Merge latest master into PR 555

# Conflicts:
#	docs/architecture.i18n.yaml
#	docs/core-data-structures/core.i18n.yaml
#	examples/acp-agent/tests/snapshots/cordis-inspect-jsdoc/session.jsonl
#	packages/client/runtime/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/MessageItem.tsx
#	packages/compact/compact-basic/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/ui/tui/README.i18n.yaml
This commit is contained in:
creatixchu
2026-07-31 19:39:22 +08:00
187 changed files with 5806 additions and 657 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-29-human-transcript-append-origin.md
2026-07-29-human-transcript-append-origin.md: dcc4a786c6f1926f06dce03124ec1d8ca805d7ae
2026-07-29-human-transcript-append-origin.zh.md: 0fefc52afa52e99cdec2bcea1a86b9c28711dd67
2026-07-29-human-transcript-append-origin.md: a47dd49dd831cdd32d520137417bf47d2c056a09
2026-07-29-human-transcript-append-origin.zh.md: 31639bd9aac5d6dace80392004f37c747bff2c36

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ No persisted event, RPC envelope, compaction transaction, or model-visible surfa
The browser client is fixed separately, in [the web transcript projection note](2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md): it projects the same append-origin transcript in log order and renders a marker component, and it closes the pagination hole this change opened — because `session.history` no longer spends quota on the checkpoint, it never cuts on the checkpoint's provenance group, so a page can carry a checkpoint citing a `surfaceOp.start` outside the window, which the browser's surface fold rejected. That hole predates this change (counting could already run past a checkpoint into the range it shadows), but the old rule accidentally covered the case where the checkpoint was the oldest counted message and pulled the whole shadowed range onto its page.
Rendering compaction *progress* — a terminal indicator while a compaction runs — needs the bracket-first ordering that the queued manual `/compact` work introduces, and is out of scope here. The marker also carries no scale: the checkpoint's `sourceEventSeqs` already hold the shadowed count, so a count or range would tell a reader how much each row folded. That belongs with progress, where the reader meets the other half of the same information. Whoever takes it should fold the terminal's two replacement branches — replay and the live listener, textually identical and 600 lines apart — into one `renderReplacement(event)` first, so the marker's content has a single home.
The terminal's [live compaction progress decision](../feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md) uses standalone bracket events to drive the existing one-cell indicator. It does not change the completion marker owned here or add scale: the checkpoint's `sourceEventSeqs` remain available for a separately justified count or range. Progress therefore needs neither marker-content changes nor a prerequisite `renderReplacement(event)` extraction.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Status: implemented
浏览器客户端在[Web 记录投影笔记](2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md)中单独修复:它按日志顺序投影同一份 append 来源记录并渲染一个标记组件,同时闭合本次变更打开的分页缺口——因为 `session.history` 不再为检查点消耗额度,它永远不会按检查点的溯源分组切分,于是一页可以携带一个引用了窗口之外 `surfaceOp.start` 的检查点,而浏览器的 surface fold 会拒绝该范围。这个缺口早于本次变更(此前计数就可能越过检查点进入它所遮蔽的范围),但旧规则恰好覆盖了这样一种情形:检查点是最旧的被计数消息,其溯源分组把整段被遮蔽的范围一起拉到该页。
渲染压缩*进度*——压缩运行期间的终端指示——需要排队式手动 `/compact` 工作引入的“先开括号”顺序,不在本次范围内。标记同样不携带规模信息:检查点的 `sourceEventSeqs` 已经包含被遮蔽的数量,因此一个计数或区间可以告诉读者每一行折叠了多少内容。这件事属于进度那一侧,读者正是在那里遇到同一份信息的另一半。接手者应当先把终端里两处替换分支——回放与实时监听器,文本完全相同却相隔 600 行——合并为一个 `renderReplacement(event)`,让标记的内容只有一个归处。
终端的[实时压缩进度决策](../feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md)使用独立标记对中的事件驱动现有的单格指示器。它既不改变本文所负责的完成标记,也不添加规模信息:检查点的 `sourceEventSeqs` 仍可供经另行论证的计数或区间使用。因此,进度显示既不需要修改标记内容,也不以提取 `renderReplacement(event)` 为前置条件。
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md
2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md: 9fb338643774efaeb9deab6f66920a9f4276ce67
2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.zh.md: 7962dd432b8bbf115acde9dd480eba9c91f35bfc
2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md: 4bc629bfa619a2858ec0335a6136d3a5a24b025a
2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.zh.md: d011ce9453bc1dbb9fdb62372aa1126c95ffb143

View File

@@ -69,4 +69,4 @@ The web e2e scenario now seeds a real compaction transaction over its recorded t
## Deferred
Compaction **progress** — an indicator while a compaction runs — needs the bracket-first ordering the queued manual-compaction work introduces, and stays out of scope here as it did in the terminal. The marker also carries no **scale**: the checkpoint's `sourceEventSeqs` already hold the shadowed count, so a count or range would tell a reader how much each row folded. Both belong together, where the reader meets the two halves of the same information.
The terminal's [compaction progress decision](../feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md) uses the live standalone bracket to drive a one-cell indicator and does not change this browser projection. The marker still carries no **scale**: the checkpoint's `sourceEventSeqs` hold the shadowed count, so a separately justified count or range can be added without coupling it to progress.

View File

@@ -69,4 +69,4 @@ Web e2e 场景现在在它录制的那一轮之上播种一次真实的压缩事
## Deferred
压缩**进度**——压缩运行期间的指示——需要排队式手动压缩工作引入的“先开括号”顺序,与终端一样不在本次范围内。标记同样不携带**规模**信息:检查点的 `sourceEventSeqs` 已经包含被遮蔽的数量,因此一个计数或区间可以告诉读者每一行折叠了多少内容。两者应当放在一起,读者正是在那里遇到同一份信息的两半。
终端的[压缩进度决策](../feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md)使用实时独立标记对驱动单格指示器,并不改变此浏览器投影。标记仍不携带**规模**信息:检查点的 `sourceEventSeqs` 保存被遮蔽的数量,因此可以另行论证后添加计数或区间,而无须将其与进度耦合。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-hero-visible-while-blank-session-opens.md
2026-07-31-hero-visible-while-blank-session-opens.md: b39963beffa403ef6fa44735aa88395a99139751
2026-07-31-hero-visible-while-blank-session-opens.zh.md: b451d7c00ec7eb8d736134e738d72e5e07fd1b04

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: Hero stays visible while a blank session opens
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-31-hero-visible-while-blank-session-opens.zh.md)
## Problem
The conversation root has a `settling` phase for a session that is still opening while its composer reads `blank`: the hero-versus-docked outcome is unknowable until history arrives, so the composer seat is hidden (`visibility:hidden`) rather than flashing the centered hero and snapping to the docked bar. Startup auto-selection turned that guard into the defect it was meant to prevent. From the no-workspace hero, `WorkspacesService.startInitialSelection` connects the most recent workspace and opens its blank session; `openState` flips to `loading` the moment `open()` lands, so the center column went blank for the whole history round-trip and then repainted, which reads as a full-page refresh on every launch.
## Decision
`ConversationRoot` reads the session list summary's `blank` flag alongside the conversation snapshot and exempts summary-proven blank sessions from settling: `settling` additionally requires `summaryBlank !== true`, and `hero` accepts a blank composer whenever the summary proves the session blank, in every open state rather than only `loading`. A session the list already reports as blank can only land on the hero, so hiding buys nothing and costs the visible flash; the same proof holds before the open starts (`cold`) and after one fails (`error`), where the previous conditions fell through to the active phase and rendered a docked bare composer under chrome `ConversationSession` hides for blank sessions. Whenever the summary does not prove the session blank — a row reporting `blank: false`, or no row at all because the list has not caught up — `summaryBlank` is not `true` and the conservative settling hide is unchanged.
The summary flag and the snapshot's own `blank` are distinct sources: the snapshot describes the session being opened, the summary is the list row that already exists before the open resolves. Only the latter is available early enough to decide the phase.
## Alternatives considered
**Drop the settling phase entirely.** Rejected because it still earns its keep for a session with no summary row: without a prior claim about emptiness, hero-versus-docked is genuinely unknowable and the flash it prevents is the worse one.
**Delay the `loading` flip until history returns.** Rejected because `openState` is authoritative about the open operation; deferring it to suppress a presentation artifact would misreport the data state to every other consumer.
**Cross-fade or otherwise animate the settling hide.** Rejected because the column has nothing to show during the round-trip either way — the fix is to not hide content whose outcome is already known, not to decorate the hiding.
## Deferred
The no-session→session tree relocation in `ConversationRoot` (the hero/composer subtree moves into the `conversation.session` outlet) still rebuilds the composer DOM on the same transition; removing it means moving `conversation.session` to `session-maybe` scope, a slot-contract change that needs its own proposal.
Object-layer reference churn found while diagnosing this — no-op projections minting fresh snapshots, the create path projecting twice, `select()` using `notifyNow` from async continuations — is real but independent of the visible flash.
## Consequences
Startup auto-selection renders the hero immediately and keeps the composer seat and header visible through the history round-trip, so launching into a recent workspace no longer looks like a page reload. Sessions whose summary does not prove them blank keep the previous settling behavior, so the guard still covers the case it was written for. Skeleton tests pin all three summary shapes: a row reporting `blank: false` settles, an absent row settles, and a summary-proven blank session opening under `loading` renders hero chrome with a live textarea.
The assembled coverage is `apps/web/tests/startup-auto-selection.e2e.ts` (keyless web browser lane): it registers a workspace, holds the `session.history` response open at the browser's network boundary, and asserts the visible frame while the auto-selected open is in flight — hero phase, hero title, painted composer — plus a recorded phase timeline of exactly `['hero']` for the whole load. Holding the round-trip is what makes it a regression test rather than a race: against a loopback host the open settles too fast to sample, and with the exemption reverted the held window is precisely when the root reports `settling`.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: 空白会话打开期间保持 hero 可见
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-31-hero-visible-while-blank-session-opens.md) | 中文
## 问题
会话根节点为"正在打开且 composer 处于 `blank`"的会话保留了一个 `settling` 阶段:在历史记录返回之前,hero 与 docked 的归属不可知,因此宁可隐藏 composer 座位(`visibility:hidden`),也不要先闪出居中的 hero 再跳到底部输入条。启动时的自动选择把这道防护变成了它本要防止的缺陷。从无工作区的 hero 进入时,`WorkspacesService.startInitialSelection` 会连接最近的工作区并打开其空白会话;`open()` 一落地 `openState` 立即翻为 `loading`,中间栏因此在整个历史往返期间保持空白,随后重绘一次——每次启动看起来都像整页刷新。
## 决策
`ConversationRoot` 在读取会话快照的同时读取会话列表摘要的 `blank` 标志,并让"摘要已证明为空白"的会话豁免 settling:`settling` 额外要求 `summaryBlank !== true`,而 `hero` 在摘要证明会话为空白时接受处于 blank 的 composer——覆盖全部 open state,而非仅 `loading`。列表已报告为空白的会话只可能落到 hero,因此隐藏毫无收益,只换来一次可见闪烁;同一份证明在打开开始之前(`cold`)与打开失败之后(`error`)同样成立,而此前的条件会在这两种状态下落到 active 阶段,在 `ConversationSession` 为空白会话隐藏的外壳之下渲染出一条停靠的裸 composer。只要摘要没有证明会话为空白——无论是报告 `blank: false` 的行,还是列表尚未跟上因而根本没有该行——`summaryBlank` 都不为 `true`,保守的 settling 隐藏行为保持不变。
摘要标志与快照自身的 `blank` 是两个不同来源:快照描述正在打开的这个会话,摘要则是在打开操作完成之前就已存在的列表行。只有后者足够早,可用于决定阶段。
## 备选方案
**彻底移除 settling 阶段。** 否决,因为对没有摘要行的会话它仍有价值:在缺少任何关于"是否为空"的先验断言时,hero 与 docked 的归属确实不可知,而它所防止的那种闪烁更糟糕。
**推迟 `loading` 的翻转,直到历史返回。** 否决,因为 `openState` 是打开操作的权威状态;为了压制一个呈现层瑕疵而推迟它,会向其他所有消费者误报数据状态。
**为 settling 的隐藏加交叉淡入或其他动画。** 否决,因为无论如何该栏在往返期间都没有内容可展示——正确的修复是不隐藏结局已知的内容,而不是把隐藏装饰得好看些。
## 推迟事项
`ConversationRoot` 中"无会话→有会话"的树位置迁移(hero/composer 子树移入 `conversation.session` 出口)仍会在同一次转换中重建 composer 的 DOM;消除它意味着把 `conversation.session` 移到 `session-maybe` 作用域,这是一次插槽契约变更,需要单独立项。
诊断期间发现的对象层引用抖动——空操作投影铸造出新的快照、创建路径重复投影一次、`select()` 在异步续体中使用 `notifyNow`——确实存在,但与这次可见闪烁相互独立。
## 影响
启动自动选择会立即渲染 hero,并在整个历史往返期间保持 composer 座位与 header 可见,因此启动进入最近工作区不再像页面重载。摘要未证明为空白的会话保持原有的 settling 行为,这道防护仍覆盖它当初针对的场景。骨架测试固定了摘要的三种形态:报告 `blank: false` 的行进入 settling;根本没有该行同样进入 settling;摘要已证明为空白的会话在 `loading` 期间渲染 hero 外壳与可用的文本框。
组装级覆盖是 `apps/web/tests/startup-auto-selection.e2e.ts`(无密钥的 Web 浏览器泳道):它注册一个工作区,在浏览器网络边界上扣住 `session.history` 的响应,并在自动选择的打开仍在飞行途中断言可见画面——hero 阶段、hero 标题、已绘制的 composer——外加整次加载记录到的阶段时间线恰好为 `['hero']`。扣住这次往返正是它成为回归测试而非竞态的原因:对着回环主机,打开会快到无从采样;而一旦回退这条豁免,被扣住的这段窗口恰恰就是根节点报告 `settling` 的时刻。