# Agent Note: The dispose ladder belongs to its consumer, not the subprocess seam

Status: implemented

English | [中文](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.zh.md)

## Problem

`SubprocessHandle.dispose(graces)` and `SubprocessDisposeGraces` put a full teardown *policy* — stdin-EOF wait, then SIGTERM, then SIGKILL, each tier bounded by a caller-supplied window — on a seam whose other verbs are single mechanisms. Only one consumer ever called it (the ACP subagent backend); bash rides `terminate()` and service teardown, and the LSP host runs its own protocol-first shutdown. Every future backend nonetheless had to implement the ladder to satisfy the interface, and the implementation carried a `dsh-timeout` dependency solely for the ladder's tier bounds.

## Decision

The ladder moves to its one consumer. `dsh-subagent-acp` owns `disposeAcpChild(child, eofGraceMs)`, built entirely on the seam's public verbs: close `stdin`, bound a `waitForExit` on `eofGraceMs`, then call `terminate()`, whose SIGTERM→spec-grace→SIGKILL escalation already owns the signal timer, and await an unbounded `waitForExit()` for the subprocess owner's whole-tree exit proof. The seam keeps `kill`/`terminate`/`waitForExit` — mechanisms, not policy — and `waitForExit(signal?)` is exactly the quiescence probe a consumer ladder needs to hold the cooperative tier on real tree exit without deriving another timer from the termination grace. The seam's handle loses one method and one exported interface.

## Alternatives considered

**Keep the ladder on the handle as a convenience.** Rejected: a Service Definition method every Service provider must implement is not a convenience, it is contract surface — and this one encodes one consumer's cooperation shape (stdin-EOF-first) as if it were process vocabulary. The seam's own README already had to caveat that children quiescing on other signals need "their own tier-1", which is the admission that the ladder is policy.

**Move the ladder to a shared helper package.** Rejected: one consumer. A second out-of-process backend with the same stdin-EOF cooperation shape can lift `disposeAcpChild` to shared code when it exists; extracting now would recreate `dsh-subagent-subprocess`, the single-purpose library this change deleted.

## Consequences

Bought: the Service Definition is one method and one type smaller; Service providers owe four verbs and no teardown policy; the cooperative EOF window lives beside the ACP config field that tunes it, while the subprocess owner alone owns the termination window and final join. Cost: a future backend wanting EOF-first teardown writes ~20 lines against the verbs (or lifts the ACP helper); the ladder's tier tests live in the ACP suite, and the Service Definition suite pins the verbs the ladder composes (bounded `waitForExit` false before escalation and an unbounded whole-tree join after it) instead of the composed policy.
