docs(tools): widen the 182 reachability shape and finish the note's two language-binding facts

"Reachable only through a raw register() whose parameters is
array-rooted" was too narrow. A root oneOf reaches the same 182: the
union arm propagates listDepth unchanged because `A | B` opens no
bracket, so an array branch starts its chain at 0 exactly as an array
root does. Say "root opens an array chain -- rooted at the array, or at
an array branch of a root oneOf", in the JSDoc and the test comment,
and assert the union shape alongside the array-rooted one.

The note's Decision paragraph said the flavor guard is reached under
"a language that has a renderer but no flavor entry, and a test covers
it". The test uses ruby, absent from both tables, and the mechanism is
that schemas() reaches run_code's getters without passing
requireCodeRuntime -- so any language absent from the flavor table hits
it. State that instead.

The Consequences paragraph recorded the language-binding obligation as
two reads, assembly and execution. Within one projection there are more:
run_code's description and parameters getters each call
resolveFlavor(peekRuntime()) and schemaOf destructures both, so a reload
between them yields one schema whose halves name different languages.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md
-2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md: d891ef171344d729ae93f98f6662608f432e5b78
-2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md: fd1c00f754b0e6c21cac659ac303482ec60e156a
+2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md: 3b78783744e2e30cf34c0603332c050252bda447
+2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md: 17fb63d686ae695b564e9283c413f8e589d56810