to the left of the card surface itself, and the copy control reaches the page's own async Clipboard API rather than the `execCommand` fallback. Its `details-open.expected.md` golden was refreshed for the panel's new terminal card. That refresh also absorbed a stale `Input json` line and its copy button, which the shiki `CodeBlock` change already on master left behind — verified as failing on a clean rebuilt tree before this change, so it is a correction carried along, not an effect of this one.
`apps/web/tests/navigation-panes.e2e.ts` adds the real-browser scenario over its existing `echo NAVIGATION_OK` bash call, asserting what jsdom cannot compute: squeezing the output pane below its content width leaves the line at one row and gives the pane horizontal overflow, the run-state dot resolves to the green success token rather than to a literal color (a `--dsw-*` var has no computed value at all without the real theme stylesheet) and starts to the left of the card surface itself, and the copy control reaches the page's own async Clipboard API rather than the `execCommand` fallback. Its `terminal-card.expected.md` golden records the resolved workspace in the prompt row, which is what a bash call with no `workdir` must show instead of a bare `$`.
## Related

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Web client 却对它视而不见。`packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/c
## Decision
`TerminalBlock``ui-primitives` 中把 shell 命令渲染为终端表面的组件bash 调用在 Web 侧的两个渲染点都经由它消费 terminal 渲染意图:聊天工具行展开后的正文,以及详情面板的 Output 区。`ui-conversation/src/client/contract/terminal-card-model.ts` 是把快照上的 `callView`/`resultView` 这一对转换为该组件 props 的唯一位置因此两个渲染点不可能在命令、cwd 或退出状态上产生分歧。当两侧都不声明 `card: 'terminal'` 时它返回 null即走 generic 路径——包括本 client 版本不认识的 `card` 取值;当一个已落定调用的结果视图是 generic 时同样返回 null这正是 bash 工具的执行错误与后台启动得以保持既有渲染的方式。
`TerminalBlock``ui-primitives` 中把 shell 命令渲染为终端表面的组件bash 调用在 Web 侧的两个渲染点都经由它消费 terminal 渲染意图:聊天工具行展开后的正文,以及详情面板的 Output 区。`ui-conversation/src/client/contract/terminal-card-model.ts` 是把快照上的 `callView`/`resultView` 这一对转换为该组件 props 的唯一位置因此两个渲染点不可能在命令、cwd 或退出状态上产生分歧。当两侧都不声明 `card: 'terminal'` 时它返回 null即走 generic 路径——包括本 client 版本不认识的 `card` 取值;当一个已落定调用的结果视图是 generic 时同样返回 null这正是 bash 工具的执行错误与后台启动得以保持既有渲染的方式。渲染意图契约交给 UI 桥接层的两项职责也落在这里,而不在工具侧:已落定结果的 `title` **替换**待定标题;工作目录针对会话 workspace 解析——视图给出的绝对路径原样使用,相对路径在 workspace 之下拼接,省略则**就是** workspace而这正是不带 `workdir` 的 bash 调用的常见情形。纯 presenter 看不到会话 cwd因此该解析属于这道接缝两个渲染点各自从会话列表行取出 cwd 传入。
该组件的契约:
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Web client 却对它视而不见。`packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/c
- **整次调用一枚运行状态点,位于第一行。** 它是 `StateDot` 四种状态中的三种:运行期间为追逐动画,与渲染状态徽章相同的退出状态为红色,干净落定为绿色——与工具行行首图标使用同一个指示器,因此一行与其自身的卡片不可能对同一条命令产生分歧。该状态点存在的理由是:读者对一条 shell 命令的第一个问题就是它是否仍在运行;没有它时,这一点只能从「没有输出」推断,而一条落定后无输出的命令看起来也一样。它以脱离文档流的方式落在卡片表面左侧预留的落区里,因此既不会缩进其命令,也不依赖命令自身的文本度量来与之对齐。无论有多少行,都只有一枚:视图携带的退出状态属于整次调用,而 bash 不报告逐条命令的状态,因此每行一枚状态点就等于在断言——一条在失败调用中其实成功了的命令行自身失败了。那一处视觉隐藏的文本标签具有相同的作用域,因为 `StateDot``aria-hidden`,而每行一个标签会被辅助技术读成好几个各自独立的结果。
- **不软换行。** 输出行使用 `white-space: pre`,置于横向滚动的容器内。列对齐得以保留;长行滚动,而非折行。
- **高度上限与展开控件。** 输出超过 `DEFAULT_TERMINAL_MAX_LINES`16行时显示 `ceil(max/2)` 行首部加余下的尾部行数,中间是一个按钮,报告被隐藏的行数并可展开。计数针对的是剥除输出末尾终止符之后解析出的行,因此以换行结尾的 N 行输出就是 N 行。切分算法与 TUI transcript 折叠态工具卡片(`packages/ui/tui/src/components/transcript.ts`)完全一致,因此同一条命令的首尾切片在两个前端之间吻合。
- **ANSI 颜色。** `anser` 切分 SGR 分段;`ui-primitives/src/ansi.ts` 把每段解析为内联样式,渲染成 React span。只设前景色的分段把基本 16 色映射到 `--dsw-*` 主题 token使作者指定的颜色在两种主题下都可读自行绘制背景的分段则前后景都保留 anser 给出的字面 rgb以保住它意图中的对比度256 色板、truecolor 以及本设计系统没有对应 token 的两种基本色同样如此。不承载颜色的转义序列OSC 串、非 CSI 转义、无显示意义的 C0 控制符)在解析前被剥除,因此绝不会以字面字符抵达 DOM回车把所在行归约为最后一次重绘,这正是终端对进度输出的呈现
- **ANSI 颜色。** `anser` 切分 SGR 分段;`ui-primitives/src/ansi.ts` 把每段解析为内联样式,渲染成 React span。只设前景色的分段把基本 16 色映射到 `--dsw-*` 主题 token使作者指定的颜色在两种主题下都可读自行绘制背景的分段则前后景都保留 anser 给出的字面 rgb以保住它意图中的对比度256 色板、truecolor 以及本设计系统没有对应 token 的两种基本色同样如此。不承载颜色的转义序列OSC 串、非 CSI 转义、无显示意义的 C0 控制符)在解析前被剥除,因此绝不会以字面字符抵达 DOM。两种光标移动在该剥除之前先行结算,因为它们对可见文本的作用必须先落地,之后才能丢弃表达它们的那些字符:回车把所在行归约为最后一次重绘,退格覆盖它前面的字符——于是 `abc` 后接两个退格再接 `XY` 读作 `aXY`,与终端的绘制一致。两者都按行结算,因此都不会跨越换行
- **退出状态与复制。** 非零退出码或信号渲染一枚状态徽章,与 bash 工具自身渲染器所作的退出状态区分一致;干净退出不渲染徽章,落定后的空输出渲染一处变暗的占位文字。复制控件复制的是原始输出文本而非渲染后的树,因此提示符行与徽章不会进入剪贴板。
几何尺寸、圆角与字体沿用 `CodeBlock`,因此终端卡片与围栏代码块在视觉上一致;`white-space: pre` 加横向滚动是有意的分歧。两个组件都需要的剪贴板写入从 `CodeBlock` 中提取到包内部的 `src/clipboard.ts`,不对外导出,因此它仍是这两个块的实现细节。
@@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ Web client 却对它视而不见。`packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/c
## Testing
`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/ansi.spec.ts` 固定解析层:基本色的 token 映射、无对应 token 取值的字面 rgb、带背景分段的前后景配对、每一项装饰以及其中两项之间的 `textDecoration` 冲突、OSC 串与非 CSI 转义及无显示意义控制符的剥除、逐行的回车重绘,以及 CRLF 的保留。`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/terminal-block.spec.tsx` 固定组件cwd 缩短、运行中/空/已落定三条分支、信号优先于退出码、末尾终止符规则、首尾高度上限及其 `aria-expanded` 开关、运行状态点全部三种可达状态及其位于提示符标签之前的位置、每条命令行一行的提示区及其位于第一行的单枚状态点,以及复制控件在剪贴板接受与拒绝两条路径上都断言原始输出,另有对 `writeClipboard` 的直接固定。
`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/ansi.spec.ts` 固定解析层:基本色的 token 映射、无对应 token 取值的字面 rgb、带背景分段的前后景配对、每一项装饰以及其中两项之间的 `textDecoration` 冲突、OSC 串与非 CSI 转义及无显示意义控制符的剥除、逐行的回车重绘与退格覆盖(含退格停在行首、以及退格在重绘之后结算),以及 CRLF 的保留。`packages/client/ui-primitives/tests/terminal-block.spec.tsx` 固定组件cwd 缩短、运行中/空/已落定三条分支、信号优先于退出码、末尾终止符规则、首尾高度上限及其 `aria-expanded` 开关、运行状态点全部三种可达状态及其位于提示符标签之前的位置、每条命令行一行的提示区及其位于第一行的单枚状态点,以及复制控件在剪贴板接受与拒绝两条路径上都断言原始输出,另有对 `writeClipboard` 的直接固定。
`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/terminal-card.spec.tsx` 固定每个渲染点上的接线:`terminalCardModel` 的推导及其每一处 null 分支、对话行受展开控制的输出体与面板的全高输出体的对比、`BashRow` 的常驻卡片及其与自身摘要行状态点的一致性,以及面板 Output 区段(含 run_code 子派发与超出窗口的调用头)。该文件在没有门禁压力的情况下写成——`packages/client/ui-conversation/src/*` 位于 `vitest.config.ts` 的覆盖率 `exclude` 列表中,因此覆盖率运行不会统计其中任何文件。
`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/terminal-card.spec.tsx` 固定每个渲染点上的接线:`terminalCardModel` 的推导及其每一处 null 分支、结果标题替换待定标题、cwd 针对会话 workspace 解析的全部四种情形、切换选中调用时面板重置卡片展开态、对话行受展开控制的输出体与面板的全高输出体的对比、`BashRow` 的常驻卡片及其与自身摘要行状态点的一致性,以及面板 Output 区段(含 run_code 子派发与超出窗口的调用头)。该文件在没有门禁压力的情况下写成——`packages/client/ui-conversation/src/*` 位于 `vitest.config.ts` 的覆盖率 `exclude` 列表中,因此覆盖率运行不会统计其中任何文件。
`apps/web/tests/terminal-card.snapshot.ts` 在构建后的客户端产物上固定组装完整的应用:同一渲染意图在两个对话渲染点、以及两种对话行形态下的表现——因为 bash 调用只有经由带键的 `BashRow` 注册才得到常驻卡片,而其他任何声明 terminal 的工具名都落到渲染点兜底行上其输出体受展开控制。fixture 第 66 轮改名为 `bash`、第 60 轮保留 `fx-bash`,于是一份 fixture 覆盖两种形态,并把第 60 轮的命令改为两行,使构建产物快照钉住逐行提示区及其单枚状态点(`dotsPerPromptRow: [1, 0]`);该轮还承载第 60 轮三行干净输出无法覆盖的部分——解析到 `--dsw-*` token 的 SGR 分段、超出对话上限的输出、嵌套 cwd以及从末尾标记还原出的非零退出码。
`apps/web/tests/navigation-panes.e2e.ts` 在其既有的 `echo NAVIGATION_OK` bash 调用上新增真实浏览器场景,断言 jsdom 无法计算的部分:把输出面板挤压到窄于内容宽度后,行仍保持单行且面板产生横向溢出;运行状态点解析为绿色的 success token而不是字面颜色没有真实主题样式表时`--dsw-*` 变量根本不产生计算值),且其起点位于卡片表面本身的左侧;复制控件走的是页面自身的异步 Clipboard API而非 `execCommand` 兜底路径。其 `details-open.expected.md` 基准已为面板的新终端卡片重新录制。该次录制同时吸收了一行陈旧的 `Input json` 及其复制按钮——那是 master 上已有的 shiki `CodeBlock` 改动留下的;在干净并重新构建的工作树上验证过它本就失败,因此那是被顺带修正的部分,而非本次改动的影响
`apps/web/tests/navigation-panes.e2e.ts` 在其既有的 `echo NAVIGATION_OK` bash 调用上新增真实浏览器场景,断言 jsdom 无法计算的部分:把输出面板挤压到窄于内容宽度后,行仍保持单行且面板产生横向溢出;运行状态点解析为绿色的 success token而不是字面颜色没有真实主题样式表时`--dsw-*` 变量根本不产生计算值),且其起点位于卡片表面本身的左侧;复制控件走的是页面自身的异步 Clipboard API而非 `execCommand` 兜底路径。其 `terminal-card.expected.md` 基准记录了提示行中已解析的 workspace——这正是不带 `workdir` 的 bash 调用应当显示的内容,而非一个裸 `$`
## Related

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md: 54730de8aa73342b609d423dc478edb076d7844b
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.zh.md: 206ac701472f14823300df0c812f2cc818f852f5
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md: a25657c6a41e2c0989db620046f44ea3254be151
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.zh.md: 058d89d3cb9e3d30963f95fda1510ef3c5bf281e

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The public contract exposes four orthogonal state dimensions:
- Registration lifetime is the `agent/created` to `agent/disposed` interval. Disposal is the terminal registry edge, not an `AgentStatus`.
- Whole-agent activity is `AgentStatus = 'idle' | 'running'`. Consecutive turns may share one `running` interval.
- A FIFO-backed message progresses from `agent/inbox/enqueue` to exactly one `agent/inbox/dequeue` or `agent/inbox/discard`, correlated by `AgentMessageId`. The inbox events describe acceptance, claim, and removal rather than turn completion.
- A FIFO-backed message progresses from `agent/inbox/enqueue` to exactly one `agent/inbox/dequeue` or `agent/inbox/discard`. Enqueue and dequeue correlate an occurrence by `MessageId` plus its queued-or-steering placement; same-placement repeats retire in FIFO order. The inbox events describe acceptance, claim, and removal rather than turn completion.
- A claimed turn passes through prompt admission and zero or more request steps. An automatic retry closes the failed turn and immediately opens another; `agent/settled` reports only the terminal turn in that chain and remains distinct from the whole-agent transition to `status === 'idle'`.
The loop keeps five machine extension events. `agent/prompt-submit` admits, rewrites, or blocks a claimed prompt. `agent/step` is the single awaited between-steps checkpoint and runs before every request is derived. `agent/request` is the waterfall for the frozen call configuration; the configuration comes only from `await next()`, not from a duplicate positional argument. `agent/request-error` serializes ownership of awaited model-request recovery. `agent/turn-stopping` runs when the turn otherwise has no work left; a listener that needs another step records real steering with `agent.steer()`, and the loop decides from that data after all listeners settle.
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Plugins no longer rewrite every phase of the loop. There is no request-only mess
Continuation plugins publish durable steering rather than returning an unlogged reason. Recovery plugins act after the failed step and return an explicit retry action. This makes every attempt a complete turn while keeping asynchronous repair and policy ownership at one narrow waterfall boundary.
The inbox lifecycle complements, rather than replaces, the durable session log. `AgentMessageId` correlates acceptance with claim or discard; turn and step numbers, messages, tool activity, and terminal reasons remain session facts.
The inbox lifecycle complements, rather than replaces, the durable session log. `MessageId` correlates acceptance with claim or discard; turn and step numbers, messages, tool activity, and terminal reasons remain session facts.
## Related

View File

@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ agent 生命周期、agent 整体活动状态、收件箱条目的进度以及
- 注册生命周期是从 `agent/created``agent/disposed` 的区间。dispose资源释放是注册表的终止边界而不是一种 `AgentStatus`
- agent 整体活动状态为 `AgentStatus = 'idle' | 'running'`。连续多个轮次可以共用同一个 `running` 区间。
- 由 FIFO 支撑的消息从 `agent/inbox/enqueue` 开始,最终必然进入 `agent/inbox/dequeue``agent/inbox/discard` 二者之一,并通过 `AgentMessageId` 关联。收件箱事件描述接受、领取和移除,而不是轮次完成。
- 由 FIFO 支撑的消息从 `agent/inbox/enqueue` 开始,最终必然进入 `agent/inbox/dequeue``agent/inbox/discard` 二者之一。enqueue 与 dequeue 通过 `MessageId` 加 queued 或 steering中途引导放置方式关联一次消息出现放置方式相同的重复项按 FIFO 顺序结算。收件箱事件描述接受、领取和移除,而不是轮次完成。
- 已领取的轮次经过提示词准入和零个或多个请求步骤。自动重试会关闭失败轮次并立即开启另一个轮次;`agent/settled` 只报告该重试链的终态轮次,且仍不同于 agent 整体转换到 `status === 'idle'`
循环保留五个状态机扩展事件。`agent/prompt-submit` 对已领取的提示词执行准入、改写或阻断。`agent/step` 是步骤之间唯一需要等待的检查点,在每次派生请求前运行。`agent/request` 是冻结调用配置所用的 waterfall配置只能来自 `await next()`,不再通过重复的位置参数提供。`agent/request-error` 串行确定需要等待的模型请求恢复由谁负责。当轮次原本已经没有剩余工作时,`agent/turn-stopping` 运行;需要再执行一个步骤的监听器使用 `agent.steer()` 记录真实的 steering(中途引导),循环在所有监听器完成后根据这份数据作出决定。
循环保留五个状态机扩展事件。`agent/prompt-submit` 对已领取的提示词执行准入、改写或阻断。`agent/step` 是步骤之间唯一需要等待的检查点,在每次派生请求前运行。`agent/request` 是冻结调用配置所用的 waterfall配置只能来自 `await next()`,不再通过重复的位置参数提供。`agent/request-error` 串行确定需要等待的模型请求恢复由谁负责。当轮次原本已经没有剩余工作时,`agent/turn-stopping` 运行;需要再执行一个步骤的监听器使用 `agent.steer()` 记录真实的 steering循环在所有监听器完成后根据这份数据作出决定。
是否继续和终止执行由数据表达,不再由返回的控制枚举表达。工具调用和已接受的 steering 要求再执行一个步骤。携带 `concludesTurn` 的工具结果会在其所属步骤终止工具循环。循环不再暴露通用的 `ContinuationDecision` 或终止停止返回通道。
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ agent 生命周期、agent 整体活动状态、收件箱条目的进度以及
负责继续执行的插件发布可持久化的 steering而不是返回未记录到日志中的原因。恢复插件在失败步骤结束后处理错误并返回显式重试动作。这样每次尝试都会成为完整轮次同时异步修复和策略归属集中在一个狭窄的 waterfall 边界。
收件箱生命周期用于补充持久会话日志,而非取代它。`AgentMessageId` 将接受操作与领取或丢弃操作关联起来;轮次编号与步骤编号、消息、工具活动和终止原因仍属于会话事实。
收件箱生命周期用于补充持久会话日志,而非取代它。`MessageId` 将接受操作与领取或丢弃操作关联起来;轮次编号与步骤编号、消息、工具活动和终止原因仍属于会话事实。
## 相关内容