Merge commit 'f7e1c47968ecf8704af9605f3f6bc1db6db869bc' into fix/hook-matcher-validation

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-approval-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: 70ccd4d486ad6e0126fa2eb638a064e9fc89bba6
-2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: d218f79888957735305db14cd97cc74480297d29
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-approval-seam.md
+2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: efb4159d736779af28edc1ae6091de4669c92f31
+2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: 9a4656f30a43473fe90cde9c56d45f48943e5d10

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-approval-seam.md

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Costs and accepted limits:
 - **Who decides whether a call asks in the first place?** Policy producers: a hook returning `permissionDecision: ask`, any `tools/pre-execute` listener, or the sandbox escalation gate. The seam and the bridge only route and answer; neither injects its own judgment about what deserves a prompt.
 - **What happens when the user dismisses the prompt, or the turn aborts mid-ask?** Dismissal maps to `cancelled` with its own deny text. An already-aborted signal settles `cancelled` without dispatching; an abort during the ask discards the late answer. When both audit appends commit, either path records one pair, never two.
 - **What if the client answers with an option the harness never offered?** Any selection other than the offered `allow_once` maps to `rejected` — an unknown optionId from a non-conforming client can never grant.
-- **How do subagents' approvals route?** An agent no answerer owns delegates through the whole waterfall and fails closed — in-process subagents are deliberately unanswerable. `subagent-acp`'s child-side auto-answer is separate; routing a child's asks to the parent controller is deferred (§ Deferred).
+- **How do subagents' approvals route?** An agent no answerer owns delegates through the whole waterfall and fails closed — in-process subagents are deliberately unanswerable. A `'never'` parent seeds that override into each in-process child's log ([decision](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)), so the child is told up front instead of asking into the empty waterfall. `subagent-acp`'s child-side auto-answer is separate; routing a child's asks to the parent controller is deferred (§ Deferred).
 - **What does `policy: 'never'` actually change at runtime?** The service resolves every ask for that session to `rejected` before dispatching any answerer (in-service, so no registration order can bypass it); the system prompt states the policy; switches are narrated at boundaries; each successful auto-rejection records the audit pair.
 - **What happens across a hot reload, or when an answerer unloads mid-session?** Answerers dispose with their owning fiber, so the next ask degrades to `unavailable` instead of hanging on a dead channel; remounting re-registers the answerer with no catch-up state.
 - **Where does a client get approval context?** The request carries the exact `callId` and the asker's human-readable `reason`; channel adapters may correlate richer tool-call state without duplicating arguments in the approval seam.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ ACP 桥只应答其会话映射所拥有的精确 agent 对象。它携带既有
 - **谁决定一次调用是否需要 ask？** 策略生产者：返回 `permissionDecision: ask` 的钩子、任何 `tools/pre-execute` 监听器、或沙箱升级门禁。seam 和桥只负责路由和应答；二者都不注入自己对「什么值得弹出提示」的判断。
 - **用户关闭提示或轮次在 ask 进行中中止时会发生什么？** 关闭映射为 `cancelled` 并携带自己的拒绝文本。已中止的 signal 直接结算为 `cancelled` 而不派发；ask 进行中的中止丢弃迟到的应答。当两个审计追加都提交时，任一路径都记录恰好一对事件，绝不会两对。
 - **如果客户端以 harness 从未提供的选项应答呢？** 除已提供的 `allow_once` 之外的任何选项都映射为 `rejected`——来自不合规客户端的未知 optionId 永远不能授权。
-- **subagent 的审批如何路由？** 没有应答者拥有的 agent 穿过整个 waterfall 委派并失败关闭——进程内 subagent 被刻意设计为不可应答。`subagent-acp` 的子侧自动应答是独立的；将子 agent 的 ask 路由到父控制器已延后（§ 延后）。
+- **subagent 的审批如何路由？** 没有应答者拥有的 agent 穿过整个 waterfall 委派并失败关闭——进程内 subagent 被刻意设计为不可应答。`'never'` 父级会把该覆盖项预置到每个进程内子 agent 的日志中（[决策](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)），因此子 agent 一开始就会得知，而不是向空的 waterfall 发出 ask。`subagent-acp` 的子侧自动应答是独立的；将子 agent 的 ask 路由到父控制器已延后（§ 延后）。
 - **`policy: 'never'` 在运行时实际改变了什么？** 服务在派发任何应答者之前，将该会话的每次 ask 解析为 `rejected`（在服务内部，因此没有注册顺序能绕过它）；系统提示词声明该策略；切换在边界处被叙述；每次成功的自动拒绝都会记录审计对。
 - **热重载或应答者在会话中途卸载时会发生什么？** 应答者随其拥有的 fiber 一起 dispose，因此下一次 ask 降级为 `unavailable` 而非挂在死通道上；重新挂载会重新注册应答者，无需追赶状态。
 - **客户端从哪里获得审批上下文？** 请求携带精确的 `callId` 和发起方的人类可读 `reason`；通道适配器可自行关联更丰富的工具调用状态，而无需在审批 seam 中重复携带参数。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md
-2026-07-06-sandbox.md: c3c61ed4539bcbca359f84f3dcc020e0bd41ae79
-2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: 39bf92aa20c697d2ad5f4c0926caeff0a0b60a1d
+2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 42b78ad8341dd52c4dd146a2207a5ae909d28f1e
+2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: dfa3349e4d74d6f2c4944414c25fe3726d4a9b5a

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md

@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ Left open: what a durable grant's scope identity is beyond the sandbox mode —
 #### Per-session modes: the session log as the store
 
 ```
-effective(session) = findLast(the session's own knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
+effective(session) = findLast(the session's knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
 ```
 
-The default is composition config (`cordis.yml`) — operator-owned, process-wide. A runtime switch is a session-scoped override recorded as one log-only event in that session's own log. Restart immunity (resuming a session replays its log, so overrides come back with zero catch-up machinery) and multi-session isolation both fall out by construction, and no external config store exists anywhere.
+The default is composition config (`cordis.yml`) — operator-owned, process-wide. A runtime switch is a session-scoped override recorded as one log-only event in that session's log. Restart immunity and multi-session isolation follow from replay, with no external config store. The in-process subagent driver snapshots a parent's explicit override at delegation and seeds a source-tagged event after the child's optional fork prefix, so delegation cannot fall back to a wider default ([decision](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)).
 
 **One event per knob, owned by its domain** — the merge-extensible `SessionEventMap` idiom every existing event family already follows (`approval/*` in `dsh-user-approval`, `hook/*` in the hooks packages):
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md

@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ Landlock launcher 源码和包工作区位于 `native/landlock-run`，与 harnes
 #### 按会话模式：会话日志即存储
 
 ```
-effective(session) = findLast(the session's own knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
+effective(session) = findLast(the session's knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
 ```
 
-默认值是组合配置（`cordis.yml`）——运维人员拥有，进程范围。运行时切换是会话范围的覆盖，记录为该会话自身日志中的一条仅日志事件。重启免疫（恢复会话时回放其日志，覆盖自然恢复，无需追赶机制）和多会话隔离都是构造性的自然结果，且不存在任何外部配置存储。
+默认值是组合配置（`cordis.yml`）——由运维人员拥有、作用于整个进程。运行时切换是会话范围的覆盖，以一条仅日志事件记录在该会话的日志中。重启免疫与多会话隔离由回放自然保证，且不存在任何外部配置存储。进程内 subagent 驱动器在委派时对父级的显式覆盖项获取快照，并在子 agent 可选的 fork 前缀之后预置一条带来源标记的事件，因此委派无法回退到更宽的默认值（[决策](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)）。
 
 **每个旋钮一种事件，由其领域拥有**——这是每个既有事件族已遵循的可合并扩展 `SessionEventMap` 惯用法（`dsh-user-approval` 中的 `approval/*`、hooks 包中的 `hook/*`）：
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md
+2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md: aeff83795eedead9c75de6bbb74c1da1945092ca
+2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.zh.md: 7a09fd972f53b46655df93ddf9625455f2077460

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note: In-process subagent policy inheritance — the child starts under the parent's sandbox and approval overrides
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+Sandbox and approval overrides are per-session log folds. An in-process subagent gets a new session, so a spawn child once fell back to deployment defaults and a fork child saw only switches inside its completed-turn prefix. Delegation could therefore widen a parent that had switched to `read-only`, or turn a parent's unattended `'never'` approval stance back into prompting behavior.
+
+## Decision
+
+The shared in-process driver snapshots `sandboxPolicy.overrideOf(parent.session)` and `approval.overrideOf(parent.session)` before its first await. A later parent switch belongs to the parent's future; cancel-and-redelegate takes a new snapshot. Both services are optional, and only explicit session overrides are copied, never deployment defaults or one-shot grants.
+
+Each captured value becomes a source-tagged `sandbox/mode` or `approval/policy` event appended during the child factory's unpublished setup. The session constructor has already fixed `Session.firstLiveSeq` at the fork-prefix length, so the inherited facts follow fork history, reach telemetry when the child is announced, and leave `SessionHeader.seedLength` at the prefix length. Existing last-event-wins folds therefore make the delegation snapshot beat stale fork history and let a later child switch beat the snapshot. A grandchild folds its parent's logged state, so the rule composes without another inheritance mechanism.
+
+Ordinary session appends validate the inherited events before publication, and persistence captures the complete unpublished log when the session is announced. Any materialized child log therefore stores the inherited events with its first batch; there is no second policy store, schema field, or query index. The `source: 'delegation'` marker lets approval narration distinguish inheritance from a child-side user switch.
+
+### What a blocked child experiences
+
+A confined child gets the ordinary denial marker. No answerer currently owns an in-process child, so an escalation request fails closed and the child reports upward; a controller-owned parent may widen its own session and delegate again. An inherited `'never'` policy tells the child not to request escalation in its first system prompt.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **Generic `SessionHeader` policy fields** — rejected: they duplicate an event-sourced fact in metadata and require propagation through core session types, persistence backends, query indexes, collision identity, and every policy consumer. Unpublished setup events have the required ordering and reuse the existing durable store.
+- **Combining new policy facts with constructor history** — rejected: `Session.firstLiveSeq` classifies the complete constructor seed as replayed history, so telemetry would skip child-only facts. Unpublished setup keeps history and new facts on their existing sides of that boundary without another session option.
+- **A first-prompt listener** — rejected: it introduces listener ordering and a later timing boundary even though the creation transaction already permits log appends before publication.
+- **Copying deployment defaults** — rejected: defaults remain operator-owned and may change; an unswitched parent stamps nothing, so its child follows the current deployment.
+- **Live resolution walking `parentSession` at each call** — rejected: it breaks the "two sessions never see each other's state" isolation invariant, requires the parent session to stay loaded for the child's lifetime, and makes a mid-run parent switch retroactively change a running child. Snapshot-at-delegation is the semantic: the child keeps the policy it was handed; cancel-and-respawn picks up a tightening.
+- **Forcing `'never'` or routing asks to the root controller** — rejected as inheritance behavior. A forced value forecloses a future child answerer; parent routing needs parent-chain ownership and the spawning `callId`, and remains deferred in [the approval-seam Agent Note](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md).
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Spawn, fork, and nested in-process children retain a parent's explicit sandbox and approval overrides. The focused suite proves real filesystem denial, stale-fork precedence, delegation-time capture, the live-event boundary, default omission, and context disposal.
+- The keyless headless snapshot is the assembled regression: only the parent is `read-only`, the deployment default is `workspace-write`, and the child's persisted event plus denied disk write both fail if capture is removed.
+- Each delegation adds at most two log-only events. `dsh-subagent-inprocess` has optional peer types for the two policy services; compositions without either service behave unchanged. Out-of-process children retain their own deployment policy, and a running child does not follow later parent switches.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note: 进程内 subagent 策略继承——子 agent 在父级的沙箱与审批覆盖项下启动
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+沙箱与审批覆盖项都是按会话的日志折叠。进程内 subagent 会获得一个新会话，因此 spawn 子 agent（智能体）过去会回退到部署默认值，fork 子 agent 则只能看到其已完成轮次前缀中的切换。因此，委派可能放宽已经切换到 `read-only` 的父级，或让父级无人值守的 `'never'` 审批立场重新变成会发起提示的行为。
+
+## 决策
+
+共享的进程内驱动器在第一次 await 之前对 `sandboxPolicy.overrideOf(parent.session)` 和 `approval.overrideOf(parent.session)` 获取快照。父级后续的切换属于父级的未来；取消后重新委派会取得新快照。这两个服务均为可选，仅复制显式会话覆盖项，绝不复制部署默认值或一次性授权。
+
+每个捕获值都会成为子 agent 工厂在未发布设置阶段追加的一条带来源标记的 `sandbox/mode` 或 `approval/policy` 事件。会话构造函数已将 `Session.firstLiveSeq` 固定为 fork 前缀的长度，因此继承事实会排在 fork 历史之后，在子 agent 公布时进入遥测，同时让 `SessionHeader.seedLength` 保持为此前缀的长度。因此，既有的末事件胜出折叠会让委派快照压过陈旧的 fork 历史，并让子 agent 后续的切换压过该快照。孙代 agent 会折叠其父级已记录的状态，因此无需另一套继承机制即可组合此规则。
+
+普通的会话追加会在发布前校验继承事件，持久化层则在会话公布时捕获完整的未发布日志。因此，任何已物化的子 agent 日志都会在首批数据中存下继承事件；不存在第二套策略存储、schema 字段或查询索引。`source: 'delegation'` 标记让审批叙述能够区分继承与子 agent 侧的用户切换。
+
+### 被拦住的子 agent 会经历什么
+
+受限子 agent 会得到普通拒绝标记。目前没有应答器认领进程内子 agent，因此升级请求会失败关闭，由子 agent 向上汇报；由控制器持有的父 agent 可以放宽自己的会话后重新委派。继承的 `'never'` 策略会在第一份系统提示词中告知子 agent 不要请求升级。
+
+## 考虑过的替代方案
+
+- **通用的 `SessionHeader` 策略字段**：不予采纳。它们会在元数据中复制一项事件溯源事实，并要求贯穿核心会话类型、持久化后端、查询索引、碰撞标识与每个策略消费方进行传播。未发布设置阶段的事件具备所需顺序，并复用现有持久化存储。
+- **将新策略事实与构造历史合并**：不予采纳。`Session.firstLiveSeq` 会把完整的构造种子归类为回放历史，因此遥测会跳过仅属于子 agent 的事实。未发布设置让历史与新事实留在该边界各自原有的一侧，无需再增加会话选项。
+- **首个提示词监听器**：不予采纳。尽管创建事务已经允许在发布前追加日志，它仍会引入监听器顺序与更晚的时序边界。
+- **复制部署默认值**：不予采纳。默认值仍由运维人员拥有且可能变化；未切换的父级不会盖章写入任何内容，因此其子 agent 跟随当前部署。
+- **每次调用时沿 `parentSession` 实时解析**：不予采纳。这会打破「两个会话永远看不到彼此状态」的隔离不变量，要求父会话在子 agent 的整个生命周期内保持加载，还会让父级在子 agent 运行途中做的切换追溯性地改变一个正在运行的子 agent。委派时快照才是本设计的语义：子 agent 保持它被交付时的策略；取消后重新 spawn 即可拿到收紧后的策略。
+- **强制使用 `'never'` 或把 ask 路由到根控制器**：不作为继承行为采纳。强制值会排除未来的子 agent 应答器；父级路由需要父链所有权与发起 spawn 的 `callId`，仍按[审批 seam Agent Note](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) 所述延期。
+
+## 后果
+
+- spawn、fork 和嵌套的进程内子 agent 会保留父级显式的沙箱与审批覆盖项。聚焦测试套件证明真实文件系统拒绝、陈旧 fork 优先级、委派时捕获、实时事件边界、默认值省略与上下文释放。
+- 无密钥 headless 快照是组装后应用层面的回归测试：只有父级是 `read-only`，部署默认值是 `workspace-write`；若移除捕获，子 agent 的持久化事件与被拒的磁盘写入这两项检查都会失败。
+- 每次委派最多增加两条仅日志事件。`dsh-subagent-inprocess` 为两个策略服务提供可选 peer 类型；未组合任一服务的组合保持原有行为。进程外子 agent 仍采用自身的部署策略，正在运行的子 agent 不跟随父级后续切换。