fix(i18n): resolve pairing workflow review findings
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 1e96622e7fb5694ab61772d68744394ef1aeb53a
|
||||
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: c752d76f12f556ce190bf80c4f3a531c0821be8e
|
||||
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 68c0f3bbc0472b0c96f9d64fc6b1b24ac7008795
|
||||
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: f93e3220fef720805c52023841f6f56f9e2834cf
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outsid
|
||||
|
||||
- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md).
|
||||
- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.
|
||||
- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), and excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
|
||||
- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired, and date-named documents on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
|
||||
- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
@@ -34,5 +34,5 @@ Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech conv
|
||||
- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, "who confirmed these consistent, and when" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.
|
||||
- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.
|
||||
- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.
|
||||
- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR. New documents are the exception — a date-named document dated on/after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff merges bilingual or not at all, so the backlog only ever shrinks.
|
||||
- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR. A date-named document dated on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff merges bilingual or not at all, so new date-named RFCs do not enlarge that backlog.
|
||||
- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
- **配对兄弟文件,两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成:英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`,以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典:一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文,反之亦可;约束配对的是:两侧必须表达相同的内容,且配对整体合并(两种语言加记录,绝不单独落一侧)。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md);翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md);术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md)。
|
||||
- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash,使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对,都能被机械检测出来(纯内容比较,无需查询历史),而且同一个 PR 内改动的文件也能计算出 hash,commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录(`verify-translation-pairing --write`)会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff:确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。
|
||||
- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts))强制执行以下规则:required 的配对必须存在;任何已存在的配对必须完整(三个文件齐全)且一致(两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致);被排除的文件(生成物或本身即双语的)保持不配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退:每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中,覆盖面只增不减。
|
||||
- **翻译是 agent 的工作,由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md),与 [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同:skill 承载工作流,并将文档作为真源。
|
||||
- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts))强制执行以下规则:required 的配对必须存在;任何已存在的配对必须完整(三个文件齐全)且一致(两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致);被排除的文件(生成物或本身即双语的)保持不配对;日期等于或晚于 manifest(元数据清单)中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档必须具有完整配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退:每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中,覆盖面只增不减。
|
||||
- **翻译是 agent 的工作,由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md),与 [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同:skill(技能)承载工作流,并将文档作为真源。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,5 +34,5 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入(`--write`),代价是目录噪音而非维护负担;换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。
|
||||
- 两侧说法冲突时,没有机械规则裁决谁赢,由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价,且是有意接受的:另一个选项(正典语言)会禁止中文先行撰写。
|
||||
- 生成文档(`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`)暂被排除;计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文,届时将这些文件移出排除清单。
|
||||
- 推进天然是渐进的:`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog(`--list`),而非红色的 CI;因此配对按可评审的批次落地,无需一个巨型 PR。
|
||||
- 推进天然是渐进的:`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog(待翻清单,`--list`),而非红色的 CI;因此配对按可评审的批次落地,无需一个巨型 PR。日期等于或晚于 manifest 中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档必须配齐双语文件,因此新增的日期命名 RFC 不会扩大这份 backlog。
|
||||
- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具(`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本,用于基于 diff 的最小更新),因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user