refactor: replace overloaded surface terminology

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ One deliberate strictness DIVERGENCE from CC: hook misuse — unknown or deferre
 
 **Trust premise**: workflow scripts have the same trust as the model's bash access. The engine contains buggy scripts and guarantees settled results, JSON-safe values, and cancellation quiescence; it does not defend against hostile code. A vm context and worker thread are not security boundaries: a script can escape to Node APIs with process-wide authority. Sandboxing requires a separate-process or isolated-vm engine behind this seam.
 
-**Why `node:worker_threads`**: each run gets one unpooled worker. A vm context limits the documented script surface, while message-port RPC bridges `agent()` to host-side child loops. The worker prevents synchronous script work from blocking the host, provides a serialization boundary, and permits forced termination after cancellation. `isolated-vm` was rejected because of its maintenance state and deployment requirements.
+**Why `node:worker_threads`**: each run gets one unpooled worker. A vm context limits the documented script API, while message-port RPC bridges `agent()` to host-side child loops. The worker prevents synchronous script work from blocking the host, provides a serialization boundary, and permits forced termination after cancellation. `isolated-vm` was rejected because of its maintenance state and deployment requirements.
 
 The host validates metadata and parses the body before publication. Private enum-keyed payload maps define the wire protocol; pending starts, published child records, one cancellation signal, worker-death reaping, result precedence, and disposal quiescence preserve the subagent run contract across it. The [agent-scope runtime-design Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md#workflow-children-are-pending-starts-or-published-records) owns those race algorithms.
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Worker-side logic runs through an in-process `MessageChannel` so V8 coverage mea
 
 - **Background collection** (start tool → run id → completion notice → collect), designed alongside bash/subagent background unification.
 - **Journaling + resume** (`resumeFromRunId`, cached agent() prefixes) — implementing it reintroduces CC's determinism bans as a script-contract tightening (scripts may read the clock today).
-- **Saved/bundled workflows** (a `.deepseek/workflows/` registry, slash-command surface) and **script persistence to a run directory** (the tool-call event already records the script durably).
+- **Saved/bundled workflows** (a `.deepseek/workflows/` registry, slash-command API) and **script persistence to a run directory** (the tool-call event already records the script durably).
 - **Nested `workflow()`**, **token `budget`**, and the `effort`/`isolation`/`agentType` agent options (each rejects loud with a message naming it deferred).
 - **An overall run wall-clock timeout** — cancellation always frees the caller (result settles within the grace), so a cap on total run time is a policy knob for the background redesign, not a correctness need here.
 - **Engine hardening beyond worker threads**: an isolated-vm or separate-process engine behind the same seam (actual sandboxing; memory limits).
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Worker-side logic runs through an in-process `MessageChannel` so V8 coverage mea
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 - **Hostile-value containment in the host** (trap-free proxy rejection, accessor-never-invoked descriptor walks, realm-side pre-rendering of thrown values, realm-built promises/arrays/error clones with structural fatal recognition): rejected because every defense targets an author the trust premise accepts, while the thread's serialization boundary already makes cross-realm values total by construction.
-- **In-process `node:vm` execution**: mechanically simplest — no RPC, no thread — but `start()` blocks the caller for the script's initial synchronous slice, a synchronous spin past the first await cannot be killed in-process (the vm `timeout` covers only that first slice), and `dispose()` could only abandon an unsettling script on the host loop. The worker-thread engine keeps the same vm-context script surface while unblocking the host and making termination real.
+- **In-process `node:vm` execution**: mechanically simplest — no RPC, no thread — but `start()` blocks the caller for the script's initial synchronous slice, a synchronous spin past the first await cannot be killed in-process (the vm `timeout` covers only that first slice), and `dispose()` could only abandon an unsettling script on the host loop. The worker-thread engine keeps the same vm-context script API while unblocking the host and making termination real.
 - **Background execution as the default** (CC's shape): deferred; foreground-synchronous matches `dsh-tool-subagent`'s cut, and background semantics should be designed ONCE across bash/subagent/workflow rather than per-tool.
 - **Workflow-layer JSON parsing for `agent({schema})`**: duplicating a seam concern at one consumer while the seam's capability flag stayed dishonestly `false`.
 - **Meta embedded in the script as `export const meta = {...}`** (CC's exact format): keeps scripts self-contained and CC scripts drop-in, but obtaining meta requires evaluating model-written text on the host. Even an empty timed vm context cannot bound script-controlled getters when the host reads the resulting object. A JSON parameter removes the scanner, evaluation, and host-spin hole; the cost is that a CC script's meta header must move into the parameter (the body stays drop-in).