Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into fix/pty-raw-ready-wait

master already stabilized the raw-mode SIGINT scenario in 65e0ffe03 and
3be090f1d with wider scenario-owned bounds and deliberately delayed child
readiness, so the merge takes master's test implementation. What this branch
keeps is the contract that explains why those bounds are required: the note
paragraph on the settle boundary in PtySendOperation.append, and the
waitForOutput comment recording that raising its deadline alone cannot
recover output the send never collected.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: df1bee2801b0e01b290b63f6edbe2e5b1be80cb7
-2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: 7fa5cb2aad2b32ef0662df04ff6576be14a3a8e7
+2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: 760373d64f462e3717a174d5793e6d47ab76b0b4
+2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: fd29e6049e6a729c2c7e78860ad7c065422da60e

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The harness gives the model bash and subagent tools but no way to record a struc
 
 ## Decision
 
-Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event; the TUI folds it directly, while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
+Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event: the TUI folds it directly, the web client projects it into `ConversationSnapshot.todos` ([web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)), while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
 
 ### Whole-list replace, three-state status
 
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The model sends the entire list every call; the new list replaces the old (last-
 
 ### State on the session log, not a service
 
-The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that.
+The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
 
 ### NOT a surface event
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具，却没有办法记录结
 
 ## 决策
 
-新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具，其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染；TUI 直接折叠它，而[仅面向自动化的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
+新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具，其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染：TUI 直接折叠它，web 客户端将其投影进 `ConversationSnapshot.todos`（[web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)），而[仅面向自动化的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
 
 ### 整列表替换，三态 status
 
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具，却没有办法记录结
 
 ### 状态在会话日志上，而非服务
 
-列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志，携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM（大语言模型）历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建：重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表，无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。
+列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志，携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM（大语言模型）历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建：重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表，无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。（全量 log 消费者直接获得这份重建；web 客户端的分页窗口则从尾页 history 携带的 host 计算投影获得——见 [web todo 展示 Note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)。）
 
 ### 不是 surface 事件
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 723ef170188dc11da24e049a1e2838fb240d0a17
-2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: a8c7743bb3d499fb58f507ea2c202b44efe2311d
+2026-07-06-sandbox.md: c6883873192f15ba2982436e156d8795396c0148
+2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: d84df9b06b15dd296801073d381603f34cfd2878

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Each phase gets its full design when picked up, validated against the code at th
 
 - **Second consumer** — `subagent-acp` optionally confines child agents (per-call policy; unconfined default — a child agent must write its own persistence).
 - **More environments** — an environment-coherent capability group example (e.g. bash+fs against one container).
-- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect and denial/runner-failure signatures.
+- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect and denial/runner-failure signatures. Wrapping the third-party landstrip runner instead was [considered and rejected](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md) — not battle-tested enough for a security invariant.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行，因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
 
 - **第二个消费方**——`subagent-acp` 可选地约束子 agent（按调用策略；默认无约束——子 agent 必须写入自己的持久化）。
 - **更多环境**——环境一致的能力组示例（如 bash+fs 对一个容器）。
-- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空（失败关闭）；填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner，从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付，加上其 profile 方言和拒绝/runner 失败签名。
+- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空（失败关闭）；填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner，从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付，加上其 profile 方言和拒绝/runner 失败签名。改为包装第三方 landstrip runner 的方案[经考虑后已驳回](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md)——对安全不变式而言，它还远未经过实战检验。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md
-2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: 72d903828f8152009a2dd3433d4f7c86b7382ba6
-2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 27dce02618ab7908f38a6b613c109fcbb4b3854c
+2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: 43c87bb159cfe1ab9f8d3a80c2adf25a57ae6e3b
+2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 8afc2103447cc58b1fcbc1062b9564e8ed643477

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md

@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ The package ships concise tool guidance explaining persistent state, owner isola
 
 - Per-file coverage pins owner fencing, concurrent reservations, unpublished-spawn cancellation and awaited teardown, sandbox-mode change rejection, retriable lifecycle cleanup, readiness tiers, sanitizer carry state, complete UTF-8 bounds, task integration, schemas, and exact render intents.
 - Linux process fixtures cover non-leader and non-main-thread stdin waits, zombie quiescence, unreadable process state, supported syscall tables, unsupported architectures, and false-positive rejection; macOS inspector logic is injected into the same unit suite.
-- Real `node-pty` tests exercise shell state, shared sandbox policy, environment scrubbing, raw-mode foreground `SIGINT`, a TERM-ignoring descendant, and immediate post-disposal quiescence on supported hosts.
+- Real `node-pty` tests exercise shell state, shared sandbox policy, environment scrubbing, raw-mode foreground `SIGINT` after deliberately delayed child readiness under scenario-owned timing bounds, a TERM-ignoring descendant, and immediate post-disposal quiescence on supported hosts.
 - A Loader-driven `cordis.yml` test mounts the real three-package composition. ACP and headless snapshots pin the six schemas, bounded results, and errors through opt-in overlays; TUI snapshots pin terminal and generic card presentation.
 - Package contracts, the architecture map, core data structures, generated catalogs, and the website API describe the same shipped surface.
 - The repository CI-equivalent sequence owns type, lint, coverage, snapshot, documentation, build, hygiene, demo, and built-entry verification.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md

@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ plugins:
 
 - 每文件覆盖率固定 owner 隔离、并发预留、未发布 spawn 的取消与等待式 teardown、沙箱模式变更拒绝、可重试的生命周期清理、就绪层级、sanitizer carry state、完整 UTF-8 结果上限、task 集成、schema 和精确 render intent。
 - Linux 进程 fixture 覆盖非 leader 与非主线程的 stdin 等待、僵尸进程静止性、不可读进程状态、受支持的 syscall 表、不支持的架构和误报拒绝；同一单元测试套件通过注入覆盖 macOS 检查器逻辑。
-- 真实 `node-pty` 测试在受支持宿主上覆盖 shell 状态、共享沙箱策略、环境清洗、raw mode 下的前台 `SIGINT`、忽略 `SIGTERM` 的子进程，以及 dispose 返回后立即静默。
+- 真实 `node-pty` 测试在受支持宿主上覆盖 shell 状态、共享沙箱策略、环境清洗、在由场景掌控的时间界限内先有意延迟子进程就绪，再对 raw mode 前台进程发送 `SIGINT`、忽略 `SIGTERM` 的子进程，以及 dispose 返回后立即完全停稳。
 - Loader 驱动的 `cordis.yml` 测试挂载真实三包组合。ACP 与 headless 快照通过 opt-in overlay 固定 6 个 schema、有界结果和错误；TUI 快照固定 terminal 与 generic 卡片展示。
 - 包契约、架构图、核心数据结构、生成目录和 website API 描述同一个已发布接口。
 - 仓库 CI 等价序列负责类型、lint、覆盖率、快照、文档、构建、hygiene、demo 和 built-entry 验证。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md: aac67ffec89606d04d5abfd233d0469e2241b102
-2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md: 0f64e2ce14b18d315f75913b82c731e77758e377
+2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md: 8d7c7b00c8d9b15ea3f2419ed44ca88209e60dad
+2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md: 49e9541c9f98c9f3beba11945ff452fc38bd9ede

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ The selected front door receives the exact generated or resumed `SessionId` used
 
 The TUI rebuilds the transcript from the active `session.surface` and reprojects it whenever an event carries a `surfaceOp`, so resumed and compacted history matches the model-visible conversation. It renders Markdown text and reasoning, token totals, the latest `todo/write` plan, and tool cards produced through each tool definition's `presentCall` and `presentResult` methods. Long card bodies retain a configurable head/tail preview with the hidden-line count; one terminal control expands or collapses every card. Pending chunks and tool calls update the same components that completed events settle.
 
-Editor input calls `agent.send()` while idle and `agent.steer()` while a turn is running. Cancellation, reasoning visibility, tool-card expansion, redraw, transcript clearing, and exit are terminal-only controls. The idle footer derives context occupancy from `tokenMeter` and shows the selected model; during a run, elapsed activity and the Escape interrupt hint replace that summary. `/status` remains available in either state and appends a detailed terminal-only snapshot: session identity and timestamps, selected model and reasoning visibility, lifecycle counts folded from the event log, the same deduplicated usage buckets and KV-cache rate as the footer, and context use from `tokenMeter` plus the selected model's advertised capacity. The plugin registers the shared `userInteraction` provider and presents queued questions in a wide bottom-left keyboard panel with batch progress, numbered options, and aligned descriptions; agent behavior and answer logging remain owned by their existing services.
+Editor input calls `agent.send()` while idle and `agent.steer()` while a turn is running. Cancellation, reasoning visibility, tool-card expansion, redraw, transcript clearing, and exit are terminal-only controls. The idle footer derives context occupancy from `tokenMeter` and shows the selected model and explicit reasoning effort; during a run, elapsed activity and the Escape interrupt hint replace that summary. `/status` remains available in either state and appends a detailed terminal-only snapshot: session identity and timestamps, selected model, reasoning effort/default state and reasoning visibility, lifecycle counts folded from the event log, the same deduplicated usage buckets and KV-cache rate as the footer, and context use from `tokenMeter` plus the selected model's advertised capacity. The plugin registers the shared `userInteraction` provider and presents queued questions in a wide bottom-left keyboard panel with batch progress, numbered options, and aligned descriptions; agent behavior and answer logging remain owned by their existing services.
 
-The `/model` command presents the advisory `ctx.llm` catalog as a keyboard selector and changes only this TUI session's target; argument forms remain available for direct selection. Agent-scoped prompt-assembly and request waterfalls snapshot one provider/model pair per step, so `{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` interpolation and request routing cannot split when a command arrives during assembly. The latest logged request header restores a used target; a selection that never reaches a request remains process-local.
+The `/model` command presents the advisory `ctx.llm` catalog as a keyboard selector and changes only this TUI session's target; argument forms remain available for direct selection. Each model row owns the adapter-advertised reasoning-effort order and default: Shift+Tab cycles that row's efforts, includes provider-default behavior when the adapter advertises no default, and leaves models without selectable metadata unchanged. Agent-scoped prompt-assembly and request waterfalls snapshot one provider/model/reasoning-effort target per step, so `{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` interpolation and request routing cannot split when a command arrives during assembly. The latest logged request header restores a used target; a selection that never reaches a request remains process-local.
 
 ### Terminal ownership
 
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ The implemented [TUI terminal-state snapshot Agent Note](../testing/2026-07-18-t
 - The TUI carries a pi-tui dependency and a strict TTY requirement; non-TTY deployments use the Headless app or a structured protocol.
 - Session projection makes resume and compaction consistent with the durable conversation, but one configured session owns the transcript and editor.
 - Tool packages extend terminal cards through their existing presentation methods without adding tool-specific branches to the TUI.
-- Model selection uses adapter-advertised metadata without turning catalog membership into request validation; unused selections are not durable state.
+- Model and reasoning-effort selection use adapter-advertised metadata without turning catalog membership into request validation; unused selections are not durable state.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ DeepSeek Harness 将 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`](../../../../packages/ui/tui/README
 
 TUI 从活跃的 `session.surface` 重建 transcript（文本记录），并在事件携带 `surfaceOp` 时重新投影，因此恢复或压缩后的历史与模型可见会话保持一致。TUI 渲染 Markdown 文本与推理、token 用量、最新 `todo/write` 计划，以及各工具定义通过 `presentCall` 和 `presentResult` 方法生成的工具卡片。较长的工具卡片正文会保留可配置的头尾预览，并显示隐藏行数；一个终端控制可以展开或收起全部卡片。进行中的分片与工具调用会更新同一组组件，随后由完成事件收束状态。
 
-agent 空闲时，编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`；轮次运行中则调用 `agent.steer()`。取消、推理显隐、工具卡片展开、重绘、清空 transcript 和退出都只是终端控制。空闲态页脚根据 `tokenMeter` 得出上下文占用率，并显示所选模型；agent 运行期间，该摘要会替换为带已用时长的活动指示和 Escape 中断提示。`/status` 在这两种状态下均可用，并会追加一份仅在终端显示的详细快照，其中包括会话标识与时间戳、所选模型及推理显隐状态、从事件日志归并得出的生命周期计数、与页脚一致的去重用量分项和 KV 缓存命中率，以及 `tokenMeter` 给出的上下文用量和所选模型公布的容量。插件注册共享的 `userInteraction` 提供方，在左下角宽幅键盘操作面板中呈现排队的问题，面板显示批次进度、带编号的选项和对齐的描述；agent 行为和答案日志仍由既有服务负责。
+agent 空闲时，编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`；轮次运行中则调用 `agent.steer()`。取消、推理显隐、工具卡片展开、重绘、清空 transcript 和退出都只是终端控制。空闲态页脚根据 `tokenMeter` 得出上下文占用率，并显示所选模型和显式选定的推理强度；agent 运行期间，该摘要会替换为带已用时长的活动指示和 Escape 中断提示。`/status` 在这两种状态下均可用，并会追加一份仅在终端显示的详细快照，其中包括会话标识与时间戳、所选模型、推理强度（或默认状态）及推理显隐状态、从事件日志归并得出的生命周期计数、与页脚一致的去重用量分项和 KV 缓存命中率，以及 `tokenMeter` 给出的上下文用量和所选模型公布的容量。插件注册共享的 `userInteraction` 提供方，在左下角宽幅键盘操作面板中呈现排队的问题，面板显示批次进度、带编号的选项和对齐的描述；agent 行为和答案日志仍由既有服务负责。
 
-`/model` 命令将建议性的 `ctx.llm` 目录呈现为键盘选择器，并且只更改当前 TUI 会话的目标；带参数的形式仍可直接选择目标。agent 作用域内的 prompt 组装和请求两条 waterfall（瀑布式事件）会为每个 step 快照一次同一个提供方/模型字段组合，因此即使命令在组装期间到达，`{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` 插值与请求路由也不会分裂。系统通过日志中最新的请求头恢复已经使用过的目标；未被请求使用的选择只保留在当前进程中。
+`/model` 命令将建议性的 `ctx.llm` 目录呈现为键盘选择器，并且只更改当前 TUI 会话的目标；带参数的形式仍可直接选择目标。每个模型行都持有适配器公布的推理强度顺序和默认值：按 Shift+Tab 可循环切换该行的推理强度；如果适配器没有公布默认值，循环中还会包含提供方默认行为；没有可选元数据的模型则保持不变。agent 作用域内的 prompt 组装和请求两条 waterfall（瀑布式事件）会为每个步骤快照一次同一个提供方/模型/推理强度目标，因此即使命令在组装期间到达，`{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` 插值与请求路由也不会分裂。系统通过日志中最新的请求头恢复已经使用过的目标；未被请求使用的选择只保留在当前进程中。
 
 ### 终端所有权
 
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ agent 空闲时，编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`；轮次运行中则调
 - TUI 会引入 pi-tui 依赖并严格要求 TTY；非 TTY 部署使用 Headless app 或结构化协议。
 - 会话投影使恢复和压缩与持久会话保持一致，但只有一个已配置会话拥有 transcript 和编辑器。
 - 工具包通过既有呈现方法扩展终端卡片，无需在 TUI 中增加工具专用分支。
-- 模型选择使用适配器提供的目录元数据，但不会把目录成员关系变成请求校验；未使用的选择不属于持久化状态。
+- 模型和推理强度选择使用适配器公布的元数据，但不会把目录成员关系变成请求校验；未使用的选择不属于持久化状态。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.md: ce98a16fa43e2743c18826ee7f2344c38e7c70e7
-2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.zh.md: 0d6fd2f9e6b91f76830586ecf4c29774e5d6978a
+2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.md: 38d193271d88b3a8f32ba1b191e8a6d432176281
+2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.zh.md: be3cd041c6012af142fc27934fda125dfc4cf6de

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.md

@@ -12,13 +12,17 @@ The Web conversation preserves assistant Markdown source through session events,
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-primitives` exports `MarkdownText` as the untrusted assistant-text renderer, and `ui-conversation` selects it only for assistant `text` blocks. Finalized history, the streaming tail, and interrupted partials already share `AssistantMarkdown`, so they receive the same renderer without changing events or snapshots. User and steering messages keep `MessageText` and remain literal.
 
-`MarkdownText` uses `react-markdown` with `remark-gfm` to build React elements from an AST. It covers CommonMark blocks plus GFM tables, task lists, strikethrough, and autolinks without `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`, raw-HTML parsing, or syntax highlighting. The dependency is explicit in `ui-primitives`; because that pure library is seeded by the Web shell, the parser is part of the initial browser bundle.
+`MarkdownText` uses `react-markdown` with `remark-gfm` to build React elements from an AST. It covers CommonMark blocks plus GFM tables, task lists, strikethrough, and autolinks without raw-HTML parsing. Fenced code routes through the shared `CodeBlock`, which highlights registered grammars with the client's shiki singleton (`--shiki-*` tokens) and falls back to plain monospace otherwise. While a turn streams, fences stay on the plain arm so growing fences are not retokenized every chunk.
+
+Visual spacing, tables, links, blockquotes, inline code, and code-block chrome follow deepsuite `@deepseek/md` (`markdown.css` / `code-block.css`) and the same `--dsw-alias-markdown-*`, `--dsw-font-markdown-*`, `--dsw-alias-border-l*`, and `--dsw-alias-label-*` tokens. Links use `--dsw-alias-state-business-primary` (deepsuite's sheet uses `--dsw-alias-brand-text`, which is blue only under newDesign; design-platform keeps brand-text near-black and is not retuned here). `CodeBlock` ships a language banner and a copy control (`复制` / `复制成功`). Citation pills, KaTeX, heading anchors, the thinking-small markdown variant, and custom □/☑ task markers are out of scope until matching product DOM exists; GFM task lists keep native checkboxes.
+
+The dependency is explicit in `ui-primitives`; because that pure library is seeded by the Web shell, the parser and highlighter are part of the initial browser bundle.
 
 ## Untrusted output policy
 
-Assistant-authored destinations are restricted to absolute HTTP, HTTPS, and mailto URLs. HTTP(S) links open in a new tab with `rel="noopener noreferrer"`; relative destinations and other protocols render as non-navigable text. Markdown images render only their alt text, so model output cannot initiate a remote image request. Raw HTML remains inert source text because no HTML parser enters the pipeline.
+Assistant-authored destinations are restricted to absolute HTTP, HTTPS, and mailto URLs. HTTP(S) links open in a new tab with `rel="noopener noreferrer"`; relative destinations and other protocols render as non-navigable text. Markdown images render only their alt text, so model output cannot initiate a remote image request. Raw HTML remains inert source text because no HTML parser enters the pipeline. Shiki output is a static span tree generated from the fence text (no scripts or user HTML).
 
-The renderer uses existing `--dsw-*` typography and color tokens. Fenced code and GFM tables own horizontal overflow so long content cannot widen the conversation column.
+Fenced code and GFM tables own horizontal overflow so long content cannot widen the conversation column.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -30,6 +34,8 @@ The renderer uses existing `--dsw-*` typography and color tokens. Fenced code an
 
 **Enable raw HTML or remote images with sanitization.** Neither capability has a current product need, while both enlarge the executable or network privacy boundary. They remain disabled rather than adding sanitizer and image-policy dependencies.
 
+**Port deepsuite Prism `highlight.css` and the mdast pipeline.** Appearance parity is owned by CSS Modules and shared `--dsw-*` tokens; highlighting stays on the existing shiki allowlist so the client does not take a second highlighter or Prism class contract.
+
 ## Consequences
 
-Assistant replies render semantic Markdown consistently during streaming and replay, while tool cards, reasoning rows, interactions, user bubbles, and the host protocol remain unchanged. Streaming reparses the current text after each accumulated update; incomplete Markdown can temporarily change structure, but the isolated tail bounds React invalidation and the final event does not switch renderers. The initial Web shell grows by the Markdown parser and GFM runtime, and future extensions such as syntax highlighting or remote media require a separate bundle and security decision.
+Assistant replies render semantic Markdown consistently during streaming and replay, while tool cards, reasoning rows, interactions, user bubbles, and the host protocol remain unchanged. Streaming reparses the current text after each accumulated update; incomplete Markdown can temporarily change structure, but the isolated tail bounds React invalidation and the final event does not switch renderers. Code fences share one chrome and copy path with tool and details surfaces. The initial Web shell includes the Markdown parser, GFM runtime, and shiki allowlist; cite/math/anchor/thinking-small surfaces remain deferred.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.zh.md

@@ -12,13 +12,17 @@ Web 对话通过会话事件、历史回放与流式累积保留 assistant Markd
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-primitives` 导出 `MarkdownText`，用作不受信任的 assistant 文本渲染器；`ui-conversation` 仅为 assistant `text` 块选择该渲染器。已完成的历史消息、流式输出尾部与被中断的部分输出已经共用 `AssistantMarkdown`，因此无需更改事件或快照，它们便会采用同一渲染器。用户消息与 steering 消息继续使用 `MessageText`，并保持按字面渲染。
 
-`MarkdownText` 使用 `react-markdown` 与 `remark-gfm`，从 AST 构建 React 元素。它支持 CommonMark 块，以及 GFM 表格、任务列表、删除线与自动链接，但不使用 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`，不解析原始 HTML，也不进行语法高亮。`ui-primitives` 显式声明该依赖；由于这一纯库由 Web shell 预置，解析器会成为初始浏览器 bundle 的一部分。
+`MarkdownText` 使用 `react-markdown` 与 `remark-gfm`，从 AST 构建 React 元素。它覆盖 CommonMark 块，以及 GFM 表格、任务列表、删除线与自动链接，且不解析原始 HTML。围栏代码经共享的 `CodeBlock` 路由；该组件用客户端的 shiki 单例（`--shiki-*` token）高亮已注册语法，否则回退为纯等宽文本。轮次流式输出期间，围栏停留在纯文本分支，以免每收到一个分片就对增长中的围栏重新分词。
+
+视觉间距、表格、链接、引用块、行内代码与代码块外框遵循 deepsuite `@deepseek/md`（`markdown.css` / `code-block.css`），并使用同一套 `--dsw-alias-markdown-*`、`--dsw-font-markdown-*`、`--dsw-alias-border-l*` 与 `--dsw-alias-label-*` token。链接使用 `--dsw-alias-state-business-primary`（deepsuite 的样式表使用 `--dsw-alias-brand-text`，仅在 newDesign 下为蓝色；design-platform 将 brand-text 保持为近黑色，此处不做重新调色）。`CodeBlock` 提供语言横幅与复制控件（`复制` / `复制成功`）。引用胶囊、KaTeX、标题锚点、thinking-small markdown 变体，以及自定义 □/☑ 任务标记均不在范围内，直至存在匹配的产品 DOM；GFM 任务列表继续使用原生复选框。
+
+该依赖在 `ui-primitives` 中显式声明；由于这一纯库由 Web shell 预置，解析器与高亮器会成为初始浏览器 bundle 的一部分。
 
 ## 不受信任输出策略
 
-assistant 生成的目标地址仅限绝对 HTTP、HTTPS 与 mailto URL。HTTP(S) 链接会在新标签页中打开，并带有 `rel="noopener noreferrer"`；相对目标地址与其他协议会渲染为不可导航的文本。Markdown 图片仅渲染替代文本，因此模型输出无法发起远程图片请求。由于管线中未引入 HTML 解析器，原始 HTML 仍是不会生效的源文本。
+assistant 生成的目标地址仅限绝对 HTTP、HTTPS 与 mailto URL。HTTP(S) 链接会在新标签页中打开，并带有 `rel="noopener noreferrer"`；相对目标地址与其他协议会渲染为不可导航的文本。Markdown 图片仅渲染替代文本，因此模型输出无法发起远程图片请求。由于管线中未引入 HTML 解析器，原始 HTML 仍是不会生效的源文本。Shiki 输出是由围栏文本生成的静态 span 树（不含脚本或用户 HTML）。
 
-渲染器使用现有的 `--dsw-*` 排版与颜色 token。围栏代码块与 GFM 表格各自处理横向溢出，因此较长内容无法撑宽对话栏。
+围栏代码与 GFM 表格各自处理横向溢出，因此较长内容无法撑宽对话栏。
 
 ## 考虑过的替代方案
 
@@ -30,6 +34,8 @@ assistant 生成的目标地址仅限绝对 HTTP、HTTPS 与 mailto URL。HTTP(S
 
 **通过净化启用原始 HTML 或远程图片。**当前产品并不需要这两项功能，但二者都会扩大可执行行为或网络隐私边界。因此它们保持禁用，无需增加净化器与图片策略依赖。
 
+**移植 deepsuite 的 Prism `highlight.css` 与 mdast 管线。**外观一致性由 CSS Modules 与共享的 `--dsw-*` token 负责；高亮仍走现有的 shiki 允许列表，使客户端不必引入第二套高亮器或 Prism class 契约。
+
 ## 后果
 
-assistant 回复在流式输出与回放期间都会一致地渲染为语义化 Markdown，而工具卡片、推理行、交互、用户气泡和宿主协议保持不变。每次累积更新后，流式输出都会重新解析当前文本；未完成的 Markdown 可能暂时改变结构，但独立的尾部会限定 React 失效范围，最终事件也不会切换渲染器。初始 Web shell 的体积会因加入 Markdown 解析器与 GFM 运行时而增大；语法高亮或远程媒体等后续扩展需要另行作出 bundle 与安全决策。
+assistant 回复在流式输出与回放期间都会一致地渲染为语义化 Markdown，而工具卡片、推理行、交互、用户气泡和宿主协议保持不变。每次累积更新后，流式输出都会重新解析当前文本；未完成的 Markdown 可能暂时改变结构，但独立的尾部会限定 React 失效范围，最终事件也不会切换渲染器。代码围栏与工具及详情表层共用同一外框与复制路径。初始 Web shell 包含 Markdown 解析器、GFM 运行时与 shiki 允许列表；cite/math/anchor/thinking-small 表层仍暂缓。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 5fe08cc40c1d23ff3a9b8c6d766fea6d3694c30d
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: c121ffc27e3d0a93707c2c22b2f180023ebae5be

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note: Web todo display — snapshot side-effect channel + two render surfaces
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+`todo_write` appends `todo/write` whole-list snapshots to the session log; the TUI renders a persistent plan panel (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation). The web client dropped the event entirely: the host mux stream already forwards every session event, but `todo/write` is not a surface type (it never folds into `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`), and no side-effect branch accumulated it — the browser had no consumption point and no display surface.
+
+## Decision
+
+Consume `todo/write` as a Session side effect, not a surface node, and render it on two surfaces matching the split the TUI already draws.
+
+### Side-effect channel, converging with window replay
+
+`applyEventSideEffects` gains a `todo/write` case (whole list, last write wins). Unlike partial/openCalls, `rebuildDerivedFromWindow` deliberately does NOT reset it: the value is session-level — taken from the tail history page's full-log projection — and an arbitrary window may not contain the latest write, so an older-page prepend keeps it and only an in-window or live write overwrites it. Every `installWindow` caller is a tail request (`doOpen`, its gap re-pull, `repairGap`; `loadOlder` prepends without it), which the host answers with the projection or omits it only when the full log holds no `todo/write` — so an absent field is the authoritative empty list and is assigned as such. That distinction matters on rollback: a live write whose host crashed before persisting leaves the log empty, and preserving the prior value instead would strand the rolled-back plan on screen indefinitely. `ConversationSnapshot.todos` is the read surface. This follows the event's own contract ("log-only UI state; never derived history"): surfacing each write as a conversation node would render superseded lists as if they were still standing.
+
+### TodoPanel: the durable list as a persistent strip
+
+The panel mounts through the `conversation.input.dock` slot (a plain registrant plugin, `todoDockEntry`, the QueueDock posture: `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` as the load-order seam, `order: -1` above the queue rows), hidden while empty, collapsible to a header of title + `"<done>/<total> tasks · <n> in progress"` (no in-progress content hint when collapsed). Status glyphs are the figma todo set (green check ring / blue fading ring / dashed pending ring) on a tip-surface card (`--dsw-specific-tip`, 14px radius, `width: calc(100% - 88px)` / `max-width: 776px` centered; InputBar top pad 6px is the gap to the composer card). It reads `snapshot.todos` via the standard-kit `useSession` hook the dock entry receives — no store, no service, no ctx. The inner component stays props-complete and framework-free; the dock adapter is a one-line wrapper.
+
+### TodoRow: the per-call row through the keyed toolview slot
+
+The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`, mounted from `apply`) that registers into the keyed `conversation.chat.toolview` slot via `ctx.slots.register` — the same seam and load-order posture as the bash sample (`inject: ['slots', 'conversation']`), but a product registration. The summary derives from call args (`N/M done · active item`); unparseable args fall back to the generic row summary; clicking opens the details column with the raw args. No `ToolEventView` is added for todo — presentation is client-owned, and the durable list renders from the session event, not the tool card.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **Fold todo writes into `nodes` as surface entries** — replayed windows would render every superseded list; the event is deliberately not a surface type.
+- **Hardcoding the panel inside `ConversationRoot`** — the original landing spot before the input-dock slot existed; the dock is the architecture's home for always-on strips above the composer, and a hardcode bypasses the slot registry's disposal and ordering.
+- **Details column for the panel** — the details slot is single-occupant and selection-driven, a different lifetime than an always-on strip.
+- **Host-computed view (a todo `ToolEventView`)** — presentation belongs to the client; the wire already carries the whole snapshot in the event payload.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel is untouched (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note: Web todo 展示——快照副作用通道 + 两个渲染面
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+`todo_write` 把 `todo/write` 的整份列表快照追加进会话日志；TUI 渲染一块常驻的 plan 面板（自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现）。Web 客户端把这个事件整个丢弃了：host mux 流本已转发每一个会话事件，但 `todo/write` 不是 surface 类型（它从不 fold 进 `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`），也没有任何副作用分支累积它——浏览器既无消费点，也无展示面。
+
+## Decision
+
+把 `todo/write` 当作 Session 副作用消费，而非 surface 节点，并在两个面上渲染它，这两个面正对应 TUI 已经绘制的那套划分。
+
+### 副作用通道，与窗口回放收敛
+
+`applyEventSideEffects` 新增一个 `todo/write` 分支（整份列表，后写覆盖先写）。与 partial/openCalls 不同，`rebuildDerivedFromWindow` 刻意不重置它：该值是会话级的——取自尾页 history 携带的全量 log 投影——而任意窗口未必包含最近一次写入，因此往前翻页保留它，只有窗口内或实时的写入才会覆盖。`installWindow` 的每个调用方都是尾页请求（`doOpen`、其补洞重拉、`repairGap`；`loadOlder` 只往前拼接、不走它），而 host 对尾页请求要么带上投影、要么仅在全量 log 没有任何 `todo/write` 时省略——因此字段缺失就是权威的空列表，直接照此赋值。这个区分在回滚场景上要紧：实时写入若在 host 持久化前崩溃，log 里就是空的，此时保留旧值会让已回滚的计划永远留在屏幕上。`ConversationSnapshot.todos` 是读取面。这遵循事件自身的契约（「仅日志 UI 状态，绝非派生历史」）：把每次写入作为对话节点呈现，会让已被取代的列表看起来仍然有效。
+
+### TodoPanel：长驻列表作为一条常驻横条
+
+面板经 `conversation.input.dock` slot 挂载（普通注册者插件 `todoDockEntry`，QueueDock 同款姿势：`inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` 载序 seam，`order: -1` 排在队列条上方），空列表时隐藏，可折叠为标题加 `"<已完成>/<总数> tasks · <n> in progress"` 的表头（折叠态不再附带进行中条目正文）。状态图标为 figma todo 套件（绿色勾选环／蓝色渐隐环／虚线未开始环），卡片使用 tip 表面（`--dsw-specific-tip`、14px 圆角、`width: calc(100% - 88px)`／`max-width: 776px` 居中；InputBar 顶部 6px 内边距是到输入卡的间距）。它经 dock entry 收到的标准件 `useSession` hook 读取 `snapshot.todos`——无 store、无 service、无 ctx。内部组件保持 props 完备且框架无关；dock 适配件只是一行包装。
+
+### TodoRow：经 keyed toolview slot 的逐调用行
+
+专用的 `todo_write` 对话行是一个普通注册者插件（`todoToolview`，由 `apply` 挂载），经 `ctx.slots.register` 注册进 keyed 的 `conversation.chat.toolview` slot——与 bash 样例同一接缝、同一载序姿态（`inject: ['slots', 'conversation']`），但属产品级注册。摘要由调用 args 推导（`N/M done · active item`）；无法解析的 args 回退到通用行摘要；点击会以原始 args 打开 details 列。todo 不新增任何 `ToolEventView`——呈现归客户端所有，常驻列表从会话事件渲染，而非工具卡。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **把 todo 写入作为 surface 条目折叠进 `nodes`**——回放的窗口会渲染每一份已被取代的列表；该事件被刻意设计成非 surface 类型。
+- **面板硬编码进 `ConversationRoot`**——input-dock slot 出现之前的原始落点；dock 是本架构给"composer 上方常开横条"安排的家，硬编码绕开了 slot 注册表的 disposal 与定序。
+- **面板放进 details 列**——details slot 单占用且由选中驱动，生命周期不同于一条常开横条。
+- **host 计算的视图（一个 todo `ToolEventView`）**——呈现属于客户端；协议已在事件载荷里携带整份快照。
+
+## Consequences
+
+回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管：未来对窗口重建的任何改动都免费保持 todos 一致；fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture（测试前置数据）加 assembled keyless snapshot（`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`）在构建产物客户端全图上钉住整条链（行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返）。`todos` 是 `ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段，所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板未受改动（自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现）；Web 各面渲染同一个事件，只新增一个协议字段，不新增事件类型。冷加载重建正是靠这个字段由 host 兜底：history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上最新一次 `todo/write` 的投影，独立于分页窗口计算（与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势）——因此重开会话时即使最后一次写入落在窗口之前，计划也照常恢复；该值跨往前翻页保留，之后的任何写入照常覆盖，而尾页响应不带投影时复位为空。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md: a02087235a36f2c257de407facf2dc02ed072f3b
-2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md: 8ccbf5b98401bef9c3fd40e948d35ec5f0818202
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md
+2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md: b8e1ec1efe19127cad8a12405dddeec38a4ff91e
+2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md: b80b75a80671e9aa2ab59ff72c44c18a8ec5c16e

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md

@@ -21,10 +21,11 @@ The Host provides the following GUI wiring on the Workspace entity:
 | `workspace.list` | Returns persistent Workspaces in order and filters out Session ids that fail header validation |
 | `workspace.create({ name })` | Creates a directory and Workspace at `workspaceRoot/name`; fails on a display-name conflict |
 | `workspace.create({ path })` | Adopts an existing directory and does not create an arbitrary path |
+| `workspace.delete({ workspaceId })` | Removes the Workspace registration while retaining its directory and session logs; its Sessions become Ungrouped |
 | `session.create({ workspaceId, sessionId? })` | Resolves cwd from the Workspace, idempotently creates a Session with an optional preallocated id, and attaches it |
 | `session.create({ cwd })` | Remains available to non-Workspace callers and creates an Ungrouped Session |
 
-`workspaceRoot` is an independent Host setting that falls back to the Host cwd when unset; it is unrelated to `storageRoot`, which stores Workspace domain data. The Host stream pushes Workspace and Session deltas, and the Client refreshes the `workspace.list` and `session.list` baselines separately after reconnecting.
+`workspaceRoot` is an independent Host setting that falls back to the Host cwd when unset; it is unrelated to `storageRoot`, which stores Workspace domain data. The Host stream pushes Workspace and Session deltas, including `host/workspace-removed`, and the Client refreshes the `workspace.list` and `session.list` baselines separately after reconnecting. Registration-deletion ownership and safety are defined in the [Workspace registration deletion Agent Note](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md).
 
 A Workspace's `sessionIds` is an ordered candidate index. A membership projection requires both that an id appear in the index and that the corresponding canonicalized `SessionHeader.cwd` equal the Workspace path; SessionHeader does not gain a `workspaceId`. A Session whose cwd matches but whose id is absent from the index remains Ungrouped, while an indexed id is filtered out if its header is missing, its cwd is invalid, or its cwd does not match. Two Workspace indexes claiming the same Session is corrupt state and fails loudly.
 
@@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ When no Workspace exists, the page creates a frontend Workspace object named `wo
 
 Top-level New Session, the plus button on a Workspace row, and the Workspace picker all invoke the same New Session action. An explicit Workspace id becomes the target directly; when none is specified, the action uses the most recent Workspace, or the Workspace Intent if no real Workspace exists. The Workspace picker's Use an existing folder and Create a new workspace actions immediately create a real Workspace when the user confirms, then retarget the frontend Session to it; an explicitly created empty Workspace remains even if the user sends no message.
 
-Create a new workspace temporarily uses the same input as both the directory name and display name. The UI prevents duplicate confirmation based on current Workspace titles, while the Host continues to reject same-name requests that bypass the UI or race concurrently. Rename, Delete, moving across Workspaces, drag-and-drop ordering, manual adoption from Ungrouped, and separate display-name and directory-name inputs are outside this iteration's scope.
+Create a new workspace temporarily uses the same input as both the directory name and display name. The UI prevents duplicate confirmation based on current Workspace titles, while the Host continues to reject same-name requests that bypass the UI or race concurrently. Moving Sessions across Workspaces, manual adoption from Ungrouped, and separate display-name and directory-name inputs remain outside this flow.
 
 ### First send and recovery
 
@@ -75,6 +76,8 @@ A frontend Session Intent appears as a “New session” row and temporarily cou
 
 Real Sessions that cannot be assigned to any Workspace appear under Ungrouped. Host `session-added` and `workspace-changed` events may arrive in either order; list merging does not depend on frame order.
 
+Deleting a Workspace registration removes its group without deleting or closing any Session. Its accounted Sessions immediately join Ungrouped, including the current Session; a reload reconstructs the same result from the independent Workspace and Session baselines.
+
 ### React and slot boundaries
 
 React components only consume `useSessions`, `useWorkspaces`, and session-scoped hooks; they do not own entity lifecycles. The Zustand store retains only layout, the current view, composer text for ordinary real Sessions, and other purely presentational state. Session and Workspace Intents, materialization phases, errors, and retained prompts reside in the React-free runtime object layer.
@@ -106,6 +109,7 @@ The Sidebar and conversation empty hero receive standardized actions through slo
 - The initial default target is determined exactly once after both baselines are ready; Workspace groups are not reordered as a whole by hydration or Session activity, and an active Session moves only itself to the front.
 - A frontend Session under a real Workspace temporarily counts toward the sidebar total, while a Workspace Intent remains hidden; neither publication nor refresh leaves duplicate rows or counts.
 - Both the UI and Host reject duplicate Workspace names; cwd-only Sessions, Sessions with invalid historical cwd values, and unattached Sessions remain Ungrouped.
+- Confirmed Workspace deletion removes only the registration, retains the current Session, directory, files, and session log, and survives reload; package tests pin unary/frame/baseline races and failure rollback.
 - Keyless runnable snapshots cover the zero state, explicit creation, and the first send; package-level tests cover bootstrap, membership validation, ordering, idempotency, failure recovery, and arbitrary frame order.
 
 ## Consequences

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md

@@ -21,10 +21,11 @@ Host 在 Workspace entity 上提供以下 GUI 接线：
 | `workspace.list` | 返回持久有序的 Workspace，并过滤未通过 header 校验的 Session id |
 | `workspace.create({ name })` | 在 `workspaceRoot/name` 创建目录和 Workspace；显示名冲突时失败 |
 | `workspace.create({ path })` | 收编已经存在的目录，不为任意路径创建目录 |
+| `workspace.delete({ workspaceId })` | 移除 Workspace 注册记录，同时保留目录和会话日志；相关 Session 进入 Ungrouped |
 | `session.create({ workspaceId, sessionId? })` | 从 Workspace 解析 cwd，以可选预分配 id 幂等创建 Session 并 attach |
 | `session.create({ cwd })` | 保留给非 Workspace 调用方，创建 Ungrouped Session |
 
-`workspaceRoot` 是独立 Host 配置，未配置时回退到 Host cwd；它与保存 Workspace domain 数据的 `storageRoot` 无关。Host stream 推送 Workspace 与 Session 增量，Client 重连后分别刷新 `workspace.list` 与 `session.list` 基线。
+`workspaceRoot` 是独立 Host 配置，未配置时回退到 Host cwd；它与保存 Workspace domain 数据的 `storageRoot` 无关。Host stream 推送 Workspace 与 Session 增量，包括 `host/workspace-removed`；Client 重连后分别刷新 `workspace.list` 与 `session.list` 基线。删除注册记录的所有权与安全边界由 [Workspace 注册记录删除 Agent Note](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md)定义。
 
 Workspace 的 `sessionIds` 是有序候选索引。成员投影同时要求 id 位于索引且对应 `SessionHeader.cwd` canonical 后等于 Workspace path；SessionHeader 不增加 `workspaceId`。cwd 匹配但未入索引的 Session 保持 Ungrouped，索引命中但 header 缺失、cwd 无效或 cwd 不匹配的 id 被过滤。同一 Session 被两个 Workspace 索引占用属于损坏状态并 fail loud。
 
@@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ Session 自己持有首条输入并驱动一条内部流水线：必要时以预
 
 顶部 New Session、Workspace 行内加号和 Workspace picker 最终都调用同一 New Session 动作：显式 Workspace id 直接成为目标，未指定时使用最近 Workspace，没有真实 Workspace 时使用 Workspace Intent。Workspace picker 的 Use an existing folder 与 Create a new workspace 会在用户确认时立即创建真实 Workspace，再把前端 Session 定位到该 Workspace；即使用户不发送消息，显式创建的空 Workspace 也保留。
 
-Create a new workspace 暂时用同一个输入作为目录名和显示名。UI 根据当前 Workspace title 禁止重复确认，Host 继续拒绝绕过 UI 或并发产生的同名请求。Rename、Delete、跨 Workspace 移动、拖拽排序、Ungrouped 手动收编和显示名/目录名双输入不在本期范围。
+Create a new workspace 暂时用同一个输入作为目录名和显示名。UI 根据当前 Workspace title 禁止重复确认，Host 继续拒绝绕过 UI 或并发产生的同名请求。跨 Workspace 移动 Session、从 Ungrouped 手动收编以及分别输入显示名和目录名仍不在此动线范围内。
 
 ### 首次发送与恢复
 
@@ -75,6 +76,8 @@ Workspace 组严格使用 Host 返回的持久顺序。Bootstrap 一次性确定
 
 无法归入任何 Workspace 的真实 Session 进入 Ungrouped。Host `session-added` 与 `workspace-changed` 可以任意顺序到达，列表合并不依赖 frame 顺序。
 
+删除 Workspace 注册记录会移除其分组，但不会删除或关闭任何 Session。已记账的 Session（包括当前 Session）会立即进入 Ungrouped；刷新后，独立的 Workspace 与 Session 基线会重建出相同结果。
+
 ### React 与 slot 边界
 
 React 组件只消费 `useSessions`、`useWorkspaces` 与 session-scoped hooks，不拥有实体生命周期。Zustand store 只保留布局、当前 view、普通真实 Session 的 composer 文本和其他纯呈现状态；Session/Workspace Intent、materialize phase、错误和 retained prompt 位于 React-free runtime 对象层。
@@ -106,6 +109,7 @@ Sidebar 与 conversation empty hero 通过 slot 获得标准化动作：`startSe
 - 初始默认目标只在两份基线 ready 后确定一次；Workspace 组不因 hydration 或 Session 活跃整体重排，单个活跃 Session 只前移自身。
 - 真实 Workspace 下的前端 Session 临时计入 sidebar 数量，Workspace Intent 保持隐藏，发布与刷新都不会留下重复行或重复计数。
 - UI 与 Host 两层拒绝同名 Workspace；cwd-only Session、无效历史 cwd 和未 attach Session 保持 Ungrouped。
+- 经确认的 Workspace 删除只移除注册记录，保留当前 Session、目录、文件和会话日志，并在刷新后保持该状态；包级测试固定一元响应／帧／基线竞态和失败回滚行为。
 - keyless runnable snapshot 覆盖零态、显式创建和首次发送；包级测试覆盖 bootstrap、成员校验、排序、幂等、失败恢复及任意 frame 顺序。
 
 ## Consequences

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
+2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.md: 869e7a2518a3ec927c0689a10816a410dc5f0862
+2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.zh.md: 353e5ac765bb2fbab9932449cf2247768a1f412f

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Agent Note: User-message IconActions under the bubble
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The chat user bubble had no under-bubble action chrome. The Harness design (figma `User_Bubble/message_container`) shows three IconActions — copy, branch in new chat, and edit — right-aligned under the bubble, matching the product action-bar pattern used elsewhere.
+
+## Decision
+
+`MessageItem` owns the actions for `kind: 'user'` only. Layout is a column (`align-items: flex-end`, 6px gap): bubble, then a 28px action row with 10px gaps and 28px circular icon buttons (`IconCopyOutline16`, `IconBranchOutline16`, `IconEditOutline16`). Tooltips carry Chinese labels. Actions stay visible by default; `@media (hover: hover)` hides them until the row is hovered or focus-within, so touch / `hover: none` devices keep discoverable controls (opacity alone still hit-tests).
+
+Copy writes the bubble's joined text blocks to the clipboard (`navigator.clipboard.writeText`, with an `execCommand` fallback). Branch and edit are present chrome with no handlers yet — they reserve the design seats without inventing session-fork or edit-resubmit behavior.
+
+Steering bubbles keep the badge-only form and do not show these actions.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Wire branch/edit to real session fork and draft-edit now.** Rejected for this change: those product flows are not specified; shipping inert buttons matches the requested scope and avoids half-built mutation paths.
+
+**Always hide with `opacity: 0` outside hover.** Rejected for touch: without `@media (hover: hover)`, idle opacity still hit-tests while looking empty. Hover-capable pointers keep the fade; others keep the actions visible.
+
+## Consequences
+
+User messages expose copy immediately; branch/edit remain clickable stubs until a later decision owns their behavior. Tests pin the three buttons, copy payload, and steering exclusion.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Agent Note: 用户消息气泡下方的 IconActions
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+聊天用户气泡下方没有操作栏。Harness 设计稿（figma `User_Bubble/message_container`）在气泡下方右对齐展示三个 IconActions——复制、在新对话中分支、编辑——与产品其他位置使用的操作栏模式一致。
+
+## 决策
+
+仅当 `kind: 'user'` 时，`MessageItem` 拥有这些操作。布局为纵向列（`align-items: flex-end`，间距 6px）：先是气泡，再是高度 28px 的操作行；行内间距 10px，圆形图标按钮尺寸为 28px（`IconCopyOutline16`、`IconBranchOutline16`、`IconEditOutline16`）。Tooltip 承载中文标签。操作默认保持可见；`@media (hover: hover)` 下在悬停或 focus-within 前隐藏，以便触摸／`hover: none` 设备仍能发现控件（仅靠 opacity 仍会命中测试）。
+
+复制将气泡内拼接后的文本块写入剪贴板（`navigator.clipboard.writeText`，并以 `execCommand` 作为回退）。分支与编辑目前仅有外观、尚无处理函数——它们预留设计席位，但不发明会话 fork 或编辑重提交流程。
+
+steering（中途引导）气泡保持仅徽章形态，不展示这些操作。
+
+## 考虑过的替代方案
+
+**现在就把分支／编辑接到真实的会话 fork 与草稿编辑。**本次变更不予采纳：这些产品流程尚未定稿；交付无行为按钮符合请求范围，也避免半成品的变更路径。
+
+**在悬停外始终以 `opacity: 0` 隐藏。**因触摸不予采纳：若无 `@media (hover: hover)`，空闲 opacity 看起来空白但仍会命中测试。具备悬停能力的指针保留淡入；其他设备保持操作可见。
+
+## 后果
+
+用户消息立即可用复制；分支／编辑仍为可点击的占位，直至后续决策明确其行为。测试钉死三个按钮、复制载荷，以及对 steering 的排除。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md
+2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md: 8168b0832ca39e6023f6981815ffe758b5695361
+2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md: b0df6982ac81426a5b0ce2f0e2b0e744212e3f5b

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Agent Note: Workspace Registration Deletion
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+A Workspace registers an existing code directory so the GUI can name it and order its Sessions. That record has no reliable provenance proving that Harness created or owns the directory, and the Session log is an independent persistence object. Treating the row's Delete action as recursive source deletion or Session deletion would destroy data outside the record's ownership boundary.
+
+The existing visual-only menu row also left deletion semantics undefined across durable order, the Workspace table, Host streams, concurrent browser tabs, reconnect baselines, and a list request racing the mutation.
+
+## Decision
+
+`ctx.workspace.delete(id)` deletes only the Workspace registration: its id leaves durable `workspaceIds`, its `workspaces` table row and entity-cache entry disappear, and its ordered `sessionIds` account disappears with that row. It never calls filesystem removal or `SessionPersistence`; the directory, every user file, every live Session, and every persisted Session log remain. Because sidebar grouping is the complement of all surviving Workspace accounts, those Sessions immediately appear under Ungrouped, including the current Session.
+
+Unknown ids return `false` at the domain seam. `workspace.delete({ workspaceId })` maps that distinction to `workspace-not-found`; success returns `{ deleted: true }`. `workspace.list` remains the reconnect baseline.
+
+## Durable commit and publication
+
+Registry operations serialize create and delete. Deletion first writes the Workspace order without the id, then removes the entity from the cache, then deletes the table row. The table deletion is the notification commit point: the package invariant accepts it only after the cache stopped publishing the entity, and the Host emits `host/workspace-removed` only from that committed deletion. A table-write failure restores the cache and prior durable order; no removal frame is published.
+
+The Host stream keeps its committed-id set through the preceding global-order write and removes the id only on the table deletion. Create rollback therefore emits no false removal, while every connected tab receives exactly the id needed to delete its projection.
+
+Create and delete write a durable `pendingMutation` before their record/order pair can diverge. Startup completes only the named create or delete and clears the marker; it never infers crash provenance from an orphan row alone. Unmarked order/table divergence therefore retains the registry's fail-loud corruption behavior. A deletion whose table write committed but marker cleanup failed still reports success—the requested state and removal frame are already committed—and the next startup clears that marker idempotently.
+
+## Client convergence
+
+`WorkspaceManager` treats both `host/workspace-changed` and `host/workspace-removed` as ordered deltas replayed over an in-flight `workspace.list` response. A successful unary delete removes the row immediately instead of waiting for its own stream echo. Removal is idempotent, and a process-local tombstone rejects late changed frames or stale baseline rows for the never-reused Workspace id. A reconnect still refreshes from `workspace.list`; Session state is never pruned by a Workspace delta.
+
+The delete confirmation remains pending until the React Workspace projection has committed the removed id, so the next create gesture cannot observe one stale list frame. During create, duplicate-name validation is suppressed while the request is pending because the committed `host/workspace-changed` frame may publish the newly created Workspace before its unary response; after failure returns the form to editing, validation uses the latest list again.
+
+## Confirmation interaction
+
+The existing Workspace row menu opens a shared `Modal` before deletion. The text states all three consequences: the Workspace leaves the list, the folder and session logs remain, and its Sessions appear under Ungrouped. While the request is pending, the confirm and Cancel controls are disabled, duplicate confirmation is ignored, and Escape or Close cannot dismiss the operation. Failure keeps the Modal open with the error; Cancel, Escape, and Close before submission never delete.
+
+The menu, Modal, and buttons retain their existing structure and design tokens. Session deletion remains visual-only and outside this decision.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Cascade-delete Sessions.** Rejected because Workspace registration does not own Session persistence and the product requirement is to preserve histories under Ungrouped. Session deletion needs its own lifecycle, running checks, descendant semantics, and explicit UI.
+
+**Move the folder to Trash.** Rejected because the record cannot prove directory ownership. A future destructive filesystem action must be separately named, separately confirmed, and enforce explicit safety boundaries.
+
+**Delete the table row and repair order later.** Rejected because a crash or write failure would leave an initialized registry whose order and table disagree. The registry updates both under one serialized operation and restores the prior order on table failure.
+
+**Delete every unreferenced row at startup.** Rejected because the same shape can come from unexplained order corruption; silently discarding it could lose Workspace metadata and Session accounting. Recovery requires the explicit pending marker written by the owning mutation.
+
+**Refetch both lists after success.** Rejected because the committed removal frame plus immediate unary echo is sufficient, preserves the current Session object, and avoids turning a local mutation into two list requests. Reconnect baselines remain the repair path.
+
+## Verification
+
+Workspace package tests pin successful metadata-only deletion, same-path re-registration, unknown-id idempotence, table-failure rollback, explicit-marker restart recovery, unexplained-corruption rejection, and cache/table invariant behavior. Apiproxy and carrier tests pin the schema, handler, `workspace-not-found`, retained Session/folder, fresh-id re-registration, and committed `host/workspace-removed` frame. Client tests pin unary direct echo, duplicate removal, late changed frames, and deletion racing an in-flight baseline. Component tests pin confirmation, projection-settled closing, pending-state duplicate suppression, success-frame-before-unary ordering, failure, Cancel, Escape, and Close. The browser scenario observes every transient alert, slot error, console error, and page error while reusing a deleted title for a different directory.
+
+The assembled keyless Web scenario registers an existing temporary project directory, accounts a persisted Session, makes that Session current, confirms deletion in Chromium, and verifies the Workspace group disappears while Ungrouped retains the current Session. It checks the user file and JSONL log before and after deletion and repeats the UI, directory, and log assertions after reload.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Deleting a Workspace is intentionally reversible by registering the same directory again with a fresh id, although its prior manual Session order is gone; re-registration does not automatically re-adopt existing Sessions after bootstrap. The operation gives up a one-click cleanup of Session histories or source directories in exchange for a deletion boundary that matches what the record actually owns.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Agent Note（agent 决策记录）：删除 Workspace 注册记录
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+Workspace 注册已有代码目录，使 GUI 能够为目录命名，并对其会话排序。该记录没有可靠的来源信息来证明 Harness 创建或拥有该目录，会话日志也是独立的持久化对象。若将行内 Delete 操作视为递归删除源码或删除会话，就会破坏该记录所有权边界之外的数据。
+
+现有菜单行仅提供视觉效果，因此持久顺序、Workspace 表、Host 流、并发浏览器标签页、重连基线，以及列表请求与变更并发时的删除语义也没有定义。
+
+## Decision
+
+`ctx.workspace.delete(id)` 只删除 Workspace 注册记录：其 id 会从持久 `workspaceIds` 中移除，`workspaces` 表行与实体缓存条目会消失，有序 `sessionIds` 账本也随该行一并消失。它绝不调用文件系统移除操作或 `SessionPersistence`；目录、所有用户文件、所有实时会话和所有持久化会话日志都会保留。侧边栏分组是所有存续 Workspace 账本的补集，因此这些会话（包括当前会话）会立即出现在 Ungrouped 下。
+
+未知 id 在 domain seam 返回 `false`。`workspace.delete({ workspaceId })` 将该结果映射为 `workspace-not-found`；成功时返回 `{ deleted: true }`。`workspace.list` 仍是重连基线。
+
+## 持久提交与发布
+
+注册表操作会串行执行创建与删除。删除时先写入移除该 id 后的 Workspace 顺序，再从缓存中移除实体，最后删除表行。表删除是通知提交点：只有缓存停止发布该实体后，包不变量才接受该删除；Host 也只根据这次已提交的删除发出 `host/workspace-removed`。表写入失败时，系统会恢复缓存和此前的持久顺序，且不会发布移除帧。
+
+Host 流在前一笔全局顺序写入期间继续保留其已提交 id 集合，只在删除表行时移除该 id。因此，创建回滚不会发出错误的移除帧，而每个已连接标签页都能收到从自身投影中删除该记录所需的准确 id。
+
+Create 与 delete 会在记录／顺序对可能分叉之前写入持久 `pendingMutation`。启动时只补全其中明确命名的 create 或 delete，并清除该标记；系统绝不会仅凭孤立表行的形状推断崩溃来源。因此，没有标记的顺序／表分叉仍会保持注册表原有的损坏直接失败语义。如果删除的表写入已经提交、但标记清理失败，操作仍会报告成功——请求状态和移除帧都已经提交——下一次启动会以幂等方式清除该标记。
+
+## 客户端收敛
+
+`WorkspaceManager` 将 `host/workspace-changed` 与 `host/workspace-removed` 都视为有序增量，并在进行中的 `workspace.list` 响应之上回放。成功的一元删除会立即移除行，无需等待本次操作自己的流回显。移除操作具有幂等性；由于 Workspace id 永不复用，进程本地删除标记会拒绝延迟到达的 changed 帧或陈旧基线行。重连仍从 `workspace.list` 刷新；Workspace 增量绝不会剪除会话状态。
+
+删除确认框会保持待处理，直到 React Workspace 投影已经提交目标 id 的移除，因此下一次创建操作不会读到一帧陈旧列表。创建请求进行中会暂停重复名称校验，因为已提交的 `host/workspace-changed` 帧可能先于一元响应发布刚创建的 Workspace；如果请求失败并让表单回到可编辑状态，系统会重新使用最新列表执行校验。
+
+## 确认交互
+
+现有 Workspace 行菜单会在删除前打开共享 `Modal`。文案明确说明三项后果：Workspace 会从列表中移除，文件夹和会话日志会保留，相关会话会出现在 Ungrouped 下。请求待处理期间，确认与 Cancel 控件均被禁用，重复确认会被忽略，Escape 或 Close 也无法关闭此次操作。失败时 `Modal` 保持打开并显示错误；提交前使用 Cancel、Escape 或 Close 绝不会触发删除。
+
+菜单、`Modal` 和按钮保留现有结构与设计 token。会话删除仍仅提供视觉效果，不在本决策范围内。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**级联删除会话。** 不予采纳，因为 Workspace 注册记录不拥有会话持久化，且产品需求是将历史记录保留在 Ungrouped 下。会话删除需要自己的生命周期、运行状态检查、后代对象的处理语义和明确 UI。
+
+**将文件夹移到废纸篓。** 不予采纳，因为该记录无法证明目录所有权。未来的破坏性文件系统操作必须使用单独名称、单独确认，并实施明确的安全边界。
+
+**先删除表行，之后再修复顺序。** 不予采纳，因为崩溃或写入失败会使已初始化注册表的顺序与表不一致。注册表会在同一串行操作内更新二者，并在表操作失败时恢复此前顺序。
+
+**启动时删除所有未引用表行。** 不予采纳，因为来源不明的顺序损坏也会呈现相同形状；静默丢弃可能损失 Workspace 元数据和 Session 账本。恢复必须依赖拥有该变更的操作预先写入的明确待处理标记。
+
+**成功后重新拉取两个列表。** 不予采纳，因为已提交的移除帧与即时一元回显已足够，既能保留当前会话对象，也避免将局部变更扩大为两次列表请求。重连基线仍是修复路径。
+
+## Verification
+
+Workspace 包测试固定了仅删除元数据的成功路径、同路径重新注册、未知 id 的幂等行为、表操作失败回滚、明确标记的重启恢复、来源不明损坏的拒绝，以及缓存／表不变量行为。Apiproxy 与载体测试固定了 schema、处理器、`workspace-not-found`、保留会话／文件夹、使用新 id 重新注册，以及已提交的 `host/workspace-removed` 帧。客户端测试固定了一元直接回显、重复移除、延迟到达的 changed 帧，以及删除与进行中基线并发的行为。组件测试固定了确认交互、投影稳定后关闭、待处理状态下抑制重复提交、成功帧先于一元响应、失败、Cancel、Escape 与 Close。浏览器场景会在为不同目录复用已删除名称时，观测每一次瞬时 alert、slot error、console error 与 page error。
+
+组装后的无密钥 Web 场景会注册一个已有临时项目目录，将持久化会话计入账本，把该会话设为当前会话，在 Chromium 中确认删除，并验证 Workspace 分组消失，而 Ungrouped 保留当前会话。该场景在删除前后检查用户文件和 JSONL 日志，并在刷新后重复验证 UI、目录与日志。
+
+## Consequences
+
+删除 Workspace 后仍可使用新 id 重新注册同一目录，因此该操作有意设计为可逆；但此前的手动会话顺序会丢失，重新注册后，系统也不会在 bootstrap 结束后自动重新收编现有会话。该操作放弃一键清理会话历史或源码目录，以换取与记录实际所有权一致的删除边界。