Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/preset-plane-fallout-p1

The pre-commit staged-pairing hook was bypassed for this merge: master's
`docs(notes): archive superseded dsh run decision` (7ee9e16001) arrives as a
rename into `.agents/notes/archived/`, and the hook hands that path to
`verify-translation-pairing`, which correctly refuses an archived note as
out-of-corpus. The full-corpus gate passes (851 pairs).
This commit is contained in:
Yichen Jiang
2026-08-11 00:32:25 +08:00
195 changed files with 4373 additions and 975 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/archived/feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md
2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md: ce9cff965192357022c49655983fe6ff8d554b9f
2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.zh.md: 0484c069ed6365235e4616542a4fb3d5ceb2d880

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
# Agent Note: `dsh run` owns one-shot headless execution
Status: implemented
Archived: 2026-08-10
English | [中文](2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.zh.md)
> **Superseded command grammar.** [Apps now own their command lines](../architecture/2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md): the headless startup row parses the task from `dsh --profile headless <task...>`, and the launcher no longer has a `run` invocation or patches task text into rows. This note remains the rejected launcher-owned design context; the direct execution and completion contract it selected remains current in [headless is a direct core entry point](../architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md).
## Problem
Generic profile boot and one-shot task execution have different lifecycle contracts. A root grammar that accepts optional task text makes one argv shape mean either a long-lived process or a terminating task according to a plugin row discovered only after composition. It also exposes a profile implementation detail as the primary user command and gives custom profiles no explicit one-shot entry.

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
# Agent Note: `dsh run` 负责一次性 headless 执行
Status: implemented
Archived: 2026-08-10
[English](2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) | 中文
> **命令语法已被取代。** [应用现在持有自己的命令行](../architecture/2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md):headless 启动行从 `dsh --profile headless <task...>` 解析任务,启动器不再包含 `run` 调用,也不再把任务文本 patch 进配置行。本笔记保留被否决的启动器持有设计背景;它选定的直接执行与完成约定仍由 [headless 是直接 core 入口](../architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)持有。
## 问题
通用 profile 启动与一次性任务执行具有不同的生命周期约定。若根语法接受可选任务文本,同一种 argv 形态会表示常驻进程或终止式任务,具体含义取决于组合完成后才发现的插件配置行。它还会把 profile 实现细节暴露成主要用户命令,并使自定义 profile 缺少明确的一次性入口。

View File

@@ -253,6 +253,9 @@
"feature/2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.i18n.yaml": "sha256:f9a6ab72a77934cdcc02167c7313f08d7e9925362017b34bed7ad56c8c70fbaa",
"feature/2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.md": "sha256:5058f7cec4497d1cb0a5c8e77b88fddacac6eead034f3edec88e8514919b8a3e",
"feature/2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.zh.md": "sha256:ba84ef2e1be61211ab5ba6950b78ede3d3a979f252bc068d3e04e2c025f7bc03",
"feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.i18n.yaml": "sha256:1c2b4c5b61b9263b6267275d6fc69faeaad3cc887f0728a7ed4172d817af812b",
"feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md": "sha256:7695fe7fd322377d5986f14e35f13337f4cd376405c758218a81230f6d182d1c",
"feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.zh.md": "sha256:113c14a36c64d2facc8ae46f37c7aa76359d8cacb9c18fcba26a723f15d036fb",
"process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.i18n.yaml": "sha256:33b6d5874427bd7a2bd82e7e2f4f482b12448b2464aef15a9c57975edb48554d",
"process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md": "sha256:aa2fe83d519fc30d48dff19e596e83c8922aacc9e063e14fe2cc35b769b9100e",
"process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.zh.md": "sha256:698017bd35f030fdea3eac51df9e43138c48140f504739d687b7251d13fced2b",

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: 514deb890d4e08d465db869669078473d32fb215
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: f6fa71e3dac25f48b2ad4744a0cc695417528b34
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: da96ae97f2a2d64aeef7794bd82ccbd86602b1ad
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: 36dc7391bc3f9bb0d5105fea14a2763d0b7159a1

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md)
We need a UI integration layer. Beyond the existing ACP/stdio baseline, more product clients are coming — Web (server), Electron, and others. We call them Clients and want the following capabilities:
- One `dsh` process supporting both `dsh web` (serve) and `dsh run` (headless) — one process, two modes (a design reservation)
- One `dsh` process supporting both `dsh web` (serve) and `dsh --profile headless` (headless) — one process, two modes (a design reservation)
- Launching inside Electron with the same Web technologies as `dsh web`
That demands a stable layered responsibility model in the engineering codebase, so future clients plug in cleanly.
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Directories layer as follows:
- **Fetch-arrival plugin packages** (`ui-layout`, `ui-sidebar`, `ui-conversation`, `ui-trajectory`): dual-entry — the root index is the node half (an empty `apply`, existing so the host Loader governs lifecycle and the web plugin registry discovers the package.json `dsh.client` declaration); the implementation lives under `src/client/`, shipped as the `./client` subpath (a tsdown closure-factory bundle). Cross-plugin consumption of `/client` is type-only; value cooperation goes through cordis services.
- `apps/` holds the externally exported applications, assembled from Client / Host mixtures.
- `apps/web` (`dsh-frontend`) is the vite application: a thin `main.ts` over the shell surface exported by `dsh-client-web`.
- `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches commands: `dsh web` = Host + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh run` = [a direct core Agent/Session entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md), with zero Host, HTTP, or browser layer.
- `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches commands: `dsh web` = Host + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh --profile headless` = [a direct core Agent/Session entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md), with zero Host, HTTP, or browser layer.
- A future Electron application reuses the same web client packages over an IPC fetch carrier.
```
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Packages under `packages/host/*` and `packages/client/*` **must carry the direct
2. **Write an assembly module under `apps/`**: `startHost()` + a client subclass + the application's private signal/print/exit semantics; a mixture never becomes a package — assembly is written in the app.
3. **Import `dsh-host-webserver` only if you need HTTP carriage**, otherwise zero ports.
The two existing applications preserve the division: the Web application mounts Host, carrier, and browser composition, while `dsh run` mounts a direct core runner with zero Host, HTTP, or ports. ACP-class protocol bridges do not follow the client-carrier checklist: they expose core to the external ecosystem and mount directly via `ctx.plugin(entry-point plugin)` without fetch.
The two existing applications preserve the division: the Web application mounts Host, carrier, and browser composition, while `dsh --profile headless` mounts a direct core runner with zero Host, HTTP, or ports. ACP-class protocol bridges do not follow the client-carrier checklist: they expose core to the external ecosystem and mount directly via `ctx.plugin(entry-point plugin)` without fetch.
## Message protocol
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ All four quadrant full forms pass through `onEnvelope`; the base implementation
| Subclass | Package | doFetch | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy itself | the injected `{ fetch }` handler | **The isomorphic point**: `new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` never touches the network yet runs the real wire serialization/zod/SSE framing; carrier tests and callers can exercise the protocol without opening a port, while product `dsh run` drives core directly |
| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy itself | the injected `{ fetch }` handler | **The isomorphic point**: `new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` never touches the network yet runs the real wire serialization/zod/SSE framing; carrier tests and callers can exercise the protocol without opening a port, while product `dsh --profile headless` drives core directly |
| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` uplink + one same-origin WebSocket downlink per logical stream | the browser client; physical boundary in the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
| `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | unused (protocol-layer override) | serverless UI development (`?fixture`): overrides the `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` virtuals and is itself the fake server (frame rpcIds minted by it, semantics self-consistent) |
| IPC bridge subclass (hypothetical example — no such shell exists) | an Electron shell | IPC serialization round trip | would swap only doFetch; contract and base class unchanged |

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
需要提供 UI 对接层,除已有 ACP(Agent Client Protocol)/stdio 基线外,还需要 Web(server)、Electron 等其他产品客户端。我们把它们统一称为 Client。希望具备以下能力:
- 一个 `dsh` 进程同时支持 `dsh web`(启动)和 `dsh run`(headless),一个进程两种模式(设计预留)
- 一个 `dsh` 进程同时支持 `dsh web`(启动)和 `dsh --profile headless`(headless),一个进程两种模式(设计预留)
- 在 Electron 中使用与 `dsh web` 相同的 Web 技术启动
那么当前的工程代码需要稳定的分层职责模型,便于以后接入各类 client。
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Status: implemented
- **fetch 到达插件包**(`ui-layout`、`ui-sidebar`、`ui-conversation`、`ui-trajectory`):双入口——根入口是 node 半边(空 `apply`,其存在是为了让 host Loader 管辖生命周期、让 web 插件注册表发现 package.json 的 `dsh.client` 声明);实现住在 `src/client/` 下,经 `./client` 子路径发布(tsdown 闭包工厂 bundle)。跨插件消费 `/client` 只限类型;值层面的协作走 cordis 服务。
- `apps/` 作为对外导出的应用入口,可以由 Client / Host 混合组装。
- `apps/web`(`dsh-frontend`)是 vite 应用:`dsh-client-web` 导出的壳表面之上的一层薄 `main.ts`。
- `apps/cli`(`@deepseek-ai/dsh`)分发命令:`dsh web` = Host + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist;`dsh run` = [直接使用核心 Agent/Session 的入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md),不含 Host、HTTP 或浏览器层。
- `apps/cli`(`@deepseek-ai/dsh`)分发命令:`dsh web` = Host + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist;`dsh --profile headless` = [直接使用核心 Agent/Session 的入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md),不含 Host、HTTP 或浏览器层。
- 将来的 Electron 应用经由 IPC fetch 载体复用同一套 web client 包。
```
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ TypeScript 以 solution 根引用的**两个聚合 program** 检查(`tsconfig.
2. **在 `apps/` 下写拼装模块**:`startHost()` + 客户端子类 + 该应用私有的信号/打印/退出语义;混合体不建包,拼装写在 app 里。
3. **需要 HTTP 承载才 import `dsh-host-webserver`**,否则零端口。
现有两个应用保持这一区分:Web 应用挂载 Host、载体与浏览器组合,而 `dsh run` 挂载直接使用核心服务的 runner,不包含 Host、HTTP 或端口。ACP 类协议桥不遵循 client 载体清单:它把 core 暴露给外部生态,直接通过 `ctx.plugin(入口插件)` 挂载,不使用 fetch。
现有两个应用保持这一区分:Web 应用挂载 Host、载体与浏览器组合,而 `dsh --profile headless` 挂载直接使用核心服务的 runner,不包含 Host、HTTP 或端口。ACP 类协议桥不遵循 client 载体清单:它把 core 暴露给外部生态,直接通过 `ctx.plugin(入口插件)` 挂载,不使用 fetch。
## 消息协议
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ export type ResponseValue<K> =
| 子类 | 所在包 | doFetch | 用途 |
|---|---|---|---|
| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy 本包 | 注入的 `{ fetch }` handler | **同构点**:`new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` 全程不过网络但真跑 wire 序列化/zod/SSE 帧;载体测试与调用方可以在不打开端口的情况下运行这套协议,而产品 `dsh run` 直接驱动 core |
| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy 本包 | 注入的 `{ fetch }` handler | **同构点**:`new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` 全程不过网络但真跑 wire 序列化/zod/SSE 帧;载体测试与调用方可以在不打开端口的情况下运行这套协议,而产品 `dsh --profile headless` 直接驱动 core |
| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` 上行 + 每逻辑流一条同源 WebSocket 下行 | 浏览器客户端;物理边界见 [WebSocket 下行载体](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
| `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | 不用(协议层覆写) | 无 server 的 UI 开发(`?fixture`):覆写 `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` 虚方法,自己就是假 server(帧 rpcId 由它 mint,语义自洽) |
| IPC 桥子类(假想示例——尚无此形态) | Electron 壳 | IPC 序列化往返 | 只需换 doFetch,约定/基类零改 |

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md
2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md: ed22e51d59a25db130b3760ce484c116bade4348
2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.zh.md: bdd549092eb30f7749c8f7561068daafe3548b28
2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md: 5cf4a227f388a1ac8315594af4e0256864ef17f5
2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.zh.md: b5a52b3d01840337c0091310e50d8fac34245519

View File

@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ The node-compat CI matrix (Node 22.19 and 26) gains `dsh-source-launch-smoke` (`
- One launch vector across the whole engines range, including future Node lines that change native TypeScript support; the smoke gate enforces it per matrix line.
- TypeScript transformation is delegated to tsx/esbuild again, reversing the prior note's goal of proving Node-native transformation; that goal is unreachable while vendored sources use non-erasable syntax and Node ships no transform mode.
- The runtime declared-dependency enforcement in source launches is gone; undeclared workspace imports now surface only through static gates or built-mode resolution failures.
- Startup improves ~0.4s over the full tsx default (`demo:headless` now aliases the same `dsh run` source launch; ACP keeps `--import tsx` because its graph was not audited for CJS-hook dependence and its launch latency is not on the interactive path).
- Startup improves ~0.4s over the full tsx default (`demo:headless` now aliases the same `dsh --profile headless` source launch; ACP keeps `--import tsx` because its graph was not audited for CJS-hook dependence and its launch latency is not on the interactive path).

View File

@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ node-compat CI 矩阵(Node 22.19 与 26)新增 `dsh-source-launch-smoke`(`
- 整个 engines 范围(包括未来改变原生 TypeScript 支持的 Node 版本线)只有一个启动向量;冒烟门禁按矩阵行强制执行。
- TypeScript 转换重新委托给 tsx/esbuild,逆转了前一篇 Agent Note「证明 Node 原生转换可用」的目标;在 vendor 源码使用不可擦除语法且 Node 不再提供 transform 模式的情况下,该目标不可达。
- 源码启动中的运行时依赖声明强制不复存在;未声明的 workspace import 现在只能通过静态门禁或构建模式的解析失败暴露。
- 启动相比完整 tsx 默认形态快约 0.4s(`demo:headless` 现为同一条 `dsh run` 源码启动命令的别名;ACP 保留 `--import tsx`,因为它的依赖图尚未就 CJS 钩子依赖性做审计,且其启动延迟不在交互路径上)。
- 启动相比完整 tsx 默认形态快约 0.4s(`demo:headless` 现为同一条 `dsh --profile headless` 源码启动命令的别名;ACP 保留 `--import tsx`,因为它的依赖图尚未就 CJS 钩子依赖性做审计,且其启动延迟不在交互路径上)。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md
2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md: c39117ab0de001650a95f98ccf3e42f3a5034c92
2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.zh.md: 5e98a2865013a355c134317ded8a4f2ddaccf42c
2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md: 5a82f0220058c10892b819a83499c817aa9be6ad
2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.zh.md: 0fb3330014eb703c854f70c9e5ed552256651c31

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Composition splits into two planes, decided by what must be shared rather than b
| Plane | Instances | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Host | one | The registries themselves (`tools`, `systemPrompt`, `agents`, `agent-loop`, `sessions`), cross-session facilities (persistence, query, projections, storage, settings, credentials, telemetry), and the web host |
| Host | one | The registries themselves (`tools`, `systemPrompt`, `agents`, `agent-loop`, `sessions`), cross-session facilities (persistence, query, projections, storage, settings, credentials, telemetry), the subagent providers those facilities resolve, and the web host |
| Agent | one per session | What a single agent contributes to those registries: tool plugins, persona and prompt sections, compaction policy |
Model routing stays out of presets. `installAgentLlmTarget` is already the per-agent seam for provider, model, and reasoning effort, and an LLM adapter mounted inside a preset would never be resolved by `agent-loop`, which lives in the host plane.
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Which preset an unnamed session gets is a user setting (`agent-presets.default`)
**Authoring a preset is an RPC, and a privileged one.** A composition is a file, but "edit it on the filesystem" is not a browser affordance, so the roster gained `read`/`write`/`remove` beside `select`. Those three are loopback-pinned: a composition names the plugins a session runs, so reading one is reconnaissance and writing one is arbitrary capability. `list` and `select` deliberately stay ordinary. The roster carries ids and trust only, and a LAN client's picker needs it; and choosing a preset looked like escalation — one of them mounts the toolset that edits the live runtime — but `session.create` already takes an `agentPreset`, so pinning only the switch would have left the same capability one method over. The capability is not the preset's to grant either: the deployment's own default already carries `bash` and the filesystem tools, so any caller that may start a session at all can already run commands as this process. Containment is a property of the id (`[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*`), checked before it becomes a directory name rather than by inspecting the joined path afterwards; the text is parsed with the loader's own schema and dialect, so a save cannot leave a file no session could load. Shipped presets are refused for writes and deletes, because the deployment's copy is what a broken local preset is compared against — which also makes "duplicate, then edit" the authoring path rather than an afterthought.
**A service with a consumer outside the agent plane cannot move into a preset.** The aggressive split moved the `subagents` registry and its spawn/fork backends into the delegation group's entry-local realm, and `dsh web` then failed to boot: `dsh-host-apiproxy` is a HOST row that injects `subagents` to answer the browser's cross-session queries (`listChildren`, `followup`), so it waited forever for a service only sessions now provided. A per-session copy is wrong twice over — a provider name registers once, so the second session would have collided anyway. The registry and its backends are host-plane; the preset contributes the delegation TOOLS, which resolve the host registry. `workflows` stays entry-local because nothing outside an agent reads it. Grepping injectors is what should have caught this and did not: the search has to include the host packages, not just the agent-plane ones.
**A service with a consumer outside the agent plane cannot move into a preset.** The aggressive split moved the `subagents` registry and its spawn/fork backends into the delegation group's entry-local realm, and `dsh web` then failed to boot: `dsh-host-apiproxy` is a HOST row that injects `subagents` to answer the browser's cross-session queries (`listChildren`, `followup`), so it waited forever for a service only sessions now provided. A per-session copy is wrong twice over — a provider name registers once, so the second session would have collided anyway. The registry and every shared backend, including the [fixed Codex and Claude Code product providers](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md), are host-plane; a preset contributes whichever delegation TOOLS its agent should see, and those tools resolve the host registry. `workflows` stays entry-local because nothing outside an agent reads it. Grepping injectors is what should have caught this and did not: the search has to include the host packages, not just the agent-plane ones.
**A real-composition test that disables a host row cannot audit that row.** The web composition test disabled `api-gateway` — the api-proxy itself — as a row with side effects, which is exactly the row whose pending injection would have named the break. It now boots with the api-proxy enabled and the browse directory picker substituted, so the boot audit covers the whole host-plane injection graph; only the port, the asset tree, and the telemetry exporter stay off.
@@ -78,3 +78,7 @@ Which preset an unnamed session gets is a user setting (`agent-presets.default`)
**Make the agent's scope key the preset.** Sessions on one preset would share a layer for free, but per-agent registrations — `installAgentLlmTarget`, per-agent tool restrictions — would then collide across sessions.
**Run each preset as a child process.** [`subagent-dsh-sdk`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/README.md) already proves a full child harness works, and isolation would be absolute. It also means proxying streaming, approvals, and projections per session, which is a transport project rather than a composition one.
**Give product subagents global enable settings and a separate settings page.** The process-wide value would compete with the preset as owner of model-visible tools and could not express two sessions using different compositions. Product providers stay host-side, while ordinary preset rows independently expose Codex and Claude Code tools.
**Ship one preset for every Codex and Claude Code combination.** Four identities duplicate the full preset composition to represent two independent rows. A copied preset can enable either row directly, so combination presets add roster and maintenance cost without adding a user result.

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
| 平面 | 实例数 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 宿主 | 一份 | 注册表本身(`tools`、`systemPrompt`、`agents`、`agent-loop`、`sessions`)、跨会话设施(持久化、查询、投影、存储、设置、凭据、遥测),以及 web 宿主 |
| 宿主 | 一份 | 注册表本身(`tools`、`systemPrompt`、`agents`、`agent-loop`、`sessions`)、跨会话设施(持久化、查询、投影、存储、设置、凭据、遥测)、这些设施所解析的 subagent provider,以及 web 宿主 |
| agent | 每会话一份 | 单个 agent 对这些注册表的贡献:工具插件、人设与提示词段落、压缩策略 |
模型路由不进 preset。`installAgentLlmTarget` 已经是 provider、model 与 reasoning effort 的按 agent 可替换点;而挂在 preset 内部的 LLM 适配器永远不会被 `agent-loop` 解析到,因为后者位于宿主平面。
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Status: implemented
**创作 preset 是一次 RPC,而且是特权 RPC。** 组装是一个文件,但“去文件系统里改它”并不是浏览器能提供的操作,因此名单在 `select` 之外新增了 `read`/`write`/`remove`。这三者被固定在环回地址:组装指明了一个会话所运行的插件,因此读取它是侦察,写入它是任意能力。`list` 与 `select` 刻意保持为普通方法。名单只携带 id 与信任级别,而局域网客户端的选择器需要它;至于选择本身,它看起来像提权——其中一个 preset 会挂载可编辑活动运行时的工具集——但 `session.create` 本就接受 `agentPreset`,只固定切换会把同一能力留在隔壁一个方法上。这份能力也不由 preset 授予:部署自带的默认 preset 本就带着 `bash` 与文件系统工具,因此任何被允许开启会话的调用方,早已能以本进程的身份执行命令。约束是 id 自身的性质(`[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*`),在它成为目录名之前就检查,而不是事后再去审视拼接出的路径;文本使用 loader 自身的 schema 与方言解析,因此保存不会留下任何会话都无法加载的文件。随部署提供的 preset 拒绝写入与删除,因为部署自带的那一份正是用来对照有问题的本地 preset 的——这也让“先复制、再编辑”成为创作路径本身,而非事后补充。
**在 agent 平面之外还有消费方的服务,不能搬进 preset。** 激进拆分把 `subagents` 注册表连同 spawn/fork 后端一起搬进了 delegation 组的 entry-local realm,于是 `dsh web` 直接起不来:`dsh-host-apiproxy` 是宿主行,它注入 `subagents` 来回答浏览器的跨会话查询(`listChildren`、`followup`),因而永远等待一个此刻只有会话才提供的服务。按会话各一份在两个层面上都是错的——provider 名只能注册一次,第二个会话本来也会相撞。注册表与后端属于宿主平面;preset 贡献的是委派**工具**,它们解析宿主注册表。`workflows` 保持 entry-local,因为 agent 之外没有任何东西读它。本该拦下它的是「检索注入方」这一步,而它没拦住:检索必须覆盖宿主包,而不只是 agent 平面的包。
**在 agent 平面之外还有消费方的服务,不能搬进 preset。** 激进拆分把 `subagents` 注册表连同 spawn/fork 后端一起搬进了 delegation 组的 entry-local realm,于是 `dsh web` 直接起不来:`dsh-host-apiproxy` 是宿主行,它注入 `subagents` 来回答浏览器的跨会话查询(`listChildren`、`followup`),因而永远等待一个此刻只有会话才提供的服务。按会话各一份在两个层面上都是错的——provider 名只能注册一次,第二个会话本来也会相撞。注册表与所有共享后端,包括[固定的 Codex 与 Claude Code 产品 provider](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md),都属于宿主平面;preset 只贡献自己的 agent 应看见的委派**工具**,这些工具解析宿主注册表。`workflows` 保持 entry-local,因为 agent 之外没有任何东西读它。本该拦下它的是「检索注入方」这一步,而它没拦住:检索必须覆盖宿主包,而不只是 agent 平面的包。
**真实组装测试若禁用了某个宿主行,就无法审计该行。** web 组装测试把 `api-gateway`——也就是 api-proxy 本身——当作「有外部副作用的行」禁用了,而它恰恰是那个会以 pending 注入点名此次断裂的行。现在它在启用 api-proxy、并替换为 browse 目录选择器的前提下引导,启动审计因此覆盖整个宿主平面的注入图;只有端口、资源目录与遥测导出器仍然关闭。
@@ -79,3 +79,7 @@ Status: implemented
**把 agent 的 scope 键设为 preset。** 同一 preset 上的会话就能免费共享一层,但按 agent 的注册——`installAgentLlmTarget`、按 agent 的工具限制——会跨会话相撞。
**把每个 preset 作为子进程运行。** [`subagent-dsh-sdk`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/README.md) 已经证明完整的子 harness 可行,隔离性也会是绝对的。但这同时意味着要按会话代理流式输出、审批与投影,那是一个传输层项目,而非组装问题。
**给产品 subagent 增加全局启用设置与独立设置页。** 进程级值会与 preset 争夺模型可见工具的所有权,也无法表达两个会话使用不同组装。产品 provider 留在宿主,普通 preset 行分别暴露 Codex 与 Claude Code 工具。
**为 Codex 与 Claude Code 的每种组合交付一份 preset。** 四个身份会复制完整 preset 组装,只为表示两条独立行。复制后的 preset 已能直接启用任一行,因此组合 preset 只增加名单与维护成本,不增加用户结果。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md
2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md: 2924b3cb445064fd47d82bcc94ec8d77ded5721b
2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md: b2287034010bcac1048bb385b2266f1bc75921da
2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md: 54626e3f48a2ba7db19813e6e883f0e77499d0e2
2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md: 357e0f63d4eba0f0985c9e14aad54595c7b41c77

View File

@@ -10,11 +10,9 @@ The `dsh` launcher hardcoded its compositions: `base.cordis.yml` + `web.cordis.y
## Decision
Everything becomes a **profile**: a directory `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>` with a `package.json` (pnpm-managed out-of-tree plugin `dependencies` plus the profile manifest `dsh.profile` with its ordered `bundles` layer list) and a user `cordis.patch.yml`. A **bundle** is an npm package declaring `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }`; the two manifest kinds live under distinct `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` keys so a package.json states which role it plays. The tree composes over an empty root by applying each bundle's patch in `dsh.profile.bundles` order, then the user layer, then `--patch` overlays, then flag patches — one `applyEntryPatches` call, identical for boot, flag derivation, and `--dump-config`.
Everything becomes a **profile**: a directory `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>` with a `package.json` (pnpm-managed out-of-tree plugin `dependencies` plus the profile manifest `dsh.profile` with its ordered `bundles` layer list) and a user `cordis.patch.yml`. A **bundle** is an npm package declaring `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }`; the two manifest kinds live under distinct `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` keys so a package.json states which role it plays. The tree composes over an empty root by applying each bundle's patch in `dsh.profile.bundles` order, then the user layer and `--patch` overlays — one `applyEntryPatches` call shared by boot and `--dump-config`. App invocation values later moved from launcher-derived patches to startup services in the [app-owned command-line decision](2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md).
The shipped bundles are `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` (shared core rows), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app` (browser Host rows and Web runtime glue), and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless` (a direct one-shot runner over base, without web-app). `dsh web` is the Web-flag alias for `--profile web`; `dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` owns one-shot execution and defaults to the headless profile; generic `dsh --profile <name>` boots without a task. Patch overlays use `--patch`. `dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` is a thin pnpm forwarder that initializes the profile and reconciles `dsh.profile.bundles` with installed bundle declarations; a package without a bundle declaration remains a plain dependency. [Headless as a direct core entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md) owns the headless composition contract.
The [`dsh run` command decision](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) owns the one-shot grammar; this note owns the profile composition it selects.
The shipped bundles are `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` (shared core rows), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app` (browser Host rows and Web runtime glue), and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless` (a direct one-shot runner over base, without web-app). Generic `dsh --profile <name>` hands its remaining arguments to that profile's command-line startup row: Web owns its flag family, while headless owns its task positional. Patch overlays use launcher-owned `--patch`. `dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` is a thin pnpm forwarder that initializes the profile and reconciles `dsh.profile.bundles` with installed bundle declarations; a package without a bundle declaration remains a plain dependency. [Headless as a direct core entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md) owns the headless composition contract.
Resolution is two-anchored by construction: `dsh.profile.bundles` names resolve from the dsh installation first, then the profile directory — so in-box bundles always come from the same installation as the running `dsh` and pnpm never manages them — while bare plugin names in patch rows resolve through the profile directory's Node parent-walk into the maintained flat fallback `$DSH_HOME/profiles/node_modules` (one symlink per package the installation's app and bundles depend on, healed on every launch).
@@ -24,7 +22,7 @@ Two supporting refactors: the webserver's built-in static dist serving became th
- **Dependency-scan plus partial `patchOrder`** (the original sketch): scanning `dependencies` for bundles and ordering unlisted ones alphabetically has two sources of truth and an implicit tie-break; one explicit ordered `dsh.profile.bundles` list is smaller and fully deterministic. A raw `pnpm add` inside the profile installs a library without activating any patch — explicit, no spooky scan.
- **`link:` entries for in-box bundles**: pnpm cannot version, install, or update a `link:` into the installation, it embeds a machine path in a user file, and it breaks when the installation moves. The two-anchor resolution plus healed symlink fallback gives the same guarantee ("bundles come from the installation") without ceremony.
- **A pre-boot `context` module in the bundle manifest** for boot-time values (dist path, flag facts): rejected in favor of pure plugins — the glue is ordinary rows the launcher patches, so the composition stays fully dumpable and the manifest stays data-only. The launcher-owned `ctx.headlessIo` host hook is the one host-provided slot, and it is provided in `boot()`'s `prepare` hook, before any config-tree entry mounts.
- **A pre-boot `context` module in the bundle manifest** for boot-time values (dist path, flag facts): rejected in favor of pure plugins — the glue is ordinary rows and app-owned startup services, so the composition stays fully dumpable and the manifest stays data-only. The launcher-owned `ctx.headlessIo` host hook is the one host-provided slot, and it is provided in `boot()`'s `prepare` hook, before any config-tree entry mounts.
- **Transitive bundle auto-application**: only direct `dsh.profile.bundles` entries contribute layers; a meta-bundle wanting to re-export another bundle's patch must do so explicitly in its own patch file.
## Consequences

View File

@@ -10,11 +10,9 @@ Status: implemented
## Decision
一切都变成 **profile**:即目录 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>`,其中包含一个 `package.json`(pnpm 管理的树外插件 `dependencies`,加上 profile manifest(元数据清单)`dsh.profile` 及其有序的 `bundles` 层列表)和一份用户 `cordis.patch.yml`。**组合包**(bundle)是声明了 `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }` 的 npm 包;两种 manifest 分别位于互不相同的 `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` 键下,因此一份 package.json 能说明自己扮演哪种角色。配置树在空的根之上组合:按 `dsh.profile.bundles` 顺序应用每个组合包的 patch,然后是用户层,然后是 `--patch` overlay,最后是 flag patch——全部收敛为一次 `applyEntryPatches` 调用,启动、flag 派生与 `--dump-config` 使用完全相同的路径。
一切都变成 **profile**:即目录 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>`,其中包含一个 `package.json`(pnpm 管理的树外插件 `dependencies`,加上 profile manifest `dsh.profile` 及其有序的 `bundles` 层列表)和一份用户 `cordis.patch.yml`。**组合包**(bundle)是声明了 `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }` 的 npm 包;两种 manifest 分别位于互不相同的 `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` 键下,因此一份 package.json 能说明自己扮演哪种角色。配置树在空的根之上组合:按 `dsh.profile.bundles` 顺序应用每个组合包的 patch,然后是用户层与 `--patch` overlay——启动与 `--dump-config` 共享同一条 `applyEntryPatches` 路径。随后,[应用持有命令行的决策](2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md)又把调用期取值从启动器派生的 patch 迁移到了启动服务。
随附的组合包是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base`(共享核心配置行)、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app`(浏览器 Host 配置行与 Web 运行时粘合层)和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless`(直接叠加在 base 上且不含 web-app 的一次性 runner)。`dsh web` 是携带 Web flag 家族的 `--profile web` 别名;`dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` 负责一次性执行,默认使用 headless profile;通用的 `dsh --profile <name>` 启动 profile 而不携带任务。patch overlay 使用 `--patch`。`dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` 是一层薄薄的 pnpm 转发器,负责初始化 profile,并依据已安装包的组合包声明调和 `dsh.profile.bundles`;没有组合包声明的包保持为普通依赖。[Headless 作为直接 core 入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)负责 headless 组合约定。
[`dsh run` 命令决策](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md)负责一次性语法;本 Agent Note 负责该语法所选择的 profile 组合。
随附的组合包是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base`(共享核心配置行)、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app`(浏览器 Host 配置行与 Web 运行时粘合层)和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless`(直接叠加在 base 上且不含 web-app 的一次性 runner)。通用的 `dsh --profile <name>` 把剩余参数交给该 profile 的命令行启动行:Web 持有自己的 flag 家族,headless 则持有任务位置参数。patch overlay 使用启动器持有的 `--patch`。`dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` 是一层薄薄的 pnpm 转发器,负责初始化 profile,并依据已安装包的组合包声明调和 `dsh.profile.bundles`;没有组合包声明的包保持为普通依赖。[Headless 作为直接 core 入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)负责 headless 组合约定。
解析在构造上就是双锚点的:`dsh.profile.bundles` 中的名称先从 dsh 安装目录解析,再从 profile 目录解析——因此内置组合包始终来自与运行中 `dsh` 相同的安装,pnpm 从不管理它们——而 patch 行中的裸插件名称经 profile 目录的 Node 父目录逐级查找,落到受维护的扁平回退目录 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/node_modules`(安装目录的应用与各组合包所依赖的每个包各一个符号链接,每次启动时修复)。
@@ -24,7 +22,7 @@ Status: implemented
- **依赖扫描加部分 `patchOrder`**(最初的草案):扫描 `dependencies` 找出组合包、未列出者按字母序排列,会产生两个真源和一条隐式决胜规则;一份显式有序的 `dsh.profile.bundles` 列表更小、完全确定。在 profile 内直接 `pnpm add` 只会安装一个库,不激活任何 patch——行为显式,没有暗中扫描。
- **内置组合包使用 `link:` 条目**:pnpm 无法对指向安装目录的 `link:` 做版本管理、安装或更新,它会把机器路径嵌进用户文件,并且在安装目录移动后失效。双锚点解析加上每次启动修复的符号链接回退提供了同样的保证(「组合包来自安装目录」),且没有这些繁文缛节。
- **在组合包 manifest 中放一个启动前 `context` 模块**承载启动期取值(dist 路径、flag 事实):否决,改用纯插件——粘合逻辑就是启动器 patch 的普通配置行,因此组合始终可完整 dump,manifest 保持纯数据。启动器持有的 `ctx.headlessIo` 宿主钩子是唯一由宿主提供的 slot,且在任何配置树条目挂载之前,于 `boot()` 的 `prepare` 钩子中提供。
- **在组合包 manifest 中放一个启动前 `context` 模块**承载启动期取值(dist 路径、flag 事实):否决,改用纯插件——粘合逻辑就是普通配置行和由应用持有的启动服务,因此组合始终可完整 dump,manifest 保持纯数据。启动器持有的 `ctx.headlessIo` 宿主钩子是唯一由宿主提供的 slot,且在任何配置树条目挂载之前,于 `boot()` 的 `prepare` 钩子中提供。
- **组合包的传递式自动应用**:只有直接列在 `dsh.profile.bundles` 中的条目才贡献层;想重新导出另一个组合包 patch 的元组合包,必须在自己的 patch 文件中显式完成。
## Consequences

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md
2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md: ed095f4077a23e51bffb647d24eed19ba09e11ed
2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.zh.md: 89d54e35573f14786e05d648f2b42891ca27a043
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md
2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md: 4a05cac5ed7f44fb55c2d4498bf28a43befdb073
2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.zh.md: 86a37f416d17c4615152b29d73f171803f24c4c3

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
# Agent Note: Apps own their command line through `ctx.cmdlineArgs`
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.zh.md)
## Problem
After profiles, compositions were installable but their command lines were not. `apps/cli` still declared the Web flag family (`--host`, `--port`, `--dev`, `--workspace-root`, `--trusted-host`) and the one-shot task positional, then derived patches for row ids it hardcoded (`webserver`, `api-gateway`, `connection`, `web-runtime`). An out-of-tree app such as [turtle-ui](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/turtle-ui) could contribute rows but had no way to accept a flag: `dsh --profile tui --resume <session>` had nowhere to be parsed, and `dsh --profile web --help` printed the launcher's help rather than the web app's.
## Decision
The launcher parses only what it owns — `--profile`, `--patch`, the config dumps — and hands **everything after its own flags** to the booted tree verbatim. The split is positional: the first token the launcher does not recognize starts the app's arguments (commander's `passThroughOptions` + `allowUnknownOption` + `helpOption(false)`). A bare `dsh -h`, which has no app to hand the flag to, still prints the launcher's own help.
The new `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cmdline` package owns the handoff. A launcher calls `provideCmdline(ctx, host)` before any entry mounts, providing `ctx.cmdlineArgs` (whose whole interface is `get(): readonly string[]`) and `ctx.appExit`. Any ordinary app plugin may inject `cmdlineArgs`, call `parseCmdline(ctx, program, plan)` with its own commander program, and provide the returned value as an app-owned service. Its Loader row carries no launcher marker or special kind, and the launcher does not inspect the composition for an owner. Multiple plugins may read the same immutable snapshot; a profile with no reader ignores its app arguments. Rows configured from a provider inject its service and read direct lazy config expressions (`port: !!js ctx.webStartup.port ?? 3080`), so a flag beats the value written beside it and nothing is written back into any row.
The boot mounts the composition once. Cordis holds each row until its injections are active; Loader then interpolates that row's `!!js` against the injection-ready plugin context immediately before activation. Include keeps nested row expressions raw until their target row reaches this point. `--help` leaves the provider's service absent, so dependent rows never activate, and a live patch reload interpolates again against the service that remains active, so a served port cannot be silently reset.
The shipped apps moved their flags into their bundles: `dsh-web-app` owns the Web family (and enables the `client-hmr` row it now ships disabled, for `--dev`), and `dsh-headless` owns the task positional and rejects a missing task as a usage error. `apps/cli/src/web.ts` is gone; `runProfile` no longer knows any flag-target row id. Out of tree, turtle-ui gained `--resume <session>` / `--session <id>` the same way, which is the design's real validation: an installed plugin added a flag with no launcher change.
Two further consequences. Loader mounts sibling rows concurrently, so one row can activate while another still mounts or while the whole boot is rolling back; the Web bundle therefore publishes its URL only after its own Loader tree settles. The Web bundle's runtime plugin owns the harness-source prompt section too, so `dsh web` and `dsh --profile web` boot identically without Web-specific launcher setup.
## Why Loader owns the ordering
Four framework facts shape the mechanism:
- **A profile's rows arrive inside the root include's `patches` option.** Include is an entry-tree owner, so its static entry-config resolver interpolates Include's own options while preserving nested `!!js` nodes for their target rows instead of recursively evaluating them in the Include context.
- **Cordis activates a fiber only after all declared injections are active.** Immediately before each activation, Cordis runs the `internal/config` waterfall against the fiber's own context; Loader's listener interpolates the raw config after Cordis snapshots its injected services.
- **Provider replacement and HMR must preserve the same contract.** Fiber reactivation re-runs the waterfall, HMR carries the raw config to the replacement fiber, and a pending row accepts option changes without prematurely evaluating expressions against absent services.
- **A row cannot be inserted from inside a mounting plugin** — `tree.create` returns a prefixed id it then fails to resolve — so a conditional row ships `disabled: true` and an active row enables it (`dsh web --dev` and its reload chain). Enablement is an in-memory Loader override rather than an options rewrite, so Include reapplication cannot silently disable it. The Web bundle also starts client discovery only after enabling the optional row, ensuring the first browser graph already contains its HMR receiver.
This leaves dependency ordering in Cordis activation and Loader interpolation, which own it. Rows keep their `inject` and config, Loader mounts the composition once, and the launcher only provides argv and process-lifecycle services.
## Alternatives considered
- **Writing the resolved values into each row** (a config update per row, plus a patch layer handed back to the launcher so a reload could not undo it): it worked, but it meant patches travelling from an app to the launcher and back, two mechanisms for one fact, and a recycle whose correctness depended on Loader restart internals. The maintainer rejected the round trip; the service the rows read replaced all of it.
- **Releasing rows by clearing their `inject`**: it worked in isolation and failed on the real web tree, because clearing `inject` is exactly what loses the plugin's static injections. The failure is silent until a plugin reads a service it declared.
- **Launcher-managed two-pass mounting**: it can make a provider active before readers are applied, but duplicates the composition, makes ordering a launcher concern, and conceals the Loader defect that nested expressions were evaluated in the include context rather than the target row's injected context.
- **The launcher running each bundle's command function before boot** (no Cordis involvement): strictly earlier than "boot, then help", but it makes app startup a second plugin protocol outside the tree. An ordinary `cmdlineArgs`-injected provider keeps one protocol and remains dumpable and patchable.
- **A launcher-enforced command-line owner**: rejecting zero or multiple readers would arbitrate overlaps such as `-h`, but `get()` is an immutable read and normal composition may need several app-owned services. Plugins therefore share the snapshot and own any parser interaction through ordinary composition.
- **`instanceof CommanderError`**: an out-of-tree plugin brings its own commander copy, so the class identity differs and a printed `--help` was rethrown as a fatal load failure. Commander's control-flow errors are detected structurally instead.
## Consequences
- An app's flags, help text, and usage errors live with the rows they configure; adding a flag to an installed plugin needs no launcher change.
- The launcher still recognizes the headless runner for one-shot process lifetime and the telemetry row for its environment switch; neither path interprets app arguments.
- `--help` leaves every row that depends on the provider's service pending and requests bounded exit; unrelated rows may activate concurrently before teardown.
- An app-owned service has no statically declared provider: a bundle shipping consumer rows without that provider fails at settlement with pending entries naming the service, not at load.
- A user patch that replaces a row's whole `config` drops its expressions, and with them the flag's precedence for that row.
- Launcher flags must precede app arguments; a first app argument equal to `web` or `plugin` selects that subcommand instead, `-V`/`--version` remains launcher-owned before that boundary, and the launcher's parser consumes one `--`, so a literal `--` for the app needs `-- --`.
- `--dump-config` never runs app command-line providers, so it prints the composition before any app argument is resolved and rejects an invocation that carries app arguments.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
# Agent Note: 应用通过 `ctx.cmdlineArgs` 持有自己的命令行
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md) | 中文
## 问题
profile 落地之后,组合可以安装,命令行却不能。`apps/cli` 仍然声明着 Web flag 家族(`--host`、`--port`、`--dev`、`--workspace-root`、`--trusted-host`)和一次性任务位置参数,再为自己硬编码的行 id(`webserver`、`api-gateway`、`connection`、`web-runtime`)派生 patch。像 [turtle-ui](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/turtle-ui) 这样的树外应用能贡献行,却无处接受一个 flag:`dsh --profile tui --resume <session>` 没有地方可供解析,而 `dsh --profile web --help` 打印的是启动器的 help,而不是 web 应用的 help。
## 决策
启动器只解析属于自己的部分(`--profile`、`--patch`、配置 dump),并把**自己 flag 之后的一切**原样交给引导起来的配置树。切分按位置进行:启动器不认识的第一个 token 就是应用参数的起点(依靠 commander 的 `passThroughOptions` + `allowUnknownOption` + `helpOption(false)`)。裸的 `dsh -h` 没有可交付的应用,仍然打印启动器自己的 help。
新包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cmdline` 持有这次交接。启动器在任何条目挂载之前调用 `provideCmdline(ctx, host)`,提供 `ctx.cmdlineArgs`(其全部接口就是 `get(): readonly string[]`)与 `ctx.appExit`。任何普通应用插件都可以注入 `cmdlineArgs`,用自己的 commander program 调用 `parseCmdline(ctx, program, plan)`,再把返回值作为应用自有服务提供出去。它的 Loader 行不携带启动器标记或特殊类型,启动器也不会检查组合中的所有者。多个插件可以读取同一份不可变快照;没有读取方的 profile 会忽略自己的应用参数。由提供方配置的行注入其服务,并在惰性配置表达式中直接读取它(`port: !!js ctx.webStartup.port ?? 3080`),因此 flag 胜过写在它旁边的值,也没有任何东西被写回任何一行。
boot 只挂载一次整套组合。Cordis 让每一行等待其注入激活;Loader 随后在激活前一刻,基于已注入就绪的插件上下文插值该行的 `!!js`。Include 会保留嵌套的行表达式,直到目标行到达这一时点。`--help` 会让提供方服务保持缺失,因此依赖行永不激活;活动 patch 重载会针对仍然在线的服务再次插值,所以已经服务中的端口不会被悄悄重置。
已交付的各应用把自己的 flag 搬进了组合包:`dsh-web-app` 持有 Web 家族(并为 `--dev` 启用它如今以禁用状态交付的 `client-hmr` 行),`dsh-headless` 持有任务位置参数,缺少任务时按用法错误拒绝。`apps/cli/src/web.ts` 已删除;`runProfile` 不再知道任何 flag 目标行 id。在树外,turtle-ui 以同样的方式获得了 `--resume <session>` / `--session <id>`,这才是这套设计的真正验证:一个已安装的插件加上了一个 flag,启动器毫无改动。
还有两条后果。Loader 会并发挂载兄弟行,因此一行可能已经激活,而另一行仍在挂载,或整次 boot 正在回滚;所以 Web 组合包只会在自身的 Loader 配置树结算后公布 URL。另外,Web 组合包的运行时插件也持有 harness 源码提示词段,因此 `dsh web` 与 `dsh --profile web` 无需 Web 专用启动器设置即可按完全相同的方式启动。
## 为什么由 Loader 持有顺序
四条框架事实塑造了这套机制:
- **profile 的各行位于根 include 的 `patches` 选项内部。** Include 是条目树所有者,因此它的静态条目配置解析器会插值 Include 自身的选项,同时为目标行保留嵌套的 `!!js` 节点,而不是在 Include 上下文中递归求值。
- **Cordis 只在所有声明的注入都已激活后才激活 fiber。** 每次激活前一刻,Cordis 会基于 fiber 自身上下文运行 `internal/config` waterfall;Cordis 快照注入服务之后,Loader 的监听器再插值原始配置。
- **提供方替换与 HMR 必须保持相同契约。** fiber 重新激活时会重跑 waterfall,HMR 会把原始配置带给替换 fiber,而待处理行可以接受选项变更,不会针对缺失服务提前求值表达式。
- **不能从正在挂载的插件内部插入一行**——`tree.create` 返回一个带前缀的 id,随后它自己解析不出来——因此条件性的行以 `disabled: true` 交付,再由活跃行启用(`dsh web --dev` 及其重载链路)。启用采用 Loader 的内存覆盖而非改写选项,因此 Include 重新应用配置时不会悄然将其禁用。Web 组合包还会在启用可选行之后才启动客户端发现,确保首份浏览器图中已经包含 HMR 接收端。
这样,依赖顺序仍由负责它的 Cordis 激活与 Loader 插值流程处理。各行保留自己的 `inject` 和配置,Loader 只挂载一次组合,启动器只提供 argv 与进程生命周期服务。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **把解析出的取值写进每一行**(逐行一次配置更新,外加交还给启动器的一层 patch,使重载无法撤销它):它能工作,但这意味着 patch 在应用与启动器之间来回传递、同一件事有两套机制,以及一套其正确性依赖 Loader 重启内部细节的回收重建。维护者否决了这次往返;供各行读取的服务取代了这一切。
- **通过清空行的 `inject` 来放行**:孤立测试可行,在真实 web 树上失败,因为清空 `inject` 恰恰会丢失插件的静态注入。在插件真的去读它声明过的服务之前,这个失败是静默的。
- **由启动器管理两趟挂载**:它可以让提供方先于读取行激活,但会重复组合、把顺序变成启动器职责,还掩盖了 Loader 的缺陷——嵌套表达式在 include 上下文而不是目标行的注入上下文中求值。
- **由启动器在 boot 之前运行每个组合包的命令函数**(完全不经过 Cordis):严格早于「先 boot 再 help」,但这会让应用启动成为配置树之外的第二套插件协议。使用注入 `cmdlineArgs` 的普通提供方只保留一套协议,并且仍可 dump、可 patch。
- **由启动器强制指定命令行所有者**:拒绝零个或多个读取方可以裁决 `-h` 等重叠项,但 `get()` 是不可变读取,普通组合也可能需要多个应用自有服务。因此插件共享该快照,并通过普通组合持有各自解析器的交互。
- **`instanceof CommanderError`**:树外插件会带来自己的一份 commander 副本,类身份因此不同,已经打印出来的 `--help` 会被重新抛成致命的加载失败。改为按结构识别 commander 的控制流错误。
## 后果
- 应用的 flag、help 文本和用法错误与它们所配置的行放在一起;给已安装的插件加一个 flag 不需要改动启动器。
- 启动器仍会识别 headless runner 以管理一次性进程生命周期,并识别 telemetry 行以应用环境开关;两条路径都不解析应用参数。
- `--help` 会让所有依赖提供方服务的行保持待处理并请求有边界的退出;无关行可能在拆除前并发激活。
- 应用自有服务没有静态声明的提供方:交付了消费行却缺少对应提供方的组合包会在结算时失败,报出指向该服务的待处理条目,而不是在加载时失败。
- 用户 patch 若整体替换某行的 `config`,会连同其中的表达式一起丢掉,该行上 flag 的优先级也随之消失。
- 启动器的 flag 必须写在应用参数之前;如果应用的第一个参数恰好等于 `web` 或 `plugin`,会选择对应的子命令;`-V`/`--version` 在该边界之前仍归启动器持有;而且启动器的解析器会消耗掉一个 `--`,因此要给应用传一个字面量 `--` 需要写成 `-- --`。
- `--dump-config` 从不运行应用命令行提供方,因此它在任何应用参数被解析之前打印组合,并拒绝携带应用参数的调用。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md
2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md: 49afe2993de7302adbedcdf9e8e2347d6424ee2a
2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.zh.md: 73c1cbe5ac777025f63f46751b1d5ccebbfe9676
2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md: b705df2e6d88e096ee3ba50a6156b815dbd98b98
2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.zh.md: 439f4c21a2ce1741e8d483bc307508550da1bec7

View File

@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ The shipped `headless` profile contains `dsh-base` and `dsh-headless`. The headl
`loadProfile` recognizes the exact installation-owned headless tuple (`dsh-base`, `dsh-web-app`, `dsh-headless`) and normalizes it to the shipped headless template while preserving every other manifest field. Extra, missing, or reordered bundle lists are user-owned and remain untouched.
This note owns the headless transport and completion contracts. [`dsh run` owns one-shot headless execution](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) owns the command grammar, [GUI layering and RPC protocol](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md) owns browser gateway boundaries, [web config-tree boot and transport layering](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md) owns the Web tree, and [the default model follows the picker](../feature/2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md) owns persistence of the shared Agent default.
This note owns the headless transport and completion contracts. [Apps own their command lines](2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md) owns the current `dsh --profile headless` grammar; the former [`dsh run` decision](../../archived/feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) records the superseded launcher-owned grammar, [GUI layering and RPC protocol](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md) owns browser gateway boundaries, [web config-tree boot and transport layering](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md) owns the Web tree, and [the default model follows the picker](../feature/2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md) owns persistence of the shared Agent default.
## Verification
Package tests use the real Session store and Agent registry around a scripted Agent factory to pin idle-to-idle aggregation, late asynchronous completion, terminal model diagnostics, other non-completed exits, direct failures, Loader-time disposal, and flush-before-exit ordering. The keyless assembled snapshots drive `dsh run` through a replayed tool round trip, record a `user/message` with `source.kind: 'user'`, and expose a terminal model failure on stderr. Built-bin acceptance reaches a mock provider through the published entry and requires final text on stdout, exit 0, and empty stderr. Config-dump acceptance excludes every Host, Web, and Client package from the shipped headless tree; PTY shutdown coverage requires no observation line and bounded disposal.
Package tests use the real Session store and Agent registry around a scripted Agent factory to pin idle-to-idle aggregation, late asynchronous completion, terminal model diagnostics, other non-completed exits, direct failures, Loader-time disposal, and flush-before-exit ordering. The keyless assembled snapshots drive `dsh --profile headless` through a replayed tool round trip, record a `user/message` with `source.kind: 'user'`, and expose a terminal model failure on stderr. Built-bin acceptance reaches a mock provider through the published entry and requires final text on stdout, exit 0, and empty stderr. Config-dump acceptance excludes every Host, Web, and Client package from the shipped headless tree; PTY shutdown coverage requires no observation line and bounded disposal.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ Package tests use the real Session store and Agent registry around a scripted Ag
## Consequences
`dsh run` provides a local Agent task rather than browser observation, Host APIs, or HTTP. Users who need those capabilities choose `dsh web`. Successful stderr is empty, completion follows durable flush, and the persisted Session remains available to later tooling. Its initial user message records `source.kind: 'user'` and therefore carries no ApiProxy `rpcId`.
`dsh --profile headless` provides a local Agent task rather than browser observation, Host APIs, or HTTP. Users who need those capabilities choose `dsh web`. Successful stderr is empty, completion follows durable flush, and the persisted Session remains available to later tooling. Its initial user message records `source.kind: 'user'` and therefore carries no ApiProxy `rpcId`.
ApiProxy carrier coverage stays in the ApiProxy package. Custom one-shot profiles may include Host or Web bundles explicitly, while the shipped profile and the recognized installation-owned tuple are Web-free.

View File

@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ Status: implemented
`loadProfile` 识别安装过程拥有的精确 headless 元组(`dsh-base`、`dsh-web-app`、`dsh-headless`),将其规范化为随附的 headless 模板,并保留 manifest(元数据清单)的其他所有字段。带额外项、缺少项或顺序不同的组合包列表归用户所有,保持不变。
本 Agent Note 负责 headless 的传输与完成约定。[`dsh run` 负责一次性 headless 执行](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md)负责命令语法,[GUI 分层与 RPC 协议](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md)负责浏览器网关边界,[Web 配置树启动与传输分层](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md)负责 Web 插件树,[默认模型跟随选择器](../feature/2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md)负责共享 Agent 默认值的持久化。
本 Agent Note 负责 headless 的传输与完成约定。[应用持有自己的命令行](2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md)负责当前的 `dsh --profile headless` 语法;原 [`dsh run` 决策](../../archived/feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md)记录已被取代的启动器持有语法,[GUI 分层与 RPC 协议](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md)负责浏览器网关边界,[Web 配置树启动与传输分层](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md)负责 Web 插件树,[默认模型跟随选择器](../feature/2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md)负责共享 Agent 默认值的持久化。
## 验证
包测试围绕脚本化 Agent 工厂使用真实的会话存储与 Agent 注册表,固定空闲态到空闲态的聚合、延迟异步完成、终止态模型诊断、其他未完成退出、直接失败、Loader 加载期间的 dispose(资源释放),以及退出前 flush 的顺序。组装后的无密钥快照通过回放的工具往返驱动 `dsh run`,记录一条带 `source.kind: 'user'` 的 `user/message`,并在 stderr 暴露终止态模型失败。构建后二进制验收通过已发布入口访问 mock 提供方,并要求最终文本出现在 stdout、退出状态为 0 且 stderr 为空。配置转储验收排除随附 headless 树中的所有 Host、Web 与 Client 包;PTY 关闭覆盖要求不出现观察行,并在有界时间内完成 dispose。
包测试围绕脚本化 Agent 工厂使用真实的会话存储与 Agent 注册表,固定空闲态到空闲态的聚合、延迟异步完成、终止态模型诊断、其他未完成退出、直接失败、Loader 加载期间的 dispose(资源释放),以及退出前 flush 的顺序。组装后的无密钥快照通过回放的工具往返驱动 `dsh --profile headless`,记录一条带 `source.kind: 'user'` 的 `user/message`,并在 stderr 暴露终止态模型失败。构建后二进制验收通过已发布入口访问 mock 提供方,并要求最终文本出现在 stdout、退出状态为 0 且 stderr 为空。配置转储验收排除随附 headless 树中的所有 Host、Web 与 Client 包;PTY 关闭覆盖要求不出现观察行,并在有界时间内完成 dispose。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ Status: implemented
## 后果
`dsh run` 提供本地 Agent 任务,而不是浏览器观察、Host API 或 HTTP。需要这些能力的用户选择 `dsh web`。成功时 stderr 为空,完成结果在持久化 flush 后推导,持久化会话仍可供后续工具使用。初始用户消息记录 `source.kind: 'user'`,因此不携带 ApiProxy `rpcId`。
`dsh --profile headless` 提供本地 Agent 任务,而不是浏览器观察、Host API 或 HTTP。需要这些能力的用户选择 `dsh web`。成功时 stderr 为空,完成结果在持久化 flush 后推导,持久化会话仍可供后续工具使用。初始用户消息记录 `source.kind: 'user'`,因此不携带 ApiProxy `rpcId`。
ApiProxy 载体覆盖保留在 ApiProxy 包中。自定义一次性 profile 可以显式包含 Host 或 Web 组合包;随附 profile 与可识别的安装过程所属元组均不含 Web。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md
2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md: 33b6eb6cf7a6c19e9ea71cdb7dc8881e8052ef24
2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.zh.md: fd78c7a3fee4e4ee30d27d87c752e1a23576fd85

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Agent Note: Product subagent providers live in the shared profile host
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.zh.md)
## Problem
The [Codex and Claude Code provider contracts](../feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md) were first shipped as independently installable packages that a deployment loaded beside the common subagent tool. Agent Presets later became the ordinary owner of one agent's model-visible tools, but a preset cannot safely own these product providers: `ctx.subagents` is a process registry, provider names are unique, and host consumers resolve the same registry across sessions. Requiring a person to edit both a Profile and a Preset would also make a generic preset row incomplete by itself.
The placement decision must preserve two independent facts. Loading a provider must not start or authenticate a product, while enabling a tool must remain per preset so two sessions can expose different products. A global product switch, a provider instance per agent, or pre-enumerated combination presets would each create a second owner for one of those facts.
## Decision
Every shipped Profile loads the fixed `codex` and `claude-code` providers once through the base bundle's host plane. Loading either plugin only registers a dormant backend; the corresponding Codex or Claude process starts on the first actual delegation call. Agent Presets independently contribute ordinary `dsh-tool-subagent` rows for `subagent_codex` and `subagent_claude_code`, so a preset can expose neither tool, either one, or both without changing the provider registry.
This decision supersedes only the opt-in composition placement recorded by the provider-contract note. That note continues to own each product protocol, result mapping, cancellation, process-tree lifecycle, and evidence tiers. The [Agent Preset architecture](2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md) continues to own the Host/Agent split, preset authoring, and the rule that edits affect only newly composed sessions.
The providers use products already selected by the host environment. Codex starts `codex` from `PATH`; Claude Code resolves `claude` through the shared subprocess execution world and passes the exact path to the official SDK. Profile loading does not install a product, create product state, probe a version, test authentication, or add product-specific settings. Missing commands and product failures remain local to the attempted delegation.
The current base dependency closure still includes the Claude Agent SDK's optional platform CLI payload even though production resolves the host `claude`. Removing that unused payload belongs to the separate product installation-closure follow-up; this placement decision neither installs it dynamically nor treats it as the production executable.
## Verification
The base Loader test proves both provider names register exactly once and no product process starts during Profile boot. Real Agent Preset composition covers none, Codex-only, Claude-only, and both tool sets, including generation isolation after an authored preset changes. Keyless ACP snapshots pin the model-visible tool schemas for one and both products, while provider tests separately prove native executable resolution, failure, cancellation, and process-tree quiescence.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep product providers opt-in at the Profile layer.** This preserves a smaller default dependency closure, but a copied or agent-authored Preset row is not usable unless the person also discovers and edits a second composition layer. It leaves the general Preset entry incomplete for these otherwise ordinary tools.
**Store global or per-Profile product enable switches.** A process switch competes with the Preset as owner of model-visible tools and cannot express two sessions using different combinations. Availability and authentication are deployment facts, not another persisted product state.
**Mount a provider inside every Agent Preset.** Provider names belong to a process registry, so the second session would collide with the first. Host consumers also need the registry independently of any one agent's lifetime.
**Ship four product-combination presets.** Four identities duplicate complete compositions to represent two independent tool rows. Ordinary rows already express the full matrix without adding roster or maintenance state.
## Consequences
A user manages both products through the same Agent Preset authoring path as other plugins, and each new session receives exactly the tools its chosen preset contributes. Every Profile carries two dormant provider registrations, so unused products consume package and module-loading footprint but no product process, login, model call, or product home.
The Host registry remains the single provider authority and each Preset remains the single model-tool authority. The trade-off is the current Claude SDK optional-payload installation cost, which stays explicitly deferred rather than being hidden behind another enable state or installer lifecycle.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Agent Note: 产品 subagent 提供方位于共享 profile 宿主
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md) | 中文
## 问题
[Codex 与 Claude Code 提供方约定](../feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md)最初以可独立安装的包交付,由部署环境在通用 subagent 工具旁加载。Agent Preset 后来成为单个 agent(智能体)的模型可见工具的常规责任方,但 preset 不能安全地拥有这些产品提供方:`ctx.subagents` 是进程级注册表,提供方名称唯一,而宿主消费方会跨会话解析同一个注册表。如果要求用户同时编辑 Profile 和 Preset,也会使通用 preset 行本身不完整。
归属决策必须同时保留两个彼此独立的事实:加载提供方不得启动产品,也不得对产品执行身份验证;而工具是否启用仍须按 preset 决定,这样两个会话才能暴露不同的产品。全局产品开关、按 agent 创建提供方实例或预先枚举的组合 preset,都会为其中一个事实另设第二责任方。
## 决策
每个随发行版交付的 Profile 都会通过 base 组合包的宿主平面,把固定的 `codex` 与 `claude-code` 提供方各加载一次。加载任一插件只会注册一个休眠后端;对应的 Codex 或 Claude 进程直到第一次实际委派调用时才启动。Agent Preset 分别通过普通的 `dsh-tool-subagent` 行贡献 `subagent_codex` 与 `subagent_claude_code`,因此一个 preset 可以不暴露任何工具、只暴露其中一个或同时暴露两者,而无需更改提供方注册表。
本决策仅取代提供方约定说明所记录的、原先由用户选择启用的组装位置。该说明仍负责每个产品的协议、结果映射、取消、进程树生命周期与证据层级。[Agent Preset 架构](2026-08-03-per-session-agent-presets.md)仍负责宿主与 agent 的划分、preset 创作,以及改动只影响新组装会话的规则。
这些提供方使用宿主环境已经选定的产品。Codex 启动 `codex`,该命令从 `PATH` 解析;Claude Code 通过共享的子进程执行世界解析 `claude`,并把确切路径交给官方 SDK。加载 Profile 不会安装产品、创建产品状态、探测版本、测试身份验证,也不会新增产品专属设置。命令缺失和产品故障仍局限于发生问题的那次委派。
当前 base 依赖闭包仍包含 Claude Agent SDK 的可选平台 CLI(命令行界面)载荷,尽管生产环境解析的是宿主提供的 `claude`。移除这份未使用载荷属于独立的产品安装闭包后续项;本归属决策既不会动态安装它,也不会将它当作生产可执行文件。
## 验证
base Loader 测试证明两个提供方名称都恰好注册一次,而且 Profile 启动期间不会启动产品进程。真实 Agent Preset 组装覆盖不暴露任何工具、仅暴露 Codex、仅暴露 Claude 和同时暴露两者这四种工具集合,也覆盖自行创作的 preset 发生改动后的代际隔离。无密钥 ACP(Agent Client Protocol)快照固定单个产品与两个产品同时启用时的模型可见工具 schema,提供方测试则另行证明原生可执行文件解析、失败、取消和进程树完全停稳。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**将产品提供方保留为 Profile 层的按需启用项。** 这样可缩小默认依赖闭包,但复制或由 agent 创作的 Preset 行无法直接使用,除非用户还发现并编辑第二个组装层。对于这些本来与其他工具无异的工具,通用 Preset 入口仍不完整。
**存储全局或按 Profile 配置的产品启用开关。** 进程级开关会与 Preset 争夺模型可见工具的责任归属,也无法表示两个会话使用不同组合。可用性与身份验证属于部署事实,并非另一份需要持久化的产品状态。
**在每个 Agent Preset 内挂载一个提供方。** 提供方名称属于进程级注册表,因此第二个会话会与第一个冲突。宿主消费方也需要独立于任何单个 agent 的生命周期使用该注册表。
**交付四个产品组合 preset。** 四个身份会复制完整组装,只为表示两条独立的工具行。普通行已经能表达完整矩阵,无需新增名单或维护状态。
## 后果
用户通过与其他插件相同的 Agent Preset 创作路径管理两个产品,每个新会话只会获得其所选 preset 所贡献的工具。每个 Profile 都携带两个休眠的提供方注册,因此未使用的产品会产生包和模块加载开销,但不会启动产品进程、登录、调用模型或创建产品主目录。
宿主注册表仍是提供方的唯一权威,每个 Preset 仍是模型工具的唯一权威。代价是当前 Claude SDK 可选载荷的安装成本继续被明确延期处理,而不会隐藏在另一种启用状态或安装程序生命周期之后。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.md
2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.md: 55917400fac2728d13dc2cdd799a7e234b6ed661
2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.zh.md: c7897a8d77e8c2ebad43cec4e12170b04c837350
2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.md: 173d06482cd8a1fcbb985763cc313e3f9b170bc6
2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.zh.md: efa52524199906cf636cb2b55cb4249857dc1348

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.zh.md)
## Problem
The default telemetry mount added SIGINT/SIGTERM handlers to `dsh web` and the headless command (now `dsh run`) so process exit could drain the Cordis tree instead of dropping queued telemetry. Each handler used a one-way boolean latch and exited only after `ctx.fiber.dispose()` settled. Headless normal completion also awaited that disposal without a bound.
The default telemetry mount added SIGINT/SIGTERM handlers to `dsh web` and the headless command (now `dsh --profile headless`) so process exit could drain the Cordis tree instead of dropping queued telemetry. Each handler used a one-way boolean latch and exited only after `ctx.fiber.dispose()` settled. Headless normal completion also awaited that disposal without a bound.
A user then reproduced the headless command hanging immediately after the observation URL and ignoring repeated `Ctrl+C`; `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` removed the hang, while a standalone Node handler in the same Linux sandbox received SIGINT. This isolated the pending disposer to telemetry rather than terminal signal forwarding. OTel's `BatchLogRecordProcessor.shutdown()` awaits `exporter.forceFlush()` before the `exportTimeoutMillis`-bounded completion promise, and the OTLP exporter's `forceFlush()` waits directly on its in-flight HTTP Promise. A proxy/sandbox connection that never obtains a socket can therefore leave provider shutdown pending despite both configured SDK timeouts.

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
默认挂载遥测后,`dsh web` 与 headless 命令(现为 `dsh run`)新增了 SIGINT/SIGTERM 处理器,使进程退出时可以排空 Cordis 插件树,而不是丢弃排队中的遥测数据。每个处理器都使用单向布尔闩锁(latch),并且只有在 `ctx.fiber.dispose()` 结算后才退出。headless 正常完成时同样会无界等待整棵树执行 dispose(资源释放)。
默认挂载遥测后,`dsh web` 与 headless 命令(现为 `dsh --profile headless`)新增了 SIGINT/SIGTERM 处理器,使进程退出时可以排空 Cordis 插件树,而不是丢弃排队中的遥测数据。每个处理器都使用单向布尔闩锁(latch),并且只有在 `ctx.fiber.dispose()` 结算后才退出。headless 正常完成时同样会无界等待整棵树执行 dispose(资源释放)。
随后有用户复现,headless 命令在打印观察 URL 后立即卡死,重复按 `Ctrl+C` 也没有反应;设置 `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` 后不再卡死,而同一 Linux 沙箱中的独立 Node 信号处理器能够收到 SIGINT。这将待结算的 disposer 定位到遥测,而非终端信号转发。OTel 的 `BatchLogRecordProcessor.shutdown()` 会先等待 `exporter.forceFlush()`,再进入受 `exportTimeoutMillis` 限制的完成 promise;OTLP 导出器的 `forceFlush()` 则直接等待正在进行的 HTTP Promise。因此,代理/沙箱连接始终无法取得 socket 时,即使已经配置两项 SDK 超时,也会让提供方关闭一直待结算。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md
2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md: 2063b99a7b0ca34f434b3e56628f3ce765d90d81
2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.zh.md: 71d4a8e9fc060f8c96483b22641fd67ee1f71c08
2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.md: ccc96d6c998c4ab958a7eea1e502d036d16ec90d
2026-08-04-claude-code-and-codex-subagent-backends.zh.md: 740eeb633e336d5b01cb0b84fb656612e690959d

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The product integrations must not become second owners for task text, cwd, cance
## Decision
The harness publishes two sibling one-shot providers as independently installable, opt-in packages. A user loads a provider and the existing common subagent tool in their own `cordis.yml`: `subagent_codex` binds `codex`, while `subagent_claude_code` binds `claude-code`. The shipped CLI dependency closure and base, Web, and headless configurations load neither provider. Each tool accepts only a standalone text task; product selection and background execution are not model arguments.
The harness publishes two sibling one-shot provider packages: `codex` and `claude-code`. This note owns their product protocols, result mapping, and process lifecycle; the [shared-profile-host placement decision](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md) supersedes the original opt-in composition placement. Loading either provider starts no product process, and each tool accepts only a standalone text task; product selection and background execution are not model arguments.
Both providers report `inheritsParentContext: false`, advertise no optional start capabilities, and pass the parent Session cwd without copying the parent conversation. Their documented tools disable background execution and use `maxDepth: 'provider-managed'`, leaving recursion policy with the out-of-process product instead of sending a limit the provider cannot enforce. Every call creates a fresh product process and a non-resumable product conversation. The shared subagent service continues to own request resolution, lifecycle events, result settlement, and foreground collection; the shared subprocess service owns credential scrubbing, process-tree termination, and whole-tree exit observation.
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Codex 0.147.0 speaks the Responses protocol, while DeepSeek's public OpenAI-comp
## Claude Code provider
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` registers the fixed `claude-code` provider and invokes `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`. The SDK's platform `optionalDependency` supplies the real Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI. The provider uses the official `query()` entrypoint and passes the SDK's `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` command, arguments, cwd, environment, and forwarded signal unchanged to `dsh-subprocess`; its private `SpawnedProcess` adapter exposes only the stream, event, kill, and exit facts the SDK requires.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` registers the fixed `claude-code` provider and invokes `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`. Before each run, the provider resolves the fixed `claude` name through the host subprocess execution world and passes that exact path as `pathToClaudeCodeExecutable`; the SDK therefore uses the native product that launched DSH rather than selecting its platform `optionalDependency`. A Windows `.cmd` or `.bat` path crosses `cmd.exe /v:off` as a quoted per-spawn environment expansion, so percent, ampersand, and exclamation path components remain data without changing the shared subprocess contract. The provider uses the official `query()` entrypoint and passes the SDK's `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` arguments, cwd, environment, and forwarded signal to `dsh-subprocess`; its private `SpawnedProcess` adapter exposes only the stream, event, kill, and exit facts the SDK requires.
The public configuration contains the same two deployment-owned values as the Codex sibling: an explicit `env` overlay and a positive finite `disposeGraceMs` no greater than the repository's shared `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS`. Each run creates its own `AbortController`, sets `persistSession: false`, and disables `AskUserQuestion`. The provider deliberately omits `settingSources`, so the SDK reads the host's normal user, project, and local Claude settings relative to the parent Session cwd. It neither copies nor filters those settings and does not create or modify login state. It supplies no `canUseTool`, elicitation, or dialog callback, so unattended interactions fail through the SDK rather than waiting for a user interface the provider does not own.
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ The Codex evidence pins `@openai/codex@0.147.0` and `codex-cli 0.147.0`. Its rea
The Codex credentialed e2e registers the production provider, starts the same real app-server, and requests one random nonce through the test-private bridge described above. It fixes the external endpoint and model, stores no credential or request payload, requires exactly one completed upstream response, compares the trimmed product answer byte-for-byte with the nonce, and waits for every managed handle to exit.
The Claude Code evidence pins Agent SDK 0.3.220 and its platform-distributed Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI. Its real-product spec observes the exact `x-api-key`, original task, byte-exact final answer, inherited temporary host-setting marker, process failure, local cancellation, and whole-tree exit. The Loader e2e resolves both product packages by name while neither product command is available and records zero child starts.
The Claude Code evidence pins Agent SDK 0.3.220 and uses its platform-distributed Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI as the deterministic compatibility fixture, routed through the same native executable-resolution path production uses. Its real-product spec observes the exact `x-api-key`, original task, byte-exact final answer, inherited temporary host-setting marker, process failure, local cancellation, whole-tree exit, and a real Windows batch shim under a path containing percent, ampersand, and exclamation metacharacters. This evidence proves the official SDK/CLI integration path, not compatibility with every independently installed product version. The Loader and shipped-profile evidence resolve both product packages by name while starting neither product, and the provider suite proves that the SDK receives the executable resolved from the host `PATH`.
The Claude Code credentialed e2e maps the key and fixed official endpoint only in the provider's in-memory environment, uses the documented `deepseek-v4-pro[1m]` and `deepseek-v4-flash` model variables, and traverses the production provider, official SDK, and real CLI. It compares the trimmed result with a random nonce and proves whole-tree exit without calling the Messages API directly from the test.
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ The project owner's distribution authorization is scoped to the official `@anthr
## Consequences
Users can install either or both product providers, bind stable foreground tools in their own Cordis configuration, and delegate one self-contained task through the existing subagent contract. Official product integrations preserve native settings and behavior while shared services retain the sole ownership of task settlement and process-tree quiescence.
Users delegate through two stable foreground tools backed by the official product integrations. Their Profile placement and per-Preset exposure are owned by the [shared-host placement decision](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md); this note's provider lifecycle keeps native settings and behavior while shared services retain the sole ownership of task settlement and process-tree quiescence.
Every delegation pays for a fresh product process and independent model context, and only final text reaches the parent. Product-native configuration makes behavior depend on the deployment's installed product, account state, and workspace settings. Credentialed e2e runs also spend external API quota and depend on the official DeepSeek endpoint; deterministic protocol, failure, cancellation, and approval coverage remains in the keyless tier. The providers do not resume sessions, stream progress, accept new human interaction, roll back tool or file side effects, or impose a wall-clock timeout.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
harness 将两个一次性兄弟提供方作为可独立安装、选择启用的包交付。用户在自己的 `cordis.yml` 中加载提供方与现有的通用 subagent 工具:`subagent_codex` 绑定 `codex`,`subagent_claude_code` 绑定 `claude-code`。随产品交付的 CLI(命令行界面)依赖闭包,以及基础、Web 与 headless 配置都不会加载任一提供方。每个工具只接受独立文本任务;产品选择与后台执行都不作为模型参数。
harness 交付两个同级的一次性提供方包:`codex` 与 `claude-code`。本说明负责它们的产品协议、结果映射和进程生命周期;[共享 profile 宿主归属决策](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md)取代原先由用户选择启用的组装位置。加载任一提供方都不会启动产品进程,而且每个工具只接受独立文本任务;产品选择与后台执行都不作为模型参数。
这两个提供方都报告 `inheritsParentContext: false`,不声明任何可选的启动能力,并传递父会话 cwd,但不会复制父级对话。文档所示的工具会禁用后台执行,并使用 `maxDepth: 'provider-managed'`,将递归策略留给进程外产品,而不是发送提供方无法强制执行的限制。每次调用都会创建一个全新的产品进程和一次不可续接的产品对话。共享 subagent 服务继续负责请求解析、生命周期事件、结果结算和前台收集;共享子进程服务负责凭证清洗、进程树终止以及整棵进程树的退出观测。
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Codex 0.147.0 使用 Responses 协议,而 DeepSeek 的公开 OpenAI 兼容端
## Claude Code 提供方
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` 注册固定的 `claude-code` 提供方,并调用 `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`。SDK 的平台 `optionalDependency` 提供真实的 Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI。提供方使用官方 `query()` 入口点,并将 SDK 的 `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` 命令、参数、cwd、环境和转发的信号原样传入 `dsh-subprocess`;其私有 `SpawnedProcess` 适配器只公开 SDK 所需的流、事件、终止和退出事实。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-claude-code` 注册固定的 `claude-code` 提供方,并调用 `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk@0.3.220`。每次运行前,提供方经宿主 subprocess 执行世界解析固定名称 `claude`,并把准确路径作为 `pathToClaudeCodeExecutable` 交给 SDK;SDK 因此使用启动 DSH 的原生产品,而不是选择自身的 platform `optionalDependency`。Windows `.cmd` 或 `.bat` 路径会作为带引号、仅供本次 spawn 使用的环境展开值穿过 `cmd.exe /v:off`,因此路径中的百分号、与号和感叹号仍只是数据,且无需改变共享子进程约定。提供方使用官方 `query()` 入口点,并将 SDK 的 `spawnClaudeCodeProcess` 参数、cwd、环境和转发的信号交给 `dsh-subprocess`;其私有 `SpawnedProcess` 适配器只公开 SDK 所需的流、事件、终止和退出事实。
公开配置包含与 Codex 兄弟提供方相同、由部署方负责的两个值:显式的 `env` 覆盖项,以及须为正有限值且不得大于仓库共享 `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS` 的 `disposeGraceMs`。每次运行都会创建自己的 `AbortController`,设置 `persistSession: false` 并禁用 `AskUserQuestion`。提供方故意省略 `settingSources`,因此 SDK 会相对于父会话 cwd 读取宿主机常规的用户、项目和本地 Claude 设置。它既不复制也不过滤这些设置,也不会创建或修改登录状态。提供方不设置 `canUseTool`、elicitation 或对话回调,因此无人值守交互会经 SDK 失败,而不会等待本提供方不负责的用户界面。
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Codex 证据锁定 `@openai/codex@0.147.0` 与 `codex-cli 0.147.0`。其真实
带密钥 Codex e2e 会注册生产提供方,启动同样的真实 app-server,并通过上述测试专用桥接层请求一个随机数。该测试固定外部端点与模型,不存储任何凭据或请求载荷,要求上游恰好完成一次响应,将去除首尾空白后的产品答案与该随机数逐字节比较,并等待所有受管句柄退出。
Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220 及其平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI。其真实产品测试会观测确切的 `x-api-key`、原始任务、逐字节完全一致的最终回答、继承的临时宿主设置标记、进程失败、本地取消以及整棵进程树退出。Loader e2e 会在两个产品命令均不可用时按名称解析两个产品包,并记录零次子级启动。
Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220,并使用 SDK 按平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1.220 CLI 作为确定性兼容性 fixture(测试前置数据),且该 fixture 经生产环境所用的同一原生可执行文件解析路径运行。其真实产品测试会观测确切的 `x-api-key`、原始任务、逐字节完全一致的最终回答、继承的临时宿主设置标记、进程失败、本地取消、整棵进程树退出,以及位于同时含百分号、与号和感叹号路径中的真实 Windows batch shim。这项证据证明官方 SDK/CLI 集成路径,而不证明它与每个独立安装的产品版本兼容。Loader 与随附 profile 证据会按名称解析两个产品包且不启动产品,provider 测试则证明 SDK 收到由宿主 `PATH` 解析出的可执行文件。
带密钥 Claude Code e2e 仅在提供方的内存环境中映射密钥与固定的官方端点,把模型变量设为文档所示的 `deepseek-v4-pro[1m]` 与 `deepseek-v4-flash`,并实际经过生产提供方、官方 SDK 与真实 CLI。它将去除首尾空白后的结果与一个随机数比较,并证明整棵进程树退出,且测试不会直接调用 Messages API。
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220 及其平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1
**面向模型的产品选择器。** 产品可用性和身份验证属于部署事实。两个固定工具使各自的 schema 与提供方绑定保持明确,也避免在通用服务中添加动态选择状态。
**以产品替身作为强制证据。** 替身可以穷尽覆盖私有协议分支,但无法证明包导出、官方发行版、身份验证或真实进程行为。强制证据会驱动每个官方产品连接回环模型 fixture(测试前置数据)。
**以产品替身作为强制证据。** 替身可以穷尽覆盖私有协议分支,但无法证明包导出、官方发行版、身份验证或真实进程行为。强制证据会驱动每个官方产品连接回环模型 fixture。
**由插件管理登录、产品主目录、模型、设置或权限。** 这些选择会在每个产品的原生配置之外建立另一套权威来源,并将一次性提供方扩张为账户管理功能。提供方只公开显式环境覆盖项和清理宽限期;无人值守交互会以默认拒绝方式失败。
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Claude Code 证据锁定 Agent SDK 0.3.220 及其平台分发的 Claude Code 2.1
## 后果
用户可以安装任一或两个产品提供方,在自己的 Cordis 配置中绑定稳定的前台工具,并通过现有 subagent 约定委派一项自包含任务。官方产品集成会保留原生设置与行为,而共享服务继续独占任务结算与进程树完全停稳的责任。
用户通过官方产品集成支持的两个稳定前台工具进行委派。它们在 Profile 中的归属和按 Preset 暴露方式由[共享宿主归属决策](../architecture/2026-08-10-product-subagent-providers-in-shared-host.md)负责;本说明规定的提供方生命周期会保留原生设置与行为,而共享服务继续独占任务结算与进程树完全停稳的责任。
每次委派都要承担新建产品进程和独立模型上下文的开销,且只有最终文本会到达父级。产品原生配置使行为取决于部署环境中安装的产品、账户状态和工作区设置。带密钥 e2e 运行还会消耗外部 API 配额,并依赖 DeepSeek 官方端点;对协议、失败、取消与审批的确定性覆盖仍由无密钥层级承担。提供方不会恢复会话、以流式方式传送进度、接受新的人工交互、回滚工具或文件副作用,也不会施加按实际经过时间触发的超时。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md: 256e626f4ff41016d0227eef7cc3e4e51e15058b
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.zh.md: 013135eff5d1dbbc570561e70c751ff4de289989
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md: 23fcb90599c2ff96cd7ac0e6f7ee8fd508a6d1ad
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.zh.md: 7aabf5612a54245327da9af804f745237472cb88

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ The stdio and Echo agents are removed without compatibility packages, modes, com
The remaining application roles are explicit:
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` owns terminal-interactive execution. It rejects non-TTY streams before Loader boot; `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus the `tui.cordis.yml` overlay own the complete coding composition, with PTY plus terminal-snapshot coverage in `apps/cli/tests/`.
- [`dsh run`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) owns non-interactive execution. Its `headless` profile is the product composition; `examples/headless-agent` owns replay snapshots, generic real-agent suites, and an unexported keyless Loader driver.
- [`dsh --profile headless`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) owns non-interactive execution. Its `headless` profile is the product composition; `examples/headless-agent` owns replay snapshots, generic real-agent suites, and an unexported keyless Loader driver.
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md) and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` own their framed protocol integrations.
The SDK project model and create/config workflows replace the `stdio` run-interface option with `tui`; generated TUI projects compose `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` and create or resume one exact session. Repository-facing demo documentation requires a DeepSeek API key and leads with the real Headless or TUI agents.
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Keyless validation is test-owned. The Headless Loader smoke uses a fixture adapt
TUI and Headless Loader coverage run the real app packages in source and built modes. PTY-driven subprocess coverage is reserved for the TUI lifecycle; other entry-point smokes use the one-shot pipe protocol. Headless proves its task/result and tool-call contracts. Generated graphs and repository searches reject stale package, command, leaf, SDK-interface, `createStdioChat`, and `StdioRuntime` references.
The built `dsh` bin rejects a piped TUI launch before Loader boot and points at `dsh run`; `apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` pins the product one-shot entry under plain Node, including output and invalid arguments. `examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts` pins product persistence, while `apps/cli/tests/headless-shutdown.e2e.ts` owns bounded signal escalation. The headless example's test-only JSONL driver preserves assembled canonical-event snapshots without creating a second CLI contract. Code Mode has programmatic TUI snapshots and an ACP overlay demo. Time-context integration uses the explicit Headless test composition for two ordered turns, while its package tests own finer elapsed-time behavior.
The built `dsh` bin rejects a piped TUI launch before Loader boot and points at `dsh --profile headless`; `apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` pins the product one-shot entry under plain Node, including output and invalid arguments. `examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts` pins product persistence, while `apps/cli/tests/headless-shutdown.e2e.ts` owns bounded signal escalation. The headless example's test-only JSONL driver preserves assembled canonical-event snapshots without creating a second CLI contract. Code Mode has programmatic TUI snapshots and an ACP overlay demo. Time-context integration uses the explicit Headless test composition for two ordered turns, while its package tests own finer elapsed-time behavior.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ DeepSeek Harness 在 TUI 和 Headless coding agent 之外,还提供了两个
保留的应用角色均有明确归属:
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` 负责终端交互式执行。它会在 Loader 启动前拒绝非 TTY 流;`apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `tui.cordis.yml` overlay 拥有完整 coding 组装,PTY 与终端快照覆盖则位于 `apps/cli/tests/`。
- [`dsh run`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) 负责非交互式执行。其 `headless` profile 是产品组装;`examples/headless-agent` 负责回放快照、通用真实 agent 测试套件和未导出的无密钥 Loader driver。
- [`dsh --profile headless`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) 负责非交互式执行。其 `headless` profile 是产品组装;`examples/headless-agent` 负责回放快照、通用真实 agent 测试套件和未导出的无密钥 Loader driver。
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md) 和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` 负责各自的分帧协议集成。
SDK 工程模型与 create/config 工作流将 `stdio` 运行接口选项替换为 `tui`;生成的 TUI 工程组合 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`,并创建或恢复一个确切会话。仓库中的演示文档要求 DeepSeek API key,并优先引导到真实的 Headless 或 TUI agent。
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ SDK 工程模型与 create/config 工作流将 `stdio` 运行接口选项替换
TUI 与 Headless 的 Loader 覆盖以源码和构建产物两种模式运行真实 app 包。由 PTY 驱动的子进程覆盖仅用于 TUI 生命周期;其他入口冒烟测试使用单次管道协议。Headless 验证任务/结果约定和工具调用约定。生成图谱与仓库搜索会拒绝陈旧的包、命令、叶节点、SDK 接口、`createStdioChat` 和 `StdioRuntime` 引用。
构建后的 `dsh` 可执行文件会在 Loader 启动前拒绝通过管道启动 TUI,并指向 `dsh run`;`apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` 在普通 Node 下固定产品的一次性入口,包括输出和无效参数。`examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts` 固定产品持久化,`apps/cli/tests/headless-shutdown.e2e.ts` 则负责有界信号升级。headless 示例仅供测试的 JSONL driver 保留组装后的规范事件快照,而不会创建第二套 CLI(命令行界面)约定。Code Mode 由程序化 TUI 快照与 ACP overlay demo 覆盖。时间上下文集成通过显式的 Headless 测试组装执行两个有序轮次,而更细粒度的耗时行为由时间上下文的包级测试负责。
构建后的 `dsh` 可执行文件会在 Loader 启动前拒绝通过管道启动 TUI,并指向 `dsh --profile headless`;`apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` 在普通 Node 下固定产品的一次性入口,包括输出和无效参数。`examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts` 固定产品持久化,`apps/cli/tests/headless-shutdown.e2e.ts` 则负责有界信号升级。headless 示例仅供测试的 JSONL driver 保留组装后的规范事件快照,而不会创建第二套 CLI(命令行界面)约定。Code Mode 由程序化 TUI 快照与 ACP overlay demo 覆盖。时间上下文集成通过显式的 Headless 测试组装执行两个有序轮次,而更细粒度的耗时行为由时间上下文的包级测试负责。
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.md
2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.md: 403e01f94c976d2d17eb391830721b31675cd6a9
2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.zh.md: 7f11e0c17a15454b99b32d14ea6eda177f4b01f6
2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.md: 31879e8284daf5f34af6731b09fce743f9eb5391
2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.zh.md: d4dfef1ba8c4d27cd667e319519cfa1ace74baef

View File

@@ -6,29 +6,29 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.zh.md)
## Problem
After [`dsh run`](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) became the product one-shot command, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` remained a second application package for the same job. It carried another executable, argument grammar, app composition, cancellation lifecycle, text/JSON/stream-JSON output contract, built artifact, documentation surface, and test suite. The two entry points also assembled different trees, so a successful demo did not prove the shipped `headless` profile and users had to choose between overlapping commands.
After [`dsh --profile headless`](../architecture/2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md) became the product one-shot command, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` remained a second application package for the same job. It carried another executable, argument grammar, app composition, cancellation lifecycle, text/JSON/stream-JSON output contract, built artifact, documentation surface, and test suite. The two entry points also assembled different trees, so a successful demo did not prove the shipped `headless` profile and users had to choose between overlapping commands.
The replay suites still need canonical session events to pin assembled backend behavior. That testing need does not require a published command or compatibility contract.
## Decision
Delete `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` completely: its package, bin, parser, app plugin, output formats, tests, workspace references, generated-catalog entries, and active documentation. No alias or compatibility package remains. The root `demo:headless` script is retained only as a direct alias of `dsh run`; the product command owns final-text stdout, the observation URL on stderr, persistence, exit status, and shutdown.
Delete `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` completely: its package, bin, parser, app plugin, output formats, tests, workspace references, generated-catalog entries, and active documentation. No alias or compatibility package remains. The root `demo:headless` script is retained only as a direct alias of `dsh --profile headless`; the product command owns final-text stdout, failure diagnostics on stderr, persistence, exit status, and shutdown.
`examples/headless-agent` becomes an explicit test composition. Its Loader configs mount `@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`, one root agent, JSONL persistence, and checkpoint policy as separate rows instead of hiding them behind an app bundle. The support-tier `@deepseek-ai/dsh-loader-smoke` package owns the shared direct-agent turn helper; unexported example-local drivers select their Loader configuration and render canonical events as JSONL. They are launched only by tests, have no bin, and do not define a supported product output format.
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep `dsh-cli-demo` as an alias or wrapper around `dsh run`.** Rejected because a second bin and package would preserve two discoverable owners without adding capability.
- **Move JSON and stream-JSON flags onto `dsh run`.** Rejected because no current product consumer requires them; adopting the old demo protocol would enlarge the canonical CLI contract solely to save test machinery.
- **Keep `dsh-cli-demo` as an alias or wrapper around `dsh --profile headless`.** Rejected because a second bin and package would preserve two discoverable owners without adding capability.
- **Move JSON and stream-JSON flags onto `dsh --profile headless`.** Rejected because no current product consumer requires them; adopting the old demo protocol would enlarge the canonical CLI contract solely to save test machinery.
- **Delete the canonical-event snapshots with the package.** Rejected because they pin model-visible assembled behavior that final-text product acceptance cannot observe.
- **Keep the app plugin but delete only its bin.** Rejected because the hidden composition would still duplicate the explicit headless profile and conceal which services the test leaf mounts.
## Consequences
This is intentionally breaking. `dsh-cli-demo`, its `--output-format` choices, and imports from `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo/src/cli.ts` no longer resolve. There is no public event-stream replacement in this change; callers use `dsh run` for one-shot execution and must choose an existing protocol surface when they need structured automation.
This is intentionally breaking. `dsh-cli-demo`, its `--output-format` choices, and imports from `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo/src/cli.ts` no longer resolve. There is no public event-stream replacement in this change; callers use `dsh --profile headless` for one-shot execution and must choose an existing protocol surface when they need structured automation.
The repository retains backend replay coverage through test-only infrastructure, while product smoke and built-bin acceptance exercise `dsh run`. A separate one-shot package may return only if it owns a genuinely independent, versioned protocol that cannot belong to the product launcher; a second spelling or output shim is not enough.
The repository retains backend replay coverage through test-only infrastructure, while product smoke and built-bin acceptance exercise `dsh --profile headless`. A separate one-shot package may return only if it owns a genuinely independent, versioned protocol that cannot belong to the product launcher; a second spelling or output shim is not enough.
## Verification
Focused Loader smokes cover the explicit composition in source and plain-Node built modes, snapshot tests diff its canonical JSONL and persisted logs, product acceptance covers `dsh run`, and documentation plus generated graph/catalog gates reject live references to the removed package. The frozen Agent Note archive remains historical evidence and is not rewritten.
Focused Loader smokes cover the explicit composition in source and plain-Node built modes, snapshot tests diff its canonical JSONL and persisted logs, product acceptance covers `dsh --profile headless`, and documentation plus generated graph/catalog gates reject live references to the removed package. The frozen Agent Note archive remains historical evidence and is not rewritten.

View File

@@ -6,29 +6,29 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
在 [`dsh run`](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) 成为产品的一次性命令后,`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` 仍是承担同一工作的第二个应用包。它另行拥有一套可执行文件、参数语法、应用组装、取消生命周期、文本/JSON/stream-JSON 输出约定、构建产物、配套文档和测试套件。两个入口组装的树也不相同,因此 demo 成功不能证明已交付的 `headless` profile 可用,用户还必须在功能重叠的命令之间作出选择。
在 [`dsh --profile headless`](../architecture/2026-08-06-app-owned-command-line.md) 成为产品的一次性命令后,`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` 仍是承担同一工作的第二个应用包。它另行拥有一套可执行文件、参数语法、应用组装、取消生命周期、文本/JSON/stream-JSON 输出约定、构建产物、配套文档和测试套件。两个入口组装的树也不相同,因此 demo 成功不能证明已交付的 `headless` profile 可用,用户还必须在功能重叠的命令之间作出选择。
回放套件仍需要规范会话事件来固定组装后的后端行为。这一测试需求不需要已发布命令或兼容性约定。
## 决策
彻底删除 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`:包括它的包、bin、解析器、应用插件、输出格式、测试、workspace 引用、生成目录条目和现行文档。不保留别名或兼容包。根目录的 `demo:headless` 脚本仅作为 `dsh run` 的直接别名保留;stdout 上的最终文本、stderr 上的观察 URL、持久化、退出状态和关闭行为均由产品命令负责。
彻底删除 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`:包括它的包、bin、解析器、应用插件、输出格式、测试、workspace 引用、生成目录条目和现行文档。不保留别名或兼容包。根目录的 `demo:headless` 脚本仅作为 `dsh --profile headless` 的直接别名保留;stdout 上的最终文本、stderr 上的失败诊断、持久化、退出状态和关闭行为均由产品命令负责。
`examples/headless-agent` 成为显式测试组装。其 Loader 配置把 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`、一个根 agent(智能体)、JSONL 持久化和检查点策略挂载为独立配置行,不再将其隐藏在应用组合包之后。支持层的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-loader-smoke` 包负责共享的直接 agent 轮次 helper;未导出的示例本地 driver 选择各自的 Loader 配置,并将规范事件渲染为 JSONL。这些 driver 只由测试启动,不提供 bin,也不定义受支持的产品输出格式。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **保留 `dsh-cli-demo` 作为 `dsh run` 的别名或包装层。** 不予采纳:第二个 bin 和包会让同一功能继续存在两个可发现的归属方,却没有增加任何能力。
- **把 JSON 和 stream-JSON 标志移到 `dsh run`。** 不予采纳:当前没有产品消费方需要这些标志;沿用旧 demo 协议,只会为了保留测试机制而扩大规范 CLI(命令行界面)约定。
- **保留 `dsh-cli-demo` 作为 `dsh --profile headless` 的别名或包装层。** 不予采纳:第二个 bin 和包会让同一功能继续存在两个可发现的归属方,却没有增加任何能力。
- **把 JSON 和 stream-JSON 标志移到 `dsh --profile headless`。** 不予采纳:当前没有产品消费方需要这些标志;沿用旧 demo 协议,只会为了保留测试机制而扩大规范 CLI(命令行界面)约定。
- **随包一并删除规范事件快照。** 不予采纳:这些快照固定了模型可见的组装行为,而只检查最终文本的产品验收无法观察这些行为。
- **保留应用插件,只删除它的 bin。** 不予采纳:隐藏的组装仍会重复显式的 headless profile,并掩盖测试叶节点挂载了哪些服务。
## 后果
这是有意为之的破坏性变更。`dsh-cli-demo`、它的 `--output-format` 选项以及对 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo/src/cli.ts` 的导入都不再可解析。本变更不提供公开的事件流替代接口;调用方使用 `dsh run` 执行一次性任务,需要结构化自动化时则必须选择现有的协议接口。
这是有意为之的破坏性变更。`dsh-cli-demo`、它的 `--output-format` 选项以及对 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo/src/cli.ts` 的导入都不再可解析。本变更不提供公开的事件流替代接口;调用方使用 `dsh --profile headless` 执行一次性任务,需要结构化自动化时则必须选择现有的协议接口。
仓库通过仅供测试的基础设施保留后端回放覆盖,产品冒烟测试和 built-bin 验收则运行 `dsh run`。只有当独立的一次性包负责一套真正独立、带版本且不能归产品启动器所有的协议时,它才可以重新引入;第二种命令写法或输出 shim 并不足以构成理由。
仓库通过仅供测试的基础设施保留后端回放覆盖,产品冒烟测试和 built-bin 验收则运行 `dsh --profile headless`。只有当独立的一次性包负责一套真正独立、带版本且不能归产品启动器所有的协议时,它才可以重新引入;第二种命令写法或输出 shim 并不足以构成理由。
## 验证
聚焦的 Loader 冒烟测试在源码模式和由普通 Node 启动的构建模式下覆盖显式组装,快照测试对比其规范 JSONL 和持久化日志,产品验收覆盖 `dsh run`,文档检查及生成图谱/目录门禁则拒绝对已移除包的活跃引用。冻结的 Agent Note 归档保留为历史证据,不会被重写。
聚焦的 Loader 冒烟测试在源码模式和由普通 Node 启动的构建模式下覆盖显式组装,快照测试对比其规范 JSONL 和持久化日志,产品验收覆盖 `dsh --profile headless`,文档检查及生成图谱/目录门禁则拒绝对已移除包的活跃引用。冻结的 Agent Note 归档保留为历史证据,不会被重写。